Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Archives

Obama’s amnesty is like Lincoln’s freeing of the slaves … or something … [Darleen Click]

The spin ramps up …

Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation provides the foundational precedent for President Obama’s executive order on immigrants in the country illegally. […]

Particulars in Obama’s proclamation may well be changed by Americans over time. But like Lincoln’s, its provisional and limited character will have a democracy-forcing effect — spurring officials and citizens to more actively engage in a constitutional dialogue.

Rather than refusing to follow the Constitution and “take care that the laws be faithfully executed,” the president emphasizes that he will continue deportations, using all the budgetary resources Congress has provided. But those appropriations cover the annual removal of only 400,000 of the 11.3 million immigrants in the country illegally. Given this fact, Obama’s initiative has a constitutionally legitimate purpose: to prevent Homeland Security from wasting its scarce resources on breaking up innocent families when it could be targeting immigrants who deserve expeditious removal.

And here

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is drawing a parallel between President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation and President Obama’s planned executive actions on immigration reform.

“Does the public know the Emancipation Proclamation was an executive order?” Pelosi asked at a news conference Thursday morning.

Looks like Leftists all got their White House talking points

Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) this week said President Barack Obama’s pending plan to give legal status to millions of illegal immigrants will someday be seen as an historical action along the lines of the Emancipation Proclamation. […]

“One day there will be movies written about this episode in American history,” he said, according to the Atlanta Journal Constitution. “There will be a president who issues an executive order like the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed three to four million slaves with the signing of a pen.”

Because slaves – people sold out of Africa and who were actual pieces of property are exactly the same as people who came here of their own free will and will do anything to stay.

Exactly the same.

9 Replies to “Obama’s amnesty is like Lincoln’s freeing of the slaves … or something … [Darleen Click]”

  1. geoffb says:

    Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) this week said ……….

    And Guam tips over again.

  2. sdferr says:

    Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation provides the foundational precedent for President Obama’s executive order on immigrants in the country illegally.

    That looks like no more than a bald-faced lie, if we simply look at the Office of Legal Counsel memorandum issued as legal justification for the action taken. No where in that memorandum is the Emancipation Proclamation mentioned. Not once.

    Now, therefore I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, by virtue of the power in me vested as Commander-in-Chief, of the Army and Navy of the United States in time of actual armed rebellion against the authority and government of the United States, and as a fit and necessary war measure for suppressing said rebellion, do, on this first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and in accordance with my purpose so to do publicly proclaimed for the full period of one hundred days, from the day first above mentioned, order and designate as the States and parts of States wherein the people thereof respectively, are this day in rebellion against the United States, the following, to wit:

    Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, (except the Parishes of St. Bernard, Plaquemines, Jefferson, St. John, St. Charles, St. James Ascension, Assumption, Terrebonne, Lafourche, St. Mary, St. Martin, and Orleans, including the City of New Orleans) Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Virginia, (except the forty-eight counties designated as West Virginia, and also the counties of Berkley, Accomac, Northampton, Elizabeth City, York, Princess Ann, and Norfolk, including the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth[)], and which excepted parts, are for the present, left precisely as if this proclamation were not issued.

    And by virtue of the power, and for the purpose aforesaid, I do order and declare that all persons held as slaves within said designated States, and parts of States, are, and henceforward shall be free; and that the Executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of said persons.

  3. geoffb says:

    So he left out the part proclaiming the whole of the United States to be in rebellion against the United States?

  4. McGehee says:

    What Barackhenaten has done is declare the Executive Branch in rebellion against the United States.

    Those seen by two or more persons cleaving to him, giving him aid and comfort, have in that act one very direct reason to want the Constitution overthrown.

  5. Drumwaster says:

    Everyone keeps talking about “comprehensive immigration reform“, but no one seems to be talking about comprehensive ENFORCEMENT. How about we try actually enforcing the laws we have before we worry about changing them?

    And the claim that “we have 15 million people living in the shadows”, since when does the number of law-breakers have anything to do with whether or not we enforce those laws? Government surveys show that nearly 100 million people have smoked marijuana and almost ten million use it chronically, but I don’t see any sudden rush by the Choomster-in-Chief to suddenly change those Federal Laws by Executive Fiat or prosecutorial discretion. There were 1.5 million marijuana arrests in 2012 (one every 42 seconds), according to the FBI, and that is a HELL of a lot higher than the number of deportations by Obumbles…

  6. McGehee says:

    Ask any federal prosecutor about FIJA, alias juror discretion.

  7. steph says:

    II’ve noticed numerous talking heads, both in media and the political “leadership”‘ an alarming propensity to say “um no, we’re not going to say the ‘I word'”, making an equivalence between uttering the “n” word and the word IMPEACH, as if the mere saying of the word impeach is, in and of itself, loaded with racist connotations, and thereby imbuing a meaning to the verb which it does not have.

  8. steph says:

    “Someday there will be a movie…”
    Texas Iwonpenphone massacre
    A Clockwork Boehner

  9. bh says:

    Maybe I missed the part where the Emancipation Proclamation reduced the wages of black people by a significant degree.

    See, slaves don’t make much money. On that scale, we might say that Barack has reintroduced slavery to his brothers because he’s a straight-up Uncle Tomas.

Comments are closed.