Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Archives

Live from Bloggers Row at CPAC (sponsored by Pajamas Media)

Some final thoughts, before I head back to the hotel and try to rinse all this strained GOP enthusiasm (and a splash or two of barmaid, whose name I’ve forgotten) off of me:

1) Were one to scroll through the photos of the PJM Xpress bloggers — the new mainstream GOP media’s picks for who gets to frame “conservatism” on the web for the next few years — one cannot help but notice how the gallery looks almost like a parody of itself, with the flag carriers of the conservative “movement” coming in a variety of vanillas: besuited and youthfully helmet haired; or else besuited and adorned with the predictable whiskers of contrived wisdom. Plus, a guy with a hat.

2) Are you fucking kidding me?

Question → Are there any wealthy conservatives out there who aren’t bent on using gangs of yes men, keyboard geeks, and corporate team players to build the future of classical liberalism or conservatism?

Anyone want to see a new movement arise in which down-to-earth, unpolished, free-thinking classical liberals become the gonzo “journalists” of new — taking on both the creeping totalitarianism of the progressives and the go along-get along complacency of today’s intellectually bankrupt GOP and their newly manufactured “media arm”?

If so, give me a call. We’ll try to build something useful.

Otherwise, fuck it. Let Ron Silver try to bring you back in from the wilderness. But please, get him a hat first. To show that you’re serious and all.

Peace.

195 Replies to “Live from Bloggers Row at CPAC (sponsored by Pajamas Media)”

  1. Jeff G. says:

    You’re just jealous — / Patrick Carroll

    This is not action. Action is writing about how to take action you must do more than write about taking action — / Warren Bonesteel

    Grow up! — / Roger Simon

  2. you seem to have a thing about hats…

  3. router says:

    hey where can i find those Capt’n Ed shirts?

  4. Techie says:

    i’m not exactly what you would call wealthy, Jeff, nor a particularly gifted writer, but you do have my support.

    I think that we are in the “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.”* phase of the nation, and I wish I knew how to change it, but I honestly don’t.

    (* H.L. Mencken)

  5. Techie says:

    Roger only wishes he had a dancing armadillo.

  6. Barrett Brown says:

    Did they kill Tucker Carlson yet?

  7. Bob Reed says:

    Circulate your “Wanted” poster, and write, “Outlaw! for Hire“…

    But you’re not really lookin’ to be a hired gun; in a way that’s just a different form of yes man…

    What you need is a patron who’d underwrite your activities…

    Maybe if instead of the Outlaw! tack, you instead “reinvented” PW as a non-profit think tank charity…

    Perhaps you could find some Daddy Big-Bucks to show you the money!

    Best Wishes

  8. Techie says:

    You could request government support under “localism”.

    Turn their weapons against them.

  9. Jeff G. says:

    I’m a moribund non-entity. And not because of the left, either.

    G’night, all.

  10. happyfeet says:

    If you need my assistance there’ll be no resistance I think. h to the o to the m to the i to the e and all that.

  11. happyfeet says:

    Wait. Moribund?? Cause of CPAC??? You’re not even a conservative. Cap’n Ed. Jeff. Cap’n Ed. Jeff. Nope. They don’t conflate. Go look at how much discussion Cap’n Ed’s CPAC posts stirred. No don’t go I already looked. It’s like none is how much. Your CPAC reports got way more comments and you didn’t even go.

  12. geoffb says:

    CPAC is one of those “you had to not be there” stories.

  13. urthshu says:

    Don’t be moribund, be festering. More outlawy.

  14. urthshu says:

    And, you know? We all knew it was our turn to be in the wilderness, politically, so don’t lose hope.

  15. Ag80 says:

    I’ve been a reader of this blog for a long time. PJM screwed you, and, I have no idea what catch wrestling is. I’m too old now to care (about the wrestling bit).

    But, you are a voice. A welcome voice. Don’t give up the fight.

  16. urthshu says:

    Pshaw. Jeff give up? No, he only taps out, then back in the game he goes.

    Dare he dream of a day when Ann Coulter is a sober, thoughtful analyst? When the unwashed Tea Party hordes have crafted a new Contract for America and had it ratified by popular acclaim [and relief]? When race hustlers are heckled openly on college campuses they were never invited to? Where catch wrestling and riflery are required gym activities in schools throughout the land?

    Well, no frankly. But only b/c I’m really no good at reading people’s minds and I thought it kinda/sorta funny to type anyway.

    I had some bad fish for dinner.

  17. malaclypse the tertiary says:

    Have y’all encountered Fabius Maximus? Regarding the futility of bolstering the GOP, methinks he has some things to say; perhaps indirectly.

  18. So I take it you weren’t impressed. Dag.

    So what was CPAC about? Was it just a bunch of morality legislators trying to reinvigorate their social-con causes or was there any talk of freedom? Freedom or not freedom? Be honest, I can take it.

    yours/
    peter.

  19. malaclypse the tertiary says:

    Meanwhile, the ever charismatic and compelling Patterico snarks at Jeff’s expense on Twitter. Which, given that Jeff isn’t using Twitter, strikes me as emblematic of Patterico’s impotence and basically makes Jeff’s point for him. Oh these luminous GOP stars, they so bold and virile!

  20. geoffb says:

    I think that is some commenter named andy levy at the Twitter site.

  21. Republican on Acid says:

    Since Gonzo is mentioned here, I am not terribly sure but I don’t think that HST had much peer support when he began. I suppose that you need to find ONE publisher willing to publish, and ONE story that will grab people by the balls and fling them around like chipmunks caught by an alley cat.

    Just a thought, although not that great of one.

    Where to democrat people hang out and do horrible shit? That is where to go and report. While fucked up?

    Maybe this will make me feel better:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoGOY-doTmM

  22. malaclypse the tertiary says:

    geoffb – No, It’s Patterico, he’s using Twitter’s @reply functionality to respond to Andy Levy.

  23. malaclypse the tertiary says:

    He was responding to this tweet by Andy Levy.

  24. geoffb says:

    Ok, I thought the unsigned ones were him. I was wrong. I’m not into Twit.

  25. SarahW says:

    What’s with all the snark?

  26. geoffb says:

    Liberals aren’t deranged? None of them? Golly gee, who’d a thunk it.

  27. malaclypse the tertiary says:

    geoffb – no offense intended. Twitter is definitely an acquired taste.

  28. Jeff G says:

    Shhh. Patterico is being a grown up. I suggest you all start, too, or else the Dems will take over both houses of Congress and maybe even the White House!

    Oh, wait. They did, but only because of McCain’s FILTHY LYING CAMPAIGN OF LIES AND FILTH!

    Karl loves when Patterico takes pot shots at me. Gives him a little boner.

  29. Jeff G says:

    Hey, Rush! NOT IN MY NAME!

  30. Silver Whistle says:

    Peace

    Hell no, it’s highly overrated. Conflict is what is needed.

  31. Jeff G says:

    Mustn’t have conflict. Collegiality is what we need. Consensus! Pragmatism!

    Everyone is a good man. Except me. I suck and don’t play well with others.

    Ask around. It’s true.

  32. Jeff G says:

    I’m sick. Got my son’s cold. Watching The Champ (1931) and drinking bloody marys. For the vitamin C.

    This racket is no good for my nerves.

    We either have to evolve or die. Well, more likely we’ll be smothered — but the conclusion is the same either way.

    I have some thinking to do. Mostly it involves writing about how evil John Bolton is.

    — Oh, wait. That’s not me. I have no desire for the left to call me “fair” anymore. I don’t need their lousy acceptance — and even if I had it, I wouldn’t mistake it for my being “principled.”

    Quite the opposite in fact.

    TWITTER THAT, PAT!

  33. cranky-d says:

    I haven’t decided how drinking affects colds, beyond the fact that it makes them easier to live with, and that is probably enough.

  34. Silver Whistle says:

    I hope the evolution is messy. Things need to be said and done, and it doesn’t look like they are getting done. It’s only 4 years til the next election, and damn, that’s not a long time to get it together. Bugger consensus, that’s just pandering to the lowest common denominator. Harnessing outrage will be what kicks this proggy nonsense into the long grass.

  35. Jeff G says:

    Mal —

    Let’s evolve. I’m ready.

  36. thor says:

    I’ll tell you where you have it all wrong, Jeff. You need a four letter name that invigorates, like Rush, Sean or thor, or Swan! Kind’a name is Jeff? Jeff doesn’t stir anger that a Rush or Swan would. It fails even compared to thor.

    Speak in short authoritative, absolutist, simplified bursts of themes populist implicating untold peril, evil winds of apocalypse, even go so far as to predict a coming hurricane a claw hammers!

    Do that all day with a bucket of ice that contains chilled Heinekens and jumbo shrimp sitting next to you so that you balloon up to three-hundred pounds or so, then start in on Oxycontins to ease that never ending back pain from your Jim Furyk-inspired golf swing. Feet up on your desk, pulling on a fat Cuban cigar, you make demands for millions in bling-bling to be brought to you on a silver serving tray. Millions chant your name with a fury in their pitch is all you have to keep telling those who are stupid enough to advertise on your show.

    I know it’s been done but who is to say it can’t be done twice.

  37. Off Colfax says:

    All I know is this…

    If the GOP has lost the G, then the GOP has flat out lost.

    Looks to me as if there is a distinct choice forming between the Big Society liberals on the left and the Big Business liberals on the right, with nary an actual conservative in sight.

    Goldstein for Republican National Congressional Committee Chair!

  38. bour3 says:

    the flag carriers of the conservative “movement” coming in a variety of vanillas

    I get what you’re saying here, and I realize it’s axiomatic, but vanilla has received an undeserved bad rap for far too long now and I’ll have none of it. Vanilla is actually a very complex flavor consisting of hundreds of compounds, chief among them vanillin which is a 4-hydroxy-3-methroxybenzaldehyde, a single-ring phenolic compound derived from lignin, a complex phenolic polymer that gives seasoned wood its color and hardness and piperonal which is a heliotropin. It is among the most expensive spices, second only to saffron due to the extensive labor required in the plant’s cultivation and the incredible amount of work required to bring the pods to market, which includes fermentation, aging, and drying. Like chocolate, most vanilla grown is limited to within 20Ëš north or south of the equator, so you can spin a globe and see for yourself how this limits production considerably.

    To use the word vanilla to connote plain or conventional, as in vanilla sex, vanilla option, vanilla software, is to completely misunderstand the basic nature of vanilla, and to wrongly malign it.

  39. […] Here: Anyone want to see a new movement arise in which down-to-earth, unpolished, free-thinking classical liberals become the gonzo “journalists” of new — taking on both the creeping totalitarianism of the progressives and the go along-get along complacency of today’s intellectually bankrupt GOP and their newly manufactured “media arm”? […]

  40. alppuccino says:

    The Frontier Party wants Obama to fail as fast as possible. Frontiersman love the frontier, and the wilderness is the new frontier.

  41. Rusty says:

    Peace

    I got yer fuckin ,PEACE, right fuckin here.

    OT
    We now own @80% of AIG. I want the resident trolls to remind me how the lack of executive experience was an advantage in our new dear leader, because the administartion is beginning to resemble a bunch of drunkin crack whores driving a money truck and throwing armloads of cash down every manhole they come across. Democrats=losers.

  42. JHoward says:

    Oh look. It’s thor cartooning. And laboring it right on over into the full-on Usual Progressive Version of Reality, never seeing the transition.

    And here we thought conservatives lacked a history the left would respect (when it’s not out picking pockets, altering texts, and practicing a sophistry of social ruin). Or that we were missing a contemporary statement of ideology. Or a defined platform. Maybe statesmen.

    When really we lacked competing orating showmen and circus breadmasters. It’s all so funny now that you point it out.

    Actually, thor, in his speech Limbaugh hit the left right about where it lives; right in the terrific decay and stink of the oppression it exists to cultivate. Right in the principle of dragging everyone down to its murky collectivist level instead of respecting someone’s individual person enough to also respect their prior liberty.

    Yeah, that ideology of yours; whatever it is in capable hands like yours it certainly comes with a hell of a sales pitch.

  43. 20+ States are making the bid to go Maverick. Why is there no blogging on this development?

  44. Carin says:

    Honestly, how many conservatives outside of the media even KNOW what CPAC is?

  45. Slartibartfast says:

    To use the word vanilla to connote plain or conventional, as in vanilla sex, vanilla option, vanilla software, is to completely misunderstand the basic nature of vanilla, and to wrongly malign it.

    Oh, cool. This is what vanilla looks like. Vanilla is an orchid. Unfortunately, one that needs a greenhouse to survive at my latitude, and also unfortunately an orchid that must be hand-pollinated, unless you just happen to have a particular species of bee on hand. I’ve got a few dozen orchids in maybe four or five species, but no Vanilla.

  46. McGehee says:

    I think “gonzo” is by definition unassimilated. Outlaw, even.

    Outlaw gangs don’t come together by holding meetings. The gravitational attraction of like ideas brings them together. Natural, like.

    Things like CPAC and PJM? Not natural, like.

  47. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    vanilla has received an undeserved bad rap for far too long now and I’ll have none of it.

    Thank you. Genuine, prime quality vanilla is a sensory delight.

  48. Brock says:

    Jeff G., I’m with you, but no more complaining that PJM doesn’t pay you lots of moolah. You know what you’d have to do to get that, and you’re not doing it. So man up, and good luck with the blog.

  49. meya says:

    “Let’s evolve. I’m ready.”

    Just don’t get suckered in by thinking you need ‘intelligent design.’

  50. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Hey, Stupid Fascist Girl: remember the other day when you and Your Personal Lord and Savior Blowbama were claiming that there were “no earmarks” in the Porkulus?

    That’s changed.

    Just wanted to make sure you saw the new pravda before you embarrassed yourself, tovarisch.

  51. Pablo says:

    Honestly, how many conservatives outside of the media even KNOW what CPAC is?

    And how many know what PJM is? Damned few, I’m guessing. Yeah, Hat Guy is great joke fodder, but it’s not like PJM matters. At the end of the day, they’re all about the benjamins and hanging with the cool kids.

    Does classical liberalism require a fairy godfather? Or a guy with male pattern fedora? That seems counterintuitive.

  52. LTC John says:

    Oh goodie, one of my employer’s biggest North American competitors gets more of my money to stay in business.

    We have something that will take care of AIG – it is called runoff.

    Bah.

  53. Pablo says:

    I blame ice cream. Vanilla should kick its ass.

  54. geoffb says:

    #28 malaclypse,

    No offense taken.

    Late getting back to you as I went to bed.

  55. Carin says:

    Exactly, Pablo. They’re important because they say they are. Their ability to help the conservative movement is hampered by their attitude. They’ve self-selected who they want to engage in the conversation, not realizing that no one (really) is paying them much attention.

  56. Tim McNabb says:

    John Derbyshire wrote about needing a middlebrow conservatism. I am one of those god-bothering evangelical types, but I agree with him and I appreciate Jeff. I don’t know if the masses will ever be mobilized by a rousing dissertation on the impact of Derrida on our ability to communicate. We need leaders in the trenches, and we need leaders in the Academy. A battalion commander in the field is a different beast than one back at West Point, but both fulfill a vital function, and neither ought to dismiss the other.

  57. Joe says:

    Noam Chomsky believes Libertarian Socialism is the next evolutionary step of Classical Liberalism. I see the socialism in this step, but not necessarily the liberalism.

    Rather than whinning on old man McCain, let’s find those Outlaw leaders who can run against this crap.

  58. slackjawedyokel says:

    Yeah, meya — I take him personally, because to borrow from hf, he is a dirty little lying socialist crap weasel who is intent on turning my country into European Union Part Deux. Fuck him. And by extension, you.

  59. JHoward says:

    Sure, meya. I usually encourage my losing twenty five thousand dollars overnight owing to a Democrat pork bill whose various provisions had failed on points for decades.

  60. meya says:

    “Yeah, meya — I take him personally, because to borrow from hf, he is a dirty little lying socialist crap weasel who is intent on turning my country into European Union Part Deux. ”

    That’s not quite how I mean though. This Spies character seems particularly obsessed what with all the ‘lord and savior’ stuff. Maybe its not really ‘taking it personally’ maybe its more like a rush to the personal. Even among people who aren’t personal relations at all.

  61. Pablo says:

    Their ability to help the conservative movement is hampered by their attitude.

    And their format. Now that they’ve declared blogging a failure, they’re a (*cough*) TV station with a luminous on air staff of … bloggers. They’re not a movement. They’re barely moving at all. Unlike the market.

  62. Joe says:

    Outlaw? Or will in 30 years will he end up like the Micky Rourke of conservatism: Walking around mumbling, lighting the filters of cigarrettes, and holding a little dog.

  63. Slartibartfast says:

    I don’t get this whole Joe The Plumber appeal. I think Jeff The Asskicker would be a bigger draw.

  64. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    This Spies character seems particularly obsessed what with all the ‘lord and savior’ stuff.

    I’m not the one who posts laughably clumsy lies about what he’s doing, SFG.

    Go on, tell us again that there aren’t any earmarks.

    Come on. Si, si puedo!

    And yeah, I take it personally when the guy is stealing my money. Go figure.

  65. Slartibartfast says:

    Or will in 30 years will he end up like the Micky Rourke of conservatism

    Oh, I likes me some Mickey Rourke, sometimes. The whole dog thing has me baffled, though.

  66. thor says:


    Comment by JHoward on 3/2 @ 8:01 am #

    Sure, meya. I usually encourage my losing twenty five thousand dollars overnight owing to a Democrat pork bill whose various provisions had failed on points for decades.

    One can only assume you’re speaking of the tax cut provisions, Alf.

  67. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Bets on how long it takes SFG to admit that she was lying about the earmarks?

  68. serr8d says:

    From a comment at that PJM link a couple threads back (oh, what the hell..linky..

    14. not a blogger:

    Where would you have preferred they place bloggers row? In the penthouse suite?

    Please. based on your assement of CPAC, you don’t even belong on blogger row. Wow. talk about a swing and a miss.

    First, we don’t need to discuss the threat of radical Islam…Conservatives get it, we understand the threat. Regardless, It was mentioned by many of the speakers I saw.

    Second, you must of been too busy bro’ing out with your fellow bloggers to notice that Rush brought more life and energy into the Conservative movement in one hour than all the effort of all bloggers since the dawn of the Internet.

    (emphasis mine)

    And that’s a fact. Rush Limbaugh, for all the distaste some bloggers have for him (jealousy, methinks) is more pivotal than any blogger alive, including that funny guy with the never-worn-in-the-rain hat. I’ve seen Rush twice, in person, and have never once met a blogger.

    Point is, until the GOP – CPAC-enablers embraces bloggers (as the Democrats have) they will always be back row to the big boys. And as for wandering in the wilderness for the next 8 years? Fine. Principles first. Sarah Palin, next.

  69. JHoward says:

    No, that’d be Oregon chip-fab electricity savings gained by overtaxing California server farms, Einstein.

  70. Joe says:

    Looky here, I have a hat too!

    Ahhh, you might have thought about that before you endorsed him.

    Roger Simon is just hiding his shinny pink head…this is more an impish gay Gene Kelly look. Someone should slap you for your father.

  71. Joe says:

    Jeff, you keep going outlaw and you are never going to get that invite to Bohemian Grove.

  72. JHoward says:

    Maybe its not really ‘taking it personally’ maybe its more like a rush to the personal.

    Or just maybe its sarcasm, rush-to-the-personal meya. Wrong blog again?

    Maybe Jeff needs a Constant Rethuglican Drumbeat of the Personal™ series as his part in meeting the upcoming restrictions on free speech Restoring Post-Rethuglican Fairness by Force Fairness Doctrine™, yeah?

  73. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Bohemian Grove

    Yep, it’d be a real shame to miss the chance to see Donald Rumsfeld naked.

  74. N. O'Brain says:

    Comment by thor on 3/2 @ 2:31 am #

    Ah, yet more vitriolic vacuity from the asshole.

    Good job, whore, good job indeed.

  75. Slartibartfast says:

    Second, you must of been too busy bro’ing out with your fellow bloggers to notice that Rush brought more life and energy into the Conservative movement in one hour than all the effort of all bloggers since the dawn of the Internet.

    I think that says more sad things about the Conservative movement than it does good things about Rush. All this obsession with Rush and Coulter and Michelle Muccio and Joe the Plumber makes conservatives look, collectively, more like a gaggle of 16-year-old-girl popstar fans than thinking humans.

    All of this while pointing Left and crying Cult of Personality. Well and truly fucked, we are.

  76. Rob Crawford says:

    Fuck it. You folks have fun trading nut shots with ‘hor.

  77. Pablo says:

    Re Joe’s #75,

    Now let me say: Unlike Rush Limbaugh, I want President Obama to succeed. I honestly do. We are all in this leaky boat together—did I say “leaky”? I meant “sieve-like”—and it would be counterproductive, if not downright suicidal, to want it to go down just to prove a conservative critique of Keynesian economics.

    Yeah, we’ll float our sieve on hope. If you don’t hope for the floating sieve, you just want to be proven right. Christopher Buckley is an idiot. I’m guessing William F is glad he’s dead.

    The strange thing is that one feels almost unpatriotic, entertaining negative thoughts about Mr. Obama’s grand plan, as if one were indulging in—call it—the audacity of nope.

    I don’t feel unpatriotic. I feel rational.

  78. Carin says:

    I don’t get the Rush hate. Liberals (I’m looking at you Rahm) want to call him our leader and chastise us for our lack of political gravitas, but as I told my husband, Rush should be viewed through the prism of a community organizer. On a national level, of course.

    He begins discussions and illuminates issues, on a national scale, that no one else can. Let us not forget that he also directs listeners to bloggers. Rush is one of the most inclusive conservatives out there.

  79. Carin says:

    Yea, Buckley should avoid writing about politics for a while. A LONG while.

  80. Carin says:

    What I got from his article was … well, sure we’re fucked, but lets go down together. No use finger pointing!

  81. Pablo says:

    All of this while pointing Left and crying Cult of Personality.

    Rush isn’t a Messiah. And he certainly isn’t Ann Coulter. He merely gives voice to conservative principles in a compelling and straightforward manner. There’s no Draft Rush movement. No one is promising to serve Rush Limbaugh. But that was a damned good speech and such a thing ought to fire up the base.

  82. Carin says:

    all of this while pointing Left and crying Cult of Personality. Well and truly fucked, we are.

    At Obama rally’s, they still chant “O-Ba-Ma”. I heard them chant “U.S. A” during Rush’s speech.

    Telling.

  83. Pablo says:

    Exactly, Carin. Bingo.

  84. Carin says:

    rallies. Whatever bitches.

  85. McGehee says:

    Those who wish to domesticate conservatives have made it “hip” to be anti-Coulter and anti-Limbaugh.

    Therefore by definition it is OUTLAW! to be pro-Coulter and pro-Limbaugh — even if only to listen long enough to get the point of what they’re saying.

    The teenybopper adulation I can indeed do without, because that’s such a lap-dog way to behave anyway.

  86. McGehee says:

    But if one must be a lap dog, it’s more fun to hang with the outlaws than the cool kids.

  87. -Ed. says:

    When you think of PJTV, think of titwhistles.

    Titwhistle is the new highwayman.

  88. Alec Leamas says:

    Suits? Whatever is wrong with suits, Jeff?

    I do believe my attire for CPAC would have consisted of slacks, a sportcoat, and a silk ascot – not Mr. Howell so much as Michael Corleone.

    But then, I’m a wartime consigliere.

  89. Joe says:

    Pablo: My apologies to Gene Kelly too. He would slap him for fucking up his look.

  90. Matt says:

    *All this obsession with Rush and Coulter and Michelle Muccio and Joe the Plumber makes conservatives look, collectively, more like a gaggle of 16-year-old-girl popstar fans than thinking humans.*

    I’m confused about this comment. I can’t imagine we’d want the face of conservative to essentially have no face. In any movement, there are the stars and/or the faces of the movement. I agree with Pablo that the “moderates” in our party have done their best to marginalize Rush because he doesn’t care about pissing them off. He has enough money and clout that it doesn’t matter if he can’t get McCain on his show – people still listen to him anyway. He had a lady on his show last Friday – she was trying to get him to be “less pompous” and spend less time “thumbing his nose at liberals”. Limbaugh correctly said a. its a business and his business is ratings b. he knows exactly how much he pisses off liberals and moderate conservatives and he doesn’t care. That’s his purpose. He’s not running for national office so he can say what he wants.

    Personally, I’m glad he’s there to say what alot of us are thinking.

  91. geoffb says:

    The “personality” in my cult.

  92. N. O'Brain says:

    “Comment by Carin on 3/2 @ 8:48 am #

    all of this while pointing Left and crying Cult of Personality. Well and truly fucked, we are.

    At Obama rally’s, they still chant “O-Ba-Ma”. I heard them chant “U.S. A” during Rush’s speech.

    Telling.”

    Yeah, I recently had the thought that the Right doesn’t have Fuhrers.

    The Left HAS to have one.

  93. N. O'Brain says:

    Maybe Jeff can start of new series “overheard in the Fuhrerbunker”.

  94. Carin says:

    I mean, shit, he’s BBF with the progressives:

    ude! I don’t believe it. Two posts with which I agree in the span of two-three days. Yep! It’s me, the progressive guy who reads everything from NATIONAL REVIEW to THE NATION.
    Dude! I think that conservatives need the kind of soul-searching you’re advocating. And I’m not being sarcastic.
    I’m a left-wing Democrat that believes my party needs competition; not demagoguery opposition from the likes of Limbaugh. What’s funny, the guy with whom I disagree the most on economics, Ron Paul; he’s the guy I respect the most in the G.O.P. He’s not constantly whining about the MSM; he’s engaging it. I just saw him a couple of weeks ago on Bill Mahr’s show.
    The FOX news/ditto-head revolution is dead! If conservatives wanna keep preaching just to the choir, they can keep using the same means.

    It’s like reading Balloon Juice. Or Sully.

  95. McGehee says:

    Domesticated is what Dreher is.

    On the bright side, he got this really darling collar with a pretty little tag that says whom to call if he’s ever found running around off the leash.

  96. mojo says:

    Dude, outlaws don’t go to fuckin’ meetings.

  97. Alec Leamas says:

    “Dude, outlaws don’t go to fuckin’ meetings.”

    Well, actually they do – they’re called “sit-downs.”

  98. Old Texas Turkey says:

    kinda OT, bust wasn’t hor out here last week touting something about this?

    http://tinyurl.com/atp32t

    For the dividends, if I remember correctly.

    Dow currently at 6882, down …. a lot

    Shameless tit, that hor.

  99. nikkolai says:

    If thor’s touting it, go the other way.

  100. thor says:

    If nikkolai says it, laugh.

    Any other bad comedians out there?

  101. Alec Leamas says:

    I might add that I do not accept the Media-generated meme that losing Congress and the Presidency in two cycles means that the party is dead and in need of a wholesale reinvention. There was no such meme when the Democrats lost in ’00, ’02, and ’04.

    Before the economic meltdown, McCain was leading by two points. Secondly, an awful lot of low-information voters for Obama weren’t aware that in 2008, the GOP no longer had a majority in either the House of Senate – an indication of Media malpractice certainly, but now people know. Additionally, Barry’s victory has consumed a lot of the pent-up change energy which isn’t likely to be regenerated in ’10 or ’12. Bush stink will likely have dissipated by then, and Barry can’t exactly run on “change” for a second go-round.

    A lot of these recriminations and reprisals are just attempts by some to use these losses to marginalize their enemies within the party. I try not to pay them any mind.

  102. thor says:


    Comment by Old Texas Turkey on 3/2 @ 10:17 am #

    kinda OT, bust wasn’t hor out here last week touting something about this?

    http://tinyurl.com/atp32t

    For the dividends, if I remember correctly.

    Dow currently at 6882, down …. a lot

    Shameless tit, that hor.

    Oh no, da wittle Old Texas Turd who didn’t the difference in equity and debt last week shows he doesn’t know the difference in preferred and common stock today.

    Shameless stupidity even for a Old Texas Turd. Typical wedumblican.

  103. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    If nikkolai says it, laugh.

    What was it you were saying just this morning?

    “Now is the time to buy.”, I believe it was.

    BWAHAHAHAHAH!

  104. thor says:

    What was it you were strokin’ off to this morning? Oh yeah, fantasies that I was a big shot forex trader. Usually you beat off thinking about my girlfriend, at least that I understand.

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! (cursory replication of sPies laughing at his own words while sitting by himself in the dark)

    Buy low sell high. Focus, chicken-little slut-boy.

  105. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Oh yeah, fantasies that I was a big shot forex trader.

    No, that would be you, whore.

    Glad I shifted a bag full of dollars into them Euro coins.

    You assume I’m ever logged out? You don’t know me well, obviously. I’m up $332 just 44 minutes into this hour. I like it when I hit 500-bones per.

    Lots more. Lots.

    Mark it down on your calendar, folks. “Now is a great time to buy!” — whore, Certified Financial Jeenius, March 2, 2009

  106. thor says:

    Ewwww, wittle slut-boy sPies links back to when I pushed around $10K in a pip account, which the Yen carried to a small profit in our corporate account. Whoopdee. Silly lie monkey, link it all.

    Snicker.

    Does it burn knowing I consider $10K to be play money, wittle welfare queen?

  107. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Does it burn knowing I consider $10K to be play money

    Actually I find your repeated public humiliation highly amusing, whore.

    Hence the laughter.

    How’s that Aggie endowment doing, whore?

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

  108. thor says:

    Mark it down, wittle broke-dick sPies, the looney GE’nius who begs men for blowjobs on PW, says wait until the Dow is over 14000 before buying stocks!

  109. MarkD says:

    If it burns, you should have quit the Russian skanks.

  110. Old Texas Turkey says:

    Poor stupid me. I guess this does not matter at all.

    http://tinyurl.com/d4c9p3

    (bullet point #2)

    For the dividends and coupon payments.

    Yes, hor, I cede the floor to you, pure financial genius.

  111. N. O'Brain says:

    Dows at 6,834.50, -228.43, -3.23%

    That Obama. A fucking financial genius, I tell ya!

  112. N. O'Brain says:

    Oh, and whore is back.
    Work release program?
    Or did you make bail?

  113. thor says:

    I’m sure it’s healthy as ever!

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! (I have no idea what the fuck sPies finds funny in his statement)

    The ninth largest university endowment in the country is, you know, teh hoohah for some mysterious reason.

  114. James Joyner says:

    I didn’t see you at CPAC. Where were you?

    (I was the guy in the dark suit and conservative necktie.)

  115. N. O'Brain says:

    Oh, keerist, whore is having his “financial jeenius” fantasies again.

  116. Old Texas Turkey says:

    You are so the fucking man, hor. Tell us more how you made turned that million dollar pip account into $10,000, with your mad trading skillz.

    Comment by thor on 9/22 @ 2:14 pm #

    Holy schmackers, the Euro is trading $148.31.

    Glad I shifted a bag full of dollars into them Euro coins. Did I tell you about the monster fish I caught yesterday? Huge!

    TODAY

    EUR/USD 125.64

  117. thor says:

    #

    Comment by Old Texas Turkey on 3/2 @ 11:00 am #

    Poor stupid me. I guess this does not matter at all.

    http://tinyurl.com/d4c9p3

    (bullet point #2)

    For the dividends and coupon payments.

    Yes, hor, I cede the floor to you, pure financial genius.

    Of course you cede the floor to me, you’re stupid fuck.

    Squawking chicken little, a downgrade and more is already built into the price. Check the yield curves, then note how I spell yield.

  118. N. O'Brain says:

    thor is proof that God has a sense of humor.

  119. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    I’m sure it’s healthy as ever!

    I’m sure.

    BWAHAHAHAH!

  120. Dan Collins says:

    James, I was the guy in the dork suit.

  121. N. O'Brain says:

    SBP, stop using facts on whore.

    It gets confused.

  122. thor says:

    Wittle Old Texas Turd, I can tell exactly how the Euro traded after bug-eyed Paulson admitted the Bushian collapse the credit market. The Euro went 1.37 to 1.43 to the dollar, then fell to 1.27, the rallied to 1.46, then fell to today’s 1.25.

    Link please on your million dollar lie. C’mon, old faggoty Queen, I’m calling you a fuckin’ two-bit liar. Link to where I’ve ever said I made a million dollars trading currency.

    Stroke off much? You and sPies should rub each other.

  123. Old Texas Turkey says:

    a downgrade and more is already built into the price

    says hor, looking around nervously. pray tell, where does one find those “facts”?

    http://www.downgradesbuiltintoprice.com ?

  124. N. O'Brain says:

    That’s rich, whore calling someone a liar.

  125. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Anyone else get the feeling that whore is actually a Opalocka convenience store clerk with a rich fantasy life and a healthy stock of impotent rage?

  126. N. O'Brain says:

    My feeling is that whore is a preening, oleaginous narcissistic asshole, an intellectual and moral pygmy.

  127. N. O'Brain says:

    Oh, and a liar and a thief.

    I forgot.

  128. thor says:

    “It’s very similar to what’s going on nationally,” Handley said. “The returns are all in the same ball park. There are variations but nobody is unscathed. Everybody had diversified portfolios, but everything has been hurt.”

    Poor wittle sPies doesn’t know his math. Think that community college you part-time at has broken into the top ten of endowments? No, don’t think you moved ahead of A&M, maybe next year.

    A&M’s endowment is as healthy as ever relative terms to others, eh Punky Spewster? And with the PUC backing it who really gives a fuck about A&M’s very impressive endowment.

  129. Mr. Pink says:

    A&M? So that makes you a redneck godbotherer doesn’t it thor?

  130. Old Texas Turkey says:

    I can tell exactly

    I got one better, don’t tell me, post your trade confirms here. pdf is fine.

  131. N. O'Brain says:

    “A&M’s endowment is as healthy as ever relative terms to others…”

    See?

    A liar.

  132. Slartibartfast says:

    I’m just wondering how many more billions we’re going to pour into AIG, and what the return could possibly be, given that their market cap is now just north of $1b.

  133. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Poor wittle sPies doesn’t know his math.

    Actually, I’ve humiliated you on that on more than one occasion, too.

    The fund managed by the Texas A&M Foundation lost about 25 percent — in the range of $240 million — of its long-term investment pool since the end of June

    Must be that “new math”.

    BWAHAHAHAHAH!

  134. Dan Collins says:

    Oh, geez. I thought it was bloggers row!

    row 3 (rou)
    n.
    1. A boisterous disturbance or quarrel; a brawl. See Synonyms at brawl.
    2. An uproar; a great noise.
    intr.v. rowed, row·ing, rows
    To take part in a quarrel, brawl, or uproar.

    My bad.

  135. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    whore’s take on health: “Yeah, I’ve got brain cancer, but I’m as healthy as ever relative to someone who’s dead.”

    Lamest. Spin Attempt. EVER.

    BWAHAHAHAHAH!

  136. Jeff G. says:

    I was the guy who wouldn’t be caught dead being seen. I spent most of the time in bars. Wearing a singlet and wrestling people for pool money.

  137. thor says:


    Comment by Spies, Brigands, and Pirates on 3/2 @ 11:17 am #

    Anyone else get the feeling that whore is actually a Opalocka convenience store clerk with a rich fantasy life and a healthy stock of impotent rage?

    Anyone else get the feeling that you don’t have a job much less a dime to your name? NTTAWWT!

    You ride a bike to class, when you have one to go to that is, don’t ya. You have a fuckin’ 5-year-old Mac, don’t ya. I bet a memory upgrade is something you have to save for.

    The fact that people look down on you makes you bitter, no.

  138. Old Texas Turkey says:

    don’t try to change the subject hor – post your fx and stock brokerage trading statements here. mister big-bitch trader. bring it. shame us.

  139. thor says:

    #

    Comment by Spies, Brigands, and Pirates on 3/2 @ 11:24 am #

    Poor wittle sPies doesn’t know his math.

    Actually, I’ve humiliated you on that on more than one occasion, too.

    The fund managed by the Texas A&M Foundation lost about 25 percent — in the range of $240 million — of its long-term investment pool since the end of June

    Must be that “new math”.

    BWAHAHAHAHAH!

    Whooosh, right over you head. How is A&M’s endowment performing any better or worse than others after the Bushian market collapse? Read the article you linked, idiot.

    Would you like another go at some Chomsky, the simple stuff? You got a zero on the last pop quiz, btw.

  140. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Whooosh, right over you head.

    You’re not even trying any more, loser.

    So, is today still “a great time to buy”, whore?

    BWAHAHAHAHAH!

  141. thor says:

    #

    Comment by Old Texas Turkey on 3/2 @ 11:30 am #

    don’t try to change the subject hor – post your fx and stock brokerage trading statements here. mister big-bitch trader. bring it. shame us.

    Why, you wouldn’t know how to read them (BWAHAHAHAHAHA, cursory attempt at mocking sPiesian self-induced laughter)!

    Come talk to me when you understand stocks from bonds and preferred from common and puts from calls, Old Wet Turd.

  142. thor says:


    Comment by Spies, Brigands, and Pirates on 3/2 @ 11:35 am #

    Whooosh, right over you head.

    You’re not even trying any more, loser.

    So, is today still “a great time to buy”, whore?

    BWAHAHAHAHAH!

    BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Yes.

    Stocks are cheaper when there’s more sellers than buyers.

  143. Old Texas Turkey says:

    Why, you wouldn’t know how to read them

    (snicker)

  144. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Sure thing, thor.

    I’m kicking myself for not taking your “now is the time to buy” advice, given right before the market opened today.

    Why, I’d probably be able to retire tomorrow!

    BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

  145. ushie says:

    The scent of pure vanilla turns me on. So does Ann Coulter.

    And I’m a girl.

  146. thor says:

    Yes, wittle sPies, that’s how it works, you buy stocks at the open and retire at lunch time.

    BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  147. DarthRove says:

    I thought day trading went out with crumpled linen suits, Motorola brick phones, and Culture Club.

  148. Old Texas Turkey says:

    Yes, wittle sPies, that’s how it works, you buy at the open and get a margin call at lunch time.

    Hor’s trading model.

    BTW, Hor:

    r’ut oh!!!

    http://tinyurl.com/cukgf5

  149. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    whore, can you point to any piece of “investment advice” you’ve ever given here that panned out?

    Go ahead. I’ll wait.

  150. DarthRove says:

    Q: What do you call couples who practice the rhythm method?
    A: Parents

    Q: What do you call day traders?
    A: People who are livin’ in a material world, and they are a material girl.

  151. Old Texas Turkey says:

    Timex should seriously consider signing hor up as a spokeman.

  152. thor says:

    Ewww, desperate Old Texas Turd is still trying to show us all ’em smarts of his.

    Hey, coward, I know you’re fuckin’ stupid, OK. A.Rank.Amateur.

    I don’t own any GE or GE pref.s, never said I did, they do have at least one large tradeable pref. issue that I’m aware of. I’m watching some interesting income plays, including FITB’s pref., just as others are. I know the value in understanding the difference in cumulative and non-cumulative preferreds. Get it? It’s not just confusing lingo to me, Sallie Mae’s TIPRS are second nature to me. Nobody but a total chucklehead like you confuses pref.s with common, much less bonds with stocks.

    Pretend as you may, but you don’t have a clue. Nobody keeps making the mistakes you’ve made who actually knows which way is up.

    And.

    BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Snicker.

    Giggle.

    Look, bunnies!

    Elevanty!!!11!!!

    None of your message board sparkles impress me either, I’ve seen ’em all before.

  153. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    whore, can you point to any piece of “investment advice” you’ve ever given here that panned out?

    Go ahead. I’ll wait.

    Still waiting, whore.

  154. McGehee says:

    There’s an awful lot of one-sided conversation in this thread — thanks to TrollHammer.

    Makes the unHammered look a little silly though.

  155. Jeff G. says:

    Please don’t play “let’s exchange variations of ‘fuck'” with thor.

    Thanks. Think Matt Ryan. It’ll help you put things in context.

  156. thor says:


    Comment by Spies, Brigands, and Pirates on 3/2 @ 12:21 pm #

    whore, can you point to any piece of “investment advice” you’ve ever given here that panned out?

    Go ahead. I’ll wait.

    You don’t have to wait, wittle sPizee-wizey. Tink weal hard, work your knuckles into your temples. How did I (we, actually) make money in our PIP account, yes, we got stopped out of almost everything, except our dollar/yen contracts. Ohnoes!

    Awww wittle sPizzzey gets busted again. Desperate fantasist, you’re not waiting, you’re rubbing yourself raw.

  157. Jeff G. says:

    Incidentally, I like and respect Slart, but — though I don’t listen to Rush Limbaugh — I certainly respect what he’s been able to do.

    That the left is able to take him out of context and browbeat people like Michael Steele (or, less importantly, Patterico) into acknowledging, for purposes of establishing their own “reasonableness”, that Limbaugh is somehow evil and ubiquitously disingenuous (not to mention poisonous to public discourse) is a problem of the exact sort I wrote about when people on the right were falling all over themselves to distance themselves from Bill Bennett’s “racist” remarks, or Bush’s handling of Katrina.

    Every time we cede such ground, we lose a bit of our principles for the purposes of pretending we’re being pragmatic.

    But REAL pragmatism demands we don’t cede the points that allow us to maintain and defend our principles.

    It’s one of those paradoxes. But nothing that can’t be scoffed at by a Patterico mass Tweet.

  158. Old Texas Turkey says:

    Hor. None of your investment acumen sparkles impresses me either, I’ve seen ‘em all before.

  159. thor says:

    You’re a dumfock who stares at the butt end of turkeys.

  160. Spiny Norman says:

    Comment by Jeff G.

    Please don’t play “let’s exchange variations of ‘fuck’” with thor.

    Why it’s not worth it arguing with the drunk at the end of the bar. When one realizes thor IS that drunk at the end of the bar, it’s easy to ignore him.

  161. Wowbagger, the Infinitely Prolonged says:

    For an encore, possibly the host could tell us what Bill Clinton meant when he said “depends on what the meaning of the word is is.” You know, since taking four word sentences at face value means “taking them out of context” maybe you understood Clinton. I’m more of a plain meaning type of a guy, so when a guy says “I’ll tell what I would have written in four words: I hope he fails,” well gosh golly, I tend to take him at his word.

    Then again, I ain’t no fancy literature guy….

  162. Alec Leamas says:

    “I hope he fails . . . [in his efforts to destroy the United States].”

    See? Howsat?

  163. pdbuttons says:

    old wooden rollercoasters
    where if u stood after the first turn u mite be decapitated
    are not as scary as bambi’s economy
    i think i’ll invest in platform sneakers
    to get my head above water?/or that “u have 2 be this tall’ line
    whee!
    who picked my cotton candy?
    give me a gun/i’ll win u a prize!

  164. JHoward says:

    Every time we cede such ground, we lose a bit of our principles for the purposes of pretending we’re being pragmatic.

    Classical liberal versus sec-progg politics are inherently and morally asymmetrical. One is theft (name your flavor, it’s all either theft or the lie needed to commit it) and the other is enforcing what law remains preventing theft.

    One is right and the other is wrong. One is true and the other false.

    Ceding ground to thieves is folly. We needa quit that.

  165. Jeff G. says:

    Or, “I hope he fails [inasmuch as he’s hoping to move the basic US system of governance toward European soft socialism and progressive totalitarianism.]”

    Works better if you’re one of them fancy lit guys what knows how to revisit context and acknowledge intent.

    What’s funny is the idea that you now have to be a “fancy lit guy” to pretend to understand intent. The rest get to act smart and nuanced for adopting a posture of dumb and clueless.

  166. Will says:

    Jeff,

    I’ve read this site a long time and loved every minute of it, particularly when you were at your heights, but also when you somewhat receded into the background and let others bear the standard. In any case, you generally had a very pleasnt disposition, only occasionally (usually when provoked) appearing downcast or bothered. Lately, however, it seems you’ve become decidedly bitter, or, at the very least, taken on a decidedly bitter tone, and I was wondering why that is.

  167. ushie says:

    Will, it’s probably because he has to dress in a singlet and wrestle people for pool money. I suppose he really likes to swim.

    Lincoln didn’t have much edumacashun but he sure could understand words and their intent.

  168. Alec Leamas says:

    Rush should just swear the Oath of Supremacy like David Brooks and Kathleen Parker and be done with it.

    No sense in going all Thomas More and losing his head or anything.

  169. Jeff G. says:

    Lately, however, it seems you’ve become decidedly bitter, or, at the very least, taken on a decidedly bitter tone, and I was wondering why that is.

    I think it has something to do with knowing what’s coming and feeling powerless to stop it.

  170. kelly says:

    I think it has something to do with knowing what’s coming and feeling powerless to stop it.

    Yup.

  171. Alec Leamas says:

    “I think it has something to do with knowing what’s coming and feeling powerless to stop it.”

    I haven’t become bitter. I’ve simply occupied myself with the mundane things of life, much like the inhabitants of Pompeii resigned to their hot, molten fate.

  172. kelly says:

    “hot, molten fate”

    No kidding. Not too long from now we’ll be begging for the wall, a blindfold, and a cigarette.

  173. Will says:

    I think it has something to do with knowing what’s coming and feeling powerless to stop it.

    I can’t argue with that at all. I guess I just never took you for a guy who would take it out on your allies and/or people with whom you’ve had the most minor of disputes. That aside, don’t let the perpetrators of “what’s coming” get you down, and even if they do, don’t give them the satisfaction of seeing you down. You may see yourself as marginalized, but I think you considerably underestimate how important you are in the ideological battle. Anyway, you keep writing and I’ll keep reading.

  174. McGehee says:

    Jeff, there is a difference between being uninfluential and being underappreciated. You may be the latter but you are most certainly not the former.

  175. Jeff G. says:

    You can’t be influential if feeling marginalized makes bothering to write a chore.

  176. happyfeet says:

    That’s not very defiant.

  177. SDN says:

    Amen #179

  178. maybe you need a “new piano”, Jeff. It’s really fired me up the last week. or it’s the drugs. but I’m going with new piano for the moment.

  179. meya says:

    “Hey, Stupid Fascist Girl: remember the other day when you and Your Personal Lord and Savior Blowbama were claiming that there were “no earmarks” in the Porkulus?”

    Well, I was claiming that the CA-NV line wasn’t in the stimulus, and the ‘acorn earmark’ wasn’t really an ‘acorn earmark.’

    “That’s changed.”

    That link isn’t talking about the stimulus.

  180. mwm says:

    It’s fun to watch. The GOP now has a recovering drug addict in charge – Limbaugh.

  181. Pablo says:

    The Dems have a recovering pot/cokehead in charge. Limbaugh is a talk show host.

  182. Pablo says:

    You can’t be influential if feeling marginalized makes bothering to write a chore.

    Marginalized? OUTLAW!

    Mebbe its time to go rob a train or something to get the juices flowing.

  183. mwm says:

    Limbaugh fits the definition of a drug addict. Many people used drugs in the 70’s. Most did not become addicts. Limbaugh became an addict. That is the difference.

  184. Pablo says:

    That and the talk show host/POTUS thingy. Very fucking astute, mwm.

  185. ushie says:

    mwm isn’t the sharpest crayon in the box. But then, he’s stamping his widdle feets because we told him to color within the lines, the fool.

  186. McGehee says:

    mwm is sharp like a Q-tip.

  187. Slartibartfast says:

    Incidentally, I like and respect Slart, but — though I don’t listen to Rush Limbaugh — I certainly respect what he’s been able to do.

    Thanks for that, Jeff. I don’t have any problem with Limbaugh’s ability to pull the conservative core together. I just have a problem with him using counterfactual crap to do that. Not saying he does that all the time, just enough to exceed my threshold of annoyance.

    Which I’m sure I’ve done for some other folks here, but you’re just as free to tune me out as I am to tune out Limbaugh.

  188. SteveG says:

    #181

    Jeff,
    That is the time to double down on the productivity.

    Hunter S Thompson was a prolific writer in his early years. After he’d made his name he blew everyone off and became exclusive… disappearing for months at a time, missing deadlines, reappearing only to ask for more money etc.
    Lots of talented people get this dynamic backwards.

    Just riff from the heart.
    Do it often… surely there are lots of things to let your passion fly over?
    Cut it all loose for a year and see what happens. No disappearing.
    Obama and the idiots that run the GOP will give you more than enough material, so make those who dissed you pay by showing them you rock.
    Life is simple that way.
    Your time catch wrestling has shown you a lot of how to deal with those out there who run their mouths but do not know who they are dealing with, no?
    Yapping away when they are an inch away from having someone rip off their heads and piss into their dead skull (if I may apologize to Jack Nicholson for stealing his line).

    Give it a dedicated no bullshit no hiatus year. This year will be full of great Washington nonsense, don’t let the opportunity pass you by.

    PS: forget about Patterico and Karl…. unless you want to get caught up in the small story of life that all petty squabbles wind up being

  189. Jeff G. says:

    I’ve given it years at a time. I don’t have the stamina any more.

  190. happyfeet says:

    yerba mate

  191. serr8d says:

    Bullshit, Jeff. No quitting allowed.

    Unless you smoke, of course.

Comments are closed.