Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Holder to sue yet another state. For the post-partisanship and post-racialism.

Unfortunately for Holder and ObamaCo, this time that state is Texas — and they don’t seem to be in the mood to be used as yet another Obama vibrator.

First, Holder’s agenda:

Two important developments this morning. First: Attorney General Eric Holder will announce that the Justice Department will initiate broad nationwide attacks on election integrity measures like Voter ID using the remaining portions of the Voting Rights Act. Last month, the Supreme Court struck down the 1965 triggers that forced 15 states to submit election law changes to Washington D.C. for federal approval.

Second: despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, the Justice Department announced it will try to recapture Texas under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act by showing the state continues to act with a racially discriminatory intent when passing voting laws.

Some of Holder’s reaction is because dozens of highly paid federal employees are now idled. James Buchanan won the Nobel Prize in economics by explaining Holder’s actions as public choice theory — bureaucrats announce policies to help bureaucrats, even if disguised as an act inspired by a public purpose.

For the last few weeks, Voting Section employees have taken extended coffee breaks, and even more extended lunches. But there was hope — outgoing Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez referred to the state of Louisiana as the “full employment for Voting Section lawyers state.”

That means Governor Bobby Jindal can expect more targeting by the DOJ Voting Section.

But this announcement is all about the midterm elections. Obama wants the House back, and the Justice Department is again being turned into a political weapon using the cloak of civil rights. This has become the new civil rights model. Because Democratic interests are so perfectly aligned with the civil rights establishment — in no small measure because of extreme bloc voting by American blacks — the DOJ is now an arm of the DNC.

And next, the reaction in Texas, with my paraphrasing:

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott is responding quickly and forcefully to Obama Attorney General Eric Holder’s decision to rope Texas back into the Voting Rights Act. The US Supreme Court just struck part of that law down.

(Essentially, he says “bring it, bitches.”)

A minute later, Abbott followed up with another Tweet.

(Essentially, noting that Holder is the baby lapdog bitch to Obama’s Alpha bitch, both of whom plan to treat SCOTUS as a fire hydrant)

The facts are on Abbott’s side. Texas specifically modeled its voter ID law on Indiana’s. That law has already been taken all the way to the US Supreme Court and was upheld. The Texas law enjoys widespread support across all ethnicities in the state. Only the Texas Democrat Party and its allies oppose it.

The Obama administration has been very consistent about opposing laws that buttress election security, and it has been very consistent about punishing states that don’t get in line with Obama’s radical agenda. Holder’s lawsuit is just another example of both.

[…]

Update: Texas Gov. Rick Perry posted the following statement on his Facebook page.

“Once again, the Obama Administration is demonstrating utter contempt for our country’s system of checks and balances, not to mention the U.S. Constitution. This end-run around the Supreme Court undermines the will of the people of Texas, and casts unfair aspersions on our state’s common-sense efforts to preserve the integrity of our elections process.”

Update: Land Commissioner and Lt. Gov candidate Jerry Patterson responds.

DON’T MESS WITH TEXAS – The latest federal attack on Texas has been launched today, and Eric Holder is back in his role as Barack Obama’s chief aggressor. There is no longer any pretense about hiding the partisan agenda to target our state. This latest attack is not about voting rights, and everything to do with destroying and diminishing the success of the Lone Star State. Our very existence is an affront to this administration, but we aren’t going anywhere, and we aren’t scared of a fight. Better dig in for the long haul, my fellow lovers of liberty – this is just the beginning.

Update: True the Vote, which is one of the victims of the scandals that President Obama called “phony” yesterday, responds.

(Yup. We think you’re a mouthy little lapdog bitch and race hustler, too, Eric.  So prepare to watch us stand our ground.)

Update: State Sen. Dan Patrick, who is also running for Lt. Gov. gets a bank shot on Wendy Davis.

(Dear Wendy:  I’d tell you to bring your army of supporters with you to DC to speak with the President, but in a kind of surpreme irony, you’ve advocated for aborting most of them. So…)

Here’s a thought.: I’m no military guy, but the land mass of Texas and a few neighboring states that may be lured into forming a separate republic, is certainly substantial enough to fit classical liberals, constitutionalists, libertarians, and legal conservatives all quite comfotably.  So all that would need be done in preparation for a new Declaration of Independence would be to wait for the universities, particularly in Austin, to go on spring break, use that moment to sweep in and remove the other statist hippies and performance artists / buskers from their squats and coffee houses, then lock down the statw’sborders — requiring those who wish to get back in to pass a test on our Constitution, the Declaration, the Bill of Rights, and some basic national history – the kind of tests we’ve given those wishing to become citizens.

Those who either can’t or who refuse can head to California, Maryland, Illinois, or what have you, and live the remainder of their selfless, tolerant, progressive lives out in Utopian bliss — free from the racists and the xenophobes and the bitterclingers with their guns and their religion  that have so poisoned the country.

And of course, cheap fuel.

Let California worry about border enforcement, and let the liberal wonderland of diversity assimilate all the noble roofers and nannies and dishwashers they can handle.

Honestly, they get what they want and we get what we want.  It’s a win win!  And when in five or ten years the entire country outside of the new republic collapses, we can buy much of it  back, bail out the rest, and create new laws that will forever prevent progressivism and Marxism to darken our doors again.

Like Attaturk, only with cool hats and snakeskin boots.

76 Replies to “Holder to sue yet another state. For the post-partisanship and post-racialism.”

  1. Blake says:

    Serious question: Just what sort of punishment does Holder and Co. think they can dish out?

    Withhold federal dollars? Um, well, Texas can just stop sending dollars to Washington.

    Arrest Gov. Perry and cohorts? (Texas would be turning away citizens at the border who want to get a piece of whomever tries to arrest Perry)

    I’ve got it…Holder will mail a sternly worded letter, guaranteed to raise an eyebrow hair on Governor Perry.

    That’ll teach ’em!!

  2. Reminds me of George Straight singing, “All my X’s live in Texas.”

  3. sdferr says:

    Q: How many chiggers does it take to hold a free and fair election?

    A; None. Chiggers are incapable of holding elections.

  4. Squid says:

    Serious question: Just what sort of punishment does Holder and Co. think they can dish out?

    That gets to the heart of my argument for states fighting back to reclaim some lost liberty and sovereignty. I’ve started calling it the “Yeah? Or else what?” campaign.

  5. Blake says:

    Squid, I can see where a few States might decide it’s better to fall in line than hold the line. However, Texas isn’t one of them.

    I suppose Holder making the statement about suing Texas is part and parcel of the current White House campaign of “Distract and Deny.”

  6. leigh says:

    Most of the states in vast middle of the country, including Texas and Oklahoma, have been quietly passing legislation with regard to state sovereignty since the Wan has held office. We’re bullet-proof.

  7. SBP says:

    “I’ve started calling it the “Yeah? Or else what?” campaign.”

    I’d really rather not see Civil War II, personally.

    However, the outcome might be different this time around. Last time the North had all the money, the industry, and the population. That’s no longer the case.

    The “red” states also have most of the food, energy, and guns, and account for a vastly disproportionate number of military personnel (the last one was also true in Civil War I, which is why the South was able to hold out so long).

  8. sdferr says:

    The DoJ statue of blindfolded LadyJustice extending a balance has become the victim of Eric Holder’s rapey sexual advances, though unlike his boss’ use of force on LadyLiberty, it is Holder’s distinct pleasure to make for the backdoor so to avoid the possibility of conception.

  9. bgbear says:

    It is only means civil war if Obama wants to keep the the treasonous racists cracker states and the Chinese will lend him the money.

  10. Shermlaw says:

    This would seem to be a very stupid move for the administration, given SCOTUS recent ruling and the Indiana precedent which has passed Constitutional muster. I cannot see how the administration gets a win, either in court or if Texas invokes its rights under the 9th and 10th Amendments. Unless, of course, this is precisely the reaction the administration wants . . .

  11. quietly passing legislation with regard to state sovereignty since the Wan has held office. We’re bullet-proof.

    Until somebody tells John Roberts that reconquering the middle states and turning them into massive internal Gitmos is just a tax.

  12. sdferr says:

    Insty:

    “Ten College Republicans were dubbed a security threat and refused admittance to President Barack Obama’s speech at the University of Central Missouri on Wednesday. Despite the fact that the students had tickets to the event, security personnel turned them away at the door to the recreation center where Obama gave a speech on economic policy, telling the group it wasn’t about their politics but the president’s safety.”

    This is consistent with the Administration’s general strategy of treating political opponents like enemies of the state.

    Consistency indeed. If there’s a power to be had, Obazmites will use it for partisan political purposes.

  13. Ernst Schreiber says:

    What were they afraid of –a bruised ego?

  14. sdferr says:

    David Ubben, the severely wounded Diplomatic security agent who was with Ambassador Stevens and Sean Smith is approached by Fox News. We can hope to hear more from him in the coming months.

    Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz says the State Department has frustrated his efforts to meet with Ubben at Walter Reed. “While initially they said they would be helpful, pretty quickly they turned that off. And I had a meeting scheduled to go visit this … young man and then I was denied.” The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, on which Chaffetz sits, has been investigating the Benghazi attack.

    On Wednesday, another Republican congressman, Frank Wolf of Virginia, who has gathered a majority of Republicans in the House in support of a Select Committee to investigate Benghazi, sent a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry complaining that the State Department has refused for months to provide Congress with the names and contact information for the survivors. It was on March 15, six months after the attack, that the State Department finally confirmed three of its agents and one contractor were injured.

    Asked why the State Department was either blocking or simply failing to facilitate these meetings, spokeswoman Jen Psaki’s explanation was in conflict with lawmakers’ claims.

  15. sdferr says:

    What were they afraid of –a bruised ego?

    Who can say? Perhaps, when the Emperor prances past in his new clothes, it won’t do to have an observant child commenting by the wayside within ear-shot of anyone capable of hearing?

  16. newrouter says:

    carlos danger had no problem showing off his new “clothes”

  17. Shermlaw says:

    sdferr, reading stories like that, I’m reminded of what the military of Imperial Japan did after Midway: the survivors were sent all over the place except Japan to prevent news of the defeat from leaking to the public.

  18. NR, why did I know that was an Ace post?

  19. newrouter says:

    it is pithy?

  20. newrouter says:

    or you saw minx.cc

  21. newrouter says:

    or carlos danger told you

  22. SBP says:

    “Until somebody tells John Roberts that reconquering the middle states and turning them into massive internal Gitmos is just a tax.”

    John Roberts has made his decision; now let him enforce it?

  23. newrouter says:

    could someone in texas call holder “a creepy ass cracka”? it is rj3.O! approved.

  24. leigh says:

    He’s welcome to come and give it a try. We’re givers that way.

  25. Spiny Norman says:

    Scribe,

    Until somebody tells John Roberts that reconquering the middle states and turning them into massive internal Gitmos is just a tax.

    If I had the chance, the first question I’d ask Edward Snowden is “what does the NSA have on Justice Roberts?”

  26. it is pithy?

    The link is subtly sarcastic.

  27. John Roberts has made his decision; now let him enforce it?

    That seems to be the Obamarrhoids’ attitude toward the VRA decision. Maybe making it unanimous would lead to… interesting times.

  28. newrouter says:

    we need a darleen photoshop of the “creepy ass crackas” baracky and holder

  29. sdferr says:

    Ray V. Hartwell: Lois Lerner’s Ace in the Hole

    *** The odds that Lerner will choose to rely on ace-in-the-hole Holder are enhanced by the fact that she, her lawyer, her superior Mr. Wilkins, and numerous others involved are all reported to be staunch supporters of (and generous campaign contributors to) President Obama. They share a common interest in doing what’s best for Team Obama, and they were listening when the President said that his administration will reward its friends.

    Lerner’s motivation to stonewall will be no different if the committee seeks to compel her testimony. A Congressional immunity order would not protect Lerner from prosecution based on evidence already in the record, which could be used without any reliance on her immunized testimony. Likewise, such an order would not protect her from prosecution for perjury or the like should she lie when testifying under immunity. But Congress itself has no power to prosecute her. Congress can only refer the matter to DOJ, where her ace in the hole — the political appointee who can kill the case — remains our Attorney General, Eric Holder. ***

    Up against the wall, motherfucker.

  30. newrouter says:

    see baracky and holder be “creepy ass crackas”

    MORGAN: C-R-A-C-K-A? JEANTEL: Yes, and that’s a person who act like they are police, who like security guard, who acting like, that’s what I said to them. Trayvon said creepy ass cracka.

    MORGAN: It means he thought it was a policeman or a security guard —

    JEANTEL: Yes. Who’s acting like a policeman and then he keeps telling me that the man still watch him. So if it was a security guard or a policeman, they would come up to Trayvon and say, do you have — do you need — do you have a problem, do you need help? You know, like normal people.

    link

  31. Libby says:

    Didn’t those college Republicans get the message? The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet Obama.

  32. newrouter says:

    oh my

    Who knows but President Obama will prove to be the Coleman Young of foreign policy — heir to a magnificent legacy which he will spend down until it is as ruined as Detroit. It must have seemed that Motor City was so rich it could never be bankrupted. But never is a long time. And it always begins now.

    link

  33. newrouter says:

    embrace your outlaw: dc be filled with ” creepy ass crackas”

  34. LBascom says:

    Those who either can’t or who refuse can head to California, Maryland, Illinois, or what have you, and live the remainder of their selfless, tolerant, progressive lives out in Utopian bliss

    What have you being, say, Colorado? Newly blue and proudly progg?

    Naw, I think something we need to wrap our brains around is, it isn’t necessarily states that are Utopian, but rather it seems to be an urban problem.

    As with Colorado, where, after exiting Denver or the richer environs like Vail the people are staunchly individualistic, most of California, after exiting the coastal enclaves and DC on the Sacramento, rural Californians are about as patriotic as Texans.

    I don’t know how you get around it; until the second world war or thereabouts, most of the population was involved in agriculture, rural, and self sufficient. Now, most of the population is urban and reliant on public services, like public transportation and the like.

    Sometimes I wonder if societal evolution is just moving faster than “conservatives” can handle. With world population graphs going vertical, time and space being compressed through technology, and an ever increasing demand for energy, compromises incompatible with classical liberal philosophy might be inevitable for political survival.

    This would be the “apocalypse” certain Jews foretold of…

  35. newrouter says:

    orangeman: be a “creepy ass cracka” with his side kicks

  36. newrouter says:

    attack the “creepy ass crackas” like baracky,reid, boehner and mcconnel. shut down with the “creepy ass crackas”

  37. LBascom says:

    An ever increaseresources I shoulda said…

  38. LBascom says:

    Shit. An ever increasing demand for resources…

  39. geoffb says:

    If Holder & Co. can get to be you online just think of all the crimes you could commit and be charged for while you are sleeping or whatever. Ya’ll “creepy ass crackas.”

  40. newrouter says:

    “An ever increasing demand for resources…”

    yes let’s shut coal fired power plants NOW. hi baracky the aftershave.

  41. BigBangHunter says:

    – nr has wandered too far from his meds again.

  42. LBascom says:

    Eh, he’s just entertaining himself BBH. I wouldn’t worry about it.

  43. happyfeet says:

    no he has not he’s talking about fascist energy policy

    the last Team R nominee wanted to shut down coal plants too

  44. newrouter says:

    they gets you with the porn thing too:

    do a google news: “child porn” search. the gov’t be taking down peeps left and right.

  45. newrouter says:

    “- nr has wandered too far from his meds again.”

    nah just watching the train wreck in slo mo

  46. newrouter says:

    “- nr has wandered too far from his meds again.”

    you be the the guy “defending the gov’t entrapping peeps” go team r

  47. newrouter says:

    the bbh

    ain’t no judeo/christian morality between the proggtard stupidity and the mohammed tribalism.

  48. newrouter says:

    Two political tendencies ‘Politics is not only the art of the possible, but as well the search for, and even the creation of the possible. We cannot passively wait for opportunities to arise, we must actively prepare and create them.’
    This is not an abstract essay on individuals living in any societ whatsoever, but about human beings and their prospects in a system circumscribed by power, ideology, and social and cultural mani- pulation. In a totalitarian political structure, just about every facet of human existence is politicized. The hierarchically organized ruling class has at its disposal a highly centralized form of decision- making power. Its totality is best revealed in the dispersive way it controls and influences all the components of society, whose subor- dinate decision-making power is derived from direct or indirect signals, resolutions, directives and orders, all emanating from the top of the ruling hierarchy.

    page 104 p-o-t-p

  49. Cowboy says:

    It’s been a long time since I’ve been able to check up on you Jeff, and also the Protein Wisdom Crew. It’s gratifying to see that you are still fighting the good fight. As always, Jeff, yours is the most precise voice, and your ability to see through the bullshit–virtual and otherwise–has not weakened a whit! [Wow, I said “whit”!]

    For the time being, I can engage in what you folks are working on.

    I’ll be reading, and when I can, I’ll drop a note.

    Cowboy

  50. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Sometimes I wonder if societal evolution is just moving faster than “conservatives” can handle. With world population graphs going vertical, time and space being compressed through technology, and an ever increasing demand for energy, compromises incompatible with classical liberal philosophy might be inevitable for political survival.

    That’s the kind of thinking that had people in the thirties arguing about whose “third way” was better –Stalin’s, Hitler’s or Mussolini’s.

  51. newrouter says:

    A dilemma facing the bureaucracy is the contradiction between its attempt to preserve the status quo and therefore to survive as a bureaucracy, and the need for social changes, particularly in the fields of culture and economics. The institutions of bureaucratic centralism are unreformable, but minor improvements within the framework of the system are important because they encourage the development of a critical spirit, a mood of opposition, and embryonic structures independent of the state. Reforms in them- selves have limitations that are well-known: they always stop – or are repressed by terror – when they touch on fundamental solutions to social contradictions. In this sense every attempt at reform has a revolutionary aspect to it, for it reveals the illusory nature of reform and strengthens the growth of a revolutionary consciousness. At a certain stage of development, the societies of eastern Europe are going to have to face up to the necessity of eliminating the bureaucratic dictatorship. This social change, even were it to disrupt bureaucratic power over a period of several months, will radically L affect all the present institutions of power, disrupt the relationships between them and, ultimately, destroy them. Therefore it is correct to term this overthrowing of bureaucratic power a revolutionary process.

    havel @ page 189

  52. dicentra says:

    None other than Touré asks “Why can’t we just get over racism??? :(

    I guess we’d better answer him.

  53. dicentra says:

    Cowboy?

    I thought you’d kicked the bukkit. Good to see you topside of the sod.

  54. Cowboy says:

    Thanks, dicentra: As it turns out, I thought so too. But I am at worst, embryonic now, trying to figure out what to do with a much smaller life.

    Cowboy

  55. happyfeet says:

    and yet life can be a fraud on the sunny side of the sod

    in food stamp’s america anyways

    it’s best just to drink reasonably-priced wines and not overthink it

  56. newrouter says:

    i find “orangeman vino” repulsive. yea it is cheap but,

  57. happyfeet says:

    it’s stale Mr. newrouter

    bachmann voted for stale then what did she do

    she up and quit

    god i just respect the shit out of that woman

    she’s the real fucking deal

  58. Cowboy says:

    Trust me, happy, the sunny side is best, and America’s free enterprise system produces wonderfully yummy and financially reasonable wines. It’s one of the things we do best.

  59. Ernst Schreiber says:

    I think the fact that she’s quitting tells us everything we need to know; about the standing of the Tea Party withing the Republican caucus, and about the direction the Republican party is headed in.

  60. happyfeet says:

    i only buy foreign wines now except for bravery blend

    it’s a thing

  61. newrouter says:

    position, is, on the contrary, an attempt to regain control over one’s own sense of responsibility. In other words, it is clearly a moral act, not only because one must pay so dearly for it, but principally because it is not self-serving: the risk may bring rewards in the form of a general amelioration in the situation, or it may not. In this regard, as I stated previously, it is an all-or-nothing gamble, and it is difficult to imagine a reasonable person embarking on such a course merely because he or she reckons that sacrifice today will bring rewards tomorrow, be it only in the form of general gratitude. (By the way, the representatives of power invariably come to terms with those who live within the truth by persistently ascribing utilitarian motivations to them – a lust for power or fame or wealth – and thus they try, at least, to implicate them in their own world, the world of general demoralization.) If living within the truth in the post-totalitarian system becomes the chief breeding ground for independent, alternative political ideas, then all considerations about the nature and future prospects of these ideas must necessarily reflect this moral dimension as a political phenomenon. (And if the revolutionary Marxist belief about morality as a product of the ‘superstructure’ inhibits any of our friends from realizing the full significance of this dimension and, in one way or another, from including it in their view of the orld, it is to their own detriment: an anxious fidelity to the postu- lates of that world view prevents them from properly understanding the mechanisms of their own political influence, thus paradoxically making them precisely what they, as Marxists, so often suspect others of being – victims of ‘false consciousness’.)

    p-o-t-p page45

    hi nsa

  62. Cowboy says:

    I know that the culture here is to avoid the personal–but good night. I don’t want anyone to think I was uninterested in their comment(s) about Holder or post-partisanship, but my guiding star has told me to come to bed. And I think it’s always best to listen to those.

    It’s good to be back and reading you all.

    Cowboy

  63. happyfeet says:

    good night Mr. Cowboy it was nice to see you

  64. newrouter says:

    orange/mcconnel vino- half assed whine

  65. newrouter says:

    hooray mr cowboy good dreams to you

  66. […] – What, You Expect Me To Know Things? Power Line: Will Texas Be “Bailed In”? Protein Wisdom: Holder To Sue Yet Another State. For The Post-Partisanship And The Post-Racialism. Bobby Jindal And Scott Walker: Unworkable ObamaCare Jihad Watch: Al Qaeda Host A Family Fun Fair In […]

  67. SBP says:

    Great to see you, Cowboy, and hope to see more of you soon.

  68. All Texas needs to do is to present Holder’s response to the New Black Panthers as an example of what isn’t happening in Texas.

    … I’m lurking lately because all I want to do is rant like a lunatic.

  69. sdferr says:

    Rep Sensenbrenner, Republican of Wisconsin, is found by a leftist news rag [headline “. . . Is Legally Justified . . . “] to have come to AG Holder’s defense.

    Or does he?

    “The department’s actions are consistent with the Voting Rights Act,” Sensenbrenner said Thursday in an email. […]

    “Increased litigation will be one of the major consequences of the court’s decision as courts will have to litigate more allegations of voter discrimination under Section 2 and whether jurisdictions should be ‘bailed-in’ to preclearance coverage,” he said.

    Possibly in the same sense that Angela Corey was “legally justified” to end-run a grand jury and indict George Zimmerman on 2nd degree murder, type ‘justified’.

  70. sdferr says:

    Apologies, I failed to leave the link above.

  71. Ruby Lennox says:

    From your lips to God’s ears, Goldstein.

  72. Blitz says:

    LMC? That’s all I ever do, and you’re far better at it than I, so please, rant away!!

  73. LBascom says:

    That’s the kind of thinking that had people in the thirties arguing about whose “third way” was better –Stalin’s, Hitler’s or Mussolini’s –

    If looking at real world 21st century problems is confined to the thinking of fascists and commies, our situation is more dire than I thought.

  74. sdferr says:

    Incompatible with classical liberal political philosophy is little else than not reading books about it, then thinking the problems over. Surely it isn’t the case that human evolution runs past a commonality between men of the 16th century (or for that matter of 450 BC) and men of our time. Yet, it’s becoming a truism of a sort that this refusal to read, think and discuss is the common condition of American education, but nothing about technological advancement prevents reading. What prevents reading are conscious choices out of a political stance to avoid counter argument altogether, which the progressives in authority in American schools are more than happy to do.

Comments are closed.