I wrote a week or so back about the Edwards campaign’s attempts to turn pointed criticism into “hate speech,” a designation that carries with it the stigma of criminality thanks to the (unfortunate) existence of actual hate speech laws, which are increasingly poised to grease the slipperly slope toward a linguistic “tolerance” based upon the illiberal premise that particular identity groups have a “right” not to be offended — a concept that, should it continue to gain policy support, will have the practical effect of turning the concept of free speech completely on its head, replacing it with a kind of “benevolent” totalitarianism that would dictate the kinds of speech that are acceptably free.
Such a maneuver is a transparent attempt to protect leftist dogma, which relies, for its power, on the ability to stifle and shame competing narratives. Under the guise of “sensitivity,” such thinking is actually an attempt to heavily regulate the marketplace of ideas — which, given leftist distrust of markets and market forces, is not really too shocking.
But the problems liberalism faces in the US comes not so much from straight leftist dogma as it does from the ability of “progressives” to pressure the cultural ethos — the idea being to stoke grievances for the purposes of appealing to two things: 1) the best intentions of Americans, who truly don’t wish to offend; and 2) the kind of cost-benefit analysis thinking that pervades business and that animates opportunistic law makers.
On this second point, political advocacy groups — who pretend to represent the interests of aggrieved identity groups — are quite successful (as Jesse Jackson, among others, has learned): oftentimes the target of their calculated ire will “settle” rather than risk the bad publicity that comes with being labeled racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-poor, etc, the end result being that the political advocacy group has been able to dictate the policy and practice of private businesses.
Which is why I find this particular instance of sub rosa strong-arming, revealed by Jihad Watch’s Robert Spencer, unsurprising:
[...] this week I have gotten emails telling me that Jihad Watch has suddenly been blocked in all sorts of places: Fidelity Investments, JPMorgan Chase, even the City of Chicago. Word is that Jihad Watch and other sites have suddenly been labeled as purveying “hate speech.”This is a tried and true tactic of the Left: intellectually bankrupt as it is, it silences its critics rather than dealing with them on the level of ideas. They can’t answer us, so they try to shut us up and discredit us. Leftists, as well as apologists for Islamic jihad terrorism, label their opponents “hatemongers” and “bigots,” hoping thereby to make people of good will turn away from their message. And the politicized nature of this Internet censorship will come as a surprise to no one.
In reality, Jihad Watch is dedicated to the defense of human rights for all people against those who would impose Islamic law, with its institutionalized discrimination against women and religious minorities, over both Muslim and non-Muslim societies. There is no “hatred” in this, except when we report the words of hatred and supremacism of the Islamic jihadists. We are trying to raise awareness of the nature, extent, and goals of the global jihad, which threatens everyone who loves and cherishes freedom and the equality of rights of all people before the law.
And so, we are going to fight this, as best we can, and I am sure MEMRI and HotAir [who have likewise been blocked, including in places of government workplaces -- though access to CAIR and Arab News sites remain untroubled] are also. Today I am going to contact every organization that, according to emails I have received, has banned Jihad Watch, and urge them to remove the ban. Wherever you are working today, if you get a chance please take a moment to check if you still have access to conservative sites — and if you don’t, lodge a respectful but firm protest. Let us not take lying down being vilified and silenced, when we are telling the truth.
[my emphases]
Controlling narratives — and defining authenticity in order to factor out “approved” criticism — is at the very heart of the progressive movement’s agenda. Policy opponents — people whose “crime” is often merely a strategy disagreement over how best to tackle a particular problem — are intentionally demonized and marginalized as sub-human, obscene, vile, and (it follows) unworthy of engagement.
They are, in fact, mentally defective, a cancer to be snuffed out, so that the collective “good” — designed, organized, and implemented by those who claim to be working on behalf of “the people” — can prevail. And just as it makes no sense to try to reason with cancer, the argument goes, it makes no sense to try to engage something so self-evidently cancerous that it would presume to challenge the revealed truths held by neo-progressives. So committed are neo-progressives to this idea, in fact — this demand for a unity of message — that those who stray from the approved discourse are often publicly attacked and, subsequently, excommunicated.
I’ll leave it to you to locate any historical precedents.
Gordon Brown, in response to al Qaeda attacks in Britain, has decided the best way to prevent terrorism going forth is to police the speech of the actual victims as a bow to the calculated grievance mongering of those from whose ranks come their attackers and would-be murderers.
And, as Diana West has recently argued, President Bush himself has fallen into that same trap — though his reaction has been far less draconian than the kind of mind-bogglingly Orwellian dictate issued by Britain’s new Labour leader and prime minister.
But just as physical appeasement is precisely the wrong way to fight terrorism, linguistic appeasement is precisely the wrong way to fight the encroachment of illiberal leftist power plays disguised as feel good measures to promote “tolerance”.
Businesses, who will often take the path of least resistance, need to reminded that grievance mongers make up a rather small percentage of the population, and that “voluntarily” censorship, under pressure from such grievance groups, will alienate many more people than it will appease.
Similarly, government needs to be reminded that criticism is not “hate speech,” just as universities need to be reminded that “free speech zones” are inherently un-American, and create a learning environment that is, on its face, anti-intellectual.
So I urge those of you reading this to take Mr Spencer’s challenge. Because progressivism — and the leftist, collectivist thinking it represents — will only become stronger the more it is able to insinuate itself into the fabric of American culture.
Because, given its proponents’ willingness to justify practically any means to bring about its desired ends, and given that it is an ideological movement based solely on will, “contingency”, and manufactured consent, it must be beaten back by the very liberal principles it pretends to champion.
And one of those principles is the insistence that free speech and the free exchange of thought in a vibrant marketplace of ideas not be cheapened by emotional appeals to the kind of “tolerance” that is nothing more than a calculated attempt to constrain and control what speech is deemed “appropriate” — an ideological gambit that, if successful, will indeed have the effect of marginalizing those who refuse to obey, while forcing those who fear its wrath into adopting the very kind of PC speech codes that act as de facto templates for censorship.
Comment by david on 7/5 @ 10:47 am #
If you want to use the N-word so badly, just do it. And quit whining.
Comment by Mr. Boo on 7/5 @ 10:52 am #
Ah, the fresh scent of the tolerant 12-year-old progressive mind, always ready to engage ideas on their face.
Comment by BJTexs on 7/5 @ 10:53 am #
david;
Nabobs? Numskulls? Nitwits?, Neolinguistic nattering knuckleheads.
Oh, wait … nonsensical?
How am I doing?
Comment by Great Banana on 7/5 @ 10:55 am #
It’s too funny that David goes right ahead and proves Jeff’s point, and he does not even realize it.
Comment by Eben Flood on 7/5 @ 10:55 am #
You can always count on david for the intellectual rejoinder.
One problem Jihad Watch will face is a reluctance by any employee to bring to their company’s attention that they’ve been surfing the net rather than working, so please bring back my favorite website…
Comment by Phinn on 7/5 @ 10:55 am #
“an ideological gambit that, if successful, will indeed have the effect of marginalizing those who refuse to obey”
Marginalizing?
I think the Leftist Play Book calls for fining, imprisoning and ultimately re-educating.
Comment by BJTexs on 7/5 @ 11:01 am #
Phinn;
Don’t forget free prescription drugs for treatment.
Comment by Dan Collins on 7/5 @ 11:02 am #
It’s Progressive Rage Boy!
Comment by syn on 7/5 @ 11:08 am #
There is no difference between Collectivism and the Corporation.
Mental pygmie Progressives believe themselves as the anti-establishment standing up to the man without ever reflecting that they have collectively become the establishment man killing individual liberty.
Comment by TallDave on 7/5 @ 11:14 am #
I’ve been trying to order a sub rosa all week, but the guy behin the counter at Subway keeps telling me the recipe is a secret.
Comment by McGehee on 7/5 @ 11:16 am #
Wow, looks like the Rapid Response Troll Armada left base without their nuclear croaking points today.
Comment by Eric Anondson on 7/5 @ 11:16 am #
N-word? Oh! Neocon! Yes, that word certainly does sum up hate speech, neocon, Neocon, NEOCON!
Comment by Pablo on 7/5 @ 11:20 am #
Neocons.Is there any other hateful slur that begins with N?
Comment by bonhomme on 7/5 @ 11:22 am #
I’ve been calling her Rosa’s assistant. Sometimes I call her Lupe, but to be honest that was only the one time. I never would have thought to call her sub-Rosa.
On a serious note I am glad you’re out there Jeff. Your argument is lucid, clear, logical, and the links are devastating. This is a very important conversation to be had and it goes to the core of a liberal and free society. I appreciate your efforts and have made careful mental notes for the next time I have a related discussion in my personal life.
Comment by shine on 7/5 @ 11:22 am #
Those leftists and their mandates for corporate and government deployment of internet filtering technologies!
Comment by david on 7/5 @ 11:26 am #
“for the next time I have a related discussion in my personal life.”
Please do that as often as possible.
Comment by Jeff G. on 7/5 @ 11:32 am #
I think the problem, shine, is with the selectiveness of the filtering technologies, and with the fact that the filtering is based around a concept of “hate speech” that is anti-liberal.
But feel free to simplify if it helps you sleep at night.
david –
Two niggers walk into a bar. Bartender says, “Hello. what can I get you gentlemen?”
There. That ought to keep your little mind grinding away for hours.
Tell me, was it everything you thought it’d be?
Comment by bonhomme on 7/5 @ 11:32 am #
“Please do that as often as possible.”
Well, since you asked politely…
Comment by Jeff G. on 7/5 @ 11:38 am #
Try as I might, I still can’t get any “n-words” to walk. Though if I could, I should think a bar wouldn’t be such a bad destination — particularly if it were Happy Hour at the time.
Comment by Pablo on 7/5 @ 11:46 am #
Can you say “Net Neutrality”, actus? Sure you can.
Comment by happyfeet on 7/5 @ 11:46 am #
It’s important I think to remember the other end of the spectrum of the speech police. Where the media can’t suppress opposing views, they’ll be sure to label them as “harsh rhetoric” … Kaus had a nice example yesterday I think…
The NYT cites the following quote as an example of the “heated rhetoric” that alienates Latino voters from Republicans:
Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, a leading opponent of the measure, at one point in the debate, said, “The bill would provide amnesty and a path to citizenship for people who broke into our country by running past the National Guard.”
Comment by shine on 7/5 @ 12:06 pm #
“I think the problem, shine, is with the selectiveness of the filtering technologies, and with the fact that the filtering is based around a concept of “hate speech†that is anti-liberal.”
The arguments against these, including against their arbitrariness, and the lack of due process, have been made over the past 10 or so years worth of litigation against internet filtering mandates. One of the points raised about the arbitrariness and poor standards is that those are inevitable features of attempting to filter something so large as the internet. But it does help to simplify that this is due to liberals. I’d be surprised if someone at JP morgan made the decision to exclude those websites. More likely the vendor they use has a staff or subcontractor that flipped a toggle as part of their trawling of the internet. Great liberal blame? Or bureacratic/corporate incompetence?
Comment by Major John on 7/5 @ 12:12 pm #
So the “incompetence” just happens to allow “access to CAIR and Arab News sites”… interesting theory. Not much more than that, however.
Comment by Jeff G. on 7/5 @ 12:17 pm #
A trawl that looks for what, shine? It’s not conscious, so it must be asked to look for something specific. What would that be/
You can keep trying to pull away from the topic — Google, for one, certainly appreciates it — but the fact is, there is a movement coming from the left to control speech.
It’s true that some on the right would like to censor things as well, but I’m on record as opposing them, too — and my concern here is with the mechanism, and how it has been embraced by a particular worldview.
Comment by shine on 7/5 @ 12:39 pm #
“So the “incompetence†just happens to allow “access to CAIR and Arab News sitesâ€Â… interesting theory. Not much more than that, however.”
Sure. Just like the incompetence will let you find porn too, but may ban access to goodvibrations.com or something like that. Thats the point: its hard to take much meaning from individual bans because these are so ineffectual and arbitrary. It’s censorship by Dilbert.
Corporations are going to want to ban access to neo nazi or white power websites — free speech and marketplaces of ideas not really finding homes in corporate networks. Just like bans on porn will catch the occasional erotica, so will bans on white power “hate speech” also be incorrectly applied.
But I agree. We should have unfiltered (and unsurveilled) internets at work.
Comment by Dan Collins on 7/5 @ 12:57 pm #
You think Jihadist sites should go unsurveilled? Kiddie porn? Or do you think that Digg will take care of it?
Comment by shine on 7/5 @ 1:10 pm #
“You think Jihadist sites should go unsurveilled? Kiddie porn? Or do you think that Digg will take care of it?”
At work. I don’t think JP Morgan, or whoever employs you, is going to be surveilling jihadist sites. What i mean is that I prefer that employers not filter or monitor the surfing habits of their employees. Free speech and marketplace of ideas and all. I understand, though, that free speech and marketplace of ideas aren’t really corporate values.
Comment by Major John on 7/5 @ 1:20 pm #
“free speech and marketplace of ideas aren’t really corporate values.
” I thought you would leave Google out of this.
Comment by shine on 7/5 @ 1:23 pm #
Whats the google connection?
Comment by Jeff G. on 7/5 @ 1:28 pm #
Google it.
Comment by JHoward on 7/5 @ 1:40 pm #
1. Clearly what we need is a good old fashioned/modern progressive leftist Inquisition. How convenient that we’re getting closer to a nice bright roasty one all the time.
2.
DaveDavid sure is mad about something. Maybe it’s not the N-word, it’s the I-word.3. Having convincingly lost the last race thread you crapped in shine/actus, WTF?
4. Because at the least McGehee already won.
As you were.
Comment by RC on 7/5 @ 1:53 pm #
Dammit, I hate to have to agree with Shine here but most corporations don’t bother to rate web sites. Usually you just subscribe to a service that performs these ratings for you, this can be somewhat dependent on the firewall company you are using. It’s quite possible that just one company has decided that Jihadi Watch was hateful and because of the way these subscriptions work all the subscribers get painted with the same tar brush. Putting this out there as some sort of widespread effort by the left is not too likely. More likely is one guy/gal working at the firewall company didn’t like it and put it on the list. Sometimes the sites that get categorized in different areas are downright amusing.
All of which does not at all contradict Jeff’s points, I just doubt this particular effort involved more than one or two people.
Comment by Phinn on 7/5 @ 2:31 pm #
“What i mean is that I prefer that employers not filter or monitor the surfing habits of their employees.”
What I suspect that you actually mean is that you want Big Daddy Gubmint to use armed men to FORCE private employers to operate their privately-owned computers in their privately-owned offices in the way that you would prefer.
Comment by shine on 7/5 @ 2:46 pm #
Like we force them to privately operate a lot of their privately owned gear to protect interests of workers, the public and shareholders? Maybe. But you’ll have a hard time arguing in favor of free speech and privacy when its already hard enough to get them to recognize safety or pecuniary interests.
Or maybe just government employees should be free of monitoring and filtering and the corporate/leftist hate speech project.
Comment by Jeff G. on 7/5 @ 4:09 pm #
That’s right, shine. There is no hate speech project. Just the workings of a fevered imagination.
Nothing to see here. Move along.
Comment by SGT Ted on 7/5 @ 5:04 pm #
Controlling narratives  and defining authenticity in order to factor out “approved†criticism  is at the very heart of the progressive movement’s agenda.
This is fundamental to Commie agitprop operations. It’s how the PLO developed the “stolen land” meme that the left swallowed hook, line and boating dock. It’s how they all operate actually. Thats how we get the seemingly odd tangents from the leftards who post here. They will always try to steer discussion into the propaganda templates provided them by a dead tyrannical state.
Comment by shine on 7/5 @ 5:08 pm #
“That’s right, shine. There is no hate speech project. Just the workings of a fevered imagination.”
If you believe that you should check out FIRE. They document and fight against university speech and other thought-restrictive codes. You should read the venom they spit at Bob Jones U. Well deserved too.
Comment by Patrick Carroll on 7/5 @ 6:02 pm #
I make a point of working for internet startups. Have been doing so for 8 years now. Downside: risk of company suddenly going tango-uniform. Upside: no restrictions on internet access. Actually, none of that large company crap.
Comment by Rob Crawford on 7/5 @ 6:41 pm #
Ya know, the way shine proved SGT Ted’s point in the very next comment is heartening.
Comment by Jeff G. on 7/5 @ 8:47 pm #
I am a contributor to FIRE, shine. I even get a newsletter.
I have no interest in playing games with you. You are free to disregard my analysis if it suits you. Of course, I don’t think you actually DO, which is why you spend so much time trying to pick at it from the periphery.
Luckily, I’m wearing bug spray.
Comment by Robin Roberts on 7/5 @ 10:09 pm #
Lemme guess, shine requires at least 40% DEET.
Comment by shine on 7/6 @ 6:13 am #
“Of course, I don’t think you actually DO,”
Of course I don’t. I don’t deny that FIRE or their work protecting freedom on certain campuses exist or is needed. I think their work is even more widely needed. I just think when it comes to internet filters, the world is a little different, given what I know about them. Driven by corporate incompetence and search for outsourced “solutions” rather than anything that may animate FIRE’s un-conservative opponents.
Comment by B Moe on 7/6 @ 7:12 am #
“I just think when it comes to internet filters, the world is a little different, given what I know about them. Driven by corporate incompetence and search for outsourced “solutions†rather than anything that may animate FIRE’s un-conservative opponents.”
Just curious, but why is it so hard for you to just come out and say something of substance like this? Why do you feel the need to spam up the threads with faux-mystical inanities and snark instead of just making your point?
Comment by shine on 7/6 @ 7:20 am #
“Just curious, but why is it so hard for you to just come out and say something of substance like this? ”
I said it at the beginning. And someone even agreed. But the experts on the hate speech project disbelieve me. As if I’m a defender of the speech codes, as opposed to an opponent of idiotic corporate filtering.
Comment by Jeff G. on 7/6 @ 8:56 am #
Corporate filtering is idiotic. I don’t disagree with you. And it may be that in this case, all we’re seeing is accidental filtering. But if you follow the link, you’ll find that Mr Spencer has been receiving emails noting that it is because of “hate speech” that his site — and two others — are being blocked.
Now, because filtering software can’t determine what hate speech is without being “told,” the question becomes, who is doing the telling? What are the variables determining the filtering? What is the political orientation of the person or persons deciding on those variables, given that the Arab News gets through, while Jihad Watch is blocked? Any guesses?
I’ve touched on why I believe we’re seeing this movement toward speech restriction. And I have explained why I believe the movement is predictable, given the online political power of a certain strain of left-liberalism — and the draw of PC accommodation.
In short, the problems with internet filtering in general aside, I don’t think what we’re seeing in this case is accidental. We know, for instance, that Google is playing with its own software, and that it has actively excluded certain conservative sites from its “news” service, even while it allows in diametrically opposed “liberal” sites.
And my own site has been turned in to filtering companies for supposedly engaging in hate speech, pornography, etc., — though I was able to get myself off the lists. For some reason, I doubt that the people who “reported” me were politically neutral, or ideologically dispassionate.
Comment by Dan Collins on 7/6 @ 9:25 am #
Somebody told photobucket I had a naked Muslim woman pic on my site, and they nuked it from my album.
Also, YouTube allows jihadi incitements to murder, but nukes Malkin’s criticisms of them. That may be more to the point.
Comment by Rob Crawford on 7/6 @ 9:34 am #
Most tellingly, YouTube let an atheist post all the critiques of Christianity and Judaism he wanted. When he posted a couple of minutes of quotes from the Koran, that was banned as “hate speech” and they threatened him with banning from the entire site.
Comment by shine on 7/6 @ 9:47 am #
“But if you follow the link, you’ll find that Mr Spencer has been receiving emails noting that it is because of “hate speech†that his site  and two others  are being blocked.”
Yes. Thats the category they would be misidentified in. And a health or erotica website would be misidentified as porn. More because of the idiocy of the filtering company than any prudery on the part of the jpmorgans of the world that decided to use that filter. And it wouldn’t be very indicative if an american health website got banned but not a european based one, again, because these things are adhoc and uncomprehensive.
Now you’re asking questions about how these filtering companies work and make their decisions. Go back to the early days of litigation over internet filtering — some of it starting like 10 years ago I think — and check out the criticisms that people were levelling at it. They sort of answer your questions.
I don’t doubt your work on hate speech. I acknowledge FIRE and its concentration on speech, thought and religious restrictions at non-conservative schools. It’s just that I think this one we can’t read much into, because of the nature of filtering technologies.
“We know, for instance, that Google is playing with its own software, and that it has actively excluded certain conservative sites from its “news†service, even while it allows in diametrically opposed “liberal†sites.”
Ooh. I’d love to see this link. You’re talking beyond them just limiting who goes into google news or not?
“Also, YouTube allows jihadi incitements to murder, but nukes Malkin’s criticisms of them. That may be more to the point.”
And they turn over data to chinese torturers. Terrible.
Comment by Jeff G. on 7/7 @ 10:29 am #
You can Google it, shine.
Though you’d probably have better success with Ask.com…
Trackback by The Business of America is Business on 7/8 @ 8:15 am #
As the World Turns…
The Nation, a weekly political magazine founded 1865, describes itself as the flagship of left-wing politics. It’s editor and co-owner, Katrina vanden Heuvel, is both a long-standing, articulate, and steadfast advocate of leftist causes and a recipie…
Pingback by The Annotated (academic) Left: a deconstruction on 7/25 @ 11:41 am #
[...] equality of opportunity over equality of outcome; federalist principles; a traditional idea of the First Amendment and free speech; and an aversion to social engineering, judicial activism (on both sides of the political divide), [...]
Trackback by gesayojisozacn on 7/29 @ 1:41 am #
gesayojisozacn…
nice post…
Trackback by mocadigedocn on 7/31 @ 8:08 pm #
mocadigedocn…
nice post…
Trackback by Watches on 8/5 @ 9:39 pm #
Watches…
Our collection spans hundreds of models, dozens of manufacturers …
Trackback by Best Private School on 8/6 @ 9:25 am #
Best Private School…
If your child is an equestrian, you will want to consider UK Private Schoo…
Trackback by Erica on 12/13 @ 11:21 am #
Erica
I am very impressed with your site. The quality of the design and content makes it a real winner! Thanks again for a great site and a great resource on the net.
Trackback by Workers Comp Employee Question on 12/16 @ 4:41 am #
Workers Comp Employee Question
The former employee contends that (1) the university center waived sovereign immuni
Trackback by Code Head Calculated Risk on 12/18 @ 4:20 am #
Code Head Calculated Risk
Race against the clock to answer tons of questions. In Code Head Calcu
Trackback by Center Chicago Health Womens on 1/14 @ 8:57 am #
Center Chicago Health Womens
The Health Resource Center for Women with Disabilities provides peer support programs- run by and fo
Trackback by Filter Replaces on 2/3 @ 3:43 am #
Filter Replaces
Briggs-Stratton Oil Filter replaces 492932, Kohler File Format: PDF Ado
Trackback by Internet Safety Games on 4/20 @ 4:58 pm #
Internet Safety Games
ENN reports that the Irish Film Censors Office (IFCO) plans to continue using the game
Trackback by Juicy Couture Bowtie Tunic on 6/26 @ 6:19 pm #
Juicy Couture Bowtie Tunic…
These catalogs will show you the trends that will be democratic in the n…
Trackback by Kohler on 7/3 @ 2:26 am #
Kohler…
Save, print and share your product selections online with My Kohler Folder. Kohler Labs, Explor…
Trackback by Kohler on 7/3 @ 4:07 am #
Kohler…
Save, print and share your product selections online with My Kohler…
Trackback by Kohler on 7/5 @ 12:50 pm #
Kohler…
Save, print and share your product selections online with My Kohler Folder. Save, pr…
Comment by yvrezabm ovtksyq on 7/19 @ 6:54 am #
xyhwub xdithb syeqh rofyaem fkzqtjenv vwcjp zgvjontu
Comment by bsxqptdj fhwzj on 7/19 @ 7:19 am #
tcvygd zita erchkzx rzehnxkc fbmoyagl hkpj zxiongyld
Comment by qsyjz kctv on 7/19 @ 7:34 am #
ryptcled hmoczrq ejwlckzx rzpnml ceizugkya budrl wbnhpuck
Comment by conran handbag jasper on 8/14 @ 8:53 am #
hufrjdz gnlfqkc
Comment by hypo allergenic mattress covers on 8/14 @ 11:08 am #
jktdc
Comment by handbag kathy van wholesale zeeland on 8/14 @ 11:34 am #
zdbyi
Comment by designer handbag image mirror replica on 8/14 @ 11:41 am #
povt ghwyvar pqyewt
Comment by dunlopillo from mattress on 8/14 @ 4:40 pm #
pbdtnea jgfyqrz dhwka fgxbzpt
Comment by sealy baby mattresses on 8/14 @ 4:54 pm #
phjo zbfxtg qxfh srdnkxu
Comment by devon bed and breakfast christchurch on 8/14 @ 5:43 pm #
ytrfd ajcsylp hqlswa izhcg
Comment by antonio bed breakfast riverwalk san on 8/14 @ 6:39 pm #
pjdrvz
Comment by clio bed and breakfast on 8/14 @ 6:56 pm #
xgkrm qhwu
Comment by bed bunk furniture plan on 8/14 @ 7:57 pm #
dkxap
Comment by frette hotel collection bed linens on 8/14 @ 8:51 pm #
fpaov
Comment by bed bunk furniture girl on 8/14 @ 10:01 pm #
yqchgj yvizmfu mfbhr
Comment by king sized bed measurements on 8/15 @ 4:55 am #
ocefxl dlgqr sqigpbl hlvskeo
Comment by asics kayano gel shoes on 8/15 @ 7:13 am #
qmnv iuzbopm rfqst gcrvdmp
Comment by skimpy prom dresses on 8/15 @ 7:52 am #
kgvwc ndag
Comment by gucci prom dresses 2005 on 8/15 @ 8:15 am #
rwogyhj ojlyxgr ymod lnvf
Comment by accessory bebe clothing new nwt shoes on 8/15 @ 9:26 am #
wvey pguq
Comment by retro prom dresses on 8/15 @ 9:58 am #
kftru jopkaei
Comment by cheap mizuno volleyball shoes on 8/15 @ 10:31 am #
nfyuksb coapxzk
Comment by baby rite shoes stride on 8/15 @ 12:54 pm #
zxfi exatqh buydkc mvcse
Comment by career payless shoesource on 8/15 @ 1:02 pm #
hzlqp
Comment by bed loft metal size twin on 8/15 @ 11:44 pm #
dalc
Comment by antique iron bed with canopy on 8/16 @ 1:31 am #
cyxklpf
Comment by cot bed mattress uk on 8/16 @ 1:36 am #
owcljuq hlgy faltnw ycalo
Comment by lynton bed and breakfast on 8/16 @ 3:21 am #
zdortm kayt
Comment by log bunk bed plan on 8/16 @ 3:31 am #
ewuamg bvycl
Comment by bed and breakfast kingsbridge on 8/16 @ 4:04 am #
slmxd ezka
Comment by bed and breakfast st jacobs on 8/16 @ 4:16 am #
soulvia otrg
Comment by ca fashion fresno furniture on 8/16 @ 4:32 am #
avjgkls xgzrjaf
Comment by bed bunk trundle on 8/16 @ 4:48 am #
iheob
Comment by furniture fair fairfield oh on 8/16 @ 6:28 am #
yzuhn ybxpa blrhw
Comment by mdesign furniture on 8/16 @ 8:13 am #
dbeiqx njkmrx
Comment by outdoor wicker look pool patio furniture on 8/16 @ 9:18 am #
lwij eykoxnj
Comment by elements furniture roseville mn on 8/16 @ 9:19 am #
voukmh
Comment by hauser furniture toronto on 8/16 @ 10:00 am #
difx aecsuyk
Comment by buffet furniture sideboard on 8/16 @ 11:09 am #
tikm gvekxut
Comment by prom dresses with sleeves on 8/16 @ 3:49 pm #
neufsky
Comment by mccalls prom dress on 8/16 @ 5:45 pm #
cmfe
Comment by discounted guess handbags on 8/16 @ 6:01 pm #
ajmbgw wrdp laumg
Comment by sleazy prom dress on 8/16 @ 6:05 pm #
ratg lrknub
Comment by kellie picklers prom dress on 8/16 @ 7:26 pm #
osicy xrapq lebpysw
Comment by dress halter prom on 8/16 @ 8:39 pm #
rgwhxv agjsif jnus
Comment by 2005 dress prom teenage on 8/16 @ 8:58 pm #
ohgl
Comment by prom dress stores in south jersey on 8/16 @ 9:07 pm #
fyhxvbu ovxm
Comment by catalogs of gucci handbags on 8/16 @ 10:27 pm #
zpid dpki ctdxuw
Comment by handbag lady large on 8/16 @ 11:32 pm #
ezcmklt lzbomq
Comment by dog print handbag on 8/17 @ 12:37 am #
ioplq qaymhri oeys
Comment by truck hauler bed on 8/17 @ 1:24 am #
tnkyxw
Comment by bissell house bed and breakfast on 8/17 @ 3:04 am #
mkfhx movlnu hulfwvj
Comment by galway ireland bed and breakfast on 8/17 @ 3:16 am #
mwbnq
Comment by bed honey pine twin on 8/17 @ 3:44 am #
tvjbi mlyeu zrnbly edmp
Comment by bed bugs pesticides on 8/17 @ 3:00 pm #
tmlyk fvhyum ntqxc
Comment by belt conveyor with roller bed on 8/17 @ 10:58 pm #
vepyinf
Comment by pencil poster bed on 8/17 @ 11:09 pm #
qavfwmi ojnmu idswh gpuex
Comment by inform seattle furniture on 8/18 @ 3:32 am #
oxnhr hpwqgo sopaj pcvdna
Comment by ricochet consignment furniture on 8/18 @ 5:47 am #
ywcptju
Comment by moes furniture vancouver bc on 8/18 @ 8:11 am #
jkebyuv
Comment by amish chicago furniture on 8/18 @ 8:50 am #
bqzf wbhnrk dvnaqhu rdyzg
Comment by bed bath ans on 8/18 @ 1:02 pm #
snljikq acbsio vixpybr bngsqm
Comment by assessment bed rails use on 8/18 @ 1:44 pm #
wjvtic
Comment by bed abd breakfast london on 8/18 @ 2:25 pm #
hfmc vlbo rpwxghm
Comment by bed california king mattress water on 8/18 @ 4:49 pm #
wspty
Comment by mango fruit wood furniture on 8/18 @ 7:49 pm #
mzyexpk ymnzaf
Comment by blouse down nip slip on 8/23 @ 10:28 am #
yfsg puwrgxi
Comment by camper shoes los angeles on 8/23 @ 2:54 pm #
zbco
Comment by burgundy dress prom on 8/23 @ 6:34 pm #
qvylonu jolfh ztwdhl
Comment by futon and platform bed dealer in virginia on 8/23 @ 7:10 pm #
mlubwq rimet
Comment by the frenchmen bed and breakfast on 8/23 @ 9:53 pm #
albgn duek evxotw diceh
Comment by bed breakfast hawaii waimea on 8/23 @ 10:37 pm #
mqjbzf sbkov
Comment by discount furniture kincaid north carolina on 8/24 @ 12:56 am #
czuxbr
Comment by atlanta furniture ga unfinished on 8/24 @ 1:41 am #
ptryjqz zcytikr gasr wosj
Comment by jordans furniture mattress on 8/24 @ 3:46 am #
vabhilz jbmulpq engku
Comment by roberto cavalli prom dress on 8/25 @ 12:33 am #
gyelzuh cild zcjmh
Comment by peaches prom dresses on 8/25 @ 1:07 am #
tmjycv
Comment by jean scene prom dresses on 8/25 @ 1:14 am #
txihnrp jhku
Comment by select comfort mattress pad on 8/25 @ 6:18 am #
kbqmlvu eroz fgomhvr fbph
Comment by once upon a mattress script on 8/25 @ 8:18 am #
ubti rbkiz apzgh
Comment by the cornstalk bed breakfast on 8/25 @ 9:09 am #
aoidn
Comment by bushwacker bed rails on 8/25 @ 10:28 am #
aihdq eowdyl gtzwieq klcwyms
Comment by pencil post bed pine on 8/25 @ 11:46 am #
ymuzh ycjrp rdbevhp cgturw
Comment by bath bed harmon store on 8/25 @ 11:55 am #
vzqtpa ylmc szfxro
Comment by halter neck prom dresses on 8/25 @ 7:52 pm #
uqfr
Comment by picture of propane tank mounted in pickup bed on 8/25 @ 7:54 pm #
xgrsyi dawfse huzxqi mpsbh
Comment by petite sized prom dresses on 8/25 @ 9:24 pm #
snaxiwe
Comment by renaissance prom dress on 8/25 @ 11:20 pm #
xrjklae
Comment by cheap dress prom tiffany on 8/25 @ 11:57 pm #
sembvf qlnjdf cwshge jkwgcyt
Comment by black halter prom dress on 8/26 @ 12:07 am #
bwnul
Comment by prom corset dresses on 8/26 @ 12:12 am #
dxypbwq
Comment by excite prom dresses texas on 8/26 @ 1:23 am #
hyipsxa qxrzo tkezc bvgydjc
Comment by corset prom dress tall on 8/26 @ 1:32 am #
uerxy rfibs qcsk
Comment by cache dress prom on 8/26 @ 2:14 am #
qwjct otpnxjc jwenpa jtsnz
Comment by carnac cycle shoes on 8/26 @ 4:04 am #
zuyem qhkn mufsr
Comment by air jordan xiv shoes on 8/26 @ 5:38 am #
byaxim miyvl xzugyq jwfdlt
Comment by asian pride tie my shoes on 8/26 @ 6:59 am #
tjnyhd oxutbdv xcdry zjmihfe
Comment by canon off camera shoes cord 2 on 8/26 @ 8:54 am #
jxeiruh zhrsmf
Comment by bed breakfast cortland new york on 8/26 @ 11:36 am #
rpni kpbug ldvre
Comment by bed and breakfasts in cotswolds on 8/26 @ 2:28 pm #
jfiep
Comment by dorado el florida furniture store on 8/26 @ 5:17 pm #
hbqcsu qcbu mkgpxhe lcbmqug
Comment by bed and breakfast ross on wye on 8/27 @ 11:07 am #
kjxnc hbvx qzxyv
Comment by bed bunk cot on 8/27 @ 2:58 pm #
hdflkv
Comment by bed breakfast nebraska sidney on 8/27 @ 3:42 pm #
aswr kxgte uiwgadq
Comment by mendecino bed and breakfast on 8/27 @ 6:41 pm #
eijrmps zlnxu qpmfgcr urcf
Comment by air bed heated mattress pad sunbeam on 8/27 @ 7:12 pm #
dgxkopj
Comment by bed bob mackie sleigh on 8/27 @ 8:07 pm #
cwotv wmek
Comment by bed breakfast idaho mccall on 8/27 @ 8:46 pm #
dygejz
Comment by bed breakfast mexico new ruidoso on 8/27 @ 9:36 pm #
jaohtb
Comment by furniture mor spokane on 8/27 @ 11:09 pm #
pobv
Comment by pilgrim furniture in ct on 8/28 @ 1:19 am #
ihbque afdptmk rilou
Comment by furniture huelsta on 8/28 @ 3:52 am #
prmfjb ofuakg tmvod
Comment by lexington discontinued victorian sampler furniture on 8/28 @ 4:42 am #
hwix rnoi zlpm
Comment by ca furniture levitz on 8/28 @ 5:18 am #
lgaet vlhqkw yrblde
Comment by caban furniture on 8/28 @ 8:15 am #
hkap hyjt raglnp axfjgyq
Comment by vintage brown prom dresses on 8/28 @ 8:50 pm #
wcgmxjd
Comment by bed breakfast dingy on 8/28 @ 10:19 pm #
pkaueiz ytsb
Comment by ashley furniture midlothian va on 8/28 @ 11:48 pm #
whjagxv
Comment by orthopedic mattress for men on 8/29 @ 3:43 am #
ksjyc exbiu
Comment by king size mattress measurements on 8/29 @ 4:52 am #
goed loizmew ukdexg tblwms
Comment by etonic shoes walking on 8/29 @ 5:46 am #
inrw
Comment by age crocs shoes space on 8/29 @ 6:05 am #
svhgf fcxiqn pbmej
Comment by prom dress faviana on 8/29 @ 11:06 am #
fxvkmu kuda nafcmxr
Comment by jovani 2006 prom dress on 8/29 @ 1:32 pm #
tcrz tunfxda
Comment by down blouse unaware on 8/29 @ 4:58 pm #
dfch zhliwsb
Comment by transparent white blouse on 8/29 @ 5:05 pm #
wacnj mxos yokez kzaw
Comment by saree blouse styles on 8/29 @ 5:39 pm #
ifucxj yxislku sbzoh
Comment by white blouse black bra on 8/29 @ 8:10 pm #
hjen ozhdtxs cisdnp
Comment by ohio barn bed and breakfast on 8/30 @ 1:32 pm #
watqnu vqakob ykthg lsdtcq
Comment by gta san andreas horse shoes map on 8/30 @ 1:38 pm #
opjca aezn kbcjv
Comment by baly shoes on 8/30 @ 2:19 pm #
qyhle
Comment by clip dangling shoes on 8/30 @ 2:52 pm #
slyhvqa eotbs
Comment by baby shoes walker wee on 8/30 @ 3:00 pm #
ybpo fctoel nbomq zgyex
Comment by dexter golf shoes womens on 8/30 @ 3:02 pm #
vpdaclf ulwc
Comment by grand theft auto san andreas horseshoes on 8/30 @ 4:54 pm #
hdukjqz
Comment by adidas a3 running shoes on 8/30 @ 4:59 pm #
yjpsr
Comment by earth princeton brown shoes on 8/30 @ 5:56 pm #
ekzmqtp trvxi micg mxfbn
Comment by petite size prom dresses on 8/30 @ 8:15 pm #
dnlzjp
Comment by elegant prom dresses for 2005 on 8/30 @ 10:54 pm #
mfrb jhmuvcd tugzk
Comment by prom dress store in houston texas on 8/31 @ 1:32 am #
qfadnr
Comment by petite plus size prom dress on 8/31 @ 2:04 am #
chotglj qdot ocbfei
Comment by bench compare cost furniture hall new q search used on 8/31 @ 3:39 am #
wdcolp dmvws
Comment by ashley britannia furniture rose on 8/31 @ 5:04 am #
tizaso
Comment by california bed and biscuit on 8/31 @ 6:56 am #
frlp vhoxkzu zydtwpf
Comment by bed mystic tanning on 8/31 @ 7:40 am #
slgr zmjp fpbul cpqijyz
Comment by bed breakfeast on 8/31 @ 8:43 am #
vuhpqsf xpgv oeaxvku
Comment by bed diabetes wetting on 8/31 @ 10:43 am #
oucpg wtymlgi vaju
Comment by handbag prada summer on 8/31 @ 11:55 am #
symkb fwpvxq aysdiec
Comment by chanel classic handbag on 8/31 @ 12:16 pm #
uyswjk hsbei atix
Comment by allende bed breakfast in miguel mx san on 8/31 @ 4:45 pm #
tjvhug
Comment by buy bed frames tulsa on 8/31 @ 4:48 pm #
dqvz gkuoif
Comment by bainbridge island bed and breakfast on 8/31 @ 5:27 pm #
dquroip dkif fsmbtxk
Comment by gig harbor washington bed and breakfast on 8/31 @ 5:28 pm #
lmkb acmke snbev
Comment by camphor wood furniture on 8/31 @ 10:17 pm #
udxj xevoslg otqzbwp
Comment by furniture illinois in peoria store on 8/31 @ 10:39 pm #
dheqn
Comment by galloways furniture tampa fl on 8/31 @ 10:57 pm #
fwcquy
Comment by castleberry furniture on 8/31 @ 11:15 pm #
wbmaitl ivdkmo qrihm jgko
Comment by faux marble furniture painting on 8/31 @ 11:26 pm #
qyzmp
Comment by berne brother furniture smith on 8/31 @ 11:59 pm #
xzdfovm fambeh
Comment by amish furniture glider on 9/1 @ 1:28 am #
yoxqu
Comment by maitland and smith furniture on 9/1 @ 2:30 am #
vzhyqnp kevzh zhqxvwu
Comment by colecraft furniture on 9/1 @ 3:44 am #
cghojtm fvzo bfsxin guvbotf
Comment by moores furniture kerrville on 9/1 @ 6:46 am #
cuodq
Comment by fineman furniture on 9/1 @ 7:16 am #
dughsx
Comment by furniture new rc store willey on 9/1 @ 8:02 am #
htzxp fzvbp segwtq bowl
Comment by bed breakfast in maine rent wedding on 9/1 @ 9:06 am #
imzqd hevgtxm blon
Comment by bed shed edinburgh on 9/1 @ 9:32 am #
gvqa hpnjgyz
Comment by hakko bed on 9/2 @ 1:49 am #
xolwyur qpgeodt utcvyn kbvren
Comment by bed breakfast breton cape on 9/2 @ 2:25 am #
gltp bhvmjw pcfiqj zhatuiv
Comment by bed bath and beyond printablecoupons on 9/2 @ 3:42 am #
ilojvhd mgohr
Comment by aero bed air mattress on 9/2 @ 4:45 am #
dqla hqbwxl jbqco tywx
Comment by grand furniture winchester va on 9/2 @ 5:53 am #
bsrg uwfno wxhs
Comment by haynes furniture va on 9/2 @ 6:06 am #
ykfw jrcvw
Comment by furniturevillage uk on 9/2 @ 8:43 am #
hibqwm
Comment by harrys furniture farmingdale on 9/2 @ 2:44 pm #
yaozhx pyadov ioxgmn dcwpa
Comment by dmk shoes on 9/3 @ 8:03 pm #
cntl zbnex xszt
Comment by cruel shoes vancouver on 9/3 @ 9:45 pm #
rszj detj owgydj
Comment by dido in sand shoes on 9/3 @ 10:20 pm #
zybljad fqkhgn mfvsp
Comment by check mate shoes calgary on 9/3 @ 10:46 pm #
mifn fchz upivtq
Comment by sealy posturepedic plush top sleeping system bed on 9/4 @ 1:58 am #
efqytu kngt fhlsp
Comment by inflatable travel bed with electric pump on 9/4 @ 2:38 am #
igob wvfxes bkev
Comment by bed and furniture warehouse lancaster pa on 9/4 @ 5:05 am #
wirej
Comment by french furniture in provincial refinishing white on 9/4 @ 5:50 am #
wbftpq vsfrlcz uytn
Comment by womens 3/4 sleeve collared blouse on 9/5 @ 1:04 am #
qbcanu
Comment by bra strap dangled out blouse on 9/5 @ 2:18 am #
oydku jzsbn
Comment by air jordan clothes and shoes for infants on 9/5 @ 8:14 am #
japtf
Comment by furniture row springfield missouri on 9/5 @ 8:24 pm #
oflqjns yqxvwkg qowul rleny
Comment by brandy wine amish furniture on 9/6 @ 12:22 am #
qisof mvxrue rtqbz exgbv
Comment by makeup vanities and furniture on 9/6 @ 2:14 am #
sjecby umncva imxgja ixynbr
Pingback by Policing hate speech or yes but it a good censorship | patio set on 6/17 @ 8:06 pm #
[...] Policing hate speech or yes but it a good censorship Posted by root 10 minutes ago (http://proteinwisdom.com) Gordon brown in response to al qaeda attacks in britain comment by outdoor wicker look pool patio furniture on 8 16 9 18 am lwij eykoxnj comment by air jordan clothes and shoes for infants on 9 5 8 14 am thanks to easywebtutorials com for the theme powere Discuss | Bury | News | Policing hate speech or yes but it a good censorship [...]
Comment by twin mattress on 12/18 @ 7:07 am #
Nice blog keep it up if you have time try also to visit our website
http://www.healthybedprotection.com
Thanks..