Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Is the media in the tank… for McCain? [Karl]

Allahpundit finds the latest effort from Media Matters to convince people that the establishment media is biased in favor of John McCain over Barack Obama to be “[s]o unspeakably lame is this that I can’t even work up a good head of schadenfreude over it.”

But let us speak of it for a moment.  Allah does not mention it, but folks on the Left are citing the latest content analysis from the supposedly conservative Center for Media and Public Affairs as the smoking gun that the media thrill has gone from Obama to McCain.  However, the latest content analysis from MediaTenor (which runs on the leftist MediaChannel.org) shows that Obama maintained better coverage, though the gap narrowed.  From the full, downloadable report:

media tenor analysis thru 7/17

As the reduction makes the dates tough to read, the post-primary coverage is shown in the last six weeks for each candidate.  By this accounting, Obama has generally received more favorable coverage than McCain.  Even in the last week studied, where Obama got net negative coverage, McCain got more coverage and more negative coverage.

Moreover, neither content analysis reflects the full coverage of Obama’s World Tour, which appeared to give him at least a temporary bounce in the polls, which suggests generally positive coverage.

In sum, Media Matters has the CMPA data to back its claim, but the picture is a mite more complex than that.  Plus, as Allah notes, however a content analyst wants to mark statements in a story, polls show that people see the media as favoring Obama.

Bonus: Jim Treacher checks in at HotAir.

18 Replies to “Is the media in the tank… for McCain? [Karl]”

  1. TheGeezer says:

    “the media thrill has gone…to McCain.”

    Pardon me, I have to go outside and somehow void the dissonance….

  2. MayBee says:

    Oh my. The earthquakes have followed me here.

  3. JD says:

    I heard there may have been an earthquake in LA. If so, I hope happyfeet, Darleen, MayBee, etal are alright.

  4. afall says:

    Sausage fest!

  5. Karl says:

    Yep, they’re reporting the quake now. Best wishes to all. There’s a comment from hf on it nearby, so I am guessing he is not trapped someplace.

  6. Ric Locke says:

    USGS sez 5.8 on the Richter scale. CalTech’s “shake map” says most of the LA basin is in Region IV, severe shaking but little damage given modern building standards.

    Regards,
    Ric

  7. BJTex says:

    I agree with the guy in the hotair comments just below Treacher: If this is what Soros money is paying for, he needs to go kick some ass. That was a laughable, childish, amateurish effort that Jib-Jab would have spit on.

    Keep it up, fools!

  8. Roy Lofquist says:

    The idea that you can distinguish between favorable and unfavorable coverage in any kind of definitive way seems to me to be a bit of a chimera. e.g.,

    “Fred Hickenlooper was the run away winner in the prestigious annual rat shoot contest at the Shady Nook landfill.”

    Reads different for PETA, NRA and folks who insist no matter what you call it is still the town dump.

  9. mojo says:

    7.7 miles directly beneath the Western Hills Country Club.

  10. Mikey NTH says:

    #4 – PTW.

    The long primary is the greatest danger to a candidate running on hype and build up. At sometime the magician better pull a rabbit out of his hat or the crowd is going to turn ugly awfully fast; or the summer block-buster movie better be real good or make its costs-plus in the first weekend.

    The public is too media saturated to stand for too long a build-up. (Seriously – how many tune into the Superbowl for the game and how many tune for the party and the commercials?)

  11. Neo says:

    This is a week old but …

    The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey, taken just before the new controversy involving the New York Times erupted, found that 49% of voters believe most reporters will try to help the Democrat with their coverage, up from 44% a month ago. Just 14% believe most reporters will try to help McCain win, little changed from 13% a month ago.

  12. cybrludite says:

    Gotta love the folks who claim the media is right-wing because the evening news doesn’t start off with a chorus of “The Internationale”…

  13. B Moe says:

    Does the study differentiate between Official Authorized Obama News and unauthorized ambush?
    http://www.thelocal.de/13337/20080728/

    Barack Obama says he was “played” and “hustled” by German tabloid daily Bild after they published a rather embarrassing unauthorized article the day after his popular speech in Berlin last week.

    I can’t believe what this fucking clown is this close to the White House.

  14. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Barack Obama says he was “played” and “hustled” by German tabloid daily Bild

    So, let me get this straight: he admits getting “played” by a a crappy German tabloid, but wants us to believe he has the stones to “negotiate” with Dinnerjacket, Chavez, and Kim?

    Mmm-kay.

  15. Mikey NTH says:

    What SBP said.

    They didn’t worship? Well they shall be cast into the outer darkness/off the campaign plane.

  16. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Someone really needs to make a compilation vid of all of his “I was played”, “I used poor judgement”, “This is not the xxx I knew”, “I had no idea yyy was a freakin’ terrorist” bits and put it on YouTube.

  17. happyfeet says:

    Me I do not think the media is in the tank for McCain. NPR was slavering over his skin biopsy this morning like a dog with a new bone. Those people have no dignity I don’t think.

  18. Sdferr says:

    RTO did a nice mash-up of Obama saying “No. That’s not what I said.” to various interviewers, on his blog. It was very effective I thought.

Comments are closed.