5 Replies to “The Hypocrite in Chief [Darleen Click]”

1. mileycyrussays says:

   February 18, 2016 at 3:17 pm

   There is a difference between opposing a particular judge, and opposing the notion that a president should even nominate someone to fill a vacancy.

2. Drumwaster says:

   February 18, 2016 at 6:01 pm

   No one is denying that Obama has the right to nominate whoever he chooses. But those who are insisting on the bloody obvious are ignoring that equal right that the Senate has to deny its Constitutionally-mandated consent, for any reason at all, and for however long suits it to do so.

   Obama just needs to learn the Constitutional lesson that Congress saying “No” is not the same as Congress refusing to act. They DID act, when they chose to say “we’re not going to approve anyone until there is a new President”, and that is entirely within their Constitutional authority. Like the fella said, “If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice”.

   If Obama refused to offer any names (using his previous statements as precedent), no one would be complaining that he isn’t doing his job. And don’t criticize the Senate for using exactly the procedures and rules set forth by the Democrats in Congresses past…

3. mileycyrussays says:

   February 20, 2016 at 11:32 am

   You’re making an excellent case for a recess appointment.

4. Ernst Schreiber says:

   February 20, 2016 at 12:33 pm

   You’re forgetting that the Democrats blew up recess appointments under Bush.

5. Danger says:

   February 21, 2016 at 9:02 pm

   “You’re making an excellent case for a recess appointment.”

   You do realize that even if one was allowed it expires at the end of the next Senate session.
   Just a few months away which explains why Obama dismissed the option.

   Here’s a little wikisays for ya miley. I’d offer more links but if your too stupid to google I can’t help you.

Comments are closed.