Disgraced former Gov. Eliot Spitzer has been identified as a long-standing client of a second high-priced call-girl ring, according to the New York Post. Too bad he could not get the media to jump on the “everybody does it” bandwagon before the state jumped from the frying pan into another frying pan.
I am shocked.
the second image on the NY Post makes it queer that boobs or no that’s a man, man.
clear, rather
Your winnings, sir.
Exposing Spitzer might have thrown the NY economy into a tailspin. He seems to have pumped (pun intended) a lot of cash in through his slatterns.
The high price of the call girl certainly isn’t going to the looks of the call girl.
Enoch, that was one of the best slips of the tongue ever.
Paul Hogan comments: “It’s a SHEILA!”
And isn’t that Patterson’s cue to admit his hobby of murdering hobos on slow weekends?
Oh wow. I wonder how big her dick is.
I’m waiting for the puppies/gunny sack revelation, myself.
Or, heaven help us, mimes.
Enoch – Looking higher than the silicon silliness, I seem to recall seeing eyes like that on the other side of scrimmage. Tackle, maybe…
i’m telling you! just wait until ALL is revealed!
Tmj – That was the tight end you were looking at.
I haven’t followed all the ins and outs of this story (so to speak), but I remember glancing at an article in which it was asserted that exclusive escort services like these would be mobbed-up. Such speculation seems logical – how else could the service credibly pledge discretion to a high-profile clientele that was absurdly vulnerable to blackmail or to the bad publicity that would follow if their use of the service was known? That is, the service could certainly take a number of steps that would foster discretion, such as offering higher pay than competing services, and, perhaps, hiring women from middle class backgrounds who didn’t want anyone to know how they were making a living. The service might also use personality profiles to screen potential employees. Maybe a top-notch service would even attempt to assist in the career transitions of those employees leaving the profession (a time when they might be considering writing a tell all). But ultimately, it sure seems their best bet would be the occasional lecture in good whore ethic taught by Vincent (“Crazy Eyes”) Catalano and Joseph (“Joey the Ape”) Locasio – Vincent: “Hey Joey, whatever happened to Tiffany? You remember, the blonde with the big tits and the big mouth?” Joey: ” I dunno nutin bout dat.” Seems like Spitzer could be asked some very uncomfortable questions with regard to whether he ever considered the way his privacy was secured and whether, either as Governor or prosecutor, he was ever “encouraged” use his position to intervene on behalf of those who provided protection to the services he frequented. Has anyone seen any speculation that the investigation of Spitzer and this service will look in this direction?
J. Brenner – I suspect all this stuff was hashed out in whatever plea deal Spitzer negotiated the weekend prior to his resignation. As in this is what he will do or not do in exchange for leaving his role. Being the state AG, I suspect there were a lot of chits accumulated between his office and the Feds over the years and I suspect Elliot was cashing those in.
I speculate he may rollover on some mob guys the Feds really REALLY wanna pin.
OTT – I believe you are right. they’re gonna flip him like a pancake.
At least he kept his socks on, or… wait…
In certain parts of Europe if a man the stature of Spitzer’s doesn’t have a dozen pre-leased harlots on speed dial they’d question his motive for going into politics in the first place.
Free the Elliot!
Certainly. But we don’t live in the Balkans, or Greece. We live in a nation where prosecutors and governors are expected to live within the law, and soliciting a prostitute is illegal.
A willingness to accept corruption on the part of government officials is not a sign of sophistication, no matter how much the Democrats want to make it so.