Well, at least one person seems to think she’s not likely “undecided” at all. Probably because she is a registered Democrat who “works for the Obama campaign out of Nassau County NY”.
— Which, if that’s true, is a pretty good reason to develop the “she’s not likely ‘undecided’ at all” hypothesis, I must say.
Developing…
Well knock me over with a feather!
[…] and…Biased? Posted on October 18, 2012 9:07 am by Bill Quick Remember the “undecided” woman at the debate who asked the AK-47 question? | protein wis… Well, at least one person seems to think she’s not likely “undecided” at […]
Didn’t someone just tweet “No one gives a sh*t about questioner stacking!”?
Rhuh-rho, rout-rage: better brace for a wave of nihilism.
And two other undecided questioners.
Stunner. Hold a townhall debate in one of the bluest parts of a deep blue State and end up with partisan Democrats asking the questions?
How is such a thing possible?
Oh, that’s right–the GOP is happy to play the amiable submissive to the Debate Commission’s sadist.
Until they start pushing back, the Republicans deserve this crap.
On the other hand, I doubt anyone has given a shit about “assault weapons” since the first Clinton term. Something tells me Crowley and Co. had to tell Gonzalez to put the kibosh on the ERA question she really, really wanted to ask.
– I found it a bit amusing that several of the ‘gotcha’ planted pot questions intended to skewer Romney ended up exposing Obama’s pitiful record in so many areas, forcing him to posture and evade.
– But given all his failed promises and lack of any real progress, or progress to the rear, that’s probably the best they could do, otherwise they’d have nothing, no topic they could even broach.
The TVs in the food court kept flashing the word “binder” in their headlines. This is bad news for Obama. If the Palace Guard are trying to run out the clock by obsessing on an issue that moves exactly nobody, it means that there’s nothing positive about Obama’s performance for them to discuss. Not good for ol’ Jugears.