I’ve avoided posting for a long while since I don’t do news summaries, and that appears to be the focus of the site, but this seems like a good time to post blather that can be quickly forgotten.
I don’t see movies on a first-run basis. Instead, I wait for them to hit the cheapo theater down the street from me. They get movies just before the DVD is released. If you can stand to wait, you can usually see most of the stuff that gets out there, while avoiding the vast majority of garbage vying for your money. So, I will provide my quick impressions of movies I’ve seen lately. These aren’t reviews as much as thoughts. I don’t give away any important plot points.
One note: I have very low expectations from cinema, having learned my lesson when I used to see movies twice per week (that was when it was much cheaper to do so). Your mileage may vary. Ratings based on a maximum of 4 stars.
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix: I have never read the books nor do I plan to in the future. Having said that, I have seen all the movies. I consider this one to be the least interesting of the bunch. While I found it entertaining enough, unlike the others I have no desire to see it again. The movie seemed more interested in setting up the next movie than anything else. The characters did not move forward much and themes we’ve already seen are repeated. One would think that after all Harry has faced the adults would be more up front with him. No such luck. Also, the “kids” are getting a bit old. Harry looks 18, but I think he’s supposed to be playing a few years younger. Not their fault, but there you are. Worth renting if you’re a fan. Never really great, but never really awful, better than a lot of the crap out there. 2.5 stars.
Ratatouille: As is typical for Pixar, they actually consider writing a good script to be important when making an animated movie (e.g. “Cars,” “The Incredibles”), unlike so many others I have seen (“Robots,” for instance). This movie, while fairly predictable at points, still entertained. The comedic moments were well-integrated with the story, unlike, say, “The Wild,” in which the movie would simply stop when they wanted to throw a slapstic bone to the kiddies. The moments were also quite funny for adults, and did not seem to be pandering, though they went a bit over the top at times.
The story moved at a fairly even pace, and I only found myself wanting a little more motion a few times. About five minutes of cutting would probably help. The story about leaving home for a career in spite of the objections from your parents is a fairly common theme, but they didn’t dwell on that aspect too much. Overall I found it to be a very satisfying movie, much better than I expected. If you liked “Cars” and “The Incredibles,” as well as “Flushed Away (another better than expected movie),” you will probably like this one. 3 stars
Hairspray: I found this movie to be delightful and entertaining, and I am not one for musicals. I went just to see what Christopher Walken was going to do. He had a number with Travolta (who is in drag and wearing a fat suit) that was both funny and oddly endearing. The material is really quite odd and quirky most of the time, and the theme of racial tolerance perhaps overplayed (or maybe not), but everyone seems to play it straight. No one was smirking their way through this movie (if they were I totally missed it), which would have ruined it.
If you cannot stand musicals you will hate this movie. There is very little regular dialog. If you find cardboard characters to be annoying you may not like this movie either, since character development is slim. They play to stereotypes to keep things moving along. If fifties music bothers you, don’t bother. If you can ignore such things, you might find yourself immensely entertained and uplifted. The music and singing is good, especially the R&B stuff, and my mood was unusually elevated when I left. 3 stars.
Update: The non-musical version of this was originally filmed by John Waters and Starred Divine as the mother and Rikki Lake as the chunky singing star. Thanks to gahrie in the comments for reminding me.
Transformers: Just like Harry Potter, saying anything about this movie is probably a moot point since the audience will be self-selecting. So. This movie is all about the eye candy, and you get that. You will have to ignore some issues with the hardware, the software, and the physics to be able to enjoy this movie. I found myself complaining often, particularly one scene involving an F-35. The computer stuff was equally annoying, since what was being attempted was at times completely impossible.
The movie could have used some cutting. I found the repeated awkward teenage moments of a boy trying to chase the hottie chick to be a waste of time. I have no need to relive my life on screen, nor do I need it pounded into me. A little set-up of the situation would be all that is required. Barring that, the adolescent crap was mostly stuck in the beginning, and after that was over the movie moved along in a predictable manner. If you’re looking for more than the outline of a story, you may be disappointed. You’re there for the robots, and you get them. The on-the-fly transformations from one form to another (say a plane zooming to the ground and changing into a robot) were very well done and fun to watch. Robots kick ass and take names. Little robots screw with humans, big ones step on them. Overall this movie is exactly what one would expect. 3 1/2 stars for visuals, and being generous a 2 for the rest of it.
Live Free or Die Hard: This one is a little older, but I thought of it when writing my thoughts on Transformers. LF or DH is a live-action cartoon, pure and simple. Unlike the first Die Hard, which actually attempted to be plausible, this one ignored plausibility completely. Again we have ridiculous stuff involving computers, but that’s just the beginning. Some of the action scenes are so over the top I found myself laughing at what was happening. I was not alone in my reaction. Forget about physics. Forget about the possibility of a human surviving extreme cases of friction and impact. Forget about reality, it has no relation to this movie.
Having said that, I had a good time. It was fun. It was very dumb. The plot is very familiar. Depending on your taste, probably worth seeing once. I doubt it’s one to watch again. I would watch “The Last Boy Scout” again rather than this one again, but I have strange tastes. 2.5 stars.
My teenage daughter bought “Transformers”; for the sole purpose of seeing-WTF-kids-are-watching-nowadays I sat for it.
Actually slept for the last 30 minutes…
The lead-role kid’s parents were in need of slappage. Or something. The (centuries-old now) “Wargames” was ten times better, plot-wise, and the robots on “Star Wars” were more intelligent (just not as well-oiled…)
For those not in the know, Hairspray is a remake of a movie by John Waters. Divine played the Travolta role in the original, and Rikki Lake played the main character.
OT – Sox in 4.
Memoirs of a Geisha is beautifully filmed and is worth watching for that alone
I’m no major league manager, but down 3 games to none, and having just gotten a run, I don’t think I’d have been holding Corpas back.
And I know for a fact I wouldn’t have had to hit Carroll — even though he hit the ball well — or Torrealba in the 9th, nor would I have had it set up so that a late-season call up would be in a position to strike out to end the series.
So much for Seth Smith’s confidence.
Probably the worst managerial job I’ve ever seen in a big game. Like I’ve said before, I like the way Hurdle deals with his players. But he is formulaic with his bullpen, and he is often tactically sloppy — and you can’t depend on the 2 out hit to win a World Championship.
No situational hitting. Hell, the only bunt we had tonight was a hit — by the freakin’ pitcher.
Great job by Aaron Cook.
Torrealba, on the other hand, needed a rest, and should have gotten one. And you don’t lose by a run and leave Jeff Baker on your bench.
Awful.
I know I know….WAY off topic SO sorry Jeff…I wish you would have put up a sticky on this so I could go straight there but….SWEEP!!!!! My Sox kicjed you’re Roxes asses. I disagree with the MVP though…should have been Papelbon or Okajima
Wow. Stay classy, Sox fans.
I should have mentioned the original “Hairspray.” My bad. This movie is actually the movie version of the Broadway (or off-Broadway, don’t know) musical version of the original movie.
As far as Transformers goes, like I said, there isn’t much of a story there. The parents made so little of an impression on me I forgot about them. I didn’t fall asleep, though. I don’t have a wife and kids to wear me out.
You know what? I could be totally wrong about the new Hairspray being a movie version of a live show. I thought it was, couldn’t find a reference to it.
You’re correct cranky-d, it’s a movie version of the Broadway musical that was based on the older movie.
cranky-d, I like the news analysis on this site. When there’s only news summaries I skip it.
I have not seen a single one of these movies you review. I buy DVDs occasionally and watch them eventually. So this post was useful and interesting. I would never have thought of getting a DVD of Hair Spray but now I might (if I can remember).
“The Rockies joined the 2005 Astros as the only teams to be swept in their first trip to the World Series.”
Welcome to the club!
I watched Transformers last night.
Many, many issues. Lots of bright lights to obscure flaws in #D graphics. DVD I watched had odd blips (it was brand new and flawless) in it that were distracting. Starscream can, unaccountably, completely ignore aerodynamics in unfolding from a rather slippery F-22 to a bipedal form at high Mach numbers. Robots can, apparently, fire continuous barrages without reloading or losing mass. The itty bitty boombox/robot can throw bits of itself away, and magically there will be new bits to replace them.
Makes me yearn for Saberhagen, it does.
Still, Megan Fox was hot. Fun movie, but my disbelief refused to be suspended. Kept oscillating and shaking itself apart, kind of like the Tacoma Narrows Bridge.
Transformers was based on a cartoon, for Christ’s sake. It’s not supposed to be able to happen in real life. Why would you even watch such a movie if you were going to be bothered by things that aren’t plausible in the real world. That’s like watching a Bugs Bunny movie and getting pissed that there was a talking rabbit in the movie.
My 24 year old son grew up on Transformers and was very afraid that Michael Bay was going to corrupt his childhood memories. He texted me after the movie: JOYGASM!!!!! He didn’t care about the physics and graphics issues but was content that they preserved the original concept.
I suspect I’ll feel differently when the new, multicultural, metrosexual GI Joe in Belgium movie is made.
I didn’t say I was pissed, Jimmy, just that there are some things that just don’t translate well from cartoon to theater. For me.
lol, tranformers was teh uber…..but jeffie…..what did the trailer at the beginning refer to? what monster clipped the head off the statue of liberty?
did the guy really say….”it’s a lion!” ?
im hopin for another of my childhood dreams to come true……..could it be…..
VOLTRON….defender of the universe?
You’re scary, Nishi.
dannie u speak truer than u kno.
lol
Nishi!
Where ya been? I just want you to know that I’ve shamelessly stolen your “misery pimps” line about the UN and have used it across a variety of topics. Thanks for that and where do I send the royalty checks? :-)