Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Hillary’s lawyers note systemic corruption and voter fraud in Nevada

But then, Hillary’s a bitch — so who even cares what her people “allege”. We have an historical imperative that needs to be followed. And by God, we will follow it.

Marx my words, Comrades: YES WE CAN!

Jill Derby, Chair
Nevada State Democratic Party
12 10 South Valley View Road
Suite 1 14
Las Vegas, NV 89 102

Dear Chair Derby:

I write on behalf of Hillary Clinton for President ("the Committee") in regard to the January 19, 2008 Nevada Democratic Caucus. The Committee is aware of a letter addressed, to you today from the Obama for America campaign requesting an inquiry into the conduct of the caucuses. The Committee shares the Obama campaign's concern that full participation in the democratic process may have been compromised by the substantial number of irregularities occurring at the caucuses, and we fully support a complete inquiry by the Nevada State Democratic Party (the "Party") into all caucus improprieties.

This letter is not intended as a response to the Obama campaign's letter. However, in the interest of a complete record, and in contrast to the alleged minor procedural problems noted by the Obama campaign, the Committee wishes to bring to your attention information we have received evidencing a premeditated and predesigned plan by the Obama campaign to engage in systematic corruption of the Party's caucus procedures. Compounding this blatant distortion of the caucus rules was an egregious effort by the Obama campaign to manipulate the voter registration process in its own favor, thereby disenfranchising countless voters.

Finally, the Committee has received a vast number of reliable reports of voter suppression and intimidation by the Obama campaign or its allies.

The Committee had 30 phone lines on Saturday to receive calls in its Las Vegas offices. These lines rang continuously from early morning until well after the caucuses concluded with reports from people who were victimized and who observed irregularities.

The phone lines were so overwhelmed that many callers resorted to calling individual Committee staff cell phones to report that they could not get through. The Committee also received many similar calls at its national headquarters.

The Committee is confident that any investigation into the conduct of the caucuses will be thorough, fair and in the interest of insuring that future Party caucuses will be as open and democratic as possible.

Systematic Corruption of the Party's Caucus Procedures

The Committee received substantially similar reports of improprieties of such a number as to leave no conclusion but that the Obama campaign and its allies and supporters engaged in a planned effort to subvert the Party's caucus procedures to its advantage. For example:

Preference cards were premarked for Obama.

Clinton supporters were denied preference cards on the basis that none were left, while Obama supporters at the same caucus sites were given preference cards.

Caucus chairs obviously supporting Obama:

o Deliberately miscounted votes to favor Senator Obama.

o Deliberately counted unregistered persons as Obama votes.

o Deliberately counted young children as Obama votes.

o Refused to accept preference cards from Clinton supporters who were at the caucus site by noon on the ground that the cards were not filled out fast enough.

o Told Clinton supporters to leave prior to electing delegates.

Clinton supporters who arrived late were turned away from the caucus, while late Obama supporters were admitted to the caucus.

Manipulation of the Voter Registration Process

Numerous reports received by the Committee demonstrate a concerted effort on the part of the Obama campaign and its supporters to prevent eligible voters supporting a candidate other than Senator Obama from caucusing. The Obarna supporters complained of were acting in positions of authority at the caucus sites. Some of these reports are as follows:

Obama supporters wrongly informed Clinton supporters that they were not allowed to participate in the caucus if their names were not on the voter rolls. However, Obama supporters whose names did not appear on the voter rolls were permitted to register at the caucus site.

Obama supporters falsely informed Clinton supporters that no registration forms were available for them to register to vote at the caucus site.

Obama supporters wrongly told Clinton supporters who were attempting to caucus at the wrong precinct that they could not caucus at that site, while simultaneously permitting Obama supporters at the wrong precinct to participate.

Obama supporters were allowed to move to the front of the registration and sign-in line.

Voter Suppression and Intimidation

The Committee received a substantial number of disturbing reports from voters that they had been subject to harassment, intimidation or efforts to prevent them from voting.

Some of the most egregious of these complaints are described below:

Voters at at-large caucus sites were informed that those sites were for Obama supporters only.

Clinton supporters at at-large caucus sites were told that their managers would be watching them while they caucused.

Workers were informed that their supervisors kept lists of Clinton and Obama supporters, and were told that they could not caucus unless their name was on the list of Obama supporters.

Many Clinton supporters were threatened with employment termination or other discipline if they caucused for Senator Clinton.

Workers were required to sign a pledge card to support Obama if they wanted time off to participate in the caucus.

Workers at one casino were offered a lavish lunch and permitted to attend and register to vote only if they agree to support Obama.

The complaints summarized above represent only a small sample of the complaints received by the Committee. With respect to each of these complaints and many more, the Committee has the names and phone numbers of those reporting these incidents and the specific precinct numbers where the incidents occurred. Upon request the Committee will share these with the Party with appropriate safeguards to protect these individuals from reprisal. On the whole, these reports show a troubling effort by the Obama campaign and its allies and supporters to advance their own campaign at the expense of the right of all Nevada Democrats to participate in the democratic process in a free, fair and open manner.

Senator Clinton and the Committee are wholly committed to ensuring that every eligible voter has his or her vote cast and counted. There is no place in the American electoral process for the types of voter suppression, intimidation and harassment systematically engaged in by the Obama campaign, its allies and supporters.

Sincerely,
Lyn Utrecht
Counsel
Hillary Clinton for President

****
Wow. If Obamalot is willing to go to these lengths to disenfranchise those in his own party, imagine what he’ll do — with the help of a press who so far doesn’t anticipate evidence of voter fraud arising from evidence of voter registration fraud — to those with whom it is his duty to remove, like a noxious cancer, from the body politic.

For the greater good. For freedom. For progress.

(h/t Spies, via the Pub)

****
related: O’s fundraising fraud.

— Which, like voter fraud, should be ignored. Otherwise you are racist. And a sore loser.

131 Replies to “Hillary’s lawyers note systemic corruption and voter fraud in Nevada”

  1. Puck says:

    This.

    Is.

    Terrifying.

  2. Sticky B says:

    There was a comment over at Ace’s the other day to the effect that if The One wins this election, that this will be the last fair election in our lifetime. That commenter may have been a little on the optimistic side. By about 4 years.

    One thing we’ve learned from third world countries over the years though is that people will be heard. If not at the ballot box, then by other means. But they will be heard. Hope it doesn’t come to that.

  3. JD says:

    This is exactly what we should expect. Bend over, folks …

  4. HeatherRadish says:

    When was this letter sent?

  5. Slartibartfast says:

    I am not terrified by this, quite. But it’s interesting, isn’t it?

    Terrifying I reserve for multimegaton nickel-iron asteroids threatening to punch a hole off the east coast of Florida, and similar act-of-God kind of things.

  6. Bob Reed says:

    But Jeff,
    Transparency! Fairness! Ethics! Honesty! A Uninter!

    O!

    Just wait and see how quickly the O!, civil defense force becomes a force of Commisars and their Brownshirt enforcers, filled with Nation of Islam types. Ready to act on a moments notice should they be informed of any dissent by, you know, the local busybodies recruited to keep an eye on things; to make sure that things are progressing as they should. Ready to get in our face!

    And the bonus is, of they pay thise folks say, 50K/year, then both spouses can be employed by, and in the name of, O!; that way they won’t have to enter the soak me tax brackets…

    Because only the rich should pay…In the name of fairness

    Forget that Ireland has enjoyed an employment and revenue boom since reducing their business tax rate to 11%; under O! the gub-mint can employ us all! And incarcerate the naysayers that won’t get with the program…

    Now that’s change we can believe in…And we better, or else!

  7. gregorbo says:

    The letter was sent January 23, 2008 (via Instapundit):

    http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=1253

  8. Jeff G. says:

    HeatherRadish —

    January of this year.

  9. Jeff G. says:

    Oops. Beaten to it. Link to original pdf available here.

  10. Rich Cox says:

    Actually, it sounds like a dry run for both sides. No one told the complainers that it was not the general election yet though. They just did what they were told to say, and expected to be on TV.

  11. geoffb (JARAIP) says:

    Welcome to the “card check” election process. Coming soon to a workplace near you.

  12. This election really isn’t about McCain v Obama, it’s about sane Americans v the legacy media. They’re dying but have a few more tricks in their bag: will they pull off this election? Obama might save them from themselves, the Democrats can save their fading business, perhaps, with a few properly worded bills and legislation to silence their competition.

  13. urthshu says:

    Police say Ashley Todd faked it.
    /in the interest of fairness

  14. HeatherRadish says:

    January. Thanks.

    Wish they would have made a bigger noise sooner…

  15. Jeffersonian says:

    We’re all Chicagoans now.

  16. steveaz says:

    If our daily tastes in food indicate our affinity for “bits” at the political buffet, I’m sampling a delectable appetizer made simply from aged white sharp cheddar cheese, raw garlic-sliced thinly, and sea-salt. A glass of cheap cab-sauv waits in the wings.

    And it’s absolute nirvana on the taste buds.

    And I feel sorry for the arugula obligates in our big cities. Don’t they know that, for pennies on the dime, they, too, could eat like kings!

    BTW: Obama is a bag of Dorritos and a can of diet Coke. According to the latest stats, America’s affinity for junk food is at “epidemic” levels. We need to look at that!

  17. We’re all Chicagoans now

    If Chicago voters knew about this, they’d roll over in their graves.

  18. JHoward says:

    Like I said, Jeff, there’s something different about the One. This isn’t just an ambitious candidate. This is a coordinated movement to finally push through globalism.

    Good thing they can’t possibly reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine.

  19. JHoward says:

    Or reinstate, whatever. Probably the shitty grammar is first to go.

    FOR THE CHILDREN!

  20. Police say Ashley Todd faked it.

    No, they say her story doesn’t hold up – they aren’t saying she never got mugged or hurt, just that the tale she told of it is untrustworthy. Maybe she fell down stairs, maybe she was beat up by a boyfriend, who knows.

  21. Aldo says:

    From Jeff’s Pajamas Media link:

    Make no mistake, the Democratic nominee may now be running the biggest underground finance operation since President Nixon deployed the “plumbers” as his key operatives for CREEP in 1972.

    Change you can believe in.

  22. urthshu says:

    Chris – I’m just glad it wasn’t true, as far as that goes. But if she lied she should be punished for that

  23. Aldo says:

    Great summation from John Hinderaker at Powerline:

    Everyone knows that Barack Obama has created the biggest money-machine of any politician in American history. But it is becoming increasingly evident that Obama’s money-machine is largely fraudulent and therefore criminal. One can imagine a world in which newspaper reporters think it’s a serious matter when a Presidential candidate tries to buy an election with illegal and fraudulent contributions. That, of course, is not the world that we live in. Have you seen Sarah Palin’s shoes?

  24. EW says:

    i agree, this is exactly what we should expect! Why would you think anything else when the liberal illuminati are involved! The only surpassing thing is that Hillary’s people actually said anything.

  25. steveaz says:

    If this is a hoax, we need to get to the bottom of it.

    I’ll bet there’s an Bilal Hussein, or a Dana Milbank, attached to it. They have a lot to gain if they can ‘find’ a Republican stand-in for Tawana Brawley.

    Watch for it, to make it work they’ll need to paint McCain’s “campaign” as Al Sharpton! This could be fun.

  26. urthshu says:

    >>This isn’t just an ambitious candidate. This is a coordinated movement to finally push through globalism.

    Maybe not globalism. Check out the study guide at the end, too.

  27. urthshu says:

    oh oops. covered sort of before – but thats the whole thing, not just the clip

  28. Smedley says:

    Here you go:

    Race-Based Targeting

    Here are a few examples of recent incidents in which groups of voters have been singled out on the basis of race.

    * Most recently, controversy has erupted over the use in the Orlando area of armed, plainclothes officers from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) to question elderly black voters in their homes. The incidents were part of a state investigation of voting irregularities in the city’s March 2003 mayoral election. Critics have charged that the tactics used by the FDLE have intimidated black voters, which could suppress their turnout in this year’s elections. Six members of Congress recently called on Attorney General John Ashcroft to investigate potential civil rights violations in the matter.
    * This year in Florida, the state ordered the implementation of a ‘potential felon’ purge list to remove voters from the rolls, in a disturbing echo of the infamous 2000 purge, which removed thousands of eligible voters, primarily African-Americans, from the rolls. The state abandoned the plan after news media investigations revealed that the 2004 list also included thousands of people who were eligible to vote, and heavily targeted African-Americans while virtually ignoring Hispanic voters.
    * This summer, Michigan state Rep. John Pappageorge (R- Troy) was quoted in the Detroit Free Press as saying, ‘If we do not suppress the Detroit vote, we’re going to have a tough time in this election.’ African Americans comprise 83% of Detroit’s population.
    * In South Dakota’s June 2004 primary, Native American voters were prevented from voting after they were challenged to provide photo IDs, which they were not required to present under state or federal law.
    * In Kentucky in July 2004, Black Republican officials joined to ask their State GOP party chairman to renounce plans to place ‘vote challengers’ in African-American precincts during the coming elections.
    * Earlier this year in Texas, a local district attorney claimed that students at a majority black college were not eligible to vote in the county where the school is located. It happened in Waller County – the same county where 26 years earlier, a federal court order was required to prevent discrimination against the students.
    * In 2003 in Philadelphia, voters in African American areas were systematically challenged by men carrying clipboards, driving a fleet of some 300 sedans with magnetic signs designed to look like law enforcement insignia.
    * In 2002 in Louisiana, flyers were distributed in African American communities telling voters they could go to the polls on Tuesday, December 10th – three days after a Senate runoff election was actually held.
    * In 1998 in South Carolina, a state representative mailed 3,000 brochures to African American neighborhoods, claiming that law enforcement agents would be ‘working’ the election, and warning voters that ‘this election is not worth going to jail.’

    http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/Jim-Crow-Intimidation26aug04.htm

    Spare me the fake outrage.

  29. Jim in KC says:

    …controversy has erupted over the use in the Orlando area of armed, plainclothes officers from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE)…

    WTF? “Law Enforcement Officers” are pretty much always armed when working.

  30. urthshu says:

    um. this ‘fake outrage’ is coming from the Hillary camp. Dems.

  31. Obstreperous Infidel says:

    Smedley, huh? Sounds like an idiot.

  32. happyfeet says:

    Democrats are so sleazy with their election stealing.

  33. SDN says:

    So, Smegma, in that list of accusations, anything involving, you know, actual proof? And links to Daily Kos or the Southern Poverty Law Center don’t count.

  34. Smedley says:

    Um, the fake outrage is being spread now by the nut right, since Obama has replaced Hillary as the hated one.

  35. Smedley says:

    Did you ask that question of, um, the letter re-printed in this post, STD? If not, why not?

  36. urthshu says:

    Really? It looked like a legal document from a Hillary for President councilor to me.

    You just don’t want anybody to report it, is that it?

  37. Dash Rendar says:

    Fake outrage. Fake ACORN. Fake Tree. Mickey Mouse. Nothing to see here, move along.

  38. RIP Ford says:

    Is that the best list you got Smedley? ‘Cause it’s pretty laughable.

  39. Dash Rendar says:

    In 2002 in Louisiana, flyers were distributed in African American communities telling voters they could go to the polls on Tuesday, December 10th – three days after a Senate runoff election was actually held.”
    – distributed by whom?

    In 1998 in South Carolina, a state representative mailed 3,000 brochures to African American neighborhoods, claiming that law enforcement agents would be ‘working’ the election, and warning voters that ‘this election is not worth going to jail.’
    – “a state representative,” name? party?

    Earlier this year in Texas, a local district attorney claimed that students at a majority black college were not eligible to vote in the county where the school is located. It happened in Waller County
    – Out of state students typically aren’t. Not enough context or information about the composition of student body.

    This summer, Michigan state Rep. John Pappageorge (R- Troy) was quoted in the Detroit Free Press as saying, ‘If we do not suppress the Detroit vote, we’re going to have a tough time in this election.’
    – Well where’s the evidence of fraud? This quote is perfectly reasonable in the sense that “if we don’t get more votes than the other side, we’ll lose.”

    Jesus fucking Christ this list is week. Expect it from a lefty.

    ACORN on the other hand…

  40. Smedley says:

    Actually, it’s just a letter, urthsu. This is old news to anyone who followed the primary. But it’s good to see you guys coming to the defense of HITLERY!!!11! albeit a bit too late.

  41. urthshu says:

    It is laughable, isn’t it?

    Good to know that reporting this letter bothers the faithful, though. Sunshine, disinfectant, etc.

  42. Dash Rendar says:

    I think its a troll variant of the ST model.

  43. urthshu says:

    oh no, smedley. many of us were actually voting for her in the primaries.
    What do you think about the fundraising fraud? Or the “We will not be silenced” documentary?

    NB, I’m not mocking you. I’m asking.

  44. Smedley says:

    Yeah, “suppress the vote” totally means the same thing as “win the election”. You’re a genius. Where was all this skepticism about Saint Hillary’s allegations? So strange. It’s almost as if you care more about whose ox is being gored than the integrity of elections.

  45. Dash Rendar says:

    Whereas thor is one of those t-9000 liquid metal terminator trolls that never stops coming back.

  46. Obstreperous Infidel says:

    “the nut right”? I was right. It is an idiot.

  47. Dash Rendar says:

    Well provide the proof moron. As it stands, your list lacks the requisite context and information. Who was disenfranchised in Detroit?

  48. Dash Rendar says:

    “It’s almost as if you care more about whose ox is being gored than the integrity of elections.”

    O. The irony is strong with this one. I suspect it cares not a fig about ACORN. I’m kind of interested in the rationalizations it will provide.

  49. urthshu says:

    You don’t even know about the “We will not be silenced” documentary, do you?

  50. The plumbers were different than CREEP. Liddy, I think, was both but not at the same time. Have to look it up. That’s been bugging me since I saw the blurb on IP.

  51. Dash Rendar says:

    I find it curious that the troll’s moral vanity precludes it from providing any (R) offenses from this presidential cycle yet thinks it’s nebulous list somehow blunts ACORN and Baracky’s mucho illegal monies.

  52. And “suppress the vote” = “playing defense”. Big city demos want to keep older suburban voters home and their opposite number want to keep the inner city vote low. Both sides pray for rain, rent vans and brew lots of coffee. If they can make voting distasteful for the other side, they effectively “suppress the vote”.

    So don’t be a dumbass…that kind of “fancy talking” to prove points doesn’t work around here.

  53. Bob Reed says:

    Smedley,
    How come you guys on the fringe always have to make it personal, and cast aspersions and all instead of talk about the issues? I’m jus’ sayin’…

    And HITLERY!!!11! What is up with that? I thought us eeeeeevil RethugliKKKans held a franchise on being Nazi-fied by the nutroots…You know, like Chimpy BusHitlerBurton McSame, or sumpin’ like that; it’s like speakin’ in tongues to me…

    I think you ned to re-check your O! talking points again, maybe they’re up on the website if you’ve already deleted the e-mail. I’m sure if you cut and paste the ones the professionals write they’ll make much more sense than the ones you shoot from the hip…

    Maybe you need a nap, or somethin’
    Or maybe stop smokin that Kay-Bizzle,
    Hope you feel better

  54. Rich Cox says:

    #53 Thus too, the 25 Milwaukee GOP vans with slashed tires in 2004

  55. urthshu says:

    OK g2g and pay $ to the hollywood cottage industry. Those poor, oppressed union movie guys need my solidarity, you know.

  56. happyfeet says:

    jeez this day is never going to be over is it god shoot me and carve a B on my face I don’t care if I can start my weekend already

  57. Rich Cox says:

    B is for beer. Lets the barkeep know your poison when you are passed out on the floor.

    Always prepared that happyfeet is.

  58. happyfeet says:

    47 minutes or so left. I thought b was for bored out of my freaking skull. I guess there’s no real news allowed today cause Baracky is out of pocket.

  59. Dash Rendar says:

    T minus 75 minutes till drunkification.

  60. happyfeet says:

    here’s one of those ok I don;t get that things…

    Jim Willse, the Star-Ledger’s editor, said Friday that the newspaper accepted 151 buyout offers from its news staff, or about 45 percent of its 334 editorial employees. He said 17 buyout applications were rejected.*

    How does that work that you get your buyout offer rejected? Is it a good thing where they like love you too much to let you go or a bad thing where they’re like no you don’t get a buyout you loser if you don’t like it here you can quit? I’ve never encountered that before.

  61. happyfeet says:

    that damn semicolon is doing that thing again

  62. Dash Rendar says:

    Star-Ledger is such garbage except for local sports. Other day they had a cover article called something like “Bush echoes Marx” all about the bailout nary a mention a Baracky.

  63. Rich Cox says:

    Yes… but only part of the time.

    I would guess it was from employees who did not meet the minimums for buyout… time served etc. but O! will fix that. BUYOUTS FOR ALL!

  64. dre says:

    O!/IRS tribunal:

    A church-state watchdog group has asked the Internal Revenue Service to investigate whether the Roman Catholic bishop of Paterson, N.J., violated tax laws by denouncing Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama.

    In a letter sent to the IRS on Wednesday (Oct. 22), Americans United for Separation of Church and State accused Paterson Bishop Arthur Serratelli of illegal partisanship for lambasting Obama’s support of abortion rights.

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2008-10-22-irs-catholic-obama_N.htm

  65. Dash Rendar says:

    Was TUCC tax exempt? Yea, I know. Probing them would be racist.

  66. Spare me the fake outrage.

    You, sir, spare us.

  67. guinsPen says:

    334 editorial employees

    And that’s the Newark Star-Ledger.

    Anyone have a guess as to how many EEs there are at Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun-Times combined?

    Because every, and I do mean every, railroad article they publish has stunningly obvious mistakes.

    So, I need to know how many stamps to buy.

  68. Rich Cox says:

    @68 I have said here before, you really never know how much the media gets wrong until they try to cover an event or subject that your are fully knowledgeable. The Master of None.

  69. guinsPen says:

    My favorite is the Chicago Tribune Sunday Magazine cover that used an obviously British steam locomotive to illustate a story about (European orphans) arriving by ship in NYC, then being sent to the Mid-west via rail (c. back in the day).

  70. Jeffersonian says:

    here

    That’s some scary shit, urthshu. Obama’s America is already looking like Zimbabwe.

  71. Carin says:

    Happy, didn’t you get rid of your semicolon?

  72. N. O'Brain says:

    I had semicolon one time.

    The doctor gave me some pills.

  73. cynn says:

    Unless I missed something, Smedley did not make it personal; merely asking how supressing the vote equates to winning an election is a valid question. And that applies to either side. I have some serious issues with the way the Obama campaign has behaved.

  74. JD says:

    Smedley did not make it personal;

    You are correct. It just lied.

  75. Makewi says:

    Smedley tried to imply that the readers here had no right to be offended because other bad crap happened (supposedly, and supposedly in our names being the typical repug mouth breathers hearabouts).

    In any case, his comments weren’t really meant for the readers here as much as they were meant to soothe his conscience that this kind of crap is being carried out by “his side”. Call it comment Ambien.

  76. cynn says:

    You mean “I” just lied.

  77. Sean M. says:

    Obama’s America is already looking like Zimbabwe.

    DENOUNCED!!!

  78. cynn says:

    Thank you, Makewi, for your position’s usual facility for speaking for others.

  79. cynn says:

    Yes, Obama will be an evil dictator who will singlehandedly transform all private interests into governmental/coporate hybrids. He will also tax what meager money you have left into oblivion. Black holes are black for a reason.

  80. Makewi says:

    You are most welcome cynn. Later, when the lights are low and we’ve had a few glasses of Cabernet, or perhaps some X, you can explain to me in soothing and sexy tones what exactly my position is.

    Later, over breakfast we can discuss the ins and outs of dismissing specific acts because the world just happens to be full of bad acts.

  81. cynn says:

    Makewi: Sorry, not grasping your point. Are you African perchance?

  82. Jeff G. says:

    Yes, Obama will be an evil dictator who will singlehandedly transform all private interests into governmental/coporate hybrids.

    I think Ayers and co. will be eager to help. O! doesn’t go it alO!ne!

  83. urthshu says:

    African? No no, he’s from Fairport.

  84. Pellegri says:

    I’m just sort of puzzled why off-topic points need to be entertained as valid in a discussion about a specific campaign’s behaviors.

    Is it an attempt at moral equivalency? A tu quoque for Obama’s side? I don’t think any of us around here are behind ANYONE being disenfranchised or barred from voting; but at the moment (I notice Smedley’s list of Outrage Points(tm) cut off at 2004) we’re concerned with the election at hand, not the fact there’s a lot of tomfoolery going on overall.

    I hope that made some kind of sense. Probably not.

  85. Merovign says:

    Cynn: Okay, your correction stands. You just lied.

    Pelligri: Don’t worry, you make more sense than Smeddles.

    Smeddles: King handle golf sand echo want you to puddle jack money vent.

  86. Pablo says:

    Note that Ayers, for the first time in an awfully long time, passed up an opportunity to run his mouth into a live mike. Of course, the Fox News on the side of it probably had something to do with it, but I can’t help thinking that he’s keeping his powder dry.

    You’ll have to wait for the boom.

  87. McGehee says:

    Will it be an earth-shattering kaboom?

  88. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Note that Ayers, for the first time in an awfully long time, passed up an opportunity to run his mouth into a live mike.

    On YouTube now.

    Most amusing parts:

    1) Ayers tells the Fox reporter “You’re on my property.” I thought you didn’t believe in property, Bill?

    2) Ayers calls the cops for an escort when he decides to leave the house.

  89. Pellegri says:

    1) Ayers tells the Fox reporter “You’re on my property.” I thought you didn’t believe in property, Bill?

    That’s something I’ve found very funny about most people who claim to be anarchists or write about the glories of anarchy (insert communism or socialism as fits here)–when they’re confronted with living their principles, they really don’t WANT to leave behind the cozy, safe nest that their “corrupt” overlords have created for them.

  90. thor says:

    William Ayers has more class than Fox News, shocka!

  91. Pellegri says:

    Obligatory thor smily: :U

  92. SevenEleventy says:

    thor talking about class makes as much sense as Rosie O’Donnell talking about dick.

  93. Pablo says:

    Someone needs to discuss that Kill Your Parents thing with the Ayers children.

  94. alppuccino says:

    You mean the Mark McKinnon who calls himself a campaigner but resigned like a pussy because he wouldn’t attack Obama? That Mark McKinnon? He sounds like a real doozy. What a gaylord. Way to perpetuate the idea that you can’t vet a presidential candidate when he’s black.

    And he sounds fully gruntled too. What a fag.

  95. Joe The Butt Plumber says:

    Alp, please wash that backwards letter B off your face. I don’t care what JD told you, it won’t make you more attractive to 6-foot-4 black men.

  96. Carin says:

    Been up all night drinking, Cleo?

  97. alppuccino says:

    Your new name fits you leo.

  98. alppuccino says:

    And a 6’4″ black man would be shorter than me leo. Should I fear him because he’s black though? What are you saying?

  99. Carin says:

    The funny thing (as mentioned earlier in another thread) is that McCain foolishly ran the campaign everyone claimed they wanted. Obama said he was running such a campaign but didn’t. People are still pretending the O! isn’t attacking McCain while every day I hear such ads.

  100. Joe The Butt Plumber says:

    Carin, please scratch a backwards letter B on your chubby face. After all, what if JD is right.

  101. alppuccino says:

    Keep using the “backwards B” line leo. It gets funnier every time. Or stick to what you know best: nothing.

  102. Joe The Butt Plumber says:

    If he can hit an 18-foot jump shot, yes, he’s gonna slide past you and do a George Gervin finger roll on your ass if you bite on his ball fake.

  103. Carin says:

    Chubby? Please, I’ll give you two hours in the gym and see who is crying first.

  104. Joe The Butt Plumber says:

    Obama says you have to find an undecided voter and get all up in their face.

  105. SevenEleventy says:

    Maybe Joe the Butt Plumber can give you an estimate for your butt plumbing problem, semenlips!

  106. Ashley says:

    I have a great idea. I’ll hit you in the face and we’ll say a big Obama-lovin’ negro did it!

  107. JHoward says:

    Kind of a microcosm of PW>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    Well, to make your point, actually pw would be a “microcosm” of that but then you’re an idiot and all.

  108. SevenEleventy says:

    I have a great idea. I’ll hit you in the face and we’ll say a big Obama-lovin’ negro did it!

    Too Robert Byrd-like!

    How about you hit(since you seem prone to violence) Barney Frank on the ass, and say a Fannie Mae executive…oh wait…nevermind.

  109. JHoward says:

    William Ayers has more class than Fox News, shocka!

    True. I mean, up to the point FOX dedicates a revolutionary manifesto composed under the influence of mind altering substances and a really whacked rearing to Bobby Kennedy’s assassin.

    Identify much, thor? HELLO! Oops: that slipped.

    By the way, you missed the middle initial. Stuff always sounds better with the middle initial. Like William Q. Ayers III and shit like that. And add a preface: Mister William X. Ayers III.

    And then there’s the obligatory titling: Mister William Q. Ayers III, veteran advocate for the disenfranchised. Or Mister William Q. Ayers III, anti-authoritarian instantaneous property reductionist and reallocation specialist.

    Or how about this one: The Mister William Q. Ayers III, justifiably tense simultaneous human circulatory system rerouter and military dancehall remodelist?

  110. Rusty says:

    #91
    Comment by thor on 10/25 @ 2:09 am #

    William Ayers has more class than Fox News, shocka!

    Reveals a lot about your charachter as well. No wonder you walk around with that parrot on your shoulder.

  111. alppuccino says:

    JBP;

    Try not to be so clever. They think yer me…………the nuance of style confuses the simple-minded.

    It’s just that I didn’t think thor would dumb it down that much. Whereas you leo, are already there.

  112. alppuccino says:

    Nuh uh!

    Uh huh!

    Nuh uh!

  113. Slartibartfast says:

    If Obama does it, it’s Big Shoulders politics, within the letter of the law. Speaks well of his ability to maneuver with the big boys. If the Secretary of State of Florida does it, though, it’s the Republican Party bending the law to their insidious end of disenfranchising voters.

    So: IOKIYAD.

  114. Slartibartfast says:

    William Ayers has more class than Fox News, shocka!

    I heard that Joseph Stalin could be quite gracious, when he wasn’t busy slaughtering his opponents.

  115. Rusty says:

    #114

    The idea is to parry a jab. Not lean into a right cross.

  116. SevenEleventy says:

    The idea is to parry a jab. Not lean into a right cross.

    Semanticleo is the <Chuck Wepner of PW commentors!

  117. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    More like the Kimbo Slice of Protein Wisdom commentors, I’d say.

    Thor is the Danny Devito of Protein Wisdom commentors.

  118. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    I take that back.

    Thor is the Amanda McKittrick Ros of Protein Wisdom commentors.

  119. N. O'Brain says:

    “Comment by Smedley on 10/24 @ 3:47 pm #

    Um, the fake outrage is being spread now by the nut right, since Obama has replaced Hillary as the hated one.”

    I don’t hate O!bama.

    He mearly scares the ever lovin’ crap out of me, seeing as how a carefully disguised Marxist ideolouge could be elected President.

  120. N. O'Brain says:

    “Comment by thor on 10/25 @ 2:09 am #

    William Ayers has more class than Fox News, shocka!”

    You’re a regular black hole of stupidity, thaw.

  121. N. O'Brain says:

    Comment by Semanticleo on 10/25 @ 8:15 am #

    Spikka di Inglese?

  122. Carin says:

    Fox news really should be more respectful of a man who contemplated the elimination of 25-million American unreformable capitalists.

  123. Pablo says:

    I’ll have to give you that, but that’s seems to be all you’ve got.

    With you as target, ‘cleo, that’s all he needs. Anything more would be overkill.

  124. guinsPen says:

    Blame game: GOP forms circular firing squad
    By Jonathan Martin & Mike Allen & John F. Harris

    Was Allen the Politico who Dennis Miller made cry last (Monday)?

    The Politico started the answer to Miller’s query about Democrat strategy with “We…”. Miller jokingly pointed it out to him. The Politico bawled like Obama. Miller cut the interview short.

  125. B Moe says:

    Most recently, controversy has erupted over the use in the Orlando area of armed, plainclothes officers from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) to question elderly black voters in their homes. The incidents were part of a state investigation of voting irregularities in the city’s March 2003 mayoral election.

    Investigating voter irregularities is controversial to Smedley and his friends. That tells me all I need to know.

  126. guinsPen says:

    …the Amanda McKittrick Ros of Protein Wisdom commentors.

    Her novel Delina Delaney begins:

    Have you ever visited that portion of Erin’s plot that offers its sympathetic soil for the minute survey and scrutinous examination of those in political power, whose decision has wisely been the means before now of converting the stern and prejudiced, and reaching the hand of slight aid to share its strength in augmenting its agricultural richness?

    Page comments: “I first read this sentence nearly three years ago. Since then, I have read it once a week in an increasingly desperate search for meaning. But I still don’t understand it.”

    Toss in some gratuitous profanity and she’s a 100% match.

  127. Ward Heeler says:

    She stole most of that from my stump speech.

    Bitch owes me $750.

  128. JHoward says:

    I’ll have to give you that, but that’s seems to be all you’ve got.

    It is if you ignore all the rest, but I repeat myself. Taking you apart to the last molecule is by now customary.

    I.e., it’s pointless.

    You write entire encyclopedias of fraud and prance about with your pants around your ankles. I admit fault at the drop of a fact. I wonder which of our philosophies holds more water.

    And why.

  129. […] MARX MY WORDS, Comrades: YES WE CAN! …. […]

Comments are closed.