It's one thing to openly engage in race baiting on the floor of the Senate. It's another thing entirely to sell the indignation you pretend to affect.
So when you say, in your lolling monotone, that there are people on the Senate Finance committee who refuse to support yet another "infrastructure investment" -- having seen once how "shovel ready jobs" were actually crony payouts and phony green boondoggles -- because the President proposing them "is the wrong color," at least have the guts to specify against whom you're leveling the odious (and perfunctory-sounding) charge of racism.
Because here's the thing, Senator: while many of us really DO object to Obama's policies based on his color, the color we object to is red, not black. We are free market capitalists. And we reject the attempts by red-diaper babies to "fundamentally transform us."
So. Kindly take your divisive rhetoric -- which we all know you don't truly believe -- wrap it up in the finest cavier your grandfather's money can buy you, and shove it up your pampered ass.
-- Or, I suppose, if you don't wish to do it yourself -- you are, after all, nothing if not refined -- you can have one of your domestics do it for you. None of whom, I'm sure, are anywhere near brownish in hue.
Short of that, I ask respectfully that you shut your hypocritical pie hole until such time as either you have something sensible and worthwhile to say, or until said pie hole belches out its final poisonous CO2 burp and you're ushered off to that great big Country Club in the sky.
Thanks much!
Sincerely,
protein wisdom
ps. If you see him, tell Charlie Crist to go suck a bag of dicks. The only thing worse than a pandering one-man clown car is a pandering one-man clown car who was actively championed by the GOP establishment, right before he lost his re-election bid and found his "liberation" in becoming a Democrat, signaling just how close the two ruling class parties truly are in governmental philosophy.
Which, he has a point. Not having any principles, and having your moral compass set to relativism and popular, media-created consensus, IS liberating. It's just that it's also disgustingly opportunistic. And the reason no one on either side really trusts you.
Just ask Charles Johnson.
When names aren’t named. There oughta be a game show.
How about?: Guess the Racist!
Or: Who’s the Homophobe?
And: Hunt Down the Christian!
With the ancillary: Find the Jew!
Maybe even: Which one is the Totalitarian?
” . . . there are impulses in the government every day . . . ” — “. . . I sense that some on the left . . .” — “There are some in this building . . .”
It’s not even like this is a new development. Who Goes Nazi? goes back at least as far as 1941!
Sound like anyone you’d recognize?
Minus the brilliant part, sure.
“Sound like anyone you’d recognize?”
In the manner of Genjisss KAAAHHHhhhnnnn.