Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Barack Simpson [Darleen Click]

Thanks to LYBD

14 Replies to “Barack Simpson [Darleen Click]”

  1. sdferr says:

    Heck, question Marbury all you like, just don’t pretend its holding isn’t its holding. If better reasoning regarding the fundamental meaning of a written Constitution can be had, I for one would like to see it.

  2. Danger says:

    Well placed, Darleen!

    Keep Firing!!!

  3. Jeff G. says:

    There’s something vaguely racist about the way Bart looks. Did he get a haircut?

  4. Danger says:

    Did he get a haircut?

    He uses just for men in mom jeans.

  5. EBL says:

    Funny. If it is judicial activism to kill Obamacare, then Obama must want to see Roe v. Wade reversed too. Can’t have an activist court.

    And I do not care for the wee man’s politics, but who knew Robert Reich has some decent moves…

  6. Lamontyoubigdummy says:

    Glad I stayed up with the laptop long enough to see this post before night night.

    Made the best late night bowl of Cinnamon Toast Crunch evah.

  7. Lamontyoubigdummy says:

    Dear Lord,

    I dunno how she made it, but please let this be plastered all over the internet tomorrow.

    Amen.

  8. JHoward says:

    Was hoping to see this covered but you went beyond the call of duty, Darleen. Nice work.

  9. RI Red says:

    Once again, I am in awe, Darleen. Hope this goes viral.

  10. Alec Leamas says:

    This is good.

    I was thinking something along the lines of King Barack I saying “Will no one rid me of this meddlesome Court?”

  11. Swen says:

    Interesting. If King Putt is willing to so blatantly challenge the authority of the Supremes now, imagine what he’ll do if he gains more ‘flexibility’.

  12. motionview says:

    Here’s Bart’s Barack’s reprimand from the principal 5th Circuit.

  13. […] Protein Wisdom Share this:Share Posted by FullMetalPatriot 12th gen. American, Constitutionalist, […]

  14. sdferr says:

    Justice O. W. Holmes Jr., dissent in Lochner: “But a constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of paternalism and the organic relation of the citizen to the State or of laissez faire.”

    Does lil’ Barry agree?

Comments are closed.