Please advice to me. The shameful talkings and cloths of my wife are shameful to me. If to remove the head would I be to defame the Islam? I wait here for you to say.
In the immediate aftermath of the election, I indulged in a fantasy that one day the middle-class dupes who voted for Obama would wake up, realize what they’d done, and angrily punish the Democrats in the next election.
Now I’m starting to worry about armed insurrection.
Most of “The World” is a cesspool of corruption, tribal warfare, backwards superstitions, and despotic governments. Tell me again why I should give a damn?
Funny thing about the UN demanding that something be made illegal.
Countries just ignore it whenever they see fit, which is all the time.
Like the US would anytime the UN demands something that violates the Constitution (as the US noted when ratifying the UDHR).
The UN is a paper tiger. Except it’s not even a tiger on paper. It’s more of a paper housecat, that occasionally makes ineffectual swipes at you with paper claws.
(And all of that assumes a binding (notionally) resolution rather than just wanking from the General Assembly, which means less than nothing.)
A Russian and an American are sitting in an airport waiting for a flight. They both get to talking and inevitability, the topic turns to politics. The American is trying to explain the concept of Freedom of Speech, which the Russian insists that he has as well.
The American goes “For example, in America, I can go right up to the White House gates and yell at the top of my lungs “Ronald Reagan is a son of a bitch!” and nothing will happen to me”.
The Russian nods and says “Ah, we have freedom of speech as well. I am able to walk to the center of Red Square and yell at the top of my lungs “Ronald Reagan is a son of a bitch!” and nothing will happen to me either.”
Sdferr, @ 11,
Scaaary, dude. No matter what we do for these people, we’re “hated.”
They give us no quarter in Palestine, for example, and yet here we are gifting them with $900M!
(Is this because they’ve been such good global citizens of late?)
One of the ancillary goals of Gramscian schemes is to, whenever possible, get the sheep to fleece themselves. In this, post-modern Italian communists think just like the Islamo’s: just one more cross-link between the progressives and their scary religionist analogs.
They can’t define terrorism, but have no trouble determining what constitutes hate speech. So I can cut off someone’s head as long as I don’t defame his religion. Bitching! Now where did I put my sword.
An interesting sidenote to this is that yesterday we found a number of prominent jihadi forums hotlinking images of gruesome beheadings. The comments were all positive.
When we replaced those images with softcore porn, the forum users were horrified.
Images showing Mujahideen beheading civlians: praise Allah! Images showing a little cleavage: shock, horror, and outrage!
Tell your friend “Mo” that there is an encyclopaedic amount of good online advice on morals, marriage and purity. I’m sure there is a correct way to remove the offending body part without transgressing.
Perhaps I’m less sanguine about armed insurrection in light of my recent, Dan Collins-guided study of “Julius Caesar” and Elizabethan Era English politics.
oh jeez SW with the purity one. That’s so not right and it just goes on and on and on with the fluids and the liquids and the discharges. These people ooze an uncommon amount I think.
Durban 2 should definitely culminate with a statement about the rights of the oozey people I think, SW. Instead of being treated as if they were impure and oozey I think they should be embraced as capriciously leaky. I think this would help them feel better about themselves. Root causes, I’m thinking.
It is a wonder, the link the world’s elite have sought always with dictators and their ilk. It’s a control thing, I know. But just how they escape the icky part of their deals with the devils?
It’s almost as if purity were undertaken in religious doctrine for the purpose of covert comedic effect. Wonder whether the Prophet had a hidden sneaky sense of humor? Nah, it’s too hard, nevermind.
Just so I know, after one month of the Obama presidency, three commenters here threaten treason against the elected government of the United States and this treason draws the condemnation of….well, no one since it’s far more entertaining to make fun of other people’s superstitions.
Treason = acquiesced
bigotry toward other religions = cool
Outlawing that bigotry = anger
bigotry toward our religion = holy rage
Protein Wisdom = strange place
PS on the record of Armed Insurrection. It worked for Shay and his friends. Good luck. I’m all for it for you guys….it would be like pruning the tree of liberty
So, Ted, you’re on board with the idea that nations should pass laws that allow arrest and prosecution for someone who writes about the fact that the vast majority of terrorism performed around the world is initiated by self confessed Muslims?
I’m sorry, we weren’t advocating overthrowing the United States Government ?
On an unrelated note, the Obamas just withdrew the canine candidate for first pet- apparently, he had not had his shots and his license fee was unpaid.
Methinks the ACLU is going to issue an ass whoopin’ on ole Ted 360.
BTW: The US position was stated as opposed to the resolution and, even if it’s passed, the US can file an exception, which is what will probably happen.
I don’t think there’ll be any armed insurrection until Obama tells us he regrets he’s going to have to confiscate our guns – for our own safety, of course. Down here in Texas that’ll be like telling us he’s going to outlaw football – it’ll prove somewhat unpopular. I suggest he practice confiscating guns in the candy-ass, liberal states like Massachusetts or California before he tries it in Texas. We have more guns and ammo down here than the Army. Ban the sale of assault weapons? Hell, everybody I know already has one.
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful
Assalaamu `alaykum waRahmatullahi Wabarakatuh
It is not permissible for males to chat unnecessarily and joke with females. As you have correctly stated in your query, there are established rulings in fiqh which prohibits males from even responding audibly to the greetings of females and vice versa. This clearly shows how much more necessary it would be for members of the opposite gender to abstain from chatting and joking with each other. In fact, we have been informed that some forums even allow private messaging between the members. Many members exploit this and end up flirting with members of the opposite gender.
We do acknowledge that in order to curb this, a few forums have set up a brothers and sisters section; however, the moderators should be more vigilant on the general threads and should not allow any unnecessary chit chats between men and women. The other members should also play their part. Remember, the devil is playing his part.
Related question: if a Muzzie female is online and chit chatting, shouldn’t she be wearing a burhka?
Duly noted. And nicely played, Ted. Like a 16 yr old single malt it is.
bigotry toward other religions = cool
Well Ted, either that or you’re promoting official standards for thought and behavior. Are you advocating official standards for thought and behavior or can I dislike you and you I just like the good old days?
Outlawing that bigotry = anger
Oh, answered it already, I see.
bigotry toward our religion = holy rage
How about “bigotry” toward Bigotry = a good idea. Like debunking you thusly is a good idea.
Al-Qa’eda has lost credibility for enforcing a series of rules imposing their way of thought on the most mundane aspects of everyday life.
They include a ban on women buying suggestively-shaped vegetables, according to one tribal leader in the western province of Anbar.
Sheikh Hameed al-Hayyes, a Sunni elder, told Reuters: “They even killed female goats because their private parts were not covered and their tails were pointed upward, which they said was haram.
“They regarded the cucumber as male and tomato as female. Women were not allowed to buy cucumbers, only men.”
I’m thinking that Ted spent hours crafting that big assed pile of obtuse and moral equivalency. It had to be deflating to see 30 comments in about 60 minutes mocking his work and the [complete lack of] intelligence behind it.
Ted needs himself a bIg ol bailout … and quite possibly some stimulus. ROWRRR!
Somebody needs to back a big pickup truck up to the local convenience store and buy them out of ice for Ted’s bruises. The poor boy’s well on his way to auditioning for Elephant Man; The Musical!
just waiting for chinatown[12-15 est][turner classic movies]
she’s my sister
she’s my daughter
she’s my sister and my daughter
only one head to identify!
makes honor killing easy
don’t worry jake, it’s only….
[…] a vehicle for Jew-hatred.” That is true, although she left out the corollary–Islamist supremacy. Posted by Dan Collins @ 7:35 am | Trackback SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “The Consequences of the […]
The countries agreeing to enact this bullshit would provide you with a very useful list of “Shitholes you would not want to move to”.
Dear Dan,
Please advice to me. The shameful talkings and cloths of my wife are shameful to me. If to remove the head would I be to defame the Islam? I wait here for you to say.
“Mo”
I’m kind of hoping the UK and US aren’t on that list, but these days – who knows?
Try a little tolerance, Dan.
Because the State said so.
Conditionally.
In the immediate aftermath of the election, I indulged in a fantasy that one day the middle-class dupes who voted for Obama would wake up, realize what they’d done, and angrily punish the Democrats in the next election.
Now I’m starting to worry about armed insurrection.
Does this mean that the next time someone uses NEA money to make a poop sculpture of Jesus, they’ll go to prison?
I don’t care what The World thinks.
Most of “The World” is a cesspool of corruption, tribal warfare, backwards superstitions, and despotic governments. Tell me again why I should give a damn?
Because a non-trivial number of them would like to see you dead, that’s why.
Funny thing about the UN demanding that something be made illegal.
Countries just ignore it whenever they see fit, which is all the time.
Like the US would anytime the UN demands something that violates the Constitution (as the US noted when ratifying the UDHR).
The UN is a paper tiger. Except it’s not even a tiger on paper. It’s more of a paper housecat, that occasionally makes ineffectual swipes at you with paper claws.
(And all of that assumes a binding (notionally) resolution rather than just wanking from the General Assembly, which means less than nothing.)
No, because Christianity doesn’t qualify as a religion under the New Regime.
See Jawa’s analysis of polling of the Muslim world, for instance.
I’m reminded of the old Cold War joke:
A Russian and an American are sitting in an airport waiting for a flight. They both get to talking and inevitability, the topic turns to politics. The American is trying to explain the concept of Freedom of Speech, which the Russian insists that he has as well.
The American goes “For example, in America, I can go right up to the White House gates and yell at the top of my lungs “Ronald Reagan is a son of a bitch!” and nothing will happen to me”.
The Russian nods and says “Ah, we have freedom of speech as well. I am able to walk to the center of Red Square and yell at the top of my lungs “Ronald Reagan is a son of a bitch!” and nothing will happen to me either.”
Sdferr, @ 11,
Scaaary, dude. No matter what we do for these people, we’re “hated.”
They give us no quarter in Palestine, for example, and yet here we are gifting them with $900M!
(Is this because they’ve been such good global citizens of late?)
One of the ancillary goals of Gramscian schemes is to, whenever possible, get the sheep to fleece themselves. In this, post-modern Italian communists think just like the Islamo’s: just one more cross-link between the progressives and their scary religionist analogs.
Can you say “pincer-action?”
They can’t define terrorism, but have no trouble determining what constitutes hate speech. So I can cut off someone’s head as long as I don’t defame his religion. Bitching! Now where did I put my sword.
Really? Worry? I’m kind of hoping for it.
Mossberg500, Jawa’s got one for that too.
happy,
Tell your friend “Mo” that there is an encyclopaedic amount of good online advice on morals, marriage and purity. I’m sure there is a correct way to remove the offending body part without transgressing.
Perhaps I’m less sanguine about armed insurrection in light of my recent, Dan Collins-guided study of “Julius Caesar” and Elizabethan Era English politics.
Now I’m starting to worry about armed insurrection.
Comment by Benedick on 2/26 @ 11:38 am
Really? Worry? I’m kind of hoping for it.
That is really starting to become the relevant question.
Will the USofA go quietly or not?
Wow. This “World” place sounds a lot like the good ol’ America. Why do you hate it so much then?
oh jeez SW with the purity one. That’s so not right and it just goes on and on and on with the fluids and the liquids and the discharges. These people ooze an uncommon amount I think.
Well hell, happy, you wouldn’t want to have impure discharges now, would you?
ohnoes. Careful, you guys. Don’t walk into AJB’s cunning trap.
It’s Cartoon Time Again!
Durban 2 should definitely culminate with a statement about the rights of the oozey people I think, SW. Instead of being treated as if they were impure and oozey I think they should be embraced as capriciously leaky. I think this would help them feel better about themselves. Root causes, I’m thinking.
What, sort of “Exudate – Movement of a people”?
It is a wonder, the link the world’s elite have sought always with dictators and their ilk. It’s a control thing, I know. But just how they escape the icky part of their deals with the devils?
It’s almost as if purity were undertaken in religious doctrine for the purpose of covert comedic effect. Wonder whether the Prophet had a hidden sneaky sense of humor? Nah, it’s too hard, nevermind.
Just so I know, after one month of the Obama presidency, three commenters here threaten treason against the elected government of the United States and this treason draws the condemnation of….well, no one since it’s far more entertaining to make fun of other people’s superstitions.
Treason = acquiesced
bigotry toward other religions = cool
Outlawing that bigotry = anger
bigotry toward our religion = holy rage
Protein Wisdom = strange place
PS on the record of Armed Insurrection. It worked for Shay and his friends. Good luck. I’m all for it for you guys….it would be like pruning the tree of liberty
Ted360. Islamist is not a religion. FYI.
Now get back to your hole.
Yes, Ted. Clearly the denizens of Protein Wisdom are threatening to overthrow the United States government. Your grasp of nuance is formidable.
Ted’s funny.
Does Ted hang with parsnip and thor?
Not yet, nikkolai, but when the revolution comes . . . he will.
from the tree of liberty?
So, Ted, you’re on board with the idea that nations should pass laws that allow arrest and prosecution for someone who writes about the fact that the vast majority of terrorism performed around the world is initiated by self confessed Muslims?
Do tell!
I’m sorry, we weren’t advocating overthrowing the United States Government ?
On an unrelated note, the Obamas just withdrew the canine candidate for first pet- apparently, he had not had his shots and his license fee was unpaid.
Improperly vetted say I.
Methinks the ACLU is going to issue an ass whoopin’ on ole Ted 360.
BTW: The US position was stated as opposed to the resolution and, even if it’s passed, the US can file an exception, which is what will probably happen.
Huh? No, really. Huh?
Groan.
I don’t think there’ll be any armed insurrection until Obama tells us he regrets he’s going to have to confiscate our guns – for our own safety, of course. Down here in Texas that’ll be like telling us he’s going to outlaw football – it’ll prove somewhat unpopular. I suggest he practice confiscating guns in the candy-ass, liberal states like Massachusetts or California before he tries it in Texas. We have more guns and ammo down here than the Army. Ban the sale of assault weapons? Hell, everybody I know already has one.
Of course, in a hopey world, the US should file an “ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR F%&*NG MINDS, BITCHES?!?!” but I’ve grown far less hopeful of the change.
I am so not going to invite that Ted round for drinks and nibbles. He seems a little simple.
From Silver Whistle’s link @ 17:
Related question: if a Muzzie female is online and chit chatting, shouldn’t she be wearing a burhka?
That’s a hard one, serr8d. Let’s ask Ted.
serr8d –
Doesn’t sound gracious or merciful in the least.
Sounds downright facist and cruel.
Yeah, Ted. I’m still waiting on the “noun = verb” mystery. Surely someone possessed of your deep intellect could deign to explain it to us.
The countries agreeing to enact this bullshit would provide you with a very useful list of “Shitholes you would not want to move toâ€.
The list of countries one could consider moving to is actually pretty short.
Oh, I don’t know, Patrick. I hear that Lebanon has some great beaches and the Kevlar vests are in all of the cabanas.
improperly vetted
Open mike night’s suck
I wonder what Ted thinks of Christianity. Maybe he can open up for us.
Comment by AJB on 2/26 @ 1:10 pm #
I don’t care what The World thinks.
Most of “The World†is a cesspool of corruption, tribal warfare, backwards superstitions, and despotic governments.
Wow. This “World†place sounds a lot like the good ol’ America. Why do you hate it so much then?”
Dear AJB, FOAD.
Thank you.
Now, Ted, the left has had 60 years of us acquiescing to treason. Surely you could give us 6 weeks?
serr8d –
Are the female posters also trying to purchase cucumbers online? ‘Coz that makes them dirty whores.
Oh, Ted 360, just in case you’ve not completely crawled back into your cave. Your list of outrages!..
..might be easily cured.
We just have to aquire the right sauces..
I want Ted to tell me how many times heavier than a mouse, is an elephant.
Baracky likes his soldiers dead and picturesque. I guess cause they’re more usefuller like that.
OTT – Nice. I imagine the only thing equal to ted’s stupidity is his cowardice. He really is a hit-n-run kind of troll.
Anyone who equates criticism to bigotry deserves shunning. Shun ted now.
Duly noted. And nicely played, Ted. Like a 16 yr old single malt it is.
Well Ted, either that or you’re promoting official standards for thought and behavior. Are you advocating official standards for thought and behavior or can I dislike you and you I just like the good old days?
Oh, answered it already, I see.
How about “bigotry” toward Bigotry = a good idea. Like debunking you thusly is a good idea.
For you, I’d tend to agree. Fallacy much, do we?
This is a good idea. By all means let the U.N. make criticism of religion illegal. That will help push the U.S. out of the U.N.
Al-Qa’eda has lost credibility for enforcing a series of rules imposing their way of thought on the most mundane aspects of everyday life.
They include a ban on women buying suggestively-shaped vegetables, according to one tribal leader in the western province of Anbar.
Sheikh Hameed al-Hayyes, a Sunni elder, told Reuters: “They even killed female goats because their private parts were not covered and their tails were pointed upward, which they said was haram.
“They regarded the cucumber as male and tomato as female. Women were not allowed to buy cucumbers, only men.”
How could anyone be bigoted against that?
That’s why they hate us: We prefer cleavage to cleavers. There’s just no accounting for tastes..
I’m thinking that Ted spent hours crafting that big assed pile of obtuse and moral equivalency. It had to be deflating to see 30 comments in about 60 minutes mocking his work and the [complete lack of] intelligence behind it.
Ted needs himself a bIg ol bailout … and quite possibly some stimulus. ROWRRR!
Ted and AJB forgot you should never go full retard.
Somebody needs to back a big pickup truck up to the local convenience store and buy them out of ice for Ted’s bruises. The poor boy’s well on his way to auditioning for Elephant Man; The Musical!
Ted, what’s your worldview on corporate water?
“
Wow. This “World†place sounds a lot like the good ol’ America. Why do you hate it so much then?”
Because it was like that even before Obama was elected President.
Techie, you make it sound like they have a choice.
AJB and Ted are foooking mendoucheous asshats. Good Allah, stoooooooooooopid that pervasive should be visibly painful.
So the UN will make it illegal to criticize Al Gore and his church of the AGW?
Benedick, who will be Cromwell/ Augustus?
C’mon guys. Let Ted speak………
……………
Ted sounds much like a cricket song, no?
(OT, but the Rocky Mountain News folds after Friday. buh-bye~!)
Hmmmph. Better crickets.
Amen and fuck Eric Holder.
Amen and fuck Eric Holder.
I had rather not.
(OT, but the Rocky Mountain News folds after Friday. buh-bye~!)
The San Francisco Crock-o-shit-nicle looks to be on its way out, too.
Trying link again.
#29
Wrong insurection , Ted. Earlier, say 1775. What was that about, by the way, Ted?
just waiting for chinatown[12-15 est][turner classic movies]
she’s my sister
she’s my daughter
she’s my sister and my daughter
only one head to identify!
makes honor killing easy
don’t worry jake, it’s only….
[…] a vehicle for Jew-hatred.” That is true, although she left out the corollary–Islamist supremacy. Posted by Dan Collins @ 7:35 am | Trackback SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “The Consequences of the […]