Bummer.  New Zealand, so it’s probably not biased, dudes.ÂÂ
It’s all good, though.  A little doob will take the edge off of the nausea from the chemo.ÂÂ
Search
Archive Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |
Archives
Categories
- A Government That Can Force You to Buy Health Insurance Can Make You Do Anything (3)
- a protein wisdom philosophy primer (3)
- academics (25)
- armadillo (8)
- Friday Fiction 100 Word Challenge (51)
- from the protein wisdom conceptual series (136)
- identity politics (33)
- If Republicans Win the Senate in 2014 (1)
- in which celebraties comment on current events (67)
- language / intentionalism (88)
- legal (6)
- My brief conversations with inanimate objects (130)
- NSA / FISA (46)
- One Term to Serve, the 2012 Revival (6)
- Overheard in a Fallujah bunker (27)
- Poems from 196x, Revised by the Ghost of Richard Brauti (27)
- protein wisdom's DNC coverage (30)
- protein wisdom's RNC coverage (29)
- protein wisdom: the movie Lists (20)
- Provocateurism (16)
- real-time empirical observations (51)
- red pills found behind the sofa cushions (42)
- Scenes from my driveway (61)
- Talking back to 80s music (41)
- The Martha Stewart Chronicles (58)
- The protein wisdom interviews (10)
- The protein wisdom original poems (142)
- Uncategorized (20,046)
- Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance, abridged (34)
Recent Comments
- In The Mailbox: 02.28.23 (Afternoon Edition) : The Other McCain on Hey, longtime pw readers…
- In The Mailbox: 12.23.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll truly IS a sad, embittered psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- In The Mailbox: 07.18.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
A good argument for switching to hash brownies…
“A good argument for switching to hash brownies…”
People need to be argued into eating them? Well, NOW we know why western civilization is falling… people have to be argued into eating brownies that make you fly.
Really people, get a clue. *sheesh*
I have heard you can saute some buds in butter with some other herbs and make a mean bowl of dirty rice.
That’s what I heard.
I like how you’ve stereo-typed all pot smokers into this like totally dumb valley person stoner reference just by using the lingo you do. Real people with real medical problems use medical marijuana as a pain reliever over “opium” based pharmies. Myself included. I thought I was being patriotic by not giving my money inadvertently to the “so-called” taliban terrorist who grow opium in Afghanistan. Now that is something a soulless neo-con 60 year old like yourself can get behind. You like your buddies are out of touch. All this from your frame of reference in two sentences. Jackhole!
is that datadave’s other personality?
And of course the surly defensiveness in response to someone making fun of potheads — that’s not stereotypical, like, at all.
All things considered, I’m quite happy to be “out of touch” with a heightened risk of lung cancer. I guess I’ll just never be edgy.
John, Dan doesn’t look a day over 59.
There’s also vaporizers — all the efficiency of smoking yet no smoke. So they say.
Say’s who?
That’s interesting, because in the last couple years there have been studies published that say the exact opposite–that THC actually fights and kills lung cancer cells. But don’t just take my word for it… Check out these articles from the Washington Post and Forbes.com:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/25/AR2006052501729_pf.html
http://www.forbes.com/health/feeds/hscout/2007/04/17/hscout603764.html
This is a problem.
Thanks. I like to go for brevity.
BTW, I don’t mind people smoking pot if they like. I just don’t like being lectured on how it’s not as bad as tobacco, it’s harmless, etc. What do you have against “black humor”?
Is this for equivalent amounts?
Are there any ‘two packs a day’ smokers of the reefer madness?
If so, how can they possibly ingest enough mallomars to go with it?
I wanna be a jackhole too!
Watch and learn, mac, watch and learn. We are MASTERS here.
This is a one study wonder. At least so far.
The makers of vaporizers.
In England the silly people are always putting tobacco in their joints; if kiwis do the same thing it might explain this….
Whether it’s true or not, you knew this was coming. The persecution of tobacco smokers initially began as revenge for the hypocrisy of legal tobacco vs. illegal hemp–the smoking generations left a huge hole for the intolerant to tyrannize them, and we know that many researchers will simply lie to gather ostensible evidence for legislation. Many happy hempers went along, reasoning badly that a trade-off was in the works: legalization of cannabis is exchange for allowing the centuries-old custom of smoking tobacco to continue unmolested. Fools, all: once you give the governing classes a club with with to eliminate one liberty, they will apply it to others.
a study of 79 people isn’t very powerful….a study out of UCLA looking at 64,000 showed no correlation between cancer and cannabis