Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Drudge’s Mojo [Dan Collins]

He’s not going to get it back by pulling a Politico like this:
TALK OF HILLARY EXIT ENGULFS CAMPAIGNS
Flapdoodle. Codswallop.  I mean, she stands to make a fortune on campaign contributions as things stand.
Happyfeet:Sorry for making you think of Drudge’s mojo.  It was inconsiderate of me.

19 Replies to “Drudge’s Mojo [Dan Collins]”

  1. SarahW says:

    We’ll see who has the last cackle. And cankle.

  2. Carin says:

    We’re not going to get rid of her this easily.

    Plus, if she doesn’t get elected Emperor of US, how are we going to pawn-off Michigan’s Jenny Granholm on the nation?

  3. Techie says:

    Hasn’t she raised some obscene amount of money, like on the order of $100 Million?

    The 2008 Campaign may make her one of the 10 Richest Women in America.

  4. Gary says:

    She’s not dead until her feet curl up under the house . . . and Dorothy’s wearing her ruby slippers!

  5. McGehee says:

    I wouldn’t mind if New Hampshire did knock her out of the running, but anyone who expects that to happen needs to remember: the woman is Freddy Krueger in a pantsuit.

  6. Lost Dog says:

    The press is on Hillary like the pack of hellhounds that they are.

    I see backlash down the road for the press and “Osama Obama” (The Swimmers words, not mine. How can one stay that drunk and still get elected, term after term?).

    If the press doesn’t back off, people are soon going to feel empathy for the heartless robot, who is being whacked like a pinata by the MSM. And once again, there is plenty of time for the winds to chamge.

    I can’t believe it, but even with the “alternative” media blowing like a hurricane, the MSM STILL defines the candidates. I hope this phenomonum will end after this next election.

    But I am not counting on it.

  7. happyfeet says:

    ack. Though for real it’s nice to see Drudge mixing it up a bit for a change, he’s become ludicrously conventionalwisdomy for the past year or so. I imagine they are weighing the upsides/downsides to various how-best-to-lose scenarios… when’s the next time they have to report on contributions?

    I still think she can win, by the way, but it would have helped her a lot if she hadn’t spent so many years being a total cooze.

  8. Karl says:

    Is that a technical term?

  9. Drumwaster says:

    Does she really get to keep the donated money? Doesn’t it revert to the national campaign slush funds or some such?

    ‘Cause daaaaammmn, sign me up for summadat…

  10. Rick Ballard says:

    “when’s the next time they have to report on contributions?”

    Jan 31.

    Considering the potential ROI (think Marc Rich and James Riady), I doubt that Miz Clinton’s rental income dropped in the fourth quarter. She had $36 million in the till on October 1 and I have extraordinary doubts concerning news that she’s tapped out today.

    It makes too nice a bookend to a “Comeback Krud” story. Zombies do not go gentle into that good night and I just haven’t seen enough stakes, silver bullets, garlic, wolfsbane or crosses to keep her down for good.

  11. N. O'Brain says:

    ….and your little dog, too!

  12. happyfeet says:

    Actually that term of art I got from Reservoir Dogs. I think it’s a colloquialism.

  13. mojo says:

    Is it really necessary to refer to me as “Drudge’s mojo”?

    Let me be clear: I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT HAT!

  14. dicentra says:

    See, if she runs and loses, she can always follow in the footsteps of Algore, who, upon losing the presidency, carved out a better role for himself as Environmental Hypocrite Nag In Chief Who Will Save The Planet.

    Or she can be like Jimmeh and Ruin The Planet from a political standpoint.

    I will hate to see what she mutates into if she loses (or wins). There’s no rest for the malignantly narcissistic.

  15. B Moe says:

    Remember back in 2004, when the Dems were lamenting the decision to try to avoid negative politics and rally behind a single candidate early? How they were saying if the primary campaign had been a little longer and dirtier Kerry’s glaring weaknesses might have been a little more apparent before it was too late? Remember how they were saying that it was important for the primary process to thoroughly vet the candidates? Yeah? Well apparently they have completely forgot all that shit.

  16. cranky-d says:

    “The planet has a fever.”

    “The Science is settled.”

    “I won an academy award.”

    /AlGore lies.

  17. steveaz says:

    Boy! Hillary’s gig sure beat’s working!

    First she gets her friends at Simon-Schuster to hand her $6 mil for an unwritten book. Then she gets the same media friends to finnagle a Senate seat for her in New York State. Then, after eight years of basking under a fawning, media-generated fame (and doing little else), she runs for President using funds donated from middle American working class voters…and if she loses she gets to keep those hundreds of millions of donated dollars?!!!

    What a scam: Hillary’s media friends sell a lot of useless print, the whole gang gets rich, but no tangible service or product of value is ever really produced for her individual donors.

    The donors are “marks” for this con, I’d say.

  18. “Flapdoodle”? Too many Travelocity ads, methinks.

  19. MarkD says:

    steveaz,

    Hey, she went on a listening tour of the state. She went to the state fair. So it’s technically incorrect to say she has done nothing for New York.

    I will concede that she didn’t pay the admission fee to the fair, nor did she listen to me. Senators that don’t acomplish much are not always a bad thing.

Comments are closed.