Not that any one should really be SHOCKED SHOCKED at this
New undercover footage shows Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s Senior Director of Medical Services, Dr. Deborah Nucatola, describing how Planned Parenthood sells the body parts of aborted unborn children and admitting she uses partial-birth abortions to supply intact body parts.
In the video, Nucatola is at a business lunch with actors posing as buyers from a human biologics company. As head of PPFA’s Medical Services department, Nucatola has overseen medical practice at all Planned Parenthood locations since 2009. She also trains new Planned Parenthood abortion doctors and performs abortions herself at Planned Parenthood Los Angeles up to 24 weeks.
Nucatola admits that Planned Parenthood charges per-specimen for baby body parts, uses illegal partial-birth abortion procedures in order to get salable parts, and is aware of their own liability for doing so and takes steps to cover it up.
I’ve linked the video below so that you can make your own judgments about the footage. At the very least, it’s damaging enough to trigger further inquiry. Planned Parenthood has long been one of the Left’s favorite organizations, facilitating their precious sexual revolution through death (often by dismemberment) on an industrial scale. It should hardly be surprising that people willing to kill without conscience might also be willing to profit from all aspects of that macabre process. It’s even less surprising when those people come from an organization founded through the racist eugenics of Margaret Sanger.
Isn’t it interesting that Planned Parenthood and its advocates are adamant that unborn babies are never human beings until completely outside of the womb; yet they are human enough to have parts and organs valuable enough to harvest and sell.
How different is this from ISIS using a unwanted baby to teach its terrorists how best to blow up a human being?
Not much.
Liberty and Free Enterprise baby, so why the bitching?
He asked sarcastically.
PP should be proud to share this info to mothers seeking abortion. It could help the mothers knowing that they are contributing a small part for the advancement of science.
“Parts is parts,” just don’t ask where they come from. Right China?
Do I need the “sarc” tag?
I want to know who the buyers are and what they want these “parts” for.
God damn them to hell.
this is much ado about nothing i think
“this is much ado about nothing i think” Satan with a happy face.
“i think” Proffered without supporting evidence.
Too much hamster. Waaaaay too much hamster.
Probably someone who thinks this is much ado about nothing.
Or hey, y’know, who executed Carrie Jean Melvin, and why? And while we’re at it, how come no major media are in the least interested?
“I want to know who the buyers are and what they want these “parts” for.
God damn them to hell.”
“Why, it is a variant of “stem cell research”, and you are an anti-science Luddite to oppose it! You probably believe in creationism too! Waah!”
And this type of “argument” comes from people who have hissy fits about nuclear power, GMOs, plastics, or pesticides.
I forgot the /sarc, sorry.
The day I rely on feets’ judgment on anything is the day you can send me to the Soylent Green factory.
All humans are completely disposable. Just ask any progressive, or hamster.
Years ago, I guess I kind of saw this coming. My comment at that time was more about who owns the property rights of the aborted fetus. But sometimes there really is a slippery slope.
https://proteinwisdom.com/?p=12476#comment-506089
“The Jigsaw Man …” er – person – er – clump of tissue.
I want to know who the buyers are and what they want these “parts” for.
Medical research.
Is it a loophole that they aren’t actually selling the parts but charging for shipping & handling?
My TL is full of some sweethearts, including:
This walking stereotype of a narcissistic millennial.
This gem, who is certain that I’m the awful one.
And this one, who thinks I’m using the nun as a symbol of MY oppression.
Good times.
Feets…do less.
Nihilism Unbound.
Nah. That’s the sovereignty of the Sovereign Individual, Bob.
Same thing really.
Remember it used to be “unviable tissue mass”?
That was back when people like me did not know there was such a thing as ‘late term abortion’.
Anyway, now that Proggs have destroyed innocence, making it but a memory for all but suckling babies [in a way even war never did], I still gotta ask.
If you are taking human organs, fully formed and functioning, how is it you are not ending a human life to do it?
I know, libs and logic rarely meet. Just ask Tracy. In half an hour you’ll get 1200 words illustrating what I mean.
Still, while I understand the position of regular joe ‘pro-choice’ abortion supporter, I don’t understand when any regular joes fail to see that late term abortion IS murder.
I guess a person can’t accept one without inevitably getting to the the other. In for a penny in for a pound I think the saying goes.
It’s ironic abortion is sold as a woman’s empowerment cause, which it is, but in reality whole generations of men have been relieved of a great deal of responsibility for their actions as well. 40 years ago I was a bit skeptical when my dad said abortion will cheapen life and debase the culture. Damned if the old man wasn’t right again!
The politics of it goes: any concession leads to further concessions being made. So if you want to make sure no poor, suffering teen is punished with a (incestuous, no less) rape-baby (I think I hit all the hot-button words there), you have to keep all abortion legal until the umbilical is cut.
Or something like that.
geez di, the hostility towards reproductive science is pretty strong with the Gosnell Party.
Why do I keep confusing “Gosnell Party” with “Donner Party”?
Re: Carrie Jean Melvin
Put me down for “obvious gang initiation”. The “knockout game” bumped up to hardcore mode.
Of course, immediately afterwards, her boyfriend pulled out his legal, constitutional-carry 1911 .45 and ventilated the perp more than adequately. Oh right, California…
bloodyfoot it is, then.
It’s ironic abortion is sold as a woman’s empowerment cause, which it is, but in reality whole generations of men have been relieved of a great deal of responsibility
A disturbingly high number of abortions are compelled by the father or the woman’s family. They either guilt her into it or threaten her with withdrawal of support.
So let’s hear it for choice.
My thanks to bergerbilder for that blast from the past. For completely ancillary reasons, I was especially struck by this comment:
To which I would have responded, had I the opportunity, umm, they call that kind of contract marriage.
Somebody should have clued in Justice Kennedy.
I found Nishi’s answer to bergerbilder’s question, btw
[…] Final question, from Darleen at protein wisdom: […]
@Ernst: I guess nishi never read the Vorkosigan novels by Bujold. Wonder what excuse they’d come up with for someone paying to have their brain transplanted into a younger clone.
Coming soon!
Soylent Pink and Soylent Blue!
[excuse me while I go drink myself insensible – more that usual, I mean…]
Two very interesting items missed in all the hoopla over monetizing reproductive” rights”
Item One: Freedom of Religion is dead
Item Two: Dissent is the new form of
patriotismmental illnessDo not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers. For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness? And what accord has Christ with Belial? Or what part has a believer with an unbeliever? And what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God. As God has said:
“I will dwell in them
And walk among them.
I will be their God,
And they shall be My people.”
Therefore
“Come out from among them
And be separate, says the Lord.
Do not touch what is unclean,
And I will receive you.”
“I will be a Father to you,
And you shall be My sons and daughters,
Says the Lord Almighty.”
Di, I notice a subtle difference in the human parts sale loophole between tissues in general and aborted baby tissue.
Body parts law say “sale” and therefore the “fee” loophole.
The aborted baby legitimation says “trafficking” is illegal. I would read that as meaning charging fees is also forbidden. Intent and all.
rise – pil
It turns out that it’s against medical ethics to change how you treat the dying so that their organs will be in better shape for harvest.
It’s also against medical ethics to perform an abortion with anything but the mother’s welfare in mind.
Also, this: https://stream.org/actually-planned-parenthood-body-parts-business-likely-illegal/
Also,
Geoffb mentioned China:
Is this what you mean?
http://gizmodo.com/5151377/chinas-death-buses-deliver-executions-organ-harvesting-on-the-go
Off the top of my head it seems delivering organs in transplant quality condition would be priceyer than UPS. And different tissue requiring different packaging and/or time restraints.
And that’s already way more thinking about the ghoulish details than I want to do. I’m out.
[…] is anyone surprised at these […]