Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

a self-effacing Monday afternoon joke for the benefit of all the comrades in the hizzouse

Q: How many progressives does it take to change a light bulb?

A: Change it? Fuck that noise. We’ll just buy a new house!

you’re welcome.*

0 Replies to “a self-effacing Monday afternoon joke for the benefit of all the comrades in the hizzouse”

  1. Squid says:

    If I snap up all their dark houses, change the light bulbs, and resell the houses at a profit, they’ll denounce me as a fatcat living at the expense of the downtrodden.

    However, if I start a “nonprofit” to snap up all their dark houses, pay some local students dirt-cheap wages to change the lightbulbs, and sell the “improved” houses to the local affordable housing authority, the NPR tote-bag crowd will host a big dinner to applaud my efforts at improving inner-city neighborhoods.

    See, you only get credit if you abuse underprivileged youth.

  2. Mattm says:

    Yeah… easy decision when your new house is bought by the taxpayers.

  3. cranky-d says:

    Squid, you nailed it. My cynicism has increased.

  4. DarthRove says:

    Slogan of the new Progressives: We Won’t Be Happy Until 100,000,00 More Of You Fuckers Are Dead!

  5. A fine scotch says:

    Buy a house? Fuck that. Get a government grant and default, baby. Free money! Free healthcare! Free, free, free…

  6. Freedoms Truth says:

    Dangit, this bill is so darned expensive, it would have been far cheaper to send those 16% who think we need MORE GOVT in health-care to CUBA:

    ” 59% oppose the Democrats’ health care bill, while only 39% favor it.

    * 70% say the federal budget deficit will go up under the Democrats’ health care bill; only 12% believe it will go down.

    * 56% say the bill creates “too much government involvement in the nation’s health care system,” 28% say about the right amount, while 16% say not enough.

    * 62% say they’ll pay more for medical care under the Democrats’ health care bill.

    * 47% say they and their families will be worse off under the Democrats’ health care bill; 33% say things will be about the same, and only 19% think they’ll be better off.”

  7. B Moe says:

    Luckily, key parts of Obamacare–especially the subsidies–don’t go into effect until 2014. So what Republicans have to do is to make the 2010 and the 2012 elections referenda on Obamacare, win those elections, and then repeal Obamacare.

    That’s only four years of oppressive taxes, total stagnation and  crushing unemployment?  No problem!  In the meantime, lets paint the barn and put on a show, gang!

    Of course that can’t be the whole message in 2010 and 2012. Of course there will be other important issues. And even on this issue, the message will have to be not just repeal but also replace–replace Obamacare with sensible reforms.

    Of course!  Because after the four years, we will start putting on band-aids and pretending this is only a superficial health care problem.

    Fucking dumbasses.

    Fucking dumbasses all the way down.

  8. Pablo says:

    More dumbasses:

    The White House is considering whether to detain international terrorism suspects at a U.S. military base in Afghanistan, senior U.S. officials said, an option that would lead to another prison with the same purpose as Guantanamo Bay, which it has promised to close.

    The idea, which would require approval by President Obama, already has drawn resistance from within the government. Army Gen. Stanley A. McCrystal, the top commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, and other senior officials strongly oppose it, fearing that expansion of the U.S. detention facility at Bagram air base could make the job of stabilizing the country even tougher.

    That the option of detaining suspects captured outside Afghanistan at Bagram is being contemplated reflects a recognition by the Obama administration that it has few other places to hold and interrogate foreign prisoners without giving them access to the U.S. court system, the officials said.

    Without a location outside the United States for sending prisoners, the administration must resort to turning the suspects over to foreign governments, bringing them to the U.S. or even killing them.

    In one case last year, U.S. special operations forces killed an Al Qaeda-linked suspect named Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan in a helicopter attack in southern Somalia rather than trying to capture him, a U.S. official said. Officials had debated trying to take him alive but decided against doing so in part because of uncertainty over where to hold him, the official added.

    U.S. officials find such options unappealing for handling suspects they want to question but lack the evidence to prosecute. For such suspects, a facility such as Bagram, north of Kabul, remains necessary, officials said, even as they acknowledged that having it in Afghanistan could complicate McCrystal’s mission.

    We’re elbow deep in stupid.

  9. Bob Reed says:

    Uh, Jeff,

    Shouldn’t that be, “…in the Hizzy“? I mean, I’m no hip-hop-lingo expert, but that’s how I always hear Schtu on ESPN employ that turn of the phrase.

    But I guess that Schtuart Scott could be as tragically un-hip as I. I mean, he does have a racial advantage though…

    And I guess even wondering all of this makes me a RAAAAAAAAACIST! anyway.

  10. Squid says:

    Hizzy is slang for hizzouse, Bob. Jeff’s just using the formal construction.

  11. DarthRove says:

    I thought it was flippity-floppity-floop now…

  12. buzz says:

    “A: Change it? Fuck that noise. We’ll just buy a new house!”
    A: Change it? Fuck that noise. We’ll just make you buy me a new house! And then we will burn it to the ground! And make you buy me another one. And again and again and again.

    Fixed it for you.

  13. Bob Reed says:

    Thanks Squid, for straightening that out for me…

    I used to be “with it”, but sometime I wonder what exactly “it” is anymore!

    I spent a lifetime defending the nation from external threats, only to see thise from within make more headway that those from without ever did…

    I wonder how many “Frank Marshall Davis” types there were surreptitiously insinuating moles into our society; because we all knew it was going on in academia, but the sacred cow of “Educate our Children!” could never really be scrutinized, just have more money thrown at it.

  14. sdferr says:

    “That’s only four years of oppressive taxes, total stagnation and crushing unemployment? No problem! In the meantime, lets paint the barn and put on a show, gang!”

    So there is some way you see to avoid the coming “four years of oppressive taxes, total stagnation and crushing unemployment” B Moe? Some — dare I say — “practical” alternative that will remove the evils before they fall? You have a program of action to offer making Kristol’s ballotbox chase pale to insignificance?

    Or is this expression more akin to one who has witnessed an awful car crash clapping hands to cheeks and crying out “Oh no! How awful!”

  15. guinsPen says:

    I fear it’s more than elb*glub* *gleep*.

  16. bh says:

    This is sorta off-topic but I’m not sure where the correct thread is. I’m heartened to hear someone like LTC John contemplating public office.

    More please and tell us where to send a donation or how we can volunteer.

  17. dicentra says:

    You all need to know that the Tea Partiers are religious fanatics who worship Glenn Beck and George Washington idolatrously:

    What happens when you hold a candlelight vigil to discuss talking points from Glenn Beck’s show, while a George Washington re-enactor speaks for the president from beyond the grave? You get a Tea Party religious service. In this service, the knowledge is from Glenn Beck, the Bibles are the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and the country is facing a moral crisis because of the sins of its citizens. We even formed a prayer circle. …

    Yes, George Washington was there too. He was not simply a man in a period-era costume, he was the republic’s first president. People addressed him as George, and pointed out that he was the model citizen. “Didn’t you go down on one knee and tell the people you would not be their King?” inquired Egtvedt, “No you got it wrong” replied George, “I went down on two knees.” …

    The forum was almost educational. The word ‘almost’ is key because everyone already knew the correct answers to his questions. He would ask the crowd “Can anyone explain what progressivism is?” “Gradual Communism” replied one man. Although everyone already knew that, this was going to be a learning opportunity: “I want everyone to say that” and the crowd obliged. “Gradual Communism” they said, like a troop of middle school students. …

    The crowd could not spend the entire evening only talking about the encroachment of progressivism, they also had to take action. They decided to turn and pray in the direction of the Capitol, raising their arms up at a 60-degree angle, to silently send their prayers to Congress. If a less discriminating journalist had passed by at that very moment, he would have had a golden opportunity to make untoward comments about the Tea Party’s ‘true’ political sympathies. This was poor image control. …

    And this journalist is more “discriminating”? More?

    Seized in the religious moment, someone in the group decided everyone should join hands and form a circle so that everyone could pray. They placed their candles in the middle, and formed a ring. Many people at the Tea Party rally would agree that there are political problems with the government. This group went further, this was a cultural, and religious crisis. …

    And these are the ONLY people in the country who perceive a cultural or spiritual crisis. The ONLY ones.

    At this candlelight vigil, the teachings of St. Glenn Beck were treated as holy writ. George Washington had reached a level of deification amongst the people there so they played along with the man in costume because he said what they wished George Washington would say if he was alive today. Egverdt had used a highlighter pen to circle the 10th amendment so he could find it as he read it out to the crowd, as if quoting scripture.

    “St. Glenn Beck” mostly teaches the history of the progressive movement and has the audacity to cite original sources. And the if the U.S. Constitution — including the 10th amendment — isn’t “American scripture,” then what is?

    This may have only been a group no larger then 30, but no one in the group felt they were witnessing anything surreal. Of the estimated 40,000 people who descended on Capitol Hill, how many of them would have found it abnormal that they were chanting back amateurish political history, oblivious to the pedagogical patterns being implemented

    Noah honey? You live in a bubble if you think that prayer vigils and God talk are “abnormal” or “surreal” or that progressive = gradual communism is “amateur political history.” Glenn got that formulation straight from the horse’s mouth. What’s your enligtened definition?

    This event is tribute to the astounding influence of Glenn Beck’s program upon the conservative world. Some conservatives criticize Beck for suggesting that Republicans are no better then Democrats. But the problem runs deeper: Here is a man who packages and disseminates a world view about governance that is totally out of step with reality and history.

    Yes, one thing you can say about Glenn Beck, his views on the Founders and what Classical Liberalism means is tewtally out in, ahem, left field. He actually believes that stuff and refuses to get with the program.

    This world view is being propagated and utilized by religiously inspired populists who pretend that they are imparting ‘knowledge’ to one another when they are really just regurgitating the same lines that they saw from the chalkboard that day.

    Maybe you should explain exactly why what Glenn Beck says about progressivism and the Constitution is incorrect or misleading instead of clutching your pearls at seeing religious fervor about our Founding principles.

    Frum Forum. Figures.

  18. B Moe says:

    You have a program of action to offer making Kristol’s ballotbox chase pale to insignificance?

    I don’t really see, “Golly gee, fellers, we outta try to win the next election” as a plan.  It is some more of the incredibly obvious plattitudes that I alluded to earlier. 

    I think the Republicans should be stirring shit  like their lives depended on it, because it does.  Organizing protests, suing anything and anybody that moves, and supporting all the States that are trying to fight this.

  19. Joe says:

    Q: How many progressives does it take to change a light bulb?

    A: Change it? Fuck that noise. We’ll just have you guysbuy us a new house!

    Elections have consequences bitches!

  20. sdferr says:

    And deriding Kristol as a dumbass is going to help? I don’t see it, sorry. Maybe the message he recommends “Repeal!” is wrong, but his piece isn’t as simple as you cartoon it “Golly gee, fellers, we outta try to win the next election”. He doesn’t say “be sure to do nothing but what I recommend here”. He doesn’t say “don’t organize protests” “don’t sue the government” “don’t support the States”.

  21. geoffb says:

    Progressive: “Gimme one of them ‘New Houses’ with cheese.”

    Mickey [D]: “You want messiah with that?”

    Progressive: “Yeah, an’ supersize it again.”

  22. B Moe says:

    He doesn’t say “be sure to do nothing but what I recommend here”. He doesn’t say “don’t organize protests” “don’t sue the government” “don’t support the States”.

    He doesn’t say a lot of things sdferr, that is my fucking point.  What he does say is don’t despair, we will get them in four years.  That is completely out of touch with the reality many of us are facing.  If you are in a position to wait, fine, I am happy for you, but get the fuck off my ass if I disagree.

  23. Pellegri says:

    @18, dicentra: …what is this i don’t even.

    I really wish I had a mind left to make coherent comments on this kind of nonsense anymore, but the poisonous state of the dialogue is at the point where all I can do is gape. People seriously say this stuff? Seriously?

  24. sdferr says:

    I’m not on your ass because you disagree B Moe (in fact, I don’t think I’m on your ass at all). Not at all.

    Kristol isn’t against you. Or is it that you think he is against you, that he wants some ill to befall you? Is it that you think I want some ill to befall you?

    Or is Kristol wrong to recognize that Obama is going to be in office and acting on us all for the next two years plus?

    Is he wrong to take up an historical metaphor that’s been bruited about lately and attempt to improve upon it? And for this he’s a dumbass?

  25. sdferr says:

    I mean, where you said this:

    “What we need to be thinking about now is a long term strategy to do to them what they did to us, to get the country back to individualism, personal responsibility, and personal freedom.

    Either that or start busting fucking heads. There is no clean and simple solution to this mess.”

    I could hardly agree more. Here you have the question we all face, Kristol included. And that is the business we should be about. Together. Which, the electoral approach just seems a sensible part of any strategy we will craft. And as obvious, then obviously to be dealt with first among any list of objectives. But nothing says we stop there.

  26. Joe says:

    Comment by geoffb on 3/22 @ 2:53 pm #

    Progressive: “Gimme one of them ‘New Houses’ with cheese.”

    Mickey [D]: “You want messiah with that?”

    Progressive: “Yeah, an’ supersize it again.”

    Progressive: “Oh by the way, the guy behind me in line, he’s buying (whisper: I think he is a Christianist Republican).

  27. newrouter says:

    imparting ‘knowledge’ to one another when they are really just regurgitating the same lines that they saw from the chalkboard that day.

    frumpy sees gnostic teachings

  28. mojo says:

    Raise your exemptions to eliminate paycheck withholding. Then don’t pay your taxes. Don’t even file. They can’t arrest everybody.

    Of course, if too many people are afraid to anger the IRS it doesn’t work.

  29. Joe says:

    The more you hear about this bill, the worse it is.

    The “fines” don’t kick in until 2014 and then they are a whopping $95 or 1% of your income. Since pre existing conditions are covered, it is in your economic interest not to get insurance and just wait till something bad happens. Literally you could get in an accident, then buy insurance. Or get cancer, then buy insurance.

    There is no real penalty for doing that (other than that nominal fine above).

    And do illegals have to buy the insurance? No one really knows. There is no mechanism for that. I suppose they could pay the fine too and just get insurnace if they get sick.

  30. happyfeet says:

    our enemies can smell our doom

  31. happyfeet says:

    our little country stepped in the little president man’s bear trap yesterday and it better be ready to chew off a leg I think cause otherwise it won’t survive the night

  32. Jeff G. says:

    Frum should be told in no uncertain terms that no one much gives a fuck what he thinks anymore, and that we kinda wish he’d just go suck a cock.

  33. sdferr says:

    Somewhere a new Kafka is aborning.

  34. David Frum says:

    But Jeff cock sucking is exactly what I am proposing for conservatives. That way Rahm and his gang don’t beat you up as bad in the Congressional showers.

  35. David Frum says:

    Well, anyway, cock sucking worked for me. You can follow your own principals. Just don’t hit me.

  36. BuddyPC says:

    5. Comment by DarthRove on 3/22 @ 1:14 pm #
    Slogan of the new Progressives: We Won’t Be Happy Until 100,000,00 More Of You Fuckers Are Dead!

    See, that’s where you’re wrong. Somebody’s needed to do shit and clean up.
    That’s why they’re always referring to “the productive class.” Know your place, drone. And stay out of certain lairs in the hive.

    29. Comment by mojo on 3/22 @ 3:32 pm #
    Raise your exemptions to eliminate paycheck withholding. Then don’t pay your taxes. Don’t even file. They can’t arrest everybody.
    Of course, if too many people are afraid to anger the IRS it doesn’t work.

    I’m in. Fuck it. Been time to catch up on my reading anyway.

    33. Comment by Jeff G. on 3/22 @ 3:49 pm #
    Frum should be told in no uncertain terms that no one much gives a fuck what he thinks anymore, and that we kinda wish he’d just go suck a cock.

    Using whatever is left of my empathy, in understanding people’s motivation, I would say somewhat in Frum’s defense that it seems that seeing the writing he has meekly chosen to be a boot rather a face. I’m not saying I agree, but I understand.

    I call dibs on this pussy’s throat.

  37. Kresh says:

    our enemies can smell our doom

    That’s cause Obama keeps letting them in the front door after he tracked it in all over the place.

    Maybe you should explain exactly why what Glenn Beck says about progressivism and the Constitution is incorrect or misleading instead of clutching your pearls at seeing religious fervor about our Founding principles.

    Thought? From them? That’d be upsetting their mental applecart. Deep though, self-analytical critical thinking, and awareness about reality isn’t conducive to their little bubble-like worldview.

    Gosh! Glad they’re our betters!

  38. dicentra says:

    Frum should be told in no uncertain terms that no one much gives a fuck what he thinks anymore

    If you’re referencing my #18, that was posted at Frum’s place but it was written by a flunky named Noah Kristula-Green.

    The comments to that post aren’t encouraging, but not surprising either, given the location.

    As for the attacks on Glenn Beck, they’ve got several memes out there:

    Glenn doesn’t believe a word he says; he’s just doing this for the money
    Glenn is a religious fanatic
    Glenn hates Jesus

    They’ll come up with more ways to discredit him, but they all steer away from his point-blank accusations (which are similar to the ones in Liberal Fascism, which he used to read on the air): Today’s progressivism is a cancer, it’s got its roots in Marxism and eugenics and the Weather Underground, and Obama and his team are doing their best to turn us into a progressive thugocracy.

    Disprove it if you can.

  39. Jeff G. says:

    Charles can disprove it, dicentra. By waving his hand at it. So much “radicalism.” So much paranoia.

    There’s no plan behind progressivism. That’s conspiracy thinking.

    Please, stop it. You’re embarrassing Charles, and the rest of the intelligent and urbane conservatives.

  40. Joe says:

    Please, stop it. You’re embarrassing Charles, and the rest of the intelligent and urbane conservatives.

    They also scatter like chickens when you waive your arms.

  41. John Bradley says:

    …but they aren’t as much fun to f*ck.

  42. geoffb says:

    Which, the electoral approach just seems a sensible part of any strategy we will craft. And as obvious, then obviously to be dealt with first among any list of objectives. But nothing says we stop there.

    Starting in the Spring of 1968 a “discussion” (quotes because, unlike today with the internet, this was carried on by letters and articles in various papers of the “underground press” and in talks at political organizing meetings or just over some coffee) on the Left of, where do we go from here.

    The entry of RFK in the Presidential race as a candidate expressing the view that America should disengage from the Vietnam War meant to the radical left that their main political tool was now being pushed by a Major Party candidate. Still useful perhaps, but of declining value to them. The discussion was to find the next issue. The next big useful thing.

    Many ideas came to be discussed. Everything from immediate armed revolution to becoming the future teachers of the coming generations so as to remake them into being the citizens of the society that was envisioned, the Utopia. What we now look back at and call “the long march through the institutions” was born then.

    The basic idea was that everyone should follow their own path to the end that all envisioned. Do nothing that would hinder others following their paths. Lend support when possible. The goal was the thing, victory, not who did what or how it was achieved.

    That is, or can be, a winning strategy in any political struggle where there can be an identifiable common goal.

  43. Diana says:

    Don’t expect too much from Frum. He’s a trust fund baby who lost his clue.

  44. LBascom says:

    “I think the Republicans should be stirring shit like their lives depended on it, because it does”

    Well, to be fair, Micheal Steele started a website called “fire Nancy Polosi”. It doesn’t really have any plan other than, you know, voting against her, but dammit, it’s a fine website!

    never fear, the RNC is all over this thing…

  45. geoffb says:

    “fire Nancy Pelosi”Taking back the House would have that effect.

  46. dicentra says:

    The basic idea was that everyone should follow their own path to the end that all envisioned.

    IOW, everybody’s got their own row to hoe, and don’t be freakin’ if the next guy uses a Mantis tiller while you do it by hand.

  47. Swen says:

    A: Change it? Fuck that noise. We’ll just buy a new house!

    I kinda feel that way about the light in the stairwell at my house. God knows how they got up there to put a bulb in that fixture..