So, "To Recap" [Dan Collins]
The Washington Times provides a concise synopsis of The Great Frosted Flake-Out.
Credit where due: Why Andrew still matters.
Hypothetical situation, guys. You do know what that means, I take it.
Suppose Republicans had decided to use the Frosts as an example. The grandfather has a little money. Picture young Graeme, surrounded by Republican leaders and the admiring Press, arguing for abolition of inheritance taxes on the ground that if Daddy can inherit he, Graeme, can get the medical care he needs without being a burden on anyone. Given whatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s known about the FrostsÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ situation it makes at least as much sense as what has happened and maybe more.
Would the exposure of the FrostsÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ wastrel ways and irresponsibility then constitute Ã¢â‚¬Å“smearingÃ¢â‚¬Â? Discuss.
(I know some will say, “But it’s different.” If you argue thus, please indicate how it is different, and how that makes a difference.)
“Go, stranger, and tell the Spartans that we lie here in obedience to their laws.”
Another one, from . . . Madison, Wisconsin?