Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

“CBO: New 10-year projected cost of ObamaCare is … $1.76 trillion”

And if you think a near doubling of the estimated cost since passage is impressive, just wait until the thing finally gets implemented!

Of course, on the glass-half-full side, free condoms / spermicidal sponges. So, you know — we’ll just call it even. Thanks, Dr Obama!

(h/t JD)

30 Replies to ““CBO: New 10-year projected cost of ObamaCare is … $1.76 trillion””

  1. RI Red says:

    Everything we predicted has come true. Do we get any extra credit for that?

  2. sdferr says:

    Nope, just a dead country.

  3. newrouter says:

    ms. sandra fluke and her progg allies shouldn’t be allowed to change fluke to some other pronunciation. she’s both an odd occurrence and a parasite and her name as spelled represents that.

  4. newrouter says:

    one small battle in the language wars

  5. Pablo says:

    In other news, if you like your plan, you can keep it! And I promise not to come in your mouth!

  6. Unpossible. Alex Knapp assured me it was going to save money. And provide more services. With ponies!

  7. RI Red says:

    My next reading project is the legal aspects of secession. Anyone have a reading list already? I see this over on Amazon:
    http://www.amazon.com/Constitutional-History-Secession-Remington-Graham/dp/1589800664/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1331686543&sr=8-2

  8. Blake says:

    The government is going to be embedding those flower things in our palms pretty soon, aren’t they? Gotta control those health care costs somehow, right?

  9. newrouter says:

    isn’t sandra fluke’s argument: the womyns are nymphomaniacs and need the big gov’t to protect them from the evil male oppressor? this shit is just progg tactics different day. and fluke you sandy.

  10. TaiChiWawa says:

    Oh, you people, bitterly clinging to your words and your numbers.

  11. newrouter says:

    go rick

  12. newrouter says:

    Readers,

    As you know, The Financial Investigator has spent the last 18 months filling in a crucial gap that the mainstream media no longer fills: Financially driven, longer-form investigative reporting.

    I don’t take ads and have done this for free. It is time consuming and quite costly but hopefully worth it to you.

    The goal was to provide what I do as a hobby of sorts free to the investing public, professional and amateur, rich or poor.

    Good intentions aside, a few things have changed that require me to ask for financial help.

    I had to fight off a large, angry corporation that was profoundly unhappy with my reporting and wanted my notes and to have a long chat with me in a courtroom (I held them off but it cost north of $30,000) and a consulting job that was paying for this site ended sooner than anticipated.

    I have installed a PayPal button–The “Donate” tab on the left-hand side–that will help me defray the considerable expenses I have incurred and, frankly, will continue to incur.

    Please be generous. There are several pieces I have wanted to tackle but have been unable to because of the likely expense involved.

    This isn’t a PBS pledge drive–there are no umbrellas or tote bags for your contribution–but your support keeps this sort of reporting alive.

    In thanks,

    Roddy Boyd

    link

  13. […] double the projected cost to taxpayers, so far (this got me started), but who knows how many times over, or in how many ways this […]

  14. newrouter says:

    rick wins al and ms!!

  15. leigh says:

    Tomorrow’s headlines will call for Gingrich to drop out because he’s splitting the vote.

  16. palaeomerus says:

    Don’t worry. We’ll pay for it by selling our excess algae energy to China. Honest.

  17. bergerbilder says:

    The Culture War survives for another week.

  18. newrouter says:

    The Culture War survives for another week.

    who started the “culture war”?

  19. newrouter says:

    who decided that this ” culture” was “bad”?

  20. Blake says:

    Santorum had a great interview on Beck this morning. Santorum thinks a drawn out primary is better because it gives Obama less time to prepare. Santorum explained that there is no way the GOP candidate can outspend Obama, so a narrower election window probably works in favor of the GOP candidate.

    I really like the fact that Santorum is unafraid to go on shows like Glenn Beck. Rick seems to have a pair to go with a spine, both of which is in desperate supply in the GOP.

  21. Car in says:

    Santorum thinks a drawn out primary is better because it gives Obama less time to prepare.

    This only works if Santorum wins the nomination. Because I’m pretty sure they’ve been prepared to run against Romney for a long time.

    Which is why the MSM has been pushing him on us.

  22. Car in says:

    What say you that if/when Romney wins, the subliminal attack on Mormanism will begin? Not overt. But little articles in Time. Showing that crappy John Travolta movie, etc.

  23. Dale Price says:

    What say you that if/when Romney wins, the subliminal attack on Mormanism will begin? Not overt. But little articles in Time. Showing that crappy John Travolta movie, etc.

    It’s a mortal lock that the LDS will receive a full-frontal assault. Most Americans don’t have even a slight grasp of LDS origins and teachings, so it will be portrayed in the worst possible light, right down to the changing of teachings on polygamy and blacks in the priesthood (despite the fact Mitt’s father was a champion of the civil rights movement in the 60s). Lurid exposes on polygamy, the differences between LDS and creedal (Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant) Christianity, all done in the passive voice, but with the clear intent to slap on the label “Weirdo Cult–Beware!”

    There will be subtle comparisons of Mitt’s flipfloppery with the LDS’ changes, and not-so-subtle accusations of racial animosity. Throw in the LDS’ role in fighting on behalf of Prop 8, and you’ll have the media hate choruses pouring culture war jet fuel on the bonfire. I hope the LDS is ready for that–the Mormons I know are good folks, and they don’t deserve the shit storm headed their way.

    This is why I’ve always thought that the idea that Mitt gives the GOP the best chance to finesse culture war issues is delusional.

  24. Car in says:

    What has bothered me, Dale, is that this has been – imho – a set-up by the MSM. They have pushed him this entire time, knowing what they would do should he become the candidate.

    They’ve got the “moderates” in their pocket (“he’s a Republican I can vote for) , who will – at the right point – be scared off by the stories they will then tell.

  25. Dale Price says:

    What has bothered me, Dale, is that this has been – imho – a set-up by the MSM. They have pushed him this entire time, knowing what they would do should he become the candidate.

    They’ve got the “moderates” in their pocket (“he’s a Republican I can vote for) , who will – at the right point – be scared off by the stories they will then tell.

    It’s pretty clear that the Obama playbook has been written with Romney in mind. There is ample evidence the Romney team is nowhere near as smart as it thinks it is, believing Mitt can run on the economy alone.

    Yeah, it’ll be a gentlemanly race, on the ground of Romney’s choosing, unimpeded by lowblows from the Dems/media (but I repeat myself). Especially nothing about religion, because that’s not an issue. Because Mitt’s team says so. QED. It’s the combination of naivete’ and arrogance that leaves me speechless.

  26. palaeomerus says:

    ” Car in says March 14, 2012 at 7:39 am
    What say you that if/when Romney wins, the subliminal attack on Mormanism will begin? Not overt. But little articles in Time. Showing that crappy John Travolta movie, etc. ”

    Perhaps I am naive but I have two…er…three…no four problems with this:

    1.) This is intended primarily to be a conservative (evangelical) voter suppression issue and I am an evangelical (Lutheran) and don’t care a bit if Romney is a Mormon. Newt’s a converted catholic. Santorum’s a catholic. Ron Paul is a Baptist. I am currently supporting Santorum. What I care about with Romney that he appears to be a moderate weathervane who dislikes his own party base and who has had at BEST very modest “success” in politics as a one term governor who ended a streak of four republican governors by not running again due to lack of support. I care that he prototyped Obamacare, won’t repudiate it even now, and for a while sold it as a decent national solution, and now says that he never did. These are all very bad signs. Romney is an attempt by the party leadership to bitch-slap the base and the tea party and pull the party leftward to where they think the new middle is or “should be”. I realize that Santorum and Newt are not model conservatives and both have records that place great doubt on their ability to represent the interests of the base. BUT I want to block the GOP leadership’s attempt to crown Romney after two primaries (one of which it runs out Romney did not win) with a lame prophecy that only he can beat Obama. OR I would like to force Romney to run to the right of where he is, and realize that the base he wants to lead will harry him if he lets them down.

    2.) Reid is a Mormon. Huntsman was a Mormon who Obama tapped to be his Ambassador to China. Is Obama throwing Reid under the bus with his campaign?

    3.) Mormonism >>> Jeremiah Wright, Trinity Church, and Chicago liberation theology. Making an issue of a weird religion would be a TRAGIC mistake for Obama.

    4.) Obama has a record of routinely doing what is worst for most Americans. Going after Mormons as icky kooks will be met by salvos of “It’s the economy stupid” and “where’s that killer rabbit when you need him? “.

  27. palaeomerus says:

    BTW I’m not saying that the democrats won’t try the “Mormons-ewww! How many wives do you have” card. I’m just saying that I don’t think it will suppress turn out in the general and that it will backfire on them.

  28. McGehee says:

    I have two…er…three…no four problems with this

    I’ll wait in the comfy chair while you go out and come back in again.

  29. LBascom says:

    “What say you that if/when Romney wins, the subliminal attack on Mormanism will begin? “

    Also, when the inevitable Mormon attacks come, how far from the church will Romney distance himself?

    Oh, wait, dumb question. The distance polls tell him of course!

  30. palaeomerus says:

    “I’ll wait in the comfy chair while you go out and come back in again.”

    It’s no good if you’re expecting it. NO ONE expects the…

Comments are closed.