Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Pam’s House Blend, Village Voice, Others Can’t Get the Story Right [Dan Collins; UPDATED 3x]

Pam Spaulding and (Roy Edroso at) the (troubled*) Village Voice, among others, can’t distinguish between my post on the PJM meltdown and Jeff’s update, addressed to Roger. Moreover, they’ve grabbed the “wingnut welfare” meme so helpfully handed to them by The Fedora and run with it.

I’ve got other things to attend to today. Lots, in fact. But I may have to spend some time responding to these twerps.

I’d rather watch the 7th goddamn season of Bewitched.

For those of you who are new to this kerfuffle (rolled in a debacle with a creamy nuance center) see here, here and here.

UPDATE: Pam’s corrected. From the comments, it seems like the VV has corrected, too. So, good, but it will be interesting to see how far-flung the original misconceptions are by the end of the day. And by that I mean, of course, that it will suck.

REUPDATE: From SBP–

The troubled* Village Voice laid off three employees Tuesday, including Nat Hentoff, the prominent columnist who has worked for the paper since 1958, contributing opinionated columns about jazz, civil liberties and politics.

Lynn Yaeger, a fashion writer who has worked for the paper for about 30 years, was also laid off, as was Chloe A. Hilliard, who has written for two years.

Comedy is all about timing, people. Yaeger’s job was made redundant by Mrs. Obama.

Rereupdate: Jeff’s email to Pam

72 Replies to “Pam’s House Blend, Village Voice, Others Can’t Get the Story Right [Dan Collins; UPDATED 3x]”

  1. happyfeet says:

    What a mess.

  2. Carin says:

    You know, attempting to interact with those folks is pointless. They’ve found a spin they’re happy with, and nothing is going to change their mind.

    I say Bravo to the Fedora for damaging the alternative message the right-side of the blogshpere is trying to promote, and giving ammunition to the likes of Pam Spaulding. His failed model has allowed them to come to these conclusions:

    Given the American people’s distaste for conservatism as practiced by George W. Bush (which can be argued was a perversion of it) and desire for change, the money wasn’t there because no one cared about what these bloggers had to say or was willing to pay them to say it in this climate.

    Good JOB! See, the model didn’t suck, it was just that no one cared what right bloggers wanted to say.

    As I said, it’s pointless to engage in conversation with these folks.

  3. SarahW says:

    It’s a disappointing situation, but let the lefty tongues wag. There’s the future to consider, time to look to that instead of busting on the obvious.

  4. happyfeet says:

    Given the American people’s distaste for socialism as practiced by Baracky (who can be argued is something of a no-account dipshit what mostly accidentally got his dirty socialist ass elected pezzydent) and desire for change, the money wasn’t there because no one cared about what the New York Times had to say or was willing to pay them to say it in this climate.

  5. Carin says:

    You know who else is going bankrupt? The Detroit papers. I guess no one is interest in their liberal message.

  6. Silver lining: the more the proggs convince themselves this PJM thing has implications beyond JM, the more poleaxed they’re going to be when the revolution comes.

    (Most revolutions these days prefer to shoot, but the poleaxe is an underappreciated weapon.)

  7. McGehee says:

    Well said, Herb.

    <looks around sheepishly>

  8. McGehee says:

    ARGH!

    “convince themselves this PJM thing has implications beyond PJM”

    <grumble>

  9. AKA Pablo says:

    You know, attempting to interact with those folks is pointless.

    Yep.

    Good JOB! See, the model didn’t suck, it was just that no one cared what right bloggers wanted to say.

    So read this piece I wrote about the right bloggers and what they had to say!

  10. happyfeet says:

    they look expensive

  11. Joe says:

    Pam’s money quote is here:

    A If you read the entirety of my post, there’s not a lot of schadenfreude going around; I think the other shoe is going to drop on the left as well; it’s the entire economy, as well as the election windfall profits (as expected) going south that will deal the blogosphere a blow in general. I’ve been saying that for a long while prior to the crash. There’s not a good sustainable model that will compete with the establishment MSM or thinktanks/lobbying organizations. That’s why those entities hope we’ll all go away to some extent, because we aren’t controlled — but we also have no infrastructure, so they know they can wait us all out. I guess the pitiful schadenfreude we can hold to in the blogosphere is that the MSM is sucking wind when it comes to advertising as well.

    Pam is probably right about this.

  12. Alec Leamas says:

    Pam Spaulding looks like Theodore from Alvin and the Chipmunks with dreadlocks. I don’t know what this adds to the discussion, but it is true, so I said it.

  13. happyfeet says:

    oh. I was gonna say that wasn’t nice, but I click over and Pam is one of those what uses the word Talibangelist when she talks about the Christian people. What a bigot and also she has no discernment. Also she likes coffee. I like coffee too. You’d think that would be enough, but no. She is not a nice person I don’t think.

  14. Joe says:

    This was a link from the Village Voice article (which is engaged in schadenfreud)–but it is an interesting link on Johnson getting the boot from PJM.

    And the VV did appear to have corrected the error about mixing Dan and Jeff.

  15. Mr. Pink says:

    “Talibangelist”

    Are you F-ing kidding me?

  16. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    You know who else is going bankrupt? The Detroit papers all the papers.

    Fixed it for you. :-)

  17. Joe says:

    Pam and her fellow Lesbian, Gay, Bi Transgendered pals are convinced if you go to church and actually take it even a wee bit seriously, you must be ready to burn them at the stake. They are convinced it was Booooooooooosh’s goal to institute the Handmaid’s Tale, and only their service at the ramparts kept that from happening. I am not endorsing Pam’s political or recent historical lunacy, but I thought her last comment on this who blogging ad mess was correct.

  18. happyfeet says:

    Talibangelist… it’s what passes for clever in our post-partisan dirty socialist utopia I think

  19. McGehee says:

    They ain’t cheap, Happy, but they also don’t need to be reloaded.

  20. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Somehow these people have convinced themselves that Grandma nagging them to go to church when they were teenagers was every bit as bad as having their genitalia mutilated and being stuffed into a sack.

    You’d think those big holes in Lower Manhattan would remind them that the Talibastards murdered 3,000 of their fellow citizens, while Rick Warren hasn’t ever murdered anybody.

    The narcissism is breathtaking.

  21. Mr. Pink says:

    So this c#nt compares people that use their religious views as a basis for their votes in a Representative Republic to a regime that in Asia that got its jollys off shooting people in a soccer stadium and preventing woman from reading. She must be a very nice and tolerant person, I would want her to come over my house for dinner most certainly.

  22. Mr. Pink says:

    How about we all start comparing Obama voters to the Shining Path.

  23. Mr. Pink says:

    Hmm how about PinO!cheist?

  24. router says:

    o people are like north koreans

  25. AKA Pablo says:

    So this c#nt compares people that use their religious views as a basis for their votes in a Representative Republic to a regime that in Asia that got its jollys off shooting people in a soccer stadium and preventing woman from reading.

    The entire world and everything that happens in it revolves around Pam’s penchant for eating pussy. Just so you know.

    And don’t tell Andrew Sullivan. He thinks it’s all about him.

  26. Mr. Pink says:

    Nah O! people are like the dirty unwashed masses in one of those pissant South American countries that knowingly vote in socialist dictators who immediately upon winning disallow any future election while closing down any hostile media outlets so the people that voted them in only see government approved propaganda that they now are having happy happy joy joy lives while their new dictator proceeds to brutalize the populace. I love run on sentences by the way.

  27. JHoward says:

    As Carin alludes, leftards certainly won’t self-correct when there’s might-makes-right to promote. Witness our lovable trolls, who trot out the populist-might canard as proof of concept at the, well, drop of a hat.

    The right needs a publicly defined platform, I’m tellin ya…

  28. serr8d says:

    Heh. A comment from “Brown Frown” Pam’s co-blogger Bachalon (closed comments over there, BTW)..

    How do these people manage to survive on a day to day basis? Is hatred really that strong, that sustaining?

    Hatred’s what got Obonga elected, Bachalon. Hatred of Bush, hatred of traditional values-values what got us here. Values you don’t have, you narcissistic pompous bum fucker.

  29. Mr. Pink says:

    “How do these people manage to survive on a day to day basis? Is hatred really that strong, that sustaining?”

    Well that person obviously had a blind fold and earmuffs on for the last 8 years. Plus comparing groups in the United States to the freakin Taliban shows a level of hatred that is very hard to ignore.

  30. Dan Collins says:

    Just FYI, I’ve had a very civil conversation with Pam herself. You’re free to whale on her ideology or her analogies, or anything else, of course, but she seems like a decent sort.

  31. Mr. Pink says:

    I would not consider using the word Talibangalist to be very civil or condusive to substantive analysis of anything other than as an example of BDS.

  32. serr8d says:

    Watch your back, Dan.

  33. cranky-d says:

    @29 So, they lack any ability for self reflection. I am shocked. Shocked!

  34. SarahW says:

    Love of liberty = hatred.

  35. JHoward says:

    Love of servitude = honor.

  36. Dan Collins says:

    I retort; you deride.

  37. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Considering that the “plastic turkey” lie is still floating around, I wouldn’t hold out much hope that the record will be set straight.

    I agree with Pink. Calling people “Talibangelists” isn’t what I’d consider civil (for the record, I’m not an evangelical Christian).

  38. Dan Collins says:

    I agree, SBP, but our email conversation was civil.

  39. Mikey NTH says:

    #20 SBP:

    The big holes do not exist. They are not part of the narrative. You can see all the film you want of the USS Arizona burning at Pearl Harbor, but you may not see any film of two big holes being made in Manhatten.

    It is not part of the approved narrative. It does not exist.

  40. Mr. Pink says:

    I was not deriding you sorry if it came across that way. The use of such completely over the top and hateful language is what I was disagreeing with.

  41. TheGeezer says:

    Carin, I hope all is well with you.

  42. Carin says:

    Thanks Geezer. I’m hoping I get those results today.

  43. happyfeet says:

    the money wasn’t there because no one cared about what the New York Times had to say or was willing to pay them to say it in this climate

    meltdown … new 52-wk low … it’s very sad

  44. Bob Reed says:

    Dan,
    Maybe Samantha can nose wiggle our way out of the financial crisis, the national debt, islamo-fascism, and Obama; all at once!

  45. Dan Collins says:

    Samantha Power? Now, she looks like someone who might really marry Darren II.

  46. Dan Collins says:

    No, Mr. Pink, I didn’t mean me.

  47. ThomasD says:

    MaO!ists

  48. Dan Collins says:

    Looks like Michael Phelps is getting more shit for his Maoi Wowie.

  49. Rick Ballard says:

    “it’s very sad”

    It sure is, feets. It’s like seeing the decline in the incidence of leprosy or syphilis or polio. There’s still hope though – syphilis is making a comeback among the ignorant, so why couldn’t the NYT?

  50. Pablo says:

    The big holes do not exist. They are not part of the narrative.

    Plus it was an inside job. And we were asking for it. Chickens coming home to roost. What Bush sent.

  51. router says:

    meltdown … new 260 wk52-wk low … it’s very sad

  52. Alec Leamas says:

    “She is not a nice person I don’t think.”

    Yes, this. She was probably only civil to Dan because she feared Dan not being civil to her. Her appearance aside, my biggest problem is with her work product, which should always be accompanied by a video of tumbleweed meandering through Mainstreet in an Old West Ghost town. It is all heat, no light, lots of factual errors and omissions, chock-full of hypocrisy, painfully Lesbo-centric [and not the good kind of lesbian], banal, and embarrassingly unwittingly revelatory of her own psychological issues. (as in, I’m embarrassed for her)

  53. happyfeet says:

    ohnoes. If you really look at that chart with a critical eye, forgetting what you know about what a strong brand the New York Times is, you can see a discernible pattern. Maybe it’s just me.

  54. libocrat says:

    VV is VILLAGE VOICE?
    I thought it was Vicious Vagina. There is nothing nice about Pam Spaulding. Most liberals ooze hate.

  55. Bob Reed says:

    Somehow these people have convinced themselves that Grandma nagging them to go to church when they were teenagers was every bit as bad as having their genitalia mutilated and being stuffed into a sack.”

    That’s the beauty of moral relativism SBP…

    Because, when it’s expedient, those things are equivalent…

    Just like by opposing Obama’s giveaway political payoffs Democrat party voters drive stimulus plasn, we are hoping that Americans and the economy suffers…

    But on the other hand, they were wielding absolute moral heft and authority when they were declaring the war lost, or hoping that it would soon be so, to suit their political ambitions…

    Know how I’m sure..? The MSM told me so, of course…

  56. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Well, I haven’t noticed Jeff laying off half his staff.

  57. Joe says:

    Comment by Spies, Brigands, and Pirates on 2/2 @ 10:58 am #

    Well, I haven’t noticed Jeff laying off half his staff.

    My guess is they work cheap.

  58. thor says:

    I’d rather watch the 7th goddamn season of Bewitched.

    True dat, Bewitched is a mighty mighty couch magnet.

  59. Jeff G. says:

    I agree, SBP, but our email conversation was civil.

    Did you mention to her that I can be a prick, and that I take medication?

    Context.

  60. happyfeet says:

    oh. Nat Hentoff. He’s a for real journalist. That’s too bad. But what would we need civil liberties reporting for anymore?

  61. Dan Collins says:

    Yeah, I’m all about dissing you, Jeff.

  62. Jeff G. says:

    My email to Pam:

    Pam —

    I am puzzled by the framing of your diary entry on PJM’s partial reorganization.

    For instance, I missed the section in my response to Roger where I suggested I was somehow entitled to a job. Similarly, I don’t recall noting that I’ll be going on welfare, nor do I remember trying to petition the government to create a new agency so that I could find employment. I believe that were I to decide to go to a pay model, my site would do just fine, given that it happens to have an extraordinarily loyal readership — and that it is something of a cult site in the first place.

    The truth is, I was disappointed that PJM wasn’t open with us about their business model. And I was outraged that Simon would characterize us as being on the dole. After all, he provided the contracts, and we fulfilled our part of the bargain after signing them. If PJM truly were losing money on the blogger network end of things, that has to do with their own inability to find a suitable pay structure and to sell advertising.

    Too, most of us who are no longer working with Pajamas, come April, will not have any trouble continuing our sites, should we wish to. There are a number of other pay models we’re looking into that won’t be so hideously mismanaged as PJM. And while it’s true that blogging is often a labor of love, doing it daily for 7 years takes its toll — particularly when a regular readership comes to expect daily content. Which you can either provide for free, or else decide is worth providing only if you make enough to cover costs and time.

    The source of my ire was Roger’s persistent suggestion that everything was peach — up to the point where he sent us out a pink slip form letter. That, coupled with the silly idea that we were on the dole (remember, to be part of PJM, you had to sign an exclusivity agreement, meaning I’ve turned down a number of other advertisers who have contacted me), was what I was reacting to.

    Sore loser? Hardly. If there’s a sore loser here, it’s PJM.

    But then, defensiveness looks like confidence, I guess, when the rest of the venture capital is still there to blow on what will no doubt be a dismal failure for both PJM, its investors, and the GOP who seems to think Pajamas is a way to compete with heavily funded and lockstep partisan leftwing sites.

    Me, I openly declared my distaste for John McCain on NPR. Which makes me something of a wild card. And PJM is doing away with that kind of thing in order to better control its message — and more importantly, the tone of that message.

    Regards,
    Jeff Goldstein

    https://www.proteinwisdom.com

  63. mcgruder says:

    MSM is in an ad-driven collapse.
    so is the blogosphere.
    something will step into the gap, or not.
    either way, Pam missed that.

    next.

  64. Mikey NTH says:

    I’m not an advertising guy, but I didn’t think the advertising thing would pay. There are only so many potential customers, and so many hours of the day that each customer is going to see an ad. with so many outlets, so much media, it would seem that the effect of an ad in any one spot would be horribly weakened. Advertising rates would have to go down to permit an ad to be placed on enough outlets to ensure it was seen.

    Media saturation = dilution of any one ad on any one media source/entity = declining ad revenues for that particular media source/entity.

  65. Alec Leamas says:

    “Obama’s stimulus plasn”

    If you meant “Obama’s Stimulus Plasm” methinks you took a stroke of genius.

  66. mojo says:

    “Cult site”?

    Does that mean we get to, like, sacrifice goats or something?

  67. dicentra says:

    Does that mean we get to, like, sacrifice goats or something?

    It means we have to post a video swearing our loyalty and first-borns to Jeff.

    Hey, as long as I don’t have to be Demi Moore. Or her boy-toy.

  68. Joe says:

    Me, I openly declared my distaste for John McCain on NPR. Which makes me something of a wild card. And PJM is doing away with that kind of thing in order to better control its message — and more importantly, the tone of that message.

    Regards,
    Jeff Goldstein

    No problem saying you have problems with McCain, conservatives are good with that. But going on NPR? Hell, you are not even supposed to know where NPR is on your car radio. This is highly suspect! Pretty soon we are going to find out you gave a $100 pledge to get a copy of the CD Terry Gross’ Best Interviews Evah.

  69. Pablo says:

    Does that mean we get to, like, sacrifice goats or something?

    It better not be castration and black Nikes.

  70. McGehee says:

    The only comet I’m hitching a ride on was made by Mercury back in the ’60s.

  71. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Yes, put me down on the no-cutting-important-stuff-off side.

    If we’re going to be in a cult, I want it to be the kind where you get to have lots of filthy cult sex.

Comments are closed.