Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Are you ready for Hillary? [Darleen Click]

SNL’s take

Street art outside of Hillary’s Brooklyn campaign headquarters:

hillarystreetart1

hillarystreetart2

hillarystreetart3

65 Replies to “Are you ready for Hillary? [Darleen Click]”

  1. […] Protein Wisdom: Are You Ready For Hillary […]

  2. McGehee says:

    Don’t say O’Malley.

  3. EBL says:

    Well don’t say it three times while looking in a mirror…or Hillary might show up and stab you in the back.

    Same goes for Warren.

  4. sdferr says:

    On the general sense of the question I wonder, aren’t sane Americans asking themselves what is it about their own lives in particular which requires of them that they be “ready” for this putrefactive woman? I mean, really. Why? Why even bother?

  5. cranky-d says:

    By “ready,” they mean ready for yet another fascist president to screw with us some more.

    Not that they would admit it.

  6. Merovign says:

    The alternate reality of the MFM is all ready for it.

  7. newrouter says:

    don’t say benghazi

  8. happyfeet says:

    if Bush is the Team R nominee then yeah I’m ready for Hillary i guess

  9. McGehee says:

    You’re ready for for whoever will give you cupcakes.

    Especially if some third party is paying for them.

  10. newrouter says:

    don’t say “i’m ridin’ with biden”

  11. McGehee says:

    Bill is overjoyed that Hillary is getting out of the house again. Now he can order the Blue Dress Special from Monica’s Pizza.

    With extra cheese.

  12. McGehee says:

    From the announcement:

    …she’s fought children and families all her career.

    This is what’s known as a Kinsley typo.

  13. happyfeet says:

    i buy my own cupcakes i do what i want

  14. happyfeet says:

    but i been saving up calories for a long time now for to get me some hummingbird cake

    cause of this cake i am needful

  15. McGehee says:

    Is it made with real hummingbirds?

  16. happyfeet says:

    no sir it is not as you well know

  17. McGehee says:

    Then it’s false advertising.

  18. happyfeet says:

    it’s the most requested recipe from Southern Living ever in all of history

  19. dicentra says:

    Suggestion for today:

    Find all the pro-Hillary hashtags on Twitter and flood them with links and mentions of how Hillary’s job was to destroy the lives of women who claimed that her predator husband had raped, sexually assaulted, or sexually harassed them.

    Methinks it’s time to turn rape hysteria into something positive.

  20. bgbear says:

    Humming birds are vicious little bastards to each other and they have vocalizations that would make a sailor blush.

  21. dicentra says:

    Hummingbirds are vicious little bastards to each other and they have vocalizations that would make a sailor blush.

    Totes.

    I see them battling in the trees around my house all the time, with their wings a-buzzing and their high-pitched, angry cheepy cheeps.

    Kind of an apt metaphor for RadFems vs. trannies or something.

    Also, #Hillary2016. It looks like the Obamas are trying to sink Hillary’s nomination, having gotten the word out to MJones and SNL.

    In favor of whom, though?

  22. bgbear says:

    The Dems have such a pathetic field I think Jerry Brown could get the nomination.

  23. sdferr says:

    In favor of whom, though?

    Almost certainly Karl Rove and minions.

  24. McGehee says:

    In favor of whom, though?

    “Apres nous, le deluge.”

  25. sdferr says:

    Though they think long term enough to know that the ripest times are indicated by “apres le deluge, nous”.

  26. McGehee says:

    The Obamas? These are people to whom time itself might as well come to an end at noon on January 20, 2017.

  27. sdferr says:

    No, I don’t intend the “Obamas” as such (hateful name to write), but the cult of the Alinskii of which they are members. The way is long, the outcome foreordained.

  28. McGehee says:

    I’m not sure I would say the Alinsk think long-term, since I consider thought to encompass not only strategy and tactics, but also goals.

    And their goals are intellectually unexamined except by their opponents.

  29. sdferr says:

    I guess I’d disagree about their own consideration of their goals. I of course don’t agree with their goals, but I do think they think long term about those, if yet mistakenly. What I see on the ground in the Middle-East, for instance, which everyone (normal) seems to mistake for incompetence is in my opinion of the ClownDeceptor’s opinion what is actually the goal, and he things this is good. We don’t, obviously. Ordinary folk think his aims are evil. And then ordinary folk stop thinking, and attribute his aims to incompetence. Un-uh.

  30. sdferr says:

    he thinks this is good — not “things”

    apologies

  31. dicentra says:

    Almost certainly Karl Rove and minions.

    I doubt seriously that Obamacrew would even inadvertently clear the field for anyone Rove supports.

    I was wondering about the contender from left field, e.g., Fauxcahontas, for whom they might take out HRC.

    Also, Alinskyites most definitely think long term. Much of the infrastructure they put in place — tucked inside those unreadable, indecipherable bills — as well as practices now embedded within the bureaucratic culture — are set to detonate during the next president’s tenure, regardless of who it is.

    Oh, like Rand Paul has 1000 eyes and 300 arms, to keep track of all the shite that’s going down in all those places.

  32. sdferr says:

    I doubt seriously that Obamacrew would even inadvertently clear the field for anyone Rove supports.

    Think about that strategically for a moment. Why wouldn’t it be a good idea to cast aside a pathetic spaz like Hillary for an incompetent boob like Jeb Bush, who either wouldn’t be up to the severe challenges facing every possible successor (given the success of ClownDeceptor’s policy so far in every corner of the polity, from utterly devastated fiscal wrecking to foreign affairs)? Wouldn’t the failure of a trifle like Jeb be just the ticket for a demolished polity fit to be taken in hand by another coming of the Alinskite savior? Why, that might just be the thing.

  33. sdferr says:

    ooh, sorry for leaving off the second dependent clause: either . . . * or would utter fuck up the country *?

  34. McGehee says:

    Any long-term critical thought applied to their goals would show them the folly.

  35. McGehee says:

    Much of the infrastructure they put in place

    Is strategy. Any pack predator can strategize.

  36. McGehee says:

    We need to stop building these people up as daunting foes, smarter than any of us. They are not.

    Overestimating the opposition leads to paralysis and defeatism, and I’ll have none of it.

  37. sdferr says:

    From their point of view critical thought means seeing the great virtue of their policies aimed at the establishment of true justice not only in America, but rendered upon America (chickens coming home to roost). From their point of view, their perfect knowledge of justice is more than enough reason to visit terrible suffering upon America which the simpleton Americans in the usual style of thieves will say they cannot deserve.

  38. The Leftist Masterminds think long term.

    The Leftist Apparatchiks think they think long term.

    The Leftist Fellow Travellers dream long term.

    The Leftist Dupes don’t even consider long term.

    Welcome To The Left In America!

  39. LBascom says:

    Proggs think long term only as a general goal; Utopia. Their planning focuses on the advancement toward their goal, but the process is the true reward; consolidation of power and establishing moral superiority.

    Think about it, what agenda have the left ever considered achieved? A hundred years after suffrage, women’s rights are still a cause. Minimum wage is never high enough, and taxes are always too low. Illegal aliens became undocumented immigrants a generation ago, now they unabashedly demand open borders. Abortion was to be rare. The EPA declares back yard ponds navigable waterways. The more that is government subsidized, the greater the need. When is enough enough?

    Never.

  40. LBascom wrote: Think about it, what agenda have the left ever considered achieved?…When is enough enough?

    Only when those pesky Humans, with their lack of perfection, of Enlightenment, are wiped-out totally.

  41. sdferr says:

    Michael Ledeen presents the incompetence case. He’s a decent man, Mr. Ledeen, who won’t go the next step to attribute knowing choice (i.e., actual malice) to the ClownDeceptor. Here he and I part company, for I do so attribute.

  42. sdferr says:

    Victor Hanson more or less captures what I see in the ClownDeceptor’s policies: Obama and Revolutionary Romance

  43. ‘What Good Is The Scheming, The Planning, And Dreaming…’

    …That comes with each new love affair The dreams that we cherish, so often might perish And leaves you with castles in air… Over at Protein Wisdom, in a post by Darleen Click, there’s been a bit of a debate going on in the Comments se…

  44. Danger says:

    sdferr,

    Their is a third possible explanation (that neither Ledeen nor Hanson explore) for Zero’s zest for dealing with the Devil.

  45. sdferr says:

    I’m open to better, more comprehensive theories Mr. Danger, certainly. Spin it out and we can take a look see.

  46. Danger says:

    Not really a comprehensive theory, merely a simple (albeit one hard to accept) explanation for a man with no paper trail nor discernible talent (beyond following a teleprompter) rising to the heights of power and once there abuse that power with such little resistance while acting so counter to American interests.

    Usually the Devil is in the details. Sometimes it’s the other way around.

  47. sdferr says:

    ah, so you mean some non-metaphorical actual supernatural kinda deal? I’ll just stick to the messy phenomena for the nonce, I think.

  48. Danger says:

    I think VDH is probably closest to the mark. I just have a bad vibe I can’t shake about the guy. Incompetence and romantics doesn’t seem to cover it completely.

    Could be a combination of the two. Could also be outside influences (Soros, Buffet) or bigger aspirations. (a weaker America and a more influential U.N. with Zero at the helm)

  49. sdferr says:

    I pretty much leave any thoughts of incompetence aside any more, since so far as I can see he’s got everyone in just the same position as Andreas Lubitz the Germanwings co-pilot. We’re plunging into terrain and there ain’t a damn thing anyone can do about it at this point.

  50. sdferr says:

    Iago.

    That‘s the topology.

  51. Danger says:

    Which brings me to my earlier question: why so little resistance? Even the Dims (with any sense) can see where this is heading.

    Do they honestly think that Hillary will be able to break down the door and pull us out of the dive? Hell, I’m not sure Ted Cruz could do it.

  52. sdferr says:

    why so little resistance?

    I generally answer this question with Shelby Steele’s analysis of white guilt — which I refer to by the term “magic shield”. The immaturity of the Americans’ political avoidance of race issues lays at the heart of the cowardice seen in the “little resistance”. Why hasn’t he been impeached? (he’s compiled a record of political crimes unmatched in American history). Magic shield.

  53. Danger says:

    I get the public posturing but with Iran on the cusp of Nuclearamadan and the Russians supplying the guards you’d think the Democrats would all be going to Zero in private and putting the k-bosh on the deal.

  54. sdferr says:

    Perhaps some of them attempt it without success. Most, on the other hand, do not, either because in some instances they quietly agree with him (we’re due a severe punishment for our sins) or in the rest simply fear the troubles he can bring down on their heads (see last weekend’s NYTs editorial.

  55. Danger says:

    NYT still can’t get over the letter. Apparently, they also missed the civics lesson that covered the part in the Constitution that says the Senate has to approve all treaties.

    How dare they act where they are constitutionally obligated to act!

  56. Danger says:

    (we’re due a severe punishment for our sins)

    It’s too bad they can’t seem to remove the beam in their eyes to better see those sins.

    (for instance: chain smoking dads shouldn’t blame climate change for their daughter’s asthma attacks)

  57. Danger says:

    Night sdfer,

    good talk!

  58. sdferr says:

    It’s too bad they can’t seem to remove the beam in their eyes to better see those sins.

    yes. For an indication of that beam (if you have the patience for it) there’s a brief mention during this talk by Michael Weiss (the entirety of which I highly recommend for the reporting on ISIS alone) about Dennis McDonough, the goulish looking chief of staff, who remarks how he “likes” that ISIS is fighting Hezbollah in Syria, to which Weiss says something like “look how cavalier McDonough is about the deaths of tens and hundreds of thousands of innocent Syrian Sunni caught in the middle”. And that’s just a tiny splinter of the entire beam in their eye.

  59. Danger says:

    Wow!

    And we took out Gaddafi because of human rights violations. WTF, OVER?

  60. Danger wrote: Hell, I’m not sure Ted Cruz could do it.

    Ted Cruz will not pull us out of our domestic dangers. The national government is too riddled with the Leftist Cancer — the patient is, ultimately, terminal. Hence, my belief that any chance at effecting a Restoration likes in us banding together in several of the Several States.

    However, no Restoration is possible if our foreign enemies are able to successfully cripple and murder us. So, while I place absolutely no hope in any conservative President being able to effect said Restoration, or even effectively slow-down our descent into a more firm and entrenched Tyranny, I do believe we must elect one because our alien enemies can still be thwarted — and must be crushed, utterly.

  61. sdferr says:

    Say Danger, give this new Jack Cashill article a read. He captures ClownDeceptor’s motivations fairly well, I think.

  62. Danger says:

    Good article,

    Cashill sems to be calling him a BICO (black in color only) that believes he created the genuine article with the help/influence of the radicals; Wright and Avery.

    Ironically he had to pretend that persona was just a fictional character during his presidential campaigns.

    “Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them”
    Matthew 7:20

Comments are closed.