April 3, 2013

“His torpid sword”

Or, “how we here on the thinking side of liberty can take a masturbatory screed filled with near aimless and infinite projection and rebut it in in a few carefully chosen links.”

To wit, this is what the 2nd Amendment as a foundational right of the free man in a constitutional republic hasn’t allowed to happen here.

For the children.

Oh. And I feel compelled to make this clear to any visitors who may arrive from the left, with their desire to end violence by seeing the haters gathered among us ground into dust and exterminated, lest we infect them with our moral impurities: it is inappropriate to rapidly stroke your meat puppet to any of the links provided here.

Though as I’m not the fascist type, I certainly won’t stop you, if that’s your thing.

(thanks to SBP)

Posted by Jeff G. @ 10:35am
140 comments | Trackback

Comments (140)

  1. Peace is our value.

    Just not the peace of the grave, exactly.

  2. Liberty is our value. No liberty, no peace.

  3. more whirl peas please

  4. This Hart fellow isn’t too sharp, is he? Why is he affecting a Cowboy Chic look is his profile picture? I thought all cowboys were illiterate hicktards and probably not democrats since they all live in Texas or he would lead his reader(s) to believe.

    Btw, Timothy McVeigh blew up the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995. Not the Alfred Murra Building.

    Just for the spellcheck lulz.

  5. The only takeaway I can get from that piece is that Hart and his commenter are declaring victory. In my mind’s eye I see them saying, “Shake… and Bake! That! Just! Happened!”

  6. I don’t know if you’ve been back to the AmCon ‘Bioshock” article today but a commenter on the article brought up your ‘hypermasculinity’ and ‘cockslap’. Apparently, they’ve all got cock on the brain when thinking about you.

    So you’ve got that going for you. Which is nice.

  7. sedition eff yeah!

  8. Hart and his commenter are declaring victory

    Without the sense of crushing rue a member of the SonderKommando might have done, say, commenting to his fellow worker that they, after all, were still breathing.

  9. Courage.

    No, really.

    “Hart Williams” somehow reminds me of a Simpson’s character. Just so he knows my intellectual level.

  10. I hadn’t been back, John, so I hadn’t seen it. Now that I have, I responded. Posted here in case it doesn’t make it through the gatekeepers:

    Are we really taking the dude who famously threatened to beat anyone who disagreed with him with his penis seriously when it comes to fantasies of violence.

    Again I ask: this is a conservative site?

    Not only is this patently false (and ridiculous on its face: my site has been active for over 11-years, and lord knows how many comments have been written, with disagreements aplenty — and yet many of the people I’ve disagreed with will gladly report back that they not only weren’t slapped by my cock, but that I never even brought it into the discussion), but it relies on oppo “research” done on my by a leftist hit site back in, what, 2004-5?

    The fact of the matter is, Jordan (or j. arthur, whichever) misread the post and misrepresented it. Instead of having the integrity to admit the mistake, he’s compounded it. And now he — and several others here on this “conservative” site are looking to rehabilitate themselves by launching silly personal broadsides.

    My suggestion that j. arthur wants so desperately to be accepted as some sort of serious theoretical thinker is based upon his condescending tone in his original post, not to mention his wholly irrelevant move to take the post into what he pompously thinks is some as yet undefined critical space just waiting on a new grammar to set it free (at which time, we may finally be able to ask it questions through our critical pressures).

    Evidently, some people here — who were likely 13-15 when I started blogging daily — haven’t yet learned who their real opponent is.

    Assuming you are actually conservative, and that this isn’t some niche into which you’ve stumbled, having been rejected by the more prestigious liberal sites you really hope one day to write for, you’ll certainly learn.

    That is, if you matter enough to the left that they feel like they need to launch an effort to diminish you.

    The crowd doesn’t boo nobodies.

    Incidentally, as you ponder your polished, non-Bulverish intellectualism, please note that you are in good company with respect to your targeting.

    A warning: the prose in the prior link could give some of you here the vapors. So a pre-emptive “my heavens!” is likely in order.

  11. Nobody wants to take away your vile instruments of mass murder and death, nor do we wish in any way to insult you drooling seditious bloodthirsty insane morons, and you’d have to be crazy to think we do. So there.

    Oh, and: we’ll take Tim McVeigh, but we won’t spot you a thousand Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrns, Pol Pots, Stalins, Maos, Castros, and Ches in return. And Hitler was a Tea Partier. So there.

    Wingnutz.

  12. but it relies on oppo “research” done on my by a leftist hit site back in, what, 2004-5?

    And a certain reasonable, non-Visigothy, conservative Good Man back in, what 2009? Who, of course, was recycling said proggy hit job…

    Man, the “reputable” crowd sure can be sleazy.

  13. I… couldn’t even follow his logic. Like many ‘progressives’ he seemed to be fixated on using as many words as he could find to describe as little as possible.

    That, and I so tire of the “gun ownerz ur ignernt killerz” shtick. I can’t even work up blood thirst in my dreams

  14. Hart Williams? Really, it sounds like he lifted the name and the outfit from a Louis L’Amour novel.

    I’ve tried to read his shitty blog a couple of times over the last few years when it ends up in my newfeed, but it is unreadable. I’d red pencil it and send it back with a do-over note if he handed it in in one of my classes.

    Snicker-snak, not so much.

  15. Just think of it as really bad performance art introduced by Leonard Pinth-Garnell.

    Mine eyes have seen the gory of the great unwashéd horde,
    He is poisoning the vintage with his grapes of wrath discord.
    He hath loosed the fateful lightning of his torpid Vorpal sword
    His TRUTH!!!!11!!1!!!! is marching on.

  16. Excellent, Charles. I would only suggest TRVTH for TRUTH.

  17. Like many ‘progressives’ he seemed to be fixated on using as many words as he could find to describe as little as possible

    Heh. Bingo.

    Word soup.

  18. “Why is he affecting a Cowboy Chic look is his profile picture?”

    Anyone who’s seen The Village People knows that there’s a difference between a cowboy and a guy wearing a cowboy costume.

  19. i heart mister dumbocles

    he’s got spunk

  20. This Hart fellow isn’t too sharp, is he? Why is he affecting a Cowboy Chic look is his profile picture? I thought all cowboys were illiterate hicktards and probably not democrats since they all live in Texas or he would lead his reader(s) to believe.

    Hart Williams? Really, it sounds like he lifted the name and the outfit from a Louis L’Amour novel.

    William S. Hart.

    Although, unlike Hart Williams, I doubt he was a puddin’ eatin’ cowboy.

  21. “using as many words as he could find to describe as little as possible”

    I propose a background check and waiting period on assault thesauri.

  22. Why does anyone need the ability to spray words at random like that? The First Amendment only applies to quill pens, not high-capacity military-designed computer networks.

  23. The National Archive of Criminal Justice Data has stats on murder and non-negligent manslaughter from 1960 to 2010. After a big spike to a high of 24,703 in 1991, the yearly totals fell sharply after 1993 to 14,748 by 2010, the lowest level since 1968. As a percentage of the total U.S. population, the .0048% level for 2010 was the lowest since 1963.

    Link to Data Tool

  24. Although, unlike Hart Williams, I doubt he was a puddin’ eatin’ cowboy.

    When you call him that, smile.

  25. …must be snack time again.

  26. Yes, somebody please tell this dude that IQ is not directly proportionate to column inches.

  27. Although, unlike Hart Williams, I doubt he was a puddin’ eatin’ cowboy

    Heh. William S. Hart would make him eat them words, boy. And tell him to smile while he was doing it.

  28. Honestly, what I don’t understand (and find a tad depressing) is the personality type that doesn’t wish to learn, debate,and expand knowledge base. This Torpid dude just seems to want to argue.

    Which is ironic since he wants to call us the angry, dangerous haters.
    Whatever.

  29. He’s not arguing. He’s preening.

  30. Exactly.

  31. Yes, well, I meant “argue” in the sense of simply disagreeing. Not in the back-and-forth of proper argument.

  32. From a fair review, the blog post was intended to be ironic, hip and witty. Which is unfortunate, given that he’s got a bad case of logorrhea and a peculiar interest in pictures of male rednecks.

    Box score: 0 for 3 on the day with 3 strikeouts on 9 pitches. But he might get another at-bat in the 8th, so hope springs eternal.

  33. About Hart Williams [..] A published novelist and a filmed screenwriter, Mr. Williams eschews the decadence of Hollywood for the simple, wholesome goodness of the plain, honest people of the land. He enjoys Luis Buñuel documentaries immensely.

    Well, this plain, honest person of the land finds Mr Williams sub-Chomskyite at best, and generally high school boilerplate leftist.

  34. How about a warning next time you link to an article with the power to put the reader into an Opium like stupor. That was the most vapid bunch of crap I’ve read in the last few years and that’s saying something.

  35. He enjoys Luis Buñuel documentaries immensely.

    Buñuel is the perennial favorite of Middle American, that’s for sure, especially his films, uh, Clockwork Orange, and, errrr, Átame.

  36. From the last paragraph of his screed:

    It is thought crime and hate crime

    And… there we have it. No mask covering up that proud and smugly self-satisfied fascist.

    All PW commentators, please report to Room 101 for re-education immediately.

  37. From a fair review, the blog post was intended to be ironic, hip and witty. Which is unfortunate, given that he’s got a bad case of logorrhea and a peculiar interest in pictures of male rednecks.

    Intentions aside, he did it by characterizing (and misunderstanding) Jeff’s article, and leaving strawmen lying all over the place.

    It’s like this guy my sister dated once. He thought himself to be extremely witty, but his biting sarcasm got old after the first 30 minutes, and you realized he was just a dick.

  38. “A published novelist”

    Whose “novels” are oddly unavailable at Amazon.com:

    http://www.amazon.com/Hart-Williams/e/B00B0BNDQQ/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1

    All I see is a self-published collection of essays on Kindle.

    “filmed screenwriter”

    Who oddly doesn’t have any credits listed at IMDB:

    http://www.imdb.com/find?q=%22hart+williams%22&s=all

    I’m calling twenty gallons of bullshit in a ten gallon hat on this one.

  39. Intentions aside, he did it by characterizing (and misunderstanding) Jeff’s article, and leaving strawmen lying all over the place.

    Oh, I wasn’t trying to make excuses for him. “Hip, witty and ironic” are quite compatible with craptacular bad faith. Increasingly, they are signs of it.

  40. Is it this Hart Williams? -the screenwriter of the following?

    Williams’ Oeuvre

  41. Mr. Williams eschews the decadence of Hollywood for the simple, wholesome goodness of the plain, honest people of the land.

    To which I say “Bullshit”. If that were truly the case, Mr. Williams wouldn’t live in Hollywood which isn’t “decadent” but rather a shithole of alcoholics, junkies and gays. And I say this as a native of Californistan.

  42. Williams’ Oeuvre

    Ah. He’s pr0n writer. There we have it, folks.

  43. I meant “argue” in the sense of simply disagreeing. Not in the back-and-forth of proper argument.

    Argument Clinic

  44. “Is it this Hart Williams? -the screenwriter of the following?”

    Oho! I think my IMDB search is set to exclude porn films. That looks like him, all right.

    Maybe his “published novels” fall into a similar category?

  45. “Mr. Williams eschews the decadence of Hollywood for the simple, wholesome goodness of the plain, honest people of the land.”

    Because nothing says “simple, wholesome goodness” like “Black Jailbait” and “Oriental Lesbian Fantasies”.

    LOL!

  46. That might explain his fascination with burly armed rednecks, leigh. It’s a sexual fetish.

  47. newrouter,

    Don’t give me that, you snotty-faced heap of parrot droppings! Shut your festering gob, you tit! Your type makes me puke, you vacuous, toffee-nosed, malodorous pervert!

    Yep. Mr Barnard is Hart Williams’ “argument” style in a nutshell.

  48. Fersure, spiny. That and his homing in on Jeff’s cock. Perhaps he wishes for a slapping, eh?

  49. Spies, Mr. Williams could probably refer you to his great prison novels Leather Thighs and In Cold Leather (for all you Firesign Theatre fans).

  50. Pron writer? Oh my . Honestly are we sure? It’s almost too good to be true.

  51. Carin, check this out: Alternate Names: Helen Bed.

    Oh my sides.

  52. “Robb Allen says April 3, 2013 at 12:26 pm
    I… couldn’t even follow his logic. Like many ‘progressives’ he seemed to be fixated on using as many words as he could find to describe as little as possible.
    That, and I so tire of the “gun ownerz ur ignernt killerz” shtick. I can’t even work up blood thirst in my dreams”

    Robb I can make this very easy for you. What Vorps said was:

    “*skwutch*skwutch*skwutch*skwutch*skwutch*skwutch*skwitch*skwutch*skwutch*skwutch*skwutch* Uughhhhhhhhhh. ”

    Then with something foul, upon the (probably paper) towel, he went galumphing back.

  53. I wouldn’t say it’s 100% confirmed that he is the auteur behind such ground-breaking cinematic “mastur”works as “Deliveries in the Rear” and “Wild Nurses in Lust”, but there are no other screenwriting credits for that name.

    And I was half-right: IMDB doesn’t show you porn titles unless you’re logged in, which I wasn’t.

    And dude, “Oriental” is not the preferred nomenclature. “Asian-American Lesbian Fantasies”, please. “Yellow Fever” is a little insensitive too, dontcha think?

  54. Hey, don’t mock him. I’m pretty sure he’s the guy who came up with the immortal line (from Deliveries in the Rear), “Oh dear, Mister Pizza Delivery Man, I don’t seem to have any money to pay you. Whatever shall I do!”

    They like to feature that one in those “Great Hollywood Moments” montages they do at the Oscars. The man’s a legend.

  55. Hey Jeff! He called you hyper masculine. That’s a step above super masculine but not quite ultra masculine. So that makes you a cave man but you haven’t got the ocher painted bear skull that entitles you to rule the moon clan on the western side of the old river. And you have no place amongst the fire people because you might get some flint chips in their organic lentil and currant couscous.

    Bloomer is better than you because he’s been through enough earth friendly, metro, hipster-pussy refinement classes to take all the burs off his finish and to teach him to stand up for bitchin’ vidja games that exist mainly to call him a racist jesus freak no matter what he says or thinks or who he disavows in public.

  56. Apparently it’s rather well known.

    So, fire away folks.

  57. Yeah, I can do cartoonish stereotypes of my ideological opponents too! Imagine that!

  58. Hey, don’t be so hard on the guy. All my best prose begins with “Dear Penthouse, you’ll never believe this, but…”

  59. By the thumbing of his prick,
    Something on the mirror sticks.

  60. “Why is he affecting a Cowboy Chic look is his profile picture? ”

    Cowboys are the next Hipster target confirmed.

    Why couldn’t it have been WW1 flying aces with goggles and leather helmets? I could get into that. I could grow a Biggles mustache and maybe get the occasional free coffee for it.

  61. It’s just ironic, because he seemed so offended by the idea of cock slapping.

  62. I’m not actually down with prying into people’s private affairs, but, you know, he claimed to be a published novelist and “filmed screenwriter” in public. I wanted to see what he’d done.

    In retrospect, it should have been clear that something was fishy when he didn’t list the titles. Most published authors and screenwriters I’ve encountered can’t be induced to shut up about the titles of their works. When no titles are given, it makes you go “Hmm…..”

  63. But Darth, he didn’t even work for Penthouse he worked at Hustler, the barrel-scraper of pron (according to my brothers) and that was before Larry Flynt got shot.

    At least Bob Guccione hired pretty girls and celebrities, not Jerry Falwell’s tricks from the truck stop in Louisiana.

  64. Cowboys are the next Hipster target confirmed.

    Hipsters may wish to stay far away from actual cowboys when wearing their dimestore get-ups.

  65. Hell, Guccione made a real movie.

    (Sure, he ruined it, but still a real movie)

  66. You’re talking about Caligula? Yeah, that was a real movie with pron scenes in it, not a porno per se. Crappy film, though.

    Those who have a purely academic interest in the subject may to know that “Oriental Lesbian Fantasies” is also available under the alternate title “Geisha Sluts”.

    Also, the five actresses involved are all credited as “Pregnant Woman in Waiting Room / Lesbian / Adult Film Actress”, for that extra layer of kink. Not just oriental lesbians, but pregnant oriental lesbians.

    Although from what I can see only 2 of the 5 are actually Asian, so caveat masturbator.

  67. I actually like Guccione’s Caligula. A guilty pleasure perhaps — like Point Break — but still a few steps above “Oriental Lesbian Fantasies / Geisha Sluts” in terms of story and acting, I’m quite certain.

  68. You’re talking about Caligula? Yeah, that was a real movie with pron scenes in it, not a porno per se. Crappy film, though.

    Yeah. How the hell do you ruin Suetonius?

  69. I don’t recall seeing Caligula. What year was it out? It could be that I saw it over one of those lost weekends.

  70. Nevermind. I remember now. You ruin it by starting with Malcolm McDowell’s Caligula walking up to his sister (played by an actress memorable only for her rack) and giving her tits a friendly honk.

  71. Sounds like parts of Gladiator.

  72. OT: I see the Won is in Denver speechifying about gun control.

  73. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080491/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

    I can see it being a guilty pleasure, but given Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren, John Gielgud, and Peter O’Toole, the budget, and (as Ernst mentions) the starting material, it should’ve been a GREAT movie.

  74. The problem, as I see it, is the McDowell, Mirren et. al. thought they were making a swords and sandles epic, and the Guccione came in with the girls and made a tits and ass epic instead.

  75. From what I’m seeing, he got funding and hired the actors based on a script he’d bought from Gore Vidal. Then he threw the script away.

  76. I rather like the combination of the two. If McDowell thought he was making a swords and sandals epic, it must mean the script was reworked on the fly to include rolling his fist in butter and plunging it into the ass of some newly betrothed citizen.

  77. Okay. I can now definitely say I have not seen this movie.

  78. Yeah. I don’t remember that scene either. But maybe I only saw the R rated cut.

    On a related note. That scene sounds like it was in Vidal’s script.

  79. As I’ve read it, the hard core stuff was done using stand-ins fuck-ins.

  80. In my misspent youth, I had hopes to break into the adult video industry as a “stunt cock”. The guy who was called in when the scene was too risky or kinky for the star. I guess it just wasn’t in the cards.

  81. Our brave would-be Limbaugh slaying cowpoke is now enforcing his censorious “comments policy.”

  82. Wait, so the jackoff that said:

    Their “oppression” is almost entirely imaginary and hallucinated like a fever dream. But their insanity and their mindless hatred are REAL. And that ought to scare hell out of us.

    is the same jackoff who wrote:

    But when the day comes that they have finally set brother against brother, and sister against sister in the name of their pocketbooks, I won’t approach exterminating them with anything approaching remorse. They’ve already told me what they think of me, of my friends and of my peers. Now, I’m returning the favor.

    ???

    OK, I’m calling dibs on this fucknut when the flag goes up. Unless that greedy bastard Limbaugh bags him first.

  83. OK, I’m calling dibs on this fucknut when the flag goes up. Unless that greedy bastard Limbaugh bags him first.

    Mind your windage and make sure to factor in the layers of protective subcutaneous fat when selecting the most appropriate load.

  84. Is that against the people who lack the courage to face the brave warrior who hasn’t so much as dipped a toe in the waters here, Alec?

  85. I was thinking .22LR and starting at the toes, Alec.

  86. Is that against the people who lack the courage to face the brave warrior who hasn’t so much as dipped a toe in the waters here, Alec?

    Yup. As if anyone would really believe that he wouldn’t delete comments clowning him, rather than enforcing a supposedly neutral comments policy.

  87. I was thinking .22LR and starting at the toes, Alec.

    You might want to rethink that, being that he’s kind of built like a sea mammal.


  88. Don’t give me that, you snotty-faced heap of parrot droppings! Shut your festering gob, you tit! Your type makes me puke, you vacuous, toffee-nosed, malodorous pervert!

    Yep. Mr Barnard is Hart Williams’ “argument” style in a nutshell.

    If only Hapr0nrt Wilpr0niams’s prose could achieve to that level.

    Python is high art. His mind is so rotted by producing, viewing, and participating in deviant sex that he can’t even produce a weak simulacrum.

    Which, most peeps on pr0n were introduced to adult sexuality way before they were adults, so maybe we can cut the poor rape victim some slack.

    OK, done. Trouble with many abuse victims is that they become so unbearably awful it’s nigh onto impossible to feel sorry for them.

  89. You violated his comment policy, dicentra. Somehow. And your comments have been removed, as have many of mine.

    So here’s the exchange we’ve been having, posted here for posterity:

    Bollinger

    I don’t know, Goldstein is an evil genius when it comes to one thing – spreading his sense of insecurity and grievance to his small circle of loyal sycophants so that they keep some amount of money pouring in to his site. He probably rakes in $800/month from his followers, just enough to prevent him from having to get an actual paying job. Comine that with his wife’s income, a trust fund from mummy and pop and maybe some Colorado EBT on the side to keep the kids fed, and you’ve got a self-sustaining lifestyle. Look at that Pablo fellow below me. Have any doubt that guy would take a bullet for his lord? Poor dude probably ponies up $45/month to Goldstein just to keep the libruls from “winning.”

    proteinwisdom

    Dude, if you’re going to obsess over my personal life, at least get the basic details straight. The money I make, such as it is, offsets any money that we’d spend on daycare and allows me to stay home, which in turn allows my oldest to attend a charter school to and from which he needs to be shuttled. Plus, it pays for liquor and restaurant trips.

    As for wrestling practice, that’s at home in the off-season and at the high school during the regular wrestling season. This being the off-season except for independent tournaments, I haven’t had to shuttle my oldest son there in several months; instead I’ve had some other kids over to practice with him in our basement, where we have a 12’x12′ mat. During the season, I’m a coach for the youth wrestling club, so even if I *wasn’t* shuttling my son, I’d still be attending, because that’s what coaches do.

    As for my wife, no, she has no trust fund. She’s just good at what she does. Neither of us has used a food stamp or any other government aid (save for the student loan program) in our lives — though if we had, that would of course make us noble and in desperate need of your championing, your being such a compassionate protector of the socially downtrodden. Which is why I find it curious that you’d use that as an attempt to take a shot at me. Here I thought you were kind and caring when it came to those less fortunate — or rather, that people like you whose charity consists of demanding the government spread around other people’s money think this of themselves — and yet you’ve just shown that you find it to be something about which people should be ashamed.

    Odd. But as I say, not terribly surprising.

    proteinwisdom

    No, I’m not going to read the comment policy. You’re every bit the fucking coward I’d thought you’d be.

    As for this Bollinger fellow, I guess I should wonder why it is he seems to concern himself so much with my private life, but the fact is I don’t wonder at all. It’s a gift I have. And a curse.

    With apologies to Monk.
    Reply

    Hart Williams
    3 April 2013 at 6:47 pm

    Well, at least you’re honestly intellectually dishonest. And you’ve sure as hell refuted:

    “They think that we are at least as dangerous to them as al Qaeda. When they’re not trying to destroy the vote, stop the country from functioning or wailing about how their “liberty” is being taken away, they prepare to go to war … against US.”

    But, just in case, here’s what’s too SCARY for you to read (speaking of cowardice):

    Comments and privacy policy:
    Comments policy is very simple: if you wouldn’t say it in my living room to my face, don’t say it here. You’re a guest, here by choice. All comments made on ‘his vorpal sword’ are considered having rendered permission for republication and quotation. If you don’t want to be quoted, don’t comment. No other information will ever be revealed than the commenter has made publicly in the ‘comments’ section. E-mail addresses will never be shared with any third party.

    proteinwisdom

    Oh, but I would say it in your living room to your face, provided I could side-step the piles of unfinished porn manuscripts and self-righteous, delusional screeds about how compassionate you are and how you feel so deeply — so much so that you feel like shooting people who don’t agree with you on policy questions.

    You’re a pussy. I know and you know it. If you want to delete my comments, just do it. Don’t pretend it’s because you’re adhering to some hard and fast rule out of some sense of online integrity.

    You write porn, for Chrissakes. Generally I find people aren’t so tied to social niceties once they’ve written screenplays about ass fucking.

    Who knows, though. Maybe you’re the gallant exception.

  90. You’re a pussy.

    That’s about the size of it.

  91. The only thing smaller than his vorpal sword is my regard for his opinion.

  92. “Removed. Read the comments policy.”

    Or whatever figleaf he provides as an excuse?

  93. Comments and privacy policy:
    Comments policy is very simple: if you wouldn’t say it in my living room to my face, don’t say it here. You’re a guest, here by choice. All comments made on ‘his vorpal sword’ are considered having rendered permission for republication and quotation. If you don’t want to be quoted, don’t comment. No other information will ever be revealed than the commenter has made publicly in the ‘comments’ section. E-mail addresses will never be shared with any third party.

    Apparently, Louis L’Amourhandles thinks he’s such an ornery buckaroo that no one would dare to take issue with him calling you a delusional, murderous traitor in his own living room. Such is the plains hospitality, one supposes.

  94. Heh. Now all of my comments are suddenly “awaiting moderation.”

    What a fucking revolutionary this guy is! Ready to take on the world with his protest art and fiery jeremiads!

    Unless mean people comment on his site. Then it’s time to concentrate on removing all traces of his having had his ass handed to him, both for his sad disjointed post and for being an ex-porn hustler and a fat loser awash in a torrent of misplaced emotionalism.

  95. Louis L’Amourhandles

    Oh, that one is a keeper right there.

  96. Look at that Pablo fellow below me. Have any doubt that guy would take a bullet for his lord? Poor dude probably ponies up $45/month to Goldstein just to keep the libruls from “winning.”

    That sounds like a guy who’s thinking about how happy he’d be to do exactly such a thing.

    And for the record, I stockpile ammo to keep the “libruls from winning” at least as far as I’m concerned. Also if God wants me to take a bullet for him, I can’t fathom how that works but it’s His call, so so be it. But if it’s going to go like that I would first like to ask that Lord, won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz?

  97. My deleted comment pointed out the dissonance between his sincere use of the words “thought crime” with reference to people whom he insists are deluded and under no peril of loss of their liberties from people who think exactly like him.

    Just so you know, if you ever have the honor of being in his living room, you just can’t say that sort of thing.

  98. And this is from the guy who said:

    You are sure one DEEP thinker there, Jeff. And so BRAVE to engage in behind-the-back snarking, rather than man up and speak your piece here.

    ???

    What a vagina.

  99. Man, are they in need of a fainting couch over there?

  100. He’s deleting stuff. This guy reminds me of the one that shall not be named.

  101. I bet this guy was in one of his own pr0n movies under the screen name Sandy Vagina.

  102. I’m going back and posting “Removed. Read the comments policy.” myself in reply to everything. Would be funny for everyone to do it over and over.

  103. “But, unlike “protein wisdom,” this isn’t about being a lonely white loser using the “N” word as a substitute for substantive thought. ”

    Just what? That’s exactly what Mr. Porn’s place is.

  104. Apparently, the only thing you can say in his living room is “Removed. Read the comments policy.”

  105. If he deletes what was actually written, he can just tell people he deleted things that weren’t. Like some instance of my having used “the ‘N’ word as a substitute for substantive thought.”

  106. “Fiery Jeremiads”

    That right there would make a great title for gay porn.

  107. he can just tell people he deleted things that weren’t.

    That’s a neat trick. It’s a shame he’s the only one who reads his blog. Well, him and his cats.

  108. True story – Soviet gulags were brimming with people who displayed bad living room etiquette.

  109. Why can’t we have a blog war with someone who has readers, like the old days? This dork makes Thersites & Co. look like a force to be reckoned with.

  110. I don’t know what I’d say in his living room, but I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t want to sit down on anything in there.

  111. I’ve managed to have been permanently disinvited from his living room.

    Just wanted to post “Nikolai Yezhov was here” at least once.

  112. I’m not going to waste my comments on that festering shit hole. It’s bad enough that I and my web browser know I was there. When you follow a link and it leads to the blogging equivalent of a bloated dead hippo’s colon full of dead flies who couldn’t handle the smell…that sucks.

    Republicans are racist! Why just look at this cartoon that says republicans are racist! That proves it! If you want it to hard enough!

    Ooh, speaking of hard enough. * wibble wibble wibble* *Goooosh!* Pipes = cleaned. Four grate Justus!

  113. Not for nothing, but is there any job on the face of the earth that requires less actual work, than say WRITING DIALOGUE FOR A PORN MOVIE?

  114. “a fat loser awash in a torrent of misplaced emotionalism”

    I may have been caught some shrapnel from that. Oh well. Nobody shits my own bed but me.

  115. ” WRITING DIALOGUE FOR A PORN MOVIE?”

    ——
    I know what you whores want.

    Yeah?

    Yeah. I do.

    Guy get’s slapped by woman. Guy grabs woman’s boobs.

    Funk music/dub step/progressive synth jazz

    Another woman watches from a cracked door trying to look embarrassed but only manages to look confused, and then comes in and gets mauled by the other two. she drops a camera that gets broken and that leads to the next camera repair shop scene, but nobody ever gets to that part because it’s 10 minutes in and anyone without health problems is already done with the movie and has lost interest in it.
    —-

    Am I close? Or is that too 80’s?

  116. Gulermo: most of his stuff dates back to the days when they at least tried to pretend that it was a real movie, with a plot and suchlike.

    His “screenwriting career” likely went sour about the time they dropped that figleaf, leading to him moving back to redneck territory.

    I’d put even money on him living in his old bedroom in his parents’ house.

  117. If anyone wants to they can have that one and film it for free. Credit me as Tex Tinkle.

  118. Who in the sam hill watches pron and listens to the dialogue?

    I have it on some unknown person’s word that that is exactly the specific reason the fast forward button was invented.

    Not that I would know first hand, or any hand for that matter.

  119. Oh crap… I still recovering from sickness, take a nap, and missed the whole blog thing

    and it looks like Mr. Precious-Living-Room-Nazi has turned off his comments.

    rats

  120. Another one left in moderation:

    Q: Who wrote the following: “You are sure one DEEP thinker there, Jeff. And so BRAVE to engage in behind-the-back snarking, rather than man up and speak your piece here.”

    A: The guy deleting many of my earlier piece speakings, and holding my newer ones in moderation.

    COURAGE!

  121. And another troll bites the dust…

  122. I think he was less wanting you to “man up and speak your piece here” and aiming more for a “man up and sit quietly whilst he lectures you, you uncouth barbarian” sort of thing.

  123. He stands on his front porch and hollers obscenities at passers-by, then is outraged when they stop and shout back.

    Sometimes you wonder what a brain scan would reveal.

    Or a soul scan.

  124. ” Mike LaRoche says April 3, 2013 at 11:52 pm
    And another troll bites the dust… ”

    But they don’t bite the dust. Like socialism, the trolls never fail they just haven’t found the correct approach. They are always warming up, or sabotaged, or the sun was in their eyes, and they look for a more effective revision of the Calvin Ball rules to prevent that happening again in the future. They never admit they were full of shit and they try to claim a victory after punching a straw man in the corner. They have no shame, no perspective that can run counter to their chosen ego role, and they just shrug and reset ( sure that any opponents will inevitably get tired of the stupid arbitrary baseless malice routine and just surrender ) until those fancy Gods of the Copy Book headings drop by and drop a cinder block on their tender ideas once and for all and ONLY THEN they start to realize that that old ‘ash heap of history’ trope isn’t a toothless patriarchal construct that fades before an “enlightened” sneer and that utopia is just another way to say ‘go piss in the corner of a round room’. Utopia is a blood soaked koan that leads to a most bitter liberation from hunger and delusion. But of course at that point a whole new crop of dunderheads is on the conveyer belt behind them and they’ll happily push the brave pioneer forerunners off into the bin. Because “Forward!” sounds great until you look down and see where it leads. Which is decay, chaos, and savagery.

  125. It cracks me up. So many comments deleted because they didn’t abide by the comments policy. Which, as they so helpfully posted, is: “Comments policy is very simple: if you wouldn’t say it in my living room to my face, don’t say it here. But most of his “post” violated his own comment policy. Otherwise, we must assume that he would be cool with us telling his THIS to his face?!
    You can see and hear it across the Rightie spectrum, although you, like most Americans, have tuned this stuff out while it has festered and suppurated, filled with the pus of sheer evil and popped, and then refilled and popped again.

    What a douche.

  126. Hart Williams is on the Twitter as @hartemus. I’ve helpfully reminded him of some the links commenters here have provided…

    https://twitter.com/serr8d/status/319820276588244994

  127. I’m going to confess that yes, I do want guns to remain as controlled as they are now so that it will be easier for lunatics to kill my children.

    That’s the real subtext, right there.

  128. What if, instead of making a fetish of guns, we stopped making a fetish of lunatics?

  129. Hm. He doesn’t want you saying “that stuff” in his living room since it belongs to his elderly mother who can barely stand the sight of him.

    Cowboy up, Hart!

  130. What if, instead of making a fetish of guns, we stopped making a fetish of lunatics?

    WHY DO YOU HATE JOE BIDEN!!!???

  131. Joe says shoot ‘em right through the door!

  132. “Joe says shoot ‘em right through the door!”

    “Behold, I stand at the door and knock.”

    BANG!

  133. Who would Jesus shoot?

  134. Only those who had it coming, I’m sure.

Leave a Reply