The Colossal Hypocrisy of Dianne Feinstein, Queen of Gun Control
From the Media Research Center:
If Dianne Feinstein grants herself the right to self protection, how on earth can she justify denying you your right to do the same. For Feinstein, an “assault weapon” is merely a weapon that cosmetically looks frightening to her. That is, her ban is (and was) nothing but a ban on aesthetics.
And that’s because the general mechanism used by “assault weapons” to fire bullets — one squeeze, one round — is the same as with nearly every pistol and revolver still extant, including I’d bet the one Feinstein herself concealed and carried. And the only other readily available guns sold legally are single-load, manual bolt-action rifles that, against two or more armed assailants who, let’s say, break into your home wielding semi-automatic pistols, would prove useless, even were you to hit and kill one of your attackers with the first shot. Because you simply couldn’t reload the gun quickly enough to get off a second shot before that second assailant was able to empty the entirety of his magazine in your direction.
This is the hypocrisy and dishonesty at the heart of the left’s gun control agenda. It is not about gun violence. It’s about aesthetic preference and control.
My natural rights trump Ms Feinstein’s aesthetic sensibilities. And it’s time we made it clear that we will not be shamed by power-hungry charlatans and hypocrites.
(h/t Mark Levin)