Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Narrative busting

Here’s what the remaining GOP candidates might look like, were we able to remove the narrative frames around each that the mainstream press and the GOP/conservative establishment in both the old and new media have used to inscribe them.

1. “Mark Levin’s no more gotchas interview with Rick Santorum”
2. “Mark Levin’s no more gotchas interview with Newt Gingrich”
3. Mitt Romney to the Detroit Economic Club: “I love this country. I sure love this state. This feels good, being back in Michigan […] You know, the trees are the right height. The streets are just right. I like the fact that most of the cars I see are Detroit-made automobiles.

“I drive a Mustang and a Chevy pick-up truck. Ann drives a couple of Cadillacs, actually. And I used to have a Dodge truck. So I used to have all three covered.”

3a. “Romney’s Tax Plan: Progressive, but Only by Republican Standards”; and “Romney’s Tax Plan Still A Boon To Rich, Despite 1% Talk”

4. Now With Alex Wagner Panel Looks Into Ron Paul And Romney’s ‘Bromance’”

So. I’m off to another very early tournament an hour off in the Colorado hinterlands. But while I’m gone I ask of you: after considering the above, what’s your takeaway?

26 Replies to “Narrative busting”

  1. jdw says:

    We’ve a steep mountain to climb, heights unimaginable (and likely insurmountable) given that our (un-loyal) opposition has already tunneled past us by pandering to the lowest levels of our society, the neo-American moocher class that responds to this ‘professional Community Organizer’ and his unseen handlers. We, the remaining Conservatives – Classic Liberals – right-side of the GOP – understand the difficulties that we as an aging Republic face, but we offer only hard, somewhat painful solutions; they, the LeftLibProggs, offer ‘easy-button’ outs that will have ‘their’ 99% flocking to elect ’em, despite the long-term consequences that they barely comprehend, and will ignore just so they can reap immediate short-term, personal benefits.

    ‘Change’. It’s almost complete.

  2. McGehee says:

    So. I’m off to another very early tournament an hour off in the Colorado hinterlands. But while I’m gone I ask of you: after considering the above, what’s your takeaway?

    That I envy anyone who has Colorado hinterlands within an hour’s drive.

  3. B Moe says:

    My takeaway?

    Why isn’t Levin running instead of these clowns.

  4. geoffb says:

    Ledeen on Santorum’s foreign policy.

  5. geoffb says:

    Question, why do 56% of Ron Paul supporters in Michigan also support the auto company bailout?

  6. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Because they’re Democrats?

  7. JHoward says:

    It’s so unhelpful — and so out of kneejerk politically correct postmodern fashion — to note that this is one profoundly sorry failshit little country that I’ll not make the remark.

    We don’t want to be all negative now, do we, noting the obvious and being overheard doing so? No, that would be unseemly.

  8. BurtTC says:

    Been a while since I’ve been here, don’t know why I haven’t. Getting tired of the Romney love over at Ace, so….. I like Santorum’s message, and I don’t fear the theocracy. Levin’s interview was good, and I think there’s a clear enough contrast between Romney and Santorum’s approach to this that I’m not really sure what other people are missing.

  9. geoffb says:

    According to the poll breakout 31% of the Democrats voting in the Republican primary will vote for Paul. 25% of the Independents will also. These two groups account for 55% of Paul’s support which is at 15% in this poll.

    Romney gets around the same percentages of Democrats (30%) and Independents (24%) but because he gets more Republicans (36%) compared to Paul at 9% the [D] & [I] vote amount to roughly 25% of his total.

    Santorum also draws about 25% of his support from [D] & [I] voters but the [I] makes up much more of that than in the case of Romney or Paul.

  10. Ernst Schreiber says:

    the [I] makes up much more of that than in the case of Romney or Paul.

    That makes sense to me, since a not insignificant number of those independents are conservatives who are fed up with the leftward drift of the GOP.

  11. Blake says:

    Santorum/Gingrich 2012

  12. newrouter says:

    pa/ga 2012

  13. EBL says:

    I liked the Mark Levin interviews. They were well done and good questions. I liked this Glenn Beck interview of Santorum. I wish Santorum would realize not all libertarians are Ron Paul supporters. http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/2012/02/glenn-beck-and-rick-santorum-discuss.html

  14. newrouter says:

    newt , hermanator speak at ca gop

    http://cagop.rg/live/

  15. newrouter says:

    cagop.org

  16. Ernst Schreiber says:

    I wish Santorum would realize not all libertarians are Ron Paul supporters.

    I’m starting to wonder if Santorum isn’t up to something here w/ regards to Libertarians and (small-L) libertarians and how he refuses to distinguish between the two.

    As in everything that’s good about libertarianism is to be found in conservatism, and the rest is better cast aside, in that it leads one into the error of Liberalism (and thence Progressivism).

  17. sdferr says:

    Markle Vin Show, whaddaya say?

  18. jdw says:

    We don’t want to be all negative now, do we, noting the obvious and being overheard doing so? No, that would be unseemly.

    You are being facetious of course. Because if, for instance, Rush had not noticed and loudly noted the ill direction Barack Obama’s well-masked intentions were steering this Republic, if he’d feared speaking aloud his intentions (“I hope that ‘Good Man’ fails”) then we might be even worse off than we are today. Someone has to note these misdirections as they happen and speak of them, no matter how unseemly it might seem to some.

  19. jdw says:

    Oh! The Third Circus finally made a ruling I can agree with…

    “Everyone is entitled to enter national forests without paying a cent.”

  20. jdw says:

    Erm, 9th circus, third ring.

  21. Pablo says:

    Somebody needs to step up and smack some Koranimals down. Damn shame we don’t have anybody like that.

  22. newrouter says:

    The HHS mandate is a coercive codification of the libertinism of the sexual revolution, which is likewise antithetical to a Christian understanding of human love and sexuality. This method of advancing these destructive ends requires trampling on religious liberty and individual conscience.

    link

Comments are closed.