Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Intentionalism making a common-sense comeback?

Krauthammer, on “Constitutionalism”:

Americans are in the midst of a great national debate over the power, scope and reach of the government established by that document. The debate was sparked by the current administration’s bold push for government expansion – a massive fiscal stimulus, Obamacare, financial regulation and various attempts at controlling the energy economy. This engendered a popular reaction, identified with the Tea Party but in reality far more widespread, calling for a more restrictive vision of government more consistent with the Founders’ intent.

Music to my ears, if it catches on.

So, then. My work here is done. MIMOSAS FOR EVERYONE! / I’M GOING TO DISNEYLAND!

51 Replies to “Intentionalism making a common-sense comeback?”

  1. Jeff G. says:

    Actually, I’m going downtown with my wife for lunch. Which is similar, while being more fiscally responsible.

    Take care while I’m gone, all!

  2. hopefully you’re mimosas are stronger than the one I had Saturday. not even fizzy.

  3. dicentra says:

    MIMOSAS FOR EVERYONE!

    Make mine a double.

    Because, check it out, Glenn Beck was DEAD WRONG on something this morning, and I told him so (via Twitter and also The Feed), but did he listen? No!

    He was upset that when congress read the Constitution this week, they left out the 3/5 clause and Prohibition, and attributed that omission to “political expediency,” and put it in the same category as the Huck Finn n-word censorship. He wanted them to leave those parts in as “teaching moments,” so that people, hearing the 3/5 clause, will wonder WTF and then maybe find out what the deal was. As if the purpose of reading the Constitution were a history lesson.

    NO GLENN, THEY LEFT OUT ALL THE PARTS THAT HAVE BEEN REPEALED BECAUSE THEY WERE REMINDING CONGRESS OF THEIR CURRENT DUTY.

    Like I said, he didn’t listen to ME, and THAT truly signals the end of Western Civilization.

  4. Bob Reed says:

    But I was told there was an LDS intra-net where you could get him on the blower directly dicentra! :)

    That’s the last time I get my TRVTH from the internet.

  5. Bob Reed says:

    And seriously, I’m surprised to hear that Glenn Beck was in agreement with the NYTimes on this matter.

    I agree with your position, myself.

  6. Drumwaster says:

    I have to ask whether their reading included the 18th Amendment, which was entirely repealed by the 21st, according to that same logic…

  7. mojo says:

    I’M GOING TO DISNEYLAND!

    Balls of Fire. Great line.

  8. dicentra says:

    Drumwaster: Yes, they left out anything that has been repealed, not just the stuff I mentioned.

    I’m surprised to hear that Glenn Beck was in agreement with the NYTimes on this matter.

    He’s just connecting a couple of dots, as is his wont, and this time one of the dots ain’t what he thought it was.

    A radio personality reacting viscerally to a news story? THE DEVIL, YOU SAY!

  9. dicentra says:

    But I was told there was an LDS intranet where you could get him on the blower directly dicentra! :)

    No, no. That’s used by our leadership to pull the levers of those LDS who have infiltrated the highest levels of government throughout the world. A mere peon such as I doesn’t have access.

  10. sdferr says:

    Peter Berkowitz, who wrote that great piece about Obama and the State of Progressivism not so long ago has a post on What Would a Return to the Constitution Entail?.

  11. sdferr says:

    This one geoffb, though I wouldn’t disinclude that one either.

  12. geoffb says:

    Thank you.

  13. bour3 says:

    Good work, you stud.

  14. The Monster says:

    Intentionalism just lost ground to the idiots trying to tie SarahPAC’s “crosshairs” targeting (gasp!) certain Democrat Congressmen (including Giffords!!) as evidence that Sarah is personally responsible for the shootings.

  15. sdferr says:

    Surely it didn’t Monster, for how could it lose what it had never gained in the case of such stupid people?

  16. happyfeet says:

    I think the number of Team Rs what will rush to defend Sarah will be vanishingly small. They’re very frightened. If their cancellation of their health care repeal vote means anything it speaks of an abiding timorousness.

  17. happyfeet says:

    Team R’s been looking for a reason to throw her under the bus anyways. I think they just found it.

  18. newrouter says:

    “Never mind that the person who allegedly shot Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and murdered several others, Jared Loughner, is reportedly a marijuana-using loner who lists the Communist Manifesto and Mein Kampf as among his favorite books, or that the most recent items which could bee seen as potential incitements to violence against Giffords have come from the left, in response to her refusal to back Nancy Pelosi for Minority Leader in the House just days ago.”

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2011/01/08/ap-determined-pin-giffords-shooting-multiple-murders-right-ignores-lefis

  19. sdferr says:

    If their cancellation of their health care repeal vote means anything it speaks of an abiding timorousness.

    That’s seems like a ridiculous reading of the mood happyfeet. Why wouldn’t you attribute the cancellation to a gesture of their respect for their colleague and her circumstances, as yet unknown, rather than to fear?

  20. serr8d says:

    They just found it, ‘feets?

    You’re weird. No they didn’t just find a reason to toss Sarah under a buss. . I can’t link with this Droid, so go look at Volokh where you’ll find a post linking a friend of this crazy shooter’s twitter feed. Seems he’s not a Palin friend.

    I’ll bet he supports gay marriage and owns a.donut shop.

  21. happyfeet says:

    Maybe. But I think they’re driven more by fear of looking disrespectful than by respect. The health care repeal vote is now linked with the shooting. That’s creepy how that happened.

  22. happyfeet says:

    here’s the Volokh link

  23. newrouter says:

    “The health care repeal vote is now linked with the shooting. ”

    effin’ 1/8/11 is linked to the shooting you idiot cupcake. O!’s linked to the shooting. the ocean is linked to the shooting.

  24. sdferr says:

    I understand that you’ve a low opinion of the Republicans in DC generically speaking, and to the extent that they’ve disappointed us all, you, me, everybody here, the country even, we’ve a just cause to be angry with them.

    But here, when one of their own colleagues was the victim of an attempted murder by a deranged man — a colleague who so far as I can see is a lovely person, and one liked by every Republican I’ve heard speak about her — it makes no sense to me to fault the Republican leadership for calling a halt to a symbolic vote that has no pressing necessity behind it in the first place.

    Think what that leadership, of the whole House now, and not just of the party, is hearing from their fellows across the aisle, or for that matter, from every delegate from the State of Arizona. They may all be insisting that they be given time to go home to visit Rep. Giffords or her family. Surely they are concerned that their own schedules will be disrupted. Decency rightly demands things that can be delayed should be delayed.

  25. happyfeet says:

    You’re probably right that I’m letting my disdain for the congress get the better of me. Interesting that the health care repeal bill has “killing” in the title, no?

  26. sdferr says:

    Heh, yeah, making the Democrats deranged guntoting job-shooters in the retrospect, no?

  27. newrouter says:

    “it makes no sense to me to fault the Republican leadership for calling a halt to a symbolic vote that has no pressing necessity behind it in the first place. ”

    that’s dysfunctional. give regards to victim and then move on. i don’t want to be in a fox hole with you.

  28. sdferr says:

    I say, if the psychotic shoe fits, make ’em wear it.

  29. sdferr says:

    i don’t want to be in a fox hole with you.

    Right back attcha buddy.

  30. newrouter says:

    where’s the meme that says ” kos kills people”?

  31. newrouter says:

    “Right back attcha buddy.”

    yea 1 member of your group of 435 get’s shot attacking a position and you want to have a counseling session. nice.

  32. geoffb says:

    Targeting, Right and Left.

    Krugman is his usual quiet, contemplative, rational self.

  33. happyfeet says:

    Mr. newrouter I think Mr. sdferr makes two very strong points in particular. This lady was very well-liked by her colleagues. And the Arizona delegation for sure and maybe many others will have to attend funerals and such. And looking at things now it was the Reuters reporter what linked the delay specifically to the health care bill, not the Team R leadership.

  34. sdferr says:

    I didn’t say anything about a counseling session newrouter, so why would you make that up? Have you never lost a friend or near acquaintance to sudden death? Have you no sense of the fellow feeling that grips one in such a circumstance?

  35. newrouter says:

    “Decency rightly demands things that can be delayed should be delayed.”

    why. are bills not to be paid? why not stop the country’s business for every car accident? are these folks worth less? sorry about gabby and her encounter with a delusional leftist but life goes on.

  36. geoffb says:

    It is only common decency to take a few days off for this event. And as a plus, the Left jumped the shark, very publicly. No sense doing anything to give them cover. Let them have their words float out there for awhile.

  37. sdferr says:

    are bills not to be paid?

    Is that an example of something that can be delayed? Or are you just stupid?

  38. newrouter says:

    “Have you no sense of the fellow feeling that grips one in such a circumstance?”

    sure but her vote is 1/435 so it doesn’t mean much in the great scheme of things. wish her a speedy recovery. but the country can not stand still for her.

  39. newrouter says:

    “Or are you just stupid?”

    no the debt clock is still ticking. this needs to be done. i don’t give O! any excuse to meet his judgment day.

  40. sdferr says:

    No one said the country should stand still. Nor will it.

    Further, it isn’t a question of her vote for cryin’ out loud, so why bring it up?

    Again, people in Congress may do bad things in their roles as legislators, but in the final analysis they are still people, and as such due any and all the respect we would give to our neighbors and friends in circumstances like this.

  41. newrouter says:

    the bond markets are looking at this little gambit by the left to get a psycho to shoot a demonrat with interest.

  42. newrouter says:

    “Further, it isn’t a question of her vote for cryin’ out loud, so why bring it up? ”

    then don’t delay anything. make a remark about it by the speaker then move on about the business of the country. look these leftist goons will use ANY excuse to slow down what was won in november.

  43. geoffb says:

    So if Congress is not in session the country will stand still? The oligarchy variation on the Great Leader as God theory of the Left? Really.

    If it happens again and then again then there is a plan behind it. This is the happenstance one.

  44. newrouter says:

    “So if Congress is not in session the country will stand still? ”

    yep as far as a business or an entrepreneur is concerned. repealing O! care is big.

  45. sdferr says:

    repealing O! care is big.

    And no one here has said “It isn’t.”

    C’mon.

    We know the symbolic value of the measure. We also know that the votes in the House will still be there when it’s taken up a week or so from the date on which it was scheduled to be taken up. We also know that it most likely won’t pass the Senate, and we for damn sure know Obama will veto it if it does pass the Senate; we know as well the requisite votes to over-ride his veto aren’t there.

    So, what is it about this chain of impending events that you don’t understand?

  46. geoffb says:

    Then we shall be still for the next two years since the House by its lonesome cannot repeal Obamacare. They can only pass a repeal bill that makes the Left defend it, over and over it is to be hoped.

    This event is already playing out to the detriment of the radical left. Their insanity is pouring out from behind their mask. Let it play out. Time enough to pass the repeal bill next week.

  47. Pablo says:

    Again, people in Congress may do bad things in their roles as legislators, but in the final analysis they are still people, and as such due any and all the respect we would give to our neighbors and friends in circumstances like this.

    Yes, that. Regardless of the letter after her name. she seems like exactly what we ought to expect of our Congresscritters and she was shot while doing exactly what she should have been doing.

    This is a very sad day, and I’m not about to question the fact that her colleagues are moved to deference.

  48. happyfeet says:

    what’s happened is Team R is letting the delay be wholly defined by the health care repeal and letting the media link that with the political violence … that’s a suboptimal state of affairs I think.

  49. newrouter says:

    “So, what is it about this chain of impending events that you don’t understand?”

    why let the communists control the narrative by freely giving up our power to shape it?

  50. newrouter says:

    “I’m not about to question the fact that her colleagues are moved to deference.”

    no the speaker of the house did this. he and his cronies should have waited til monday to let the dust settle. too stupid on their part.

Comments are closed.