It’s that much ballyhooed professional staff of reporters and editors that makes the MSM so much more reliable than blogs. The reporter won a Pulitzer a while back doncha know.
When I first heard about the “professional” media’s much-vaunted “layers of oversight,” I thought they meant layers in the organizational sense, e.g. supervisors, managers, directors, editors, etc.
It wasn’t until much later that I realized that the media’s “layers of oversight” actually refers to a bunch of ink-stained wretches whose job it is to say, “Oversight? Fuck it!”
– “clavicle journalism …that funny thing a reporters clavicle bones do when someone has the temerity to ask if the story has been sourced properly, and the reporter spreads his hands and says “Huh?”.
Why would the L.A. Times reporting be any more informed than they were in the
90s, when they bought Rick Ross’ story
of how the crack epidemic occurred, ignoring the role of “Toots” Reese. Which they had to retract after Webb used that lie to foist the CIA ‘Dark
Alliance’ conspiracy onto the Webb. I know it’s been 15 years, but they still
got it wrong.
When I first heard about the “professional†media’s much-vaunted “layers of oversight,†I thought they meant layers in the organizational sense, e.g. supervisors, managers, directors, editors, etc.
No, they meant “oversight” as in “that was overlooked”.
It’s that much ballyhooed professional staff of reporters and editors that makes the MSM so much more reliable than blogs. The reporter won a Pulitzer a while back doncha know.
I’m pretty sure mass-produced “Dad of the Year” awards hold more legitimacy than Pulitzers at this point.
– Maybe they should switch “clavicle journalism” over to a category in the Nobel prizes.
– You know, something like “Story most likely to blow up”.
I didn’t know Rather had switched jobs…
When you’re reduce to one writer at the LAT (who also puts the paper in plastic bags when it rains), things tend to slip by.
When I first heard about the “professional” media’s much-vaunted “layers of oversight,” I thought they meant layers in the organizational sense, e.g. supervisors, managers, directors, editors, etc.
It wasn’t until much later that I realized that the media’s “layers of oversight” actually refers to a bunch of ink-stained wretches whose job it is to say, “Oversight? Fuck it!”
Layers, indeed.
– “clavicle journalism …that funny thing a reporters clavicle bones do when someone has the temerity to ask if the story has been sourced properly, and the reporter spreads his hands and says “Huh?”.
Why would the L.A. Times reporting be any more informed than they were in the
90s, when they bought Rick Ross’ story
of how the crack epidemic occurred, ignoring the role of “Toots” Reese. Which they had to retract after Webb used that lie to foist the CIA ‘Dark
Alliance’ conspiracy onto the Webb. I know it’s been 15 years, but they still
got it wrong.
Northern Industrial Air Cutoff Tool on allow me to interject.
paris hilton in jail on Capt. Jamil X reports from Hollywood [Karl]
No, they meant “oversight” as in “that was overlooked”.
My mistake. Mayhaps it’s the fact-checking that gets laid?