Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

"Stingy 1 Percenters Stand in Solidarity with #OWS, Demand Government Tax Them to Share Ill-Gotten Gains with the Rest of Us"

Here’s an idea: put down the cameras long enough to stop filming your own ostentatious, self-serving sanctimony and write a freakin’ check.

If you want to play rubber-suited gimp in a masochism fantasy, try hiring a bonded dominatrix by the hour like the rest of us regular folk.

Penn Jillette:

It’s amazing to me how many people think that voting to have the government give poor people money is compassion. Helping poor and suffering people is compassion. Voting for our government to use guns to give money to help poor and suffering people is immoral self-righteous bullying laziness.

People need to be fed, medicated, educated, clothed, and sheltered, and if we’re compassionate we’ll help them, but you get no moral credit for forcing other people to do what you think is right. There is great joy in helping people, but no joy in doing it at gunpoint.

It’s not the giving that’s important: it’s the appearance that you really really really want to, if just somebody will use the power of government to force your hand.

Ggah.

69 Replies to “"Stingy 1 Percenters Stand in Solidarity with #OWS, Demand Government Tax Them to Share Ill-Gotten Gains with the Rest of Us"”

  1. Stephanie says:

    Cain / Jillette 2012

    The MBM already claims Cain is a black faced minstrel performing for his massas for votes. Might as well go the full vaudeville.

  2. sdferr says:

    Cain-Teller feels just as good. Teller’s a sharpie.

  3. JHoward says:

    It’s not the giving that’s important: it’s the appearance that you really really really want to, if just somebody will use the power of government to force your hand.

    Appearances way count. Force is cool. But morality under pain of law? Teh boss.

    Especially to the character disordered.

  4. mojo says:

    “Freedom” includes the freedom to starve to death if you’re a lazy, useless bastard. I have no moral imperative to help you if you refuse to even try to help yourself.

  5. Mikey NTH says:

    Valuing the appearance of doing good as opposed to actually doing good?

    Didn’t somebody a long time ago say something about that? Guy’s name escapes me right now.

  6. Obstreperous Infidel says:

    Appearances way count

    These are the “perception is reality” morons that pomo has created.

  7. Joe says:

    Good think we have Frum on our side.

    In late 2009, I had coffee with Frum for the first and last time outside AEI. He made two claims which stick with me – one was that Dodd-Frank wouldn’t really hurt business growth, and the other that small businesses would adore Obamacare. I disagreed on both counts, and strongly on the second. He rejected that idea thoroughly. Walking back to the office, his last comment to me was “Just you wait: two years from now, everyone will agree with me.”
    Almost two years to the day, the NFIB filed the first petition in the Supreme Court case against Obamacare.

    Oh wait, maybe Frum is part of the Axis of Idiots.

  8. Joe says:

    I try to catch P&T’s act every couple of years (going back to the 80s). I like them a lot. Penn is a straight shooter.

  9. LBascom says:

    I hate Penn. He’s an atheist. Ya’ll are going to hell.

    I’M KIDDING! QUIT LOOKING AT ME LIKE THAT!!

  10. Carin says:

    Just imagine, a person who inherited her wealth – probably didn’t struggle and invest and risk a dime – thinks she should be taxed more to help the 99%.

    I’ve got a great idea – if you did nothing to earn that money, and you just so terribly – do us all a favor and GIVE IT ALL AWAY. It will absolve you of all your sins.

  11. Carin says:

    That people who inherit their money feel that people who EARNED it (and probably went through many, many lean years)or somehow the same as them … makes me want to puke.

    I knew rich kids – those who inherited everything; most every one of them is utterly useless, and the majority are soft in the head.

  12. motionview says:

    There’s my moderator.

  13. Ernst Schreiber says:

    David Frum is a Clark Clifford Republican. The hell with him.

  14. Jeff G. says:

    Romney and McCain have both today said issued statements saying Obama deserves the credit for Ghadaffi’s death.

    Apparently, going around Congress is okay if you like the outcome.

    Ends justify the means. No, I don’t think I can pull the lever for Romney. I did for McCain last time, but only because I hoped that might pave the way for Palin when McCain was forced to step down for beating a staffer with a slipper.

  15. Squid says:

    President Teller speaks softly and carries a big stick says nothing at all and kills anyone he wants to, Congress be damned!.

  16. newrouter says:

    “David Frum is a Clark Clifford Republican. ”

    so are mittens and mccain

  17. happyfeet says:

    “I think it reflected negatively on Perry. … I think Mitt handled himself well,” Cain said, commenting that Romney was trying to have a “civil conversation.”*

    More and more everyday I think it’s becoming more and more likely Cain is just running to be Romney’s veep.

    He’ll have well and truly ass-fucked America if that’s his game I think. It’s very disheartening and it makes it very difficult to work up any enthusiasm for him.

  18. newrouter says:

    Candidate Comparison: Top Contributors
    2012 Cycle

    Barack Obama
    Microsoft Corp $170,323
    Comcast Corp $116,155
    Harvard University $94,225
    Google Inc $90,166
    University of California $83,679

    Mitt Romney
    Goldman Sachs $354,700
    Credit Suisse Group $195,250
    Morgan Stanley $185,800
    HIG Capital $176,500
    Barclays $155,250

    Link

  19. newrouter says:

    “More and more everyday I think it’s becoming more and more likely Cain is ”

    a former supporter of mittens in 2008.

  20. happyfeet says:

    I don’t really like his snotty attitude towards Mr. Governor Perry either. I wouldn’t mind it so much but he’s always fawning over Wall Street Romney like he has some kind of schoolgirl crush.

  21. newrouter says:

    “snotty attitude towards Mr. Governor Perry”

    ricky perry isn’t a very good public speaker at least in a debate format.

  22. happyfeet says:

    no he’s not but he’s been a capable governor and he’s governed as much in accord with Tea Party principles as just about anyone you can name

    and Cain just wants to piss all over him

    I don’t really see what that accomplishes.

  23. newrouter says:

    “and Cain just wants to piss all over him”

    mr ricky was acting rudely towards mittens at the debate. so i wouldn’t read too much into the hermanator’s comments.

  24. mongo78 says:

    From #19 – University of California

    wtf? isn’t the UC system a public university? how is it making partisan political contributions? or is this some private foundation associated with but independent of the university?

    either way, if I was an alumni, i’d be pissed.

  25. newrouter says:

    but i did enjoy ricky getting into the mittens face and mitten’s reaction to it.

  26. newrouter says:

    @25

    “These tables list the top donors to these candidates in the 2012 election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate , rather the money came from the organization’s PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals’ immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.”

  27. happyfeet says:

    well yes you are right Mr. Governor Perry got testy – but that was after Wall Street Romney lied and lied for weeks about Perry’s positions

    but it was retarded for Perry to lash like that out on immigration – he needed to focus on jobs and spending and rolling back regulations and growth

    he can’t hate spics as viciously and convincingly as Wall Street Romney and Cain, no matter how hard he tries – cause that’s just not how he rolls

  28. mongo78 says:

    #27 – Ah, I see. Thank you for the clarification.

    Also, actually sort of on topic – Penn Jillette may be an atheist but he is pointedly respectful and complimentary towards believers; in that respect he is the antithesis of pretty much everyone else in the mainstream media culture.

  29. LBascom says:

    I can’t blame anyone that would refuse to vote for Romney.

    If Cain lost the nomination to Romney,and then agreed to be a TEA Party write in campaign candidate, a la that Alaska chic(Mercowsky?), people would say he’s a sneaky, self interested turncoat who’s only doing it because he wants Obama to win ‘cuz of the racism, but I’d be receptive to the idea.

  30. newrouter says:

    “but that was after Wall Street Romney lied”

    yes he’s a mormon baracky but smiles when he lies

  31. happyfeet says:

    I can’t blame anyone that would refuse to vote for Romney either in fact they are welcome to join me for tasty pancakes.

  32. geoffb says:

    Re: #12

    bh, you’re a prince among lesser men, that recipe is to die for.

  33. dicentra says:

    OT: Jonah explains why sending troops to Uganda is actually a Good Thing:

    President Obama notified Congress that he’s sending about 100 combat-equipped troops to advise African forces on how best to kill or capture (but hopefully kill) one of the truly hideous villains breathing today, Joseph Kony, and destroy his militia cult, the Lord’s Resistance Army.

    And Obama is absolutely right to do it.

    The news was so sudden, unexpected, and just plain odd that the reaction from both left and right has been hurried and confused. Many claims are simply wrong. For instance, the LRA is not a “Christian” militia. The LRA routinely burns down churches and slaughters the congregants, but usually not before raping and mutilating them.

    Kony is a classic example of the charismatic terrorist cult leader. He blends indigenous witchcraft with bits of Christianity and Islam (soldiers pray the rosary and bow to Mecca) to brainwash his uneducated, terrified flock of hostages and child soldiers, many of whom were forced to murder their own parents.

    Here’s a graphic passage from a 2006 report from Christianity Today on the LRA:

    Under threat of death, LRA child soldiers attack villages, shooting and cutting off people’s lips, ears, hands, feet, or breasts, at times force-feeding the severed body parts to victims’ families. Some cut open the bellies of pregnant women and tear their babies out. Men and women are gang-raped. As a warning to those who might report them to Ugandan authorities, they bore holes in the lips of victims and padlock them shut. Victims are burned alive or beaten to death with machetes and clubs. The murderous task is considered properly executed only when the victim is mutilated beyond recognition.

    Wow.

    If this is accurate, then I have to agree: We (the rest of the world) dropped the ball on the Hutu/Tutsi slaughter. We can’t ignore this monster, too.

  34. sdferr says:

    Off topically, have any of you all read Codevilla’s new essay The Lost Decade at Claremont? I haven’t yet, but from the looks of the first paragraph, it’s a challenger:

    America’s ruling class lost the “War on Terror.” During the decade that began on September 11, 2001, the U.S. government’s combat operations have resulted in some 6,000 Americans killed and 30,000 crippled, caused hundreds of thousands of foreign casualties, and spent—depending on various estimates of direct and indirect costs—somewhere between 2 and 3 trillion dollars. But nothing our rulers did post-9/11 eliminated the threat from terrorists or made the world significantly less dangerous. Rather, ever-bigger government imposed unprecedented restrictions on the American people and became the arbiter of prosperity for its cronies, as well as the manager of permanent austerity for the rest. Although in 2001 many referred to the United States as “the world’s only superpower,” ten years later the near-universal perception of America is that of a nation declining, perhaps irreversibly. This decade convinced a majority of Americans that the future would be worse than the past and that there is nothing to be done about it. This is the “new normal.” How did this happen?

  35. newrouter says:

    “We can’t ignore this monster, too.”

    why is this our problem?

  36. newrouter says:

    oh @35 look @34

  37. newrouter says:

    “We (the rest of the world) dropped the ball on the Hutu/Tutsi slaughter. ”

    yea “we” dropped the ball on pol pot, idi amin, stalin, che, castro, kim il nk, mao…

  38. BBHunter says:

    – Say what you will, I have to believe there are some Mullahs in Tehran who feel a good deal less secure than they did 24 hours ago.

  39. We and the rest of the world didn’t drop the ball on the Hutu/Tutsi slaughter; the French organized the whole thing.

  40. buzz4t says:

    “Just imagine, a person who inherited her wealth – probably didn’t struggle and invest and risk a dime – thinks she should be taxed more to help the 99%.”

    Not a fan. I don’t think she is either conservative, republican or libertarian. However, the article indicates she is down there to report on them, not join them.

  41. dicentra says:

    Time Magazine Violates the Double Standard

    That overhead squealing you hear are airborne porcines.

  42. dicentra says:

    yea “we” dropped the ball on pol pot, idi amin, stalin, che, castro, kim il nk, mao…

    This monster is small enough potatoes that we can stop him without breaking a sweat. Not so of the rest, especially Mao and Stalin.

    If it turns out that Obama has an ulterior motive in this, then I’ll summarily withdraw my support.

  43. guinspen says:

    Nope, too red.

  44. sdferr says:

    T.Vokoun is turning out to be pretty stingy though maybe only just barely a 1%er; the Flyers, on the other hand, have adopted an open net policy.

  45. newrouter says:

    “This monster is small enough potatoes that we can stop him without breaking a sweat”

    coming from presumably a citizen of a bankrupt country that’s mighty fine of you. what’s uganda’s problem in not taking lra out?

  46. newrouter says:

    is lra causing spookey dude problems:

    yes we can

    Posted on October 15, 2011 at 1:50 PM EST
    image

    By Aaron Klein

    TEL AVIV — An influential “crisis management organization” that boasts billionaire George Soros as a member of its executive board recently recommended the U.S. deploy a special advisory military team to Uganda to help with operations and run an intelligence platform.

    The president-emeritus of that organization, the International Crisis Group, is the principal author of Responsibility to Protect, the military doctrine used by Obama to justify the U.S.-led NATO campaign in Libya.

    Soros’ own Open Society Institute is one of only three nongovernmental funders of the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect, a doctrine that has been cited many times by activists urging intervention in Uganda.

    Authors and advisers of the Responsibility to Protect doctrine, including a center founded and led by Samantha Power, the National Security Council special adviser to Obama on human rights, also helped to found the International Criminal Court.

    Several of the doctrine’s main founders also sit on boards with Soros, who is a major proponent of the doctrine.

    Soros himself maintains close ties to oil interests in Uganda. His organizations have been the leading efforts purportedly to facilitate more transparency in Uganda’s oil industry, which is being tightly controlled by the country’s leadership.

    Link

  47. happyfeet says:

    that’s a very very narrow lens Codevilla is looking through

    is my first impression

    the degradation of America encompasses far far more than just foreign policy and military whatnot and silly homeland security shenanigans

  48. guinspen says:

    hello
    berkeley

  49. newrouter says:

    “that’s a very very narrow lens Codevilla is looking through”

    jen the rube and the boys at commentary share the view codevilla skewers. ymmv

  50. dicentra says:

    Soros and the “Responsibility to Protect” is behind it?

    Crap. I withdraw my support.

    Jonah? WTF?

  51. sdferr says:

    He doesn’t rule out the further loss of American identity throughout our politics hf, and though he doesn’t go into it much here, the seeds of the analysis are obviously present — besides foreign policy and national security issues being his predominant interest, the article’s already pretty long.

  52. Darleen says:

    Romney and McCain have both today said issued statements saying Obama deserves the credit for Ghadaffi’s death.

    Well, I haven’t heard their statements .. so they did, of course, also give Bush credit that Gah-daffy no longer had nuke and chemical programs because he saw what happened to Saddam ..

    Right?

  53. happyfeet says:

    are you sure he’s not just recasting the old blah blah blah about asymmetrical warfare and its attendant frustrations?

    I will need to read more carefully later. But I did read far enough to check to see if he acknowledged Mr. President Bush’s extreme reluctance to create the failshit gay-assed Department of Homeland Security.

    He didn’t.

  54. sdferr says:

    In the main, it gists to me as a sketch of our eagerness to overspend to salve our (unnecessarily) guilty consciences, right across the board. Once admirable American can-do-it-ism, making efficiencies work for us, has been abandoned to absurdly complex yet still morally ambiguous bureaucratism.

  55. happyfeet says:

    you can’t plant me in your penthouse I’m going back to my plow

  56. Swen says:

    Jeez Jeff, your dominatrix is bonded? I’m pretty sure mine doesn’t even carry Contractor’s General Liability. But I think she enjoys her job ’cause she works for tips. She gives whole new meaning to “give ’til it hurts”! ‘Course she might work cheap because she looks a lot like Penn Jillette..

  57. newrouter says:

    “I’m going back to my plow”

    please check epa dust rules before doing so.

  58. Ivy Berkeley says:

    so
    goodbye
    yellow
    prick
    toad

  59. happyfeet says:

    that was clever Mr. guins

  60. BBHunter says:

    “My gosh, he is certainly one of us far more so than Barack Obama. Raised in Hawaii and going to a private school, an expensive private school,” economist Thomas Sowell said on FOX Business.

    – Yes, well Mr. Sowell can just forget about any invites as keynote speaker at Dem gatherings after that little display of sneaking off the reservation.

  61. B. Moe says:

    The leader of the movement to try terrorists in civilian court while Bush was doing just that with Saddam has now proudly claimed responsibility for the assasinations of Bin Ladin and Qhadafi.

    What was that thing his preacher said about chickens coming home to roost?

  62. DarthLevin says:

    Some of the most loyal water carriers are beginning to grumble about Dear Leader.

  63. Joe says:

    sdferr, that paper is disturbing but he has a point.

  64. […] Jeff G @Protein Wisdom. Related Posts:Social Justice, For The Glory of GovernmentPreach the Gospel at all times and when […]

  65. motionview says:

    SurveyUSA headlines
    18 point difference between home phone and cell phone on NJ Gov Christie
    12 point difference between home phone and cell phone on Obama job approval
    21 point difference between home phone and cell phone on Obama favorability
    9 point difference between home phone and cell phone from seven 2010 elections
    I would hope Rasmussen would recreate this research and if it is confirmed include it in their methodology, SurveyUSA says 13% of adults are cell phone only.
    Wait, one more.
    38 point difference between home phone and cell phone on legalizing marijuana.
    Well, I guess it won’t change the “likely voter” numbers.

  66. Ivy Berkeley says:

    Genderist.

  67. LBascom says:

    Gender is optional these days.

    NO LABELS!!

  68. LBascom says:

    ? How much are those(sweater)pu-ppies in the win-dow ?

Comments are closed.