6 Replies to “Peter Kirsanow Must Be Hamlet [Dan Collins]”

1. JD says:

   June 30, 2008 at 7:31 am

   It is not a baby until Baracky declares it to be one, Dan.

2. SevenEleventy says:

   June 30, 2008 at 7:43 am

   …babies who happen to survive an abortion attempt…

   They don’t vote!

   ☻ !

3. Big Bang Hunter (pumping you up) says:

   June 30, 2008 at 7:52 am

   “I would wager, however, that if more people knew about Obama’s disregard for babies who have the audacity to survive an abortion, there would be more scrutiny and less adulation.”

   – Indeed. Unfortunately theres no clear evidence that “Mr. Kindly McOldDuffer has the stones it will take to educate the electorate in the fall campaign.

4. B Moe says:

   June 30, 2008 at 8:33 am

   From a link in the comments over there
   http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_200104/ai_n8933816

   In the U.S. Congress, Rep. Steve Chabot (R.-Ohio) plans to reintroduce the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, which passed the House overwhelmingly last year but was ignored by the Senate. “I don’t expect a problem,” said Chabot when asked about his bill’s chances this year. “It’s incomprehensible to me that people try to justify opposition to such a commonsense bill.” The bill would simply define a person deserving of full legal protection as anyone born alive.

5. cranky-d says:

   June 30, 2008 at 12:10 pm

   When we get our government health care these babies will be left to die (like they are in other countries that have gov’t health care, they do not even count these as live births). The very old and the very young are a huge drain on the healthcare system.

6. Dan Collins says:

   June 30, 2008 at 12:11 pm

   Will Baracky’s lung cancer be covered?

Comments are closed.