Gee. What a shocker. Of course, here, elites are classified by wealth, giving he whole study a kind of Marxist feel, with undertones that speak to “income inequality” (read:  a condition of liberty) — whereas if there weren’t politicians willing to be directed or “nudged” by bribery or other favors from cronies in our current corporatist system, money wouldn’t much matter. The problem is not money. The problem is that

Looking for ways to limit whites on campus isn’t racism, you see.  It’s a push for “diversity” — because, let’s face it, all white people have the same ideas, same social experiences, same nurtured backgrounds, and are essentially carbon copies of one another, a kind of pale horde, indistinguishable from one another and therefore, because of sheer numbers, overdetermined on university campuses. To argue otherwise just proves how racist you

I suppose one could argue that we still have a relatively free press, but what one can also argue is that — because it’s a press that has become an arm of progressive activism and big government — the freedom it has is being used not as a check on the powerful, but rather as a propaganda arm for them. Which says to me that we need, institutionally, to begin

Answer:  it’s who they are.  It’s what they do.  And when they’re panicked, it gets even worse. Not to mention, more and more partisan and incoherent. I wonder:  did the people — the vast majority Democrats or more avowed leftists / Marxists / socialists / communists — who actually attended the speech denouncing photo IDs as Republican tools of racist voter suppression, have to show a photo ID in order

Because saying “we lied, and it worked, and now we control just about every aspect of the progressive plan to ‘de-grow’ the private sector,” is just a bit too candid.  CNS NEWS: Seven months after being subpoenaed by Congress, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Gina McCarthy conceded that her agency does not have –  and cannot produce – all of the scientific data used for decades to justify numerous rules

Keep an eye on this one.  Because from a legal perspective, this is a no-brainer:  what we had in Wisconsin were Soviet-style investigations, intimidation, and prosecution, with the targets forcibly gagged under penalty of punishment.   The question is, how will the courts ultimately resolve what is, in fact, an actual civil rights suit — not of the kind brought by racial charlatans like Al Sharpton or La Raza or the

Utopia is just around the corner! People participating in the food stamp program outnumbered the women who worked full-time, year-round in the United States in 2012, according to data from the Department of Agriculture and the Census Bureau. In the average month of 2012, according to the Department of Agriculture, there were 46,609,000 people participating in the food stamp program (formally known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program). That contrasts

Wait, is this a trick question?  Because my gut says, “uh, of course they don’t. Or rather, they don’t much care, as long as they can continue to write the tax laws that keep them flush — and then claim they’ve helped solve “income inequality,” as if all incomes should be the same, despite the amount of work, the kind of work, or the desire of the good or service.

Federalism is dead.  Sure, it’s there in the Constitution, but since marriage (and just about every other “noble cause”) has been re-defined as a civil right, the entirety of the 10th amendment is now effectively and functionally moot. Washington Examiner: A federal judge has ordered Ohio authorities to recognize the marriages of gay couples performed in other states. Judge Timothy Black’s ruling on Monday criticized the state’s “ongoing arbitrary discrimination