March 14, 2011

"Rubio to Oppose Short-Term CR"

More Republicans are beginning to get it. Now if only our leadership would sack up. From The Corner, Andrew Stiles:

The House will vote Tuesday on a three-week continuing resolution that would cut federal spending by $6 billion. It is the second short-term resolution proposed by the 112th Congress. And though it is expected to pass the House comfortably, a number of conservative groups have come out against the measure.

Republican freshmen like Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R., Kan.) have said they will vote against it, arguing that a short-term spending bill forestalls a broader debate over meaningful budget reform and deficit reduction, and expressing concern that the pending measure does not contain any of the policy amendments including in the House’s long-term spending bill, H.R. 1, e.g., the defunding of the EPA and Planned Parenthood.

Today, freshman Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.) announced that he “will no longer support short-term budget plans.” In a sternly worded press release, Rubio decried the spending debate in Washington as “absurd political theatre.” He slammed Democrats in Congress for failing to pass a budget last year and for refusing to propose meaningful spending cuts in recent weeks, and an “absent” President Obama for his “lack of leadership.”

“All this has led to a very predictable outcome: Washington politicians of both parties scrambling to put together two and three week plans to keep funding the government, while not fundamentally changing the behavior that has gotten us into this mess to begin with,” he said. “Running our government on the fumes of borrowed spending is unacceptable, short-sighted and dangerous. I commend the efforts of House and Senate Republican leaders to deal with this, but I did not come to the U.S. Senate to be part of some absurd political theatre.”

As Congress prepares for another recess next week, Rubio said lawmakers “should feel ashamed if they have to go home again, look their constituents in the eye, and explain why nothing is being done about our debt crisis.”

Sadly, too many on the GOP side believe they’ve achieved a great political victory if they allow the Democrats to go yet another several weeks without a budget for the single greatest spending entity on the entire earth ever provided that in return, our fearless leadership can show that it’s “won” another handful of billion in cuts to a budget proposal that includes $1.65 trillion in deficit spending.

Not good enough.

Get serious, or get out of the way.

Posted by Jeff G. @ 9:26am
6 comments | Trackback

Comments (6)

  1. A quarter quadrillion dollars in debt and unfunded obligations.

    Government management of anything with a number attached to it is part of a structurally terminal system of fail. This is not an opinion; this is the nature of government reality and the accounting proves it.

    Our present state is not a recession. It is a harbinger.

  2. I like that Rubio fella. He’s got balls. But I could have sworn Dustin Hoffman stabbed his ass on a pirate ship in Neverland.

  3. I like that Rubio fella. He’s got balls.

    Exactly what Tanner Boyle said about Kelly Leak.

    Can’t have a stronger endorsement than that.

  4. Who knows, maybe Coulter could find Marco attractive.

  5. This is all part of the Democrats’ plan. President Obama sent his FY2012 budget proposal to Congress a month ago, but Congress isn’t doing one damned thing about it, because they’re still tied yo with the FT2011 budget. The Dems will drag this on and on and on, because the last thing that they want is for the Republicans to start looking seriously at the FY2012 budget.

  6. Give Daniels a chance. I know he hasn’t said the right words lately, but he will have his chance. At least I hope that the Repubs will have a shoot out of ideas before the election. How the heck did McCain get to be the nomination – I mean besides the endorsement of the New York Times.

Leave a Reply