Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

“Weekly Standard may have been shooter target”

Hmmm. Does this mean the Weekly Standard is not really on the political right? I’ll have to remember to ask Shep, or that Napolitano lady what is suddenly all the rage again…

FBI agents visited the offices of the conservative Weekly Standard magazine yesterday after a shooting at the Holocaust Memorial Museum and told employees they’d found the magazine’s address

A senior Standard staffer confirmed the visit but declined to discuss it in detail. An FBI spokeswoman, Katherine Schweit , also declined to comment on the investigation.

Two other sources said two FBI agents arrived shortly after 5:00 p.m. Thursday at the 17th Street offices of the magazine. They told staffers that they had found the address of the magazine on a piece of paper associated with the shooter, James von Brunn, and asked whether the Standard had received any threats.

The magazine is about a mile north of the Holocaust Museum, and there’s no other indication that von Brunn had targeted it. Von Brunn’s published rants included attacks on “neocons,” and the Standard has been at the heart of the neoconservative movement.

The suggestion that the Standard may have been a target complicates any view of the racist shooter in contemporary left-right terms. Von Brunn’s white supremacist roots put him under the rubric of a “right-wing extremist,” but the substance of his views — which included everything from believing that President Bush may have been in on the September 11 attacks to denying that President Obama is an American citizen — are too far on the fringe to fit into conventional political classification.

Really? Because I can think of several disparate ways to map “anti-Bush, anti-war, anti-Israel, anti-Jew, anti-Christian, pro-eugenicist” onto certain “political classifications” — from the Paulites to any number of “progressives.”

In fact, I’ve been hammering away at this point since the early days of this site: the current progressive left and the fringe right have much in common, from their stance on trade and the war to their distaste for Israel.

The difference being that the fringe right is just that: fringe. Whereas the progressives? Well, they just happen to control the Executive and Legislative branches of the US just now, and so would hardly count as some “fringe” portion of the left.

So I suspect that, upon closer examination, some of the more observant and politically cautious pundits on left will find it prudent to begin walking back attempts to tie the Holocaust Museum shooter to any particular political ideology, lest people begin noticing a few uncomfortable similarities in political vision between this Nazi-sympathizing leftover from the Greatest Generation and the current political power holders.

(h/t Mr Pink)

241 Replies to ““Weekly Standard may have been shooter target””

  1. Dan Collins says:

    Way to crap all over The Narrative, Jeff. Pony Boy’s not going to like that.

  2. happyfeet says:

    omg. Rainiest wedding day ever.

  3. Dan Collins says:

    Holocaust Museum? Weekly Standard? Holocaust Museum? Weekly Standard?

    Geez. That’s a toughie.

    Flip a coin?

  4. JD says:

    EVIL NEOCONS !!!!!!!!!!!!! The Leftist’s hateful words towards and about neocons led to this. I blame nishi, and the other trolls.

  5. Danger says:

    Happyfeet,

    Liquid sunshine baby, send some of it my way please;)

  6. Dan Collins says:

    I assume Danger means in a Listerine bottle, hf.

  7. happyfeet says:

    Eye Opener: Does Holocaust Shooting Validate Homeland Security Report?*

  8. Pablo says:

    This looks like a good spot to note this stupid bint.

    Meanwhile, Pvt. William Long remains unavailable for comment, though his fellow wounded soldier and his killer are both talking. But not on any of the news networks.

  9. Pablo says:

    Holocaust Museum? Weekly Standard?

    Look! A Joooooo!

  10. Danger says:

    Dan,

    I was talking about rain but perhaps a few more weeks from now other liquid refreshments will be more on my mind.

  11. SarahW says:

    Von Brunn was the sort of fellow to get you kicked out of LGF if you refused to acknowlege him as a “right wing” extremist. Extremist not good enough: you must confess his right wingedness or Charles just can’t have a conversation with you.

  12. mojo says:

    There are precisely FIFTY-SEVEN Jews keeping the Rev. Wright from speaking with President Obama!

    Says so right here in my magic 8-ball…

  13. Danger says:

    Dan and Jeff,

    While it is kind of fun chasing you guys all over these threads the server speed here makes it difficult to keep up. (Man, I sound like I’m an internet stalker)

    Any chance you could increase the length of the recent comments list?

  14. Jeff G. says:

    That’s my wife’s purview, Danger, and she’s out of town on business just now, sorry.

  15. Curmudgeon says:

    There are precisely FIFTY-SEVEN Jews keeping the Rev. Wright from speaking with President Obama!

    One for each state in the Obamanation.

  16. Mr. Pink says:

    I wonder if you will see anyone in the MSM link the Holocaust shooting with Rev. Wright and left wing websites like Kos that rail against neo-cons? Nah never happen.

  17. N. O'Brain says:

    “The suggestion that the Standard may have been a target complicates any view of the racist shooter in contemporary left-right terms. Von Brunn’s white supremacist roots put him under the rubric of a “right-wing extremist,””

    Fucking liars.

  18. Makewi says:

    Nice try wingers, but everyone knows that white supremacists make up the core of the right wing. No other facts will be considered.

    Sarcasm included at no extra charge.

  19. Mr. Pink says:

    “Nice try wingers, but everyone knows that white supremacists make up the core of the right wing. No other facts will be considered.”

    Robert Byrd (D) WV was unavailable for comment.

  20. Carin says:

    So I suspect that, upon closer examination, some of the more observant and politically cautious pundits on left will find it prudent to begin walking back attempts to tie the Holocaust Museum shooter to any particular political ideology, lest people begin noticing a few uncomfortable similarities in political vision between this Nazi-sympathizing leftover from the Greatest Generation and the curren

    If my blog is any indication, they just dropped the issue, as they did once I linked Dan’s piece from earlier today. This was after my resident liberal DEMANDED I address it.

  21. N. O'Brain says:

    Lester Maddox was unavailable for comment.

  22. N. O'Brain says:

    Orval Faubus was unavailable for comment.

  23. N. O'Brain says:

    George Wallace was unavailable for comment.

  24. N. O'Brain says:

    Albert Gore, Sr. was unavailable for comment.

  25. Joe says:

    I am frankly surprised he did not go for the Weekly Standard, it is probably a softer target. But the lure of the Holocaust Museum was too much.

  26. N. O'Brain says:

    William Fulbright was unavailable for comment.

  27. N. O'Brain says:

    “Bull” O’Connor was unavailable for comment.

  28. Mr. Pink says:

    Lost in all this is the inhumanity of the left wing using an American citizens murder as a bloody political football. Then the tit for tat I just engaged in. Sometimes paying attention to this crap is just too damn depressing.

  29. JD says:

    Carin – Kneel & Bob and OC are real treats.

  30. cranky-d says:

    Joe: The Weekly Standard would’ve been a nice soft target. Since it’s D.C. and those guys are law-abiding folks, you can bet none of them was armed. Nutcase guy could’ve kept shooting until he ran out of shells.

  31. JD says:

    So we can blame all of the ones that raged about neoconz and all of the anti-semites for the actions of this whackjob, since it is obvious their rhetroic incited him.

  32. cranky-d says:

    If it isn’t Bush’s fault, it’s the fault of the right in general. That’s the narrative, and they will continue to defend it.

  33. Dan Collins says:

    Donald Douglas post you might want to link, Jeff.

  34. Bob Reed says:

    Well, this makes sense,

    Von Brunn hated neo-cons and Jooooooooooos! And one of the main guys at WS is one of the original neo-cons, and a Jew; Bill Kristol…

    I am surprised he didn’t follow through, WS would have clearly been a softer target…

    But, he was an effin’ nutcase, so, reason can be discounted from his calculus…

  35. JHo says:

    my resident liberal

    Doesn’t that airing opposite The Goode Family?

  36. JHo says:

    Or air.

  37. Bob Reed says:

    In fact, I’ve been hammering away at this point since the early days of this site: the current progressive left and the fringe right have much in common, from their stance on trade and the war to their distaste for Israel.

    Careful Jeff G,
    That’s essentially the coalition that put the NAZI’s in power; save that the fringe left elements then didn’t stop at go, but went straight to bolshevism…

    That’s scary because, as you note, progressivism is now sort of mainstreamed, by virtue of Obama’s election. And soon, when he really starts bustin’ on Israel, the fringe right will start to find him more acceptable. Add in the RINO RethugliKKKans, all the go-along, get-along crew, and all others who think Obama to be a good man, and BINGO! you have national socialist soup…

    OK, now I’m really pissed…

  38. ML says:

    This is interesting, I wonder if the media or crap holes like LGF will take notice.

    From: http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2009/06/10/james-von-brunn-like-most-holocaust-deniers-are-from-the-left-not-the-right/
    But after some research it appears the shooter, James Von Brunn is in fact – despite the protestations of the Kos Kids – a registered democrat from Maryland.

    Well, we all know the lefties cant fact check their own shit to save their lives.

  39. psycho... says:

    Too late. Whoever lies first wins. Facts are literally (literally) useless.

    (And to the degree that “Paulites” can be said to be “anti-Israel, anti-Jew, anti-Christian, pro-eugenicist,” they’re differently so than Nazis and Democrats (who are samely so), but hey. See above.)

  40. Dan Collins says:

    Is that a fact, psycho?

  41. Obstreperous Infidel says:

    {sniff} I love you man. That connection is pretty interesting and more importantly, very apt.

    Dan, for one I presume that psycho means that Paulites don’t wnat to build ovens and kill the Jews. And as for anti-Israel, well, hell they’re anti any foreign policy but trade, trade, trade. Their foreign policy to me is, for lack of a better word, naive.

  42. Joe says:

    Ron Paul, the darling pet Publican of Andrew Sullivan, is now transformed by Charles “Stay Golden Pony Boy” Johnson into the raving anti Semite hero of Nazi wannabees like Von Brunner. Sarah Palin is a hypocricial slut with slutty daughters. The Weekly Standard with its neocon ravings provoked Von Brunner and of course they are primarily responsible for this horror.

    And only the unifying love of our god king Barack Obama can save us from the chaos we are facing. One day he will be reconciled with his spirtual father Jeremiah Wright. Even if Obama did throw Wright under a bus.

  43. David R. Block says:

    If Paulites are pro-eugenicist, then they are simply ignoring the fact that Dr. Paul is an OB/Gyn.

  44. Obstreperous Infidel says:

    Oh and spot on, JD, in regards to root causes. Well, of course the loony left made him do it. He was their trigger man, because frankly there to big of pussies to do it themselves.

  45. Obstreperous Infidel says:

    Good point, David. Plus, isn’t Ron Paul pro-life?

  46. Joe says:

    Obama the big liar is his name.

  47. urthshu says:

    Can haz flowchartz for Teh Narrative[s]?

    B/c was just wondering why
    Snowbilly = teen preggers
    &
    Old Nazi = Rightwinger
    but
    Black =/= Teh Funneh
    Although:
    Richard Pryor did a funneh Black Prez way earlier

  48. urthshu says:

    I mean, it’s a little like so

  49. Rob Crawford says:

    The narrative reached the ridiculous when I read about some lefty trying to blame the shooter on Limbaugh. The level of ignorance it takes to make that argument is breath-taking. Worse is the amount of effort it requires to maintain that level of ignorance.

  50. The castrated republicans says:

    Psycho went to journalism school, I think. He’s also right, sadly.

  51. Squid says:

    Worse is the amount of effort it requires to maintain that level of ignorance.

    Au contraire! Letting familiar voices spoon-feed you with information that makes you feel warm and comfortable is the easiest thing in the world. Trust me, my life before the age of 26 was one long, pleasant dream.

    The years since? One long headache, my friend.

  52. donald says:

    Staff Sargeant John Beale is coming home at 6:00PM at Falcon Field in Peachtree City. I went by and the Patriot Riders are there to escort him home. I feel terrible for this Riverdale High School Raider. I’m going to meet a few decent people up at the Publix and we’ll cry as he passes by.

    Thanks Sargeant Beale.

  53. Joe says:

    Freaky!

    H/T: Althouse

  54. Mike says:

    …”lest people begin noticing a few uncomfortable similarities in political vision between this Nazi-sympathizing leftover from the Greatest Generation and the current political power holders.”

    It’d be be nice to think so. But how? The people who pay attention to the lamestream media won’t be told about any of those connections, either historical or contemporary, either.

  55. Danger says:

    Thanks Sargeant Beale. X 2

  56. newrouter says:

    Mr. President, I am deeply disturbed that you would offer such a distortion of truth in the hopes of creating a lasting peace. A lasting peace cannot be created out of lies, distortions and half truths.

    You profess to be a Christian. But you seem more intent on protecting Muslims. In your speech you talked openly of your Muslim heritage, your admiration of their way of life, and so forth. You said in your speech that you have made one of your chief aims of your presidency repairing the image of Islam.

    Why did you hide these views from the American public during the recent presidential campaign?

    Why, as president, did you fully bow to the Saudi king, who refuses to allow any religious freedom for any Christian or Jew?

    You have made clear, by your words and assertions, that you are re-positioning the United States away from Israel, America’s lone democratic ally in the Mid-East.

    You have made clear through your statements and those of your minions that Israel should, under no circumstances, prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons.

    And yes, you have promised to retaliate against Iran if it ever attacks Israel with nuclear weapons.

    But you know full well that if Iran succeeds in its admitted goal of “wiping the Jewish state off the map” — and hits this tiny nation with nuclear warheads — there will be no Israel for the U.S. to retaliate on behalf of.

    Some Jews may be naïve, but we are not stupid.

    Rabbi Dr. Morton H. Pomerantz is a member of the Reform movement of Judaism and serves as a chaplain for the State of New York. A former Navy and Marine Corps officer and chaplain, he has also served as deputy national chaplain for the Jewish War Veterans of the United States.

    ?

  57. Joe says:

    Mel Gibson! Where is Mel Gibson! Forget about Rev. Wright! You are taking him out of context. Mel Gibson!

  58. donald says:

    I just back from the procession. I apologize to the Patriot Guard (Not that they care, they’re real men). I thank (For once) the police and other law enforcement. I’m awed by the turnout of the good people of Coweta and Fayette counties. My parents drove down and apparently it’s wall to wall all the way over to McDonogh. I’m real proud of my neighbors today, and a whole lot more proud of Sgt. Beale. The only bummer is my parents told me my nephew is going back to Afghanistan in September. Go Billy!

  59. Joe says:

    Hot Air’s advice to Sarah Palin.

    a. Allah?
    b. Capt?
    c. Michelle?
    d. All of the above?

  60. Dapper Usurper says:

    So I suspect that, upon closer examination, some of the more observant and politically cautious pundits on left will find it prudent to begin walking back attempts to tie the Holocaust Museum shooter to any particular political ideology

    Not likely. Despite Jim Robinson’s scrubbing, it is now widely known that Free Republic in particular was all “gooba gobba, one of us” about von Brunn’s rantings.

    And let’s face it: Freeper types illustrate “the base” concept in a way that I suspect makes “politically cautious pundits on the right” secretly appalled.

  61. JD says:

    Didn’t it turn out that this guy is a registered Dem in Maryland?

  62. geoffb says:

    “current progressive left and the fringe right have much in common,”

    “Whoever lies first wins. Facts are literally (literally) useless.

    Stalin wins from the grave.

  63. Dan Collins says:

    Ben Johnson at Front Page Magazine takes a close look at the lefty howlers and the evidence of what it is that Mr. von Brunn really did believe.

  64. JD says:

    Dan – Mathred and Corn are in a tizzy trying to make him out to be a Rightwinger.

  65. The Castrated Republicans says:

    Advice for Palin
    If it’s Allah that’s one amazing turnabout. He was practically sympatico with Andrew Sullivan until the Palin site started slapping him around.

  66. Mikey NTH says:

    Now my WAG (wild-ass-guess) is that this guy, Mr. von Brunn, doesn’t belong in any normal political placement in the American political scene, that he is off in some little political world consisting of himself; you know, if you were to guess on the color of the sky in his world ‘plaid’ or ‘paisely’ would be acceptable answers.

    Like Mr. Kaczynski, the Unabomber, he isn’t anywhere on the visible political spectrum at all. And any attempt to place him on the visible political spectrum is a real good indication that the ‘placer’ needs to come up for air and start looking at the forest.

    So to speak.

  67. Joe says:

    Charles “Stay Golden Pony Boy” Johnson fights off evidence that Von Brunn was a supporter of evolution and eugenics.

    Now I support evolution too, nor do I think every vegatarian or German Shepard lover is the next Adolf Hitler, but it is nice to see Pony Boy put off his game and be forced to defend. Now LGF hardly represents the MSM, but this does as an example support the Jeff Goldstein theory on dealing with the media. Attack them right back.

  68. not bh, he's begun his Death to Kobe chanting early tonight says:

    re: Advice to Palin link.

    By writing style and word choice, that’s certainly not Allah. Doesn’t read like the other two either.

  69. JD says:

    Olberman is in high dudgeon, and refuses to even acknowledge that a US serviceman was murdered by an American Muslim.

  70. Joe says:

    Hey JD, woof!

  71. The Castrated Republicans says:

    re: Palin link,

    No, but firmly arguing both sides of a position is pretty Allah like.

  72. Joe says:

    I think the advice to Palin is actually not bad. Not sure about the charity stuff, didn’t seem to hurt Obama that the only charity he gave was to Jeremiah Wright.

  73. Mikey NTH says:

    Just having to post a comment like I have above – I mean, damn.

    So, Jeff, Dan. When did it get so crazy that pure 100% genuine crazy cannot be acknowledged as just crazy? I think Dick Cheney and Joe Biden have everything in common that could never be shared – politically speaking – with Mr. von Brunn. When did the obvious become so hard to see?

    Let me make myself plain for the trolls here: So far as I know, Mr. von Brunn is a WWII vet, from the navy, who commanded a PT Boat.

    Get it?

    That stuff means nothing – he is just crazy, not part of the American political sphere – totally extra-solar, politically speaking.

    Get it? If Democrats are Donkeys, and Republicans are Elephants, Mr. von Brunn is quartz.

    Get it?

  74. The Castrated Republicans says:

    Little early maybe. The public won’t get overly excited about the midterms until unemployment hits eleven percent.

  75. happyfeet says:

    But even if some distorted version of evolutionary theory was part of Von Brunn’s world view, does that discredit the theory of evolution itself?

    That’s either evidence of drug abuse I think or adult-onset retardation, writing something that stupid. Charles Johnson is not in the game no mores. Not hardly.

  76. Dan Collins says:

    Yeah, Mikey, I don’t think it’s hard to see that he’s sui generis, or virtually so, and that’s why I entitled my post “The Political Uses” rather than “The Political Species”.

  77. Mikey NTH says:

    Dan – you see. I knew you would see, I knew Jeff would see. I knew so many of the regulars would see.

    But so many don’t see. And that is part of our political problem. Some people, like Mr. von Brunn, are so far outside the American political sphere, that trying to tie him to one part or another part of that sphere is an insult to everyone in that sphere. And those who attempt that tie-in have too many enthusiasms for their own good, and need to take a little break, smell the roses, and see the forest as a forest.

    So to speak.

  78. Dapper Usurper says:

    Ben Johnson at Front Page Magazine takes a close look at the lefty howlers and the evidence of what it is that Mr. von Brunn really did believe.

    I’d say both he and Scott Roeder certainly seemed to believe in taking direct action.

    I’m sure it’s all just a coincidence. Ain’t nothin’ but a tea party y’all.

  79. newrouter says:

    i wonder what mr. von brunn would think of the THE BELIZEAN GROVE

    ?

  80. JD says:

    Dap¶er – How did his views diverge from Jeremiah Wright’s, you fucking troll?

  81. Dan Collins says:

    DU, you somehow find the expedient formula to be that there was no shooting by Mr. Bledsoe.

    Why is that? In point of fact, Mr. Bledsoe’s beliefs are demonstrably closer to this dude’s than Tiller’s murderer. Sorry that that’s not real convenient for you, but that’s the case.

  82. Joe says:

    NOW denouces Letterman?

    Holy Steinem, Thomas, and Dworkin! I just fell off my chair.

  83. JD says:

    Dan – The fuckin’ Leftists and the MSM (I know, redundant) have practically ignored the murder of Pvt. Long, while going absolutely apeshit over Tiller and the museum shooting. It is vile, reprehensible, and sadly, expected.

  84. Dan Collins says:

    Joe, iirc, NOW also denounced the Playboy hate sex piece.

  85. Joe says:

    I guess that why my cat has been humping the neighbor’s dog.

  86. Mikey NTH says:

    See what I mean? Mr. von Brunn is outside of any part of the American political sphere. He is just outside it by any measure.

    Yet there are those trying to tie him to one part or another. It says a lot about the person trying to make the tie-in, doesn’t it?

    Again – where in normal American political life does Ted Kaczynski fall?
    The answer is: Nowhere. Like Mr. von Brunn, Mr. Kaczynski was his own wing, a party of one.

  87. newrouter says:

    g. gordon pulls now’s chain:

    Liddy starts out the segment by accusing Judge Sotomayor with making racist comments and criticizing her membership in the group National Council of La Raza, which he says means “the race” in “illegal alien”. Yes, that’s right — Liddy referred to the Spanish language as “illegal alien.” (By the way: the organization says a closer translation of La Raza would be “the people” or “the Hispanic people of the New World.”)

  88. Mikey NTH says:

    Newrouter: You missed the part where you tie your comment about Mr. Liddy to the post here, or any other comment.

    And if you want to say “look! someone else did something bad!”, well, that is just pathetic.
    Someone else behaving badly does not excuse another person behaving badly; it is the childish excuse of “Mom! He did it too!”

  89. newrouter says:

    oh my cap’t ed gets ethically equivalent:

    Update (Ed): Since NOW has been good enough to put principle above politics, then I can do the same by agreeing that conservative pundits should leave menstruation out of their criticisms of Sonia Sotomayor. If we complain about the belittling and sexualizing of conservative women in politics, then G. Gordon Liddy should stick to the substantive issues in the Sotomayor nomination. I hadn’t heard about that one until I clicked over to NOW’s site.

    ?

    i’m glad the good cap’t didn’t have to explain that “illegal alien” isn’t a language or give la raza’s interpretation of their name.

    yea kiss up to the radicals

  90. newrouter says:

    yea so now “addresses” this in a blog post for a cya. if they were really serious i’m sure they can get katie couric’s ear or npr. ask anita hill’s pubic hair or the coke can.

  91. newrouter says:

    Comment by Mikey NTH on 6/11 @ 7:04 pm #

    Newrouter: You missed the part where you tie your comment about Mr. Liddy to the post here, or any other comment.

    now was introduced @84 do you read illegal alien?

  92. newrouter says:

    @90

    And if you want to say “look! someone else did something bad!”

    nah goofing on now’s reaction to gordon’s short hand for illegal alien mexicans

  93. Dapper Usurper says:

    Why is that? In point of fact, Mr. Bledsoe’s beliefs are demonstrably closer to this dude’s than Tiller’s murderer.

    Hey, nice move. Make the straw man as obscure as possible.

  94. Dan Collins says:

    I’m sorry, DU, but why exactly is this Bledsoe fellow not acknowledged as part of this disturbing pattern by the left? Don’t von Brunn’s sources and enmities sort of pair up better with those of an Islamist, as versus those of an anti-abortionist? Does the fact that von Brunn’s and Bledsoe’s targets were generalized groups rather than specific individual make the killings a little more similar, or not.

    You don’t even understand the rhetorical idea of the straw man.

  95. Ric Locke says:

    So far as I know, Mr. von Brunn is a WWII vet, from the navy, who commanded a PT Boat.

    Well, we know of another WWII vet who commanded a PT boat. He was a Democrat, too.

    Just sayin’.

    Regards,
    Ric

  96. newrouter says:

    “Mr. Bledsoe’s beliefs are demonstrably closer to” jerry wright’s

  97. newrouter says:

    “Mr. Bledsoe’s beliefs are demonstrably closer to” louis farrahkan’s

  98. newrouter says:

    “Mr. Bledsoe’s beliefs are demonstrably closer to” bill ayers and bernie d

  99. Ric Locke says:

    (By the way: the organization says a closer translation of La Raza would be “the people” or “the Hispanic people of the New World.”)

    Bullshit. The word means “race” in Spanish, and is used exactly the way the English is. La Raza is attempting to identify Hispanics as a “race” in order to take advantage of the identity politics associated with the concept.

    Regards,
    Ric

  100. Mel says:

    Danger,

    Please remember, all that have gone before you are with you now. Do us proud.

  101. Rob Crawford says:

    (By the way: the organization says a closer translation of La Raza would be “the people” or “the Hispanic people of the New World.”)

    So what? Declaring yourself “The People” is no less disgusting than declaring yourself “The Race”.

    Hey, I got an idea — stop trying to defend the goddamned racists you like. Start condemning all racists. What was it that wise man said… “The way to stop discriminating based on race is to stop discriminating based on race”.

  102. Makewi says:

    Sure Rob, but then it would logically follow that Affirmative Action is discriminatory, and it follows from that, that you must hate black people. Hater.

  103. Bob Reed says:

    Best Wishes to you Mel,
    I hope your travels are exciting, in a peaceful kind of way of course…

    Many Happy returns

  104. newrouter says:

    So what? Declaring yourself “The People” is no less disgusting than declaring yourself “The Race”.

    they sell narratives to each other then sell them collectively to the state controlled media

  105. Rob Crawford says:

    Newrouter: You missed the part where you tie your comment about Mr. Liddy to the post here, or any other comment.

    That would require intellectual effort, original thinking, and would, in the end, be beside the point. The point is to use any means possible to link the lunatics to outspoken conservatives, to make it easier to get those outspoken conservatives shut down.

    On the flip side, the possibility that rhetoric coming from the left might possibly contribute to violence is never examined. It never seems to occur to them that that “Snipers Wanted” over a picture of President Bush might incite a lunatic to murder, that repeated calls to rape prominent conservative women might provoke a lunatic to try, that constantly comparing Israel to Nazi Germany might be giving cover to those who think killing “Zionists” is akin to storming Normany on D-Day.

    It would be nice to see calm, reasoned debate from everyone, but it’s hard not to reach for the rhetorical axe when you’re accused of everything up to — and including — genocide.

  106. newrouter says:

    cap’t ed said:

    then I can do the same by agreeing that conservative pundits should leave menstruation out of their criticisms of Sonia Sotomayor.

    yea because “that time of the month” is a patriarchy stereotype and that female stuff doesn’t happen to a racialist latina

  107. JD says:

    Asspulls and feces-flinging appears to be all Dapper has.

  108. newrouter says:

    . There’s probably 10 ten times as many “birthers” than people who actually know who Bledsoe is.

    very true considering the coverage of tiller vs bledsoe. go google it fool

  109. Dan Collins says:

    Dapper says, in effect: “Truth? What is truth? All that matters is what people believe, and they believe what we tell them to.”

  110. Mel says:

    Bob! My favorite flyboy, and I mean that in a good way.

    Travels are good, thanks for asking. Headed north now to avoid the heat. Global warming and all, or as we used to call it, summer.

    Best to all.

  111. JD says:

    Meya just cannot help but to be mendoucheous.

  112. Pablo says:

    Hey newrouter! What are you drinking tonight?

  113. N. O'Brain says:

    “Comment by Mikey NTH on 6/11 @ 6:44 pm #

    See what I mean? Mr. von Brunn is outside of any part of the American political sphere.”

    Nonsense.

    He didn’t create his political views ab initio, they are part and parcel of a loooong history of reactionary leftist thought stretching all the way back to the French Revolution.

  114. N. O'Brain says:

    “Again – where in normal American political life does Ted Kaczynski fall?”

    The reactionary left.

  115. meya says:

    “He didn’t create his political views ab initio, they are part and parcel of a loooong history of reactionary leftist thought stretching all the way back to the French Revolution.”

    http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/06/11/alleged-holocaust-museum-shooter-had-given-up-hate-site-planned-other-attacks/

    Conservatives were all talk and no action, according to von Brunn. On his website he complained, “The American Right-wing with few exceptions is totally Pacifist. The [right wing] does NOTHING BUT TALK. MORAL: America dies for want of men.”

    What a lefty.

  116. N. O'Brain says:

    “Sadly, conservatives seem to have lost their touch at translating obvious bullshit into votes.”

    We sold the franchise to the O!bama administration.

  117. N. O'Brain says:

    I mean, you voted for him, right?

  118. N. O'Brain says:

    “What a lefty.”

    The first correct thing you’ve ever typed, meya.

  119. ThomasD says:

    This is as ridiculous as putting an NAACP lawyer on the court. Oh wait.

    Well, spell it out then. Oh wait. You can’t.

    Racial preference is racial privilege, and you are down with that, no matter how absurd and illiberal it may be.

  120. ThomasD says:

    Yes, because everyone knows the Constitution is subservient to the will of the people.

  121. JD says:

    Meya – Let’s see if you can answer a direct question. I know, I know … silly me. Explain the differences between Von Nutjob’s view and Jeremiah Wright’s views.

  122. newrouter says:

    #

    Comment by Pablo on 6/11 @ 8:27 pm #

    Hey newrouter! What are you drinking tonight?

    pablo did you stop beating your wife?

  123. Mel says:

    Well Mr Dapper, thanks for the demonstration of hubris. Enjoy it while it lasts kid. It never does. It’s called history kiddo. Look into it.

  124. Joe says:

    What did Todd Palin say to Olbermann?

    Mush!

  125. newrouter says:

    Actually, all that really matters is democratic elections.

    fucking chavez this guy. one vote one time

  126. JD says:

    Dapper is a douchenozzle, but is illustrative of the Leftist lust for power over others.

  127. Rob Crawford says:

    NOBrain — I lean towards your opinion of von Brunn and Kaczynski, but get what Mikey’s saying, too. Those two wouldn’t be able to lead any movement larger than a short bus[*], but they were certainly steeped in a certain ethos. I remember a lot of “well… he has a point” noise from the left after Kaczynski’s “manifesto” was published, and apparently von Brunn’s peculiar strain of “thought” was heavily fertilized by Chomsky and works with titles like “Is Capitalism Dead?”

    I’ve also never seen conservatives or Republicans reluctant to make it clear that nominally “right-wing” extremists are not welcome. Even relatively mild comments that intimate approval of racist beliefs are enough to cost a conservative or Republican politician their position. Sure, some of that is political calculation — but mostly it’s because conservatives and Republicans are vehemently non-racist.

    This doesn’t mean there aren’t idiot conservatives or Republicans. It means we don’t bless them. We don’t go around making up excuses for allied groups calling themselves “The Race”. We don’t put a guy who spent twenty years calling an unabashed racist and antisemite his spiritual mentor into the White House.

    [*] — The counter example being Jim Jones. His “religion” was thinly veiled Marxism; poorly developed liberation theology. He was lauded by leftist luminaries, who praised his “good works” and his teachings while carefully ignoring every sign of his mental instabilities. It was only after paranoia fed by leftist conspiracy theories about the CIA led to the mass murder/suicide of his followers that the left began building a wall between him and themselves.

  128. Mel says:

    Hi Maggie.

  129. Joe says:

    I hesitate even to post this.

  130. newrouter says:

    hey trent don’t say that. mr. jerry wright says this. liberal wiggers knows your language

  131. Pablo says:

    pablo did you stop beating your wife?

    Don’t have one to beat, newrouter. Did you stop beating your meat? And, what are you drinking tonight?

  132. JD says:

    Dapper – You are not original, nor witty, or even good in comparison to other trolls. You should be ashamed.

  133. You should be ashamed.

    yeah, at least it took Sammy a week or two to get hammered.

  134. Joe says:

    Hmmmm…

    This is what The Andy Griffin Show would have been like…if Barney killed Andy, buried him in the basement, and had a tazer to use on Aunt Bea to keep her in line.

    Okay, it is not a total slam dunk in her favor because she said she was getting in her truck, but he could have easily overpowered her or blocked her from doing so. The officer was letting his own emotions go too. Reminded me a little of Andrew Sullivan, going after Sarah Palin (only difference being Sarah Palin could probably physically kick this cop’s and Andrew Sullivan’s ass at the same time).

  135. Mel says:

    Dapper, you remind me of an old golf partner. He would hit a great shot and then talk a lot of trash. Most of tje time he would miss the putt. There’s a lesson in there if you care to look for it.

  136. newrouter says:

    #

    Comment by Pablo on 6/11 @ 9:07 pm #

    pablo did you stop beating your wife?

    Don’t have one to beat, newrouter. Did you stop beating your meat? And, what are you drinking tonight?

    oh a twofer. pablo are you still an idiot?

  137. Pablo says:

    I wish I had a dime for every “stocking up on ammo” hit on teh Google.

    I wish I had a dime for every “chocolate chip cookies” hit on Google. Did you have a point?

  138. newrouter says:

    pablo are you still a neocon?

  139. Pablo says:

    pablo are you still an idiot?

    Never been one. What are you drinking tonight, hero?

  140. newrouter says:

    Did you have a point?

    a fucking idiot like you has one on the top of your head obama

  141. newrouter says:

    What are you drinking tonight, hero?

    yo asshat the dave letterman school of masterbate don’t work here

  142. Pablo says:

    I wish I had a dime for every “stocking up on ammo” hit on teh Google.

    Hey, you’d have $32.00. Sweet! I’d have $21K for my cookies.

  143. Pablo says:

    I take it you’re drinking kerosene, then?

  144. newrouter says:

    yo pablo do you speak “illegal alien”?

  145. newrouter says:

    I take it you’re drinking kerosene, then?

    i take it that ad homo attacks are your only shot of looking like a dickhead. you suckceeded

  146. newrouter says:

    hey pablo

    when did you stop beating obama’s meat?

  147. aw, is google fight defunct?

  148. Pablo says:

    This is the comment where I giggle at newrouter suggesting that I’m an O!-bot. Because idiots are funny. See Joe Biden.

  149. Mel says:

    Pablo and Newrouter

    Might I suggest pistols at dawn?

  150. ThomasD says:

    You think we ever could have an NAACP lawyer on the court? I mean, “advancement of colored people” ? Ridic!

    Yes, I grok your fealty to racial privilege. Paleo-leftist is the new conservative, blue hair optional.

  151. Pablo says:

    Only if you’re willing to spot router some ammo, Mel. Fair is fair, after all.

  152. Dapper Usurper says:

    Hey, you’d have $32.00. Sweet! I’d have $21K for my cookies.

    I was actually surprised when Sean Hannity’s forum was only number three for “stocking up on ammo”.

    At this point, I believe you all need to apologize to Janet Napolitano.

    Unless, of course, you hate and fear strong liberal women.

  153. sdferr says:

    I’d figure Janet Napolitano will want to apologize to Janet Napolitano, don’t you? She did take herself to the ground for the pin after all.

  154. baxtrice says:

    Dear jeff, please consider doing a weekly podcast. I offer my meager tech info to help! :)

  155. JD says:

    Mel – That is a very apt description, except Dapper is the kind that once saw someone else hit a great shot, basks in the glory of same as though he did it, and then later on down the line, starts telling the story where he was the one that hit the great shot.

  156. Pablo says:

    At this point, I believe you all need to apologize to Janet Napolitano.

    I believe we need to start casting the stink eye at WWII vets, especially those registered as Democrats.

  157. Mel says:

    Pablo and Newrouter,

    Conservation of force for future action is often a wise choice. I would suggest that you both make that choice.

  158. Jeff G. says:

    Where in Napolitano’s warning were we asked to be on the lookout for 80-year-old Democratic WWII vets who parrot a good deal of the progressive platform and idolize Margaret Sanger?

  159. Mel says:

    80 year old vets? Am I on the list? Crap, I’m going fishing.

  160. Crap, I’m going fishing.

    great. just remember Janet will be watching you.

  161. The Monster says:

    Is “illegal alien” like “Austrian”?

  162. Bob Reed says:

    No Mel, Marines are exempt from that list…

    But driving a winnebago..? That might be a crime soon…

    Can you fit all your gear in a Hyundai..?

    Just kiddin’, good luck fishing!

    Until Next Time,
    Best Wishes

  163. Mel says:

    Janet can watch all she wants. Maybe if she learned to tie a fly she wouldn’t be so uptight.

  164. Sammy says:

    I’m guessing the shooter didn’t vote for Obama.

  165. happyfeet says:

    yes. But not everyone who didn’t vote for Obama is the shooter.

  166. Mel says:

    And thus ends my visit to Protein Wisdom. Best to all.

  167. Sammy says:

    But not everyone who didn’t vote for Obama is the shooter.

    Not everyone who’s Muslim shoots up recruiting stations or (supposedly) makes trans-atlantic flights go down, but you’d never know it hanging around here.

  168. happyfeet says:

    good night, Mel

  169. happyfeet says:

    oh. I didn’t know that about the Muslims. If that’s true then definitely I think the non-shooty ones should be applauded.

  170. Sammy says:

    (clap, clap)

    There’s, like, 1.2 billion of them who don’t shoot.

  171. happyfeet says:

    If we got together and gave them each a red velvet cupcake for to be like positive reinforcement, that would be an unprecedented number of red velvet cupcakes to where I honestly don’t even know if that’s feasible, Sammy.

  172. well, I love any excuse to make red velvet cupcakes. Is there a holiday in June that might require them?

  173. happyfeet says:

    Juneteenth? Yay! Freedom! In Texas! I think freedom cupcakes would be beautiful and timely.

  174. oh, Father’s Day. duh. and RTO tells me that Flag day is also the Army’s birthday.

  175. alppuccino says:

    I wish I had a dime for every “stocking up on ammo” hit on teh Google.

    I wish I had ammo for every “stocking up on ammo” hit on teh Google.

  176. […] and here’s Jeff, whom I’m either squabbling with or crushing on—I can’t remember which: I can […]

  177. Rusty says:

    #172
    G*dd#mn, M%therf@cking number 22s.

  178. SDN says:

    Sammy, until you’ve read the Koran, I suggest you have a heaping helping of STFU. The danger isn’t just the “shooty types”; the danger is the percentage of that 1.2 billion who have read the Suras about dividing the world into the D’ar al Islam and the D’ar al Harb (hint:well over 90%) and send money, materials, and the occasional warm body to kill everyone who isn’t a Muslim / a slave.

  179. N. O'Brain says:

    “Not everyone who’s Muslim shoots up recruiting stations…”

    But all recruiting station shooters are muslim.

  180. N. O'Brain says:

    “…or (supposedly) makes trans-atlantic flights go down, but you’d never know it hanging around here.”

    But it wasn’t for want of trying.

  181. N. O'Brain says:

    BTW, you know a lot of Amish shoe bombers?

  182. N. O'Brain says:

    Amish horse shoe bombers?

  183. Danger says:

    Comment by Mel on 6/11 @ 7:41 pm #

    “Danger,

    Please remember, all that have gone before you are with you now. Do us proud.”

    Thanks Mel, and I will do my best.

    If I had raised the right flag I probably could have avoided this deployment. But as hard as it was to leave my family, squirming out of it would have been dishonerable.

    Too many good men like Staff Sargeant John Beale (refered to @ #53) gave everything they had and deserve someone to pick up the ball for them.

    I’ll be darned if I am going to let them down.

    Fair winds Mel,

  184. serr8d says:

    136 Comment by Joe on 6/11 @ 9:01 pm #

    I hesitate even to post this.

    I made it to where that crazy jackass in the fedora breaks through the glass wall. But I’ll happily read your quick synopsis.

  185. JHo says:

    NOW denouces Letterman?

    Holy Steinem, Thomas, and Dworkin! I just fell off my chair.

    Why the surprise? NOW lobbies hard and eternally for the system that once had Letterman falsely accused of domestic violence from half a nation away.

  186. JHo says:

    Yeah, its only a fraction of the people who read about how a usurper is gonna take everything away and destroy western civilization that actually go out and follow the “courageous” conclusion rather than just talk about it.

    Er, its only a few orders of magnitude more people than who read about how a usurper is gonna take everything away and destroy western civilization. Those few orders actually go out and follow the “courageous” conclusion to saw an infidel head off rather than just talk about it.

    Assuming that’s where that piece of crap you wrote was headed, meya. Law briefs much? My excuse is I don’t write for a living.

  187. royf says:

    “Yeah, its only a fraction of the people who read about how a usurper is gonna take everything away and destroy western civilization that actually go out and follow the “courageous” conclusion rather than just talk about it.”

    The evidence clearly points to James von Brunn having heard and believed the lefts lies and fabrications about Boosh having bombed the WTC and invading Afghanistan and Iraq in a “illegal and immoral war for oil” as the driving force for him making his “courageous” decision.

  188. Mark A. Flacy says:

    @192

    A very tiny fraction of a basic shitload of people adds up nonetheless to be quite a few. Try .083% of 1.2 billion as an example.

  189. N. O'Brain says:

    “#Comment by meya on 6/12 @ 6:11 am #

    And he better do it before the mulatto takes away his guns.”

    Why do hate brown people so?

  190. Carin says:

    Where in Napolitano’s warning were we asked to be on the lookout for 80-year-old Democratic WWII vets who parrot a good deal of the progressive platform and idolize Margaret Sanger?

    Heh. Is it wrong for the proprietor to be the thread-winner? There’s prolly some small type somewhere that say’s Jeff’s prohibited.

    I’m guessing the shooter didn’t vote for Obama.

    And, that’s prolly the totality of the crossover in the Venn diagram between the shooters’ views, and those of “conservatives.”

  191. LTC John says:

    meya, why so afraid to see this guy was a basket of really weird things, mostly handpicked from the far-Left shelf of the store? Nobody here is claiming that since he hated “neo-cons” we need to make sure no registered Democrats have access to firearms or are allowed within 500 feet of Bill Kristol.

  192. meya says:

    “meya, why so afraid to see this guy was a basket of really weird things, mostly handpicked from the far-Left shelf of the store?”

    Because he’s a right wing extremist. Which is not to be confused with a conservative. If an enviro wacko decides to take out some neighborhood development or union owned project, that doens’t make him a right wing union buster or anti-government spending nutcase. He’s still an enviro wacko and a left wing extremist that our government agencies warn us about. I mean, you all know that there are right wing extremists that hate neocons and jews right? New world order black helicopter types. The non-extremist non-hate part of that is the right wingness that people like pat buchanan espouse. The fact that pat doesn’t like neocons does’nt make him left.

    I think the problem here is for people who can’t grasp extremes. They think the ALF/ELF is in charge of congress in the form of nancy pelosi, so they see this guy and they cant have him associated with the mainstream right, so the reaction is to turn him into the left. Rather than seeing that the extreme right and extreme left are the source of this terrorism, not the people who actually get elected.

  193. Carin says:

    Your explanation falls apart, Meya, because the term “right winger” has been thrown at just about everyone to the left of Kathleen Parker.

    Perchance if you don’t look as the right/left dichotomy as a line. And, instead – a circle.

  194. Carin says:

    I mean, you all know that there are right wing extremists that hate neocons and jews right? New world order black helicopter types. The non-extremist non-hate part of that is the right wingness that people like pat buchanan espouse.

    So, Pat Buchanan is JUST like the shooter, only a bit more grounded. Got it.

  195. Dan Collins says:

    That’s why he’s always guesting on MSNBC, Carin. Because of the mainstream winger bonafides.

  196. Bob Reed says:

    meya,

    With all due respect this guy probably voted for neither major party candidate last fall…

    He hates Booooosh! nearly as much as you do. He despises neo-cons, and all that they stand for. He’s an extremem anti-semite, which judging by the Presidents mentor’s and the prevailing sentiments is a viable mainstream point of view in the Democratic party. And finally, he is a NAZI, which is an ultra-nationalistic socialist; and although the Democrats have become the party of “hate/blame America first”, they are clearly the party of a socialist mindset that borders on communism…

    He’s the kind of guy Bill Buckley ran out of he conservative movement 50 years ago…

    Regardless of your semantics game, this guy was anything but right wing; even though you all would definately want to make the right the ideology of racism…

    But that convoluted meta-narrative is the subject of most certainly a whole different thread…

    all that said, have a lovely Friday

  197. royf says:

    “Because he’s a right wing extremist.”

    Yeah just like his hero Adolf Hitler right? Oh well except for the “National Socialism”.

  198. meya says:

    “So, Pat Buchanan is JUST like the shooter, only a bit more grounded. Got it.”

    See this is the part where I’m talking about the problem is people don’t grasp extremes.

    “He’s the kind of guy Bill Buckley ran out of he conservative movement 50 years ago…”

    Exactly. And not because he was too liberal. But because he’d be the type to actually lynch people, rather than write articles about how the south is entitled to take steps necessary to control blacks.
    “Your explanation falls apart, Meya, because the term “right winger” has been thrown at just about everyone to the left of Kathleen Parker.”

    Look man, nancy pelosi is left wing and pat buchanan is right. This guy an extremist of the latter, not the former.

  199. slackjawedyokel says:

    Danger,
    If you were really getting ready to deploy, you’d know how to spell “Sergeant”. I call bullshit.

  200. slackjawedyokel says:

    Danger,
    My apologies. I had you confused with another commenter. Disregard my previous.

    Good luck and Godspeed.

  201. royf says:

    He’s a Nazi meya and you know what that means, even though you chose to lie and distort the truth.

  202. meya says:

    “He’s a Nazi meya and you know what that means”

    An extremist of this:

    http://buchanan.org/blog/buchanan%E2%80%99s-necessary-book-1557

  203. SBP says:

    Perchance if you don’t look as the right/left dichotomy as a line. And, instead – a circle.

    Better yet, a plane.

    SFAG and Buchanan are both at about 5, 1′.

  204. SBP says:

    Look man, nancy pelosi is left wing and pat buchanan is right.

    Look, woman, “right” and “left” in the sense you’re using them are utterly meaningless, other than as a rhetorical cudgel.

  205. Pablo says:

    Look man, nancy pelosi is left wing and pat buchanan is right.

    You can tell by his Reform Party membership, his perch at MSNBC and his anti Israel sentiment.

  206. Rob Crawford says:

    He’s a Nazi meya and you know what that means

    Um… he’s a close friend of the Kennedys?

  207. Rob Crawford says:

    You can tell by his Reform Party membership, his perch at MSNBC and his anti Israel sentiment.

    Excepting his party membership, Buchanan’s indistinguishable from most Democrats.

  208. McGehee says:

    I wasn’t really listening, but did Meya just say she thinks Buchanan is right?

  209. royf says:

    “An extremist of this:”

    So now your saying it’s MSNBC’s fault?

  210. Carin says:

    SBP, that was kinda interesting.

    The shooter’s political leanings were so bizarre, how ’bout we say it’s utterly useless to put him on a right/left line.

    But, the issue is, Meya, we KNOW why the “he’s a right winger” line is being repeated so often. We know. It is an attempt, by the media, to smear conservatives with the taint of Von Bron. How is this NPR headline for you. “Was the Holocaust Museum Shooter a Right-Winger?” Notice the absence of the word “extreme”. I see, though, that is where you got your talking points about Buchanan.

    Third, it’s somewhat apparent from Von Brunn’s writing that he did identify with the Republican Party on some basic partisan questions. He cheered conservatives for getting Dan Rather fired, believed Sarah Palin was unfairly hounded by the media, and so on. Indeed, if there’s anything surprising and disturbing about Von Brunn’s beliefs, it’s that he identifies more closely with the Republican Party than I would have thought a radical white supremacist would. This may be a sign that the GOP has become more appealing to radical right-wingers than it once was, but it could also be an anomally

    Make of that what you will.

  211. physics geek says:

    lest people begin noticing a few uncomfortable similarities in political vision between this Nazi-sympathizing leftover from the Greatest Generation and the current political power holders.

    That would require the leftists to remove their ideological blinders. Let me know when the Four Horsemen arrive, because that’s about the only time that that’s likely to happen.

  212. Carin says:

    I keep repeating myself, but a Venn diagram would be helpful. Overlap of the shooter’s believes and the two political parties.

  213. royf says:

    This article brings to mind another story which has been deemed not news worthy by the media, which ideology spawned this?

    Why did the press ignore the firebombing of Sarah Palin’s church?
    By Dave Gibson

    Link

    Perhaps, the most important reason why the press has chosen not to cover the story is that during the months after Palin was chosen as John McCain’s running mate, teams of Democratic Party operatives swarmed the Wasilla area in an attempt to uncover any dirt that could be used against the Governor.

    Could it be that a few of the more zealous Democrat operatives stayed-on and took their devotion to party a step further, and actually set the blaze?…Such a discovery would be disastrous to the left. Faced with this possibility the mainstream media may have decided not to explore the crime too deeply.

    Could anyone imagine that no media coverage would have been given, if it had been Barack Obama’s church in Chicago which had been firebombed?

    Instead, it was Sarah Palin’s church in Wasilla that was the subject of a terrorist act, and the crime has been completely ignored by the press.

  214. Mr. Pink says:

    The real question is how long did it take MAINSTREAM leftwing pundits and activists to start gameplanning how this holocaust pyscho’s murder of an American citizen could be used for a political advantage? Would anyone even give them 5 minutes?

  215. The Monster says:

    Perchance if you don’t look as the right/left dichotomy as a line. And, instead – a circle.

    Better yet, a plane.

    I love me some Pournelle, but his axes aren’t the only ones to use. I’m rather fond of the Nolan Chart, particularly in its diamond orientation as presented by the World’s Smallest Political Quiz. Those two axes cover most of domestic politics, but there needs to be a third for foreign policy, and let’s not even go into abortion, which divides even those who strongly believe in both personal and economic liberty.

  216. Bob Reed says:

    I took that quiz Monster, agreeing with every question…

    It told me i was libertarian; and here all along I thought I was an eeeeevil RethugliKKKan!

  217. The Monster says:

    You can be both, Bob. I am also a registered Rep and an ideological Libbie. (Note that parties are coalitions of ideological groups.)

  218. JD says:

    mean, you all know that there are right wing extremists that hate neocons and jews right?

    The lying little fascist was at it again. In case nobody pointed it out, there is nothing uniquely right wing about hatred of neocons and Jews. In fact, the combination of hatred of neocons and Jews appears to be uniquely Leftwing. For you to claim that is Right wing is to ignore the rhetoric from your side of the aisle for the last 8 years. Then, meya pulls out Buchanon, instead of, let’s say, Jeremiah Wright.

  219. Mikey NTH says:

    It should be noted that Kos is a veteran, and that he does have some political views, and is rather vocal about those views.

    I think DHS ought to keep an eye on him lest he go on some rampage.

    And keep an eye on that Frank Buckles – can’t trust those WWI vets.

  220. Nishi_Jenkins says:

    Dude shot a black man in the Holocaust Museum.
    Sowwy JeffieG, fail on empirical data.

  221. JD says:

    There is nothing “empirical” about the blather you puke out, nishidiot.

  222. Nishi_Jenkins says:

    Also dude served 6 years for attempting to kidnap members of the Fed Reserve, on the whole jews-control-the-world conspiracy theory.
    Hated Jews and Blacks and wrote a whole bunch about it.
    Your misdirect is not working JeffieG.
    Do you have The Fisher King in your Infinite Movie Playlist?
    Can I send it to you if you don’t?

  223. Abe Froman says:

    Nishi’s apparently under the impression that she can joust in shorthand on a blog where everyone thinks she’s weird and creepy.

  224. JD says:

    Abe – Nishit is under the impression that she is sentient and sane.

  225. Abe Froman says:

    Nishi freaks me out. In a bunny in a pot of boiling water sorta way. She just exudes ickiness.

  226. Rob Crawford says:

    Nishi freaks me out. In a bunny in a pot of boiling water sorta way. She just exudes ickiness.

    It’s the combination of appearing developmentally disabled and calling for eugenics.

  227. Silver Whistle says:

    Whenever I see Nishi’s name I get an image of orderlies in white coats running behind her.

  228. JD says:

    Silver Whistle – Like I always say, every time I see that name show up, I realize that some hospital has lost a patient, and some orderly is out looking for her, again.

  229. Silver Whistle says:

    JD, I hope she has a label, like Paddington Bear. Then I wouldn’t worry so much about her getting lost in the big world.

  230. JD says:

    The orderly should considered RFID or an ankle bracelet.

  231. Silver Whistle says:

    JD, that doesn’t seem so bad, if a little unsightly. A Paddington label would be a little cuter, though. Especially if she had a duffle coat and red wellies.

  232. Nishi_Jenkins says:

    No, I am weird and creepy.

  233. Mr. Pink says:

    Not to mention a liar.

  234. Silver Whistle says:

    No, I am weird and creepy.

    I’m sure if you spent a little time on your wardrobe, met some nice friends, took your Chlorpromazine, maybe painted your bedroom a nice pastel, then you wouldn’t see things that way.

  235. meya says:

    “Excepting his party membership, Buchanan’s indistinguishable from most Democrats.”

    Fascinating stuff guys. Really.

  236. Merovign says:

    The problem with dumbshits is that they don’t know they’re dumbshits (because they’re dumbshits), so they just go on and on and on as if they were contributing something interesting or useful, as opposed to just smearing their feces on the comment box and clicking “Say It!”

    It isn’t dissent, it isn’t an alternative opinion, it isn’t an intellectual challenge, it’s dumb shit.

  237. SDN says:

    And who here hates Obama? I disapprove of every policy position of his I can figure out through the clouds of unicorn dust and Skittles, but hate him? Nah.

    thor, OTOH? Hate is not the exact word I’d choose. Loathe and despise are lots closer.

    Oh, and meya? von Brun is registered in Maryland as a Democrat. Just like Democrats Fred Phelps and Kleagle Byrd, two other fine examples of Democrat tolerance.

  238. The James W. von Brunn “Thing” (UPDATED)…

    So a “white supremacist” goes into a Holocaust Museum… sounds like the beginning to a bad joke huh?  But a joke its not, the ass hat walked in, started shooting and the spin machines oiled up to start rolling.
    Other coverage…
    L…

  239. ?????? ?? ?????? ?????. ?????? ????? ??????, ??????? ? ????,
    ??????????? ?????? ??????? ? ???????? ??????? ????.

Comments are closed.