39 Comments  :::   Post a comment »

1. Comment by cjd on 11/10 @ 10:30 am #

   Honesty or Freudian slip? Not that it matters, the result is the same. Hope. Change. O!bey.

2. Comment by apotheosis on 11/10 @ 10:30 am #

   …Freudian faceplant.

3. Comment by Mossberg500 on 11/10 @ 10:31 am #

   Words are meaningfully ambiguous!

4. Comment by alppuccino on 11/10 @ 10:34 am #

   Maybe he’ll be a kind and benevolent ruler.

5. Comment by mojo on 11/10 @ 10:38 am #

   “Balls!” cried the Queen. “If I had ‘em I’d be King!”

6. Comment by BJTexs on 11/10 @ 10:39 am #

   Whoopsy!

   I’m going to give her the benefit of the doubt and suggest that she was momentarily bedazzled by the “President-Elect” seal on the lectern.

7. Comment by McGehee on 11/10 @ 10:40 am #

   She’s in trouble! She just implied that O! is only 12 inches.

8. Comment by Techie on 11/10 @ 10:42 am #

   Look, I’ll admit that I’m not the biggest historical scholar, but is there really an “Office of the President-Elect”?

9. Comment by alppuccino on 11/10 @ 10:43 am #

   She’s fairly attractive. Why couldn’t El PresidentO’s transition team leader look like Shirley Hemphil?

10. Comment by Pablo & Clyde on 11/10 @ 10:44 am #

    Techie, not until just now.

11. Comment by Roland THTG on 11/10 @ 10:44 am #

    We can hope for a Benevolent Depotism I suppose.
    That would be some change right there, I don’t care who you are.

12. Comment by Roland THTG on 11/10 @ 10:47 am #

    s. there should be an ’s’ in there.

13. Comment by Roland THTG on 11/10 @ 10:48 am #

    Benevolent Depotism would be like home depot maybe.

14. Comment by ThomasD on 11/10 @ 10:49 am #

    I’m pretty sure it’s not the Cubicle of the President Elect.

    Other than that, it is a rather vague concept.

15. Comment by McGehee on 11/10 @ 10:52 am #

    In past occasions it’s been called “the transition office” or some such. Leave it to O! to make it personal.

16. Comment by happyfeet on 11/10 @ 10:56 am #

    What I take from that is more that the flunky wants to make sure that as the economy tanks and tanks and languishes uncertainly with no indication from Baracky what the parameters of his dirty socialist schemes are to be that it’s all on Bush. Just one president at a time so it would be wrong to help anyone gauge an investment or a business plan. We are in a deep hole Baracky will say and the deeper the better cause that narrative rocks.

17. Comment by BumperStickerist on 11/10 @ 11:06 am #

    I look forward to the recycling of Yakov Smirnoff material.

    -

18. Comment by baxtrice on 11/10 @ 11:08 am #

    Dizzying spectacle isn’t it. Rule? I know that B’s supposed to be some great Harvard Constituational scholar, but I’m doubting he ever read it, I think he just picked up the Cliff Notes.

19. Comment by Bob Reed on 11/10 @ 11:12 am #

    “Just words…”

    Rule does not equal govern or preside, at least noy in our constitutional sense…

    It may have simply been a Freudian slip, or a mask slip…or sumpin’…

    But it was definately a slip

20. Comment by Rob Crawford on 11/10 @ 11:13 am #

    No wonder lefties never want to talk about how they’d govern. They don’t intend on governing.

21. Comment by HeatherRadish on 11/10 @ 11:15 am #

    But don’t use the word “Chimperor.”

22. Comment by Sdferr on 11/10 @ 11:19 am #

    Attractive? I dunno, she looks like Obama’s Mac McClarty to me.

23. Comment by Techie on 11/10 @ 11:45 am #

    All Glory to the Hypno-toad.

24. Comment by Dan Collins on 11/10 @ 11:45 am #

    She has lizard neck, but . . .

    OBAMA RULES!!!

25. Comment by thoreapergrim on 11/10 @ 11:47 am #

    Finally Collins comes around.

26. Comment by cranky-d on 11/10 @ 11:57 am #

    Whatever you’re calling yourself these days, where’s my free gas, bitch!?

27. Comment by Veeshir on 11/10 @ 12:09 pm #

    He should just cut to the chase and change his name to Nehemiah Scudder.

28. Comment by charles austin on 11/10 @ 12:24 pm #

    He’s no fool. He knows a feudal lord must rule as well as reign.

29. Comment by N. O'Brain on 11/10 @ 12:31 pm #

    Conservatives govern. Reactionary leftists rule.

30. Comment by Tony LaVanway on 11/10 @ 1:24 pm #

    Buckle your seat belts,kids
    Venezuela here we go!!!!

    tony
    south haven,mi

31. Comment by lee on 11/10 @ 1:32 pm #

    Jeez Goldstein, it’s always about the the words for you!

    Govern/rule

    Good man/dangerous man

    Surely distinctions without a difference!

    Quit getting hung up on these persnickety little details.

32. Comment by Cave Bear on 11/10 @ 1:55 pm #

    For some reason the videos you link to don’t work for me (just get the little box with the red x), so I went to the site you linked to and watched it there.

    The word “creepy” comes to mind.

33. Comment by mojo on 11/10 @ 2:02 pm #

    BTW, Jeff - you’re apparently now “self-aggrandizing”…

    C’est la guerre, baby.

34. Comment by Aaron on 11/10 @ 2:12 pm #

    Governing is soooo 2008, we are transitioning to the Obama “rule” of 2009. I think for our insane liberal douche-nozzle friends like Cliff Lyon http://oneutah.org/2008/11/09/bush-an-ugly-man-a-very-ugly-man-by-fox-news/ 2009 is the “Messianic reign” of Obama.

35. Comment by The Way Lost Dog on 11/10 @ 3:01 pm #

    #

    Comment by urthshu on 11/10 @ 11:43 am #

    “We’ll just have to design a Perfect Government Hamburger to replace all that CRAP in fast food joints.

    And you WILL eat it. Baracky won’t allow you to go back to your old lives, UN-uniformed, uninvolved, or unfed.”

    There. Fixed that for you.

36. Comment by The Way Lost Dog on 11/10 @ 3:02 pm #

    See? So rattled that I posted on the wrong thread….

37. Comment by MarkD on 11/10 @ 3:32 pm #

    I think I had one of those perfect government hamburgers back in the 70s. Can I have some fermented soybeans instead, please?

    Hey, Carter was president, what did you expect? Maybe he’ll come back as a consultant. That sawdust from Habitat for humanity has to go somewhere, slackers.

38. Comment by EW on 11/11 @ 12:45 am #

    Well the liberal illuminati wanted to get in there and take over why not kick Bush out a couple months early. It’s not like he is going to be doing anything anyway.

39. Trackback by hypnos för viktnedgång on 6/23 @ 11:01 am #

    hypnos för viktnedgÃ¥ng…

    hypnos.se…

RSS feed for comments on this post.

TrackBack URI: http://proteinwisdom.com/wp-trackback.php?p=13627

Leave a comment

If you want to leave a feedback to this post or to some other user´s comment, simply fill out the form below.