Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

"Obama On Oil: More Misleading Rhetoric" [updated]

Misleading rhetoric seems to be all the rage these days, I must say. ALG:

According to AAA, the average price of a gallon of gas in America reached $3.55 last week. That’s up 43 cents from a month ago – the second-fastest spike on record.

All told, gas prices have increased by 67 percent since Mr. Obama took office – and as the global economy grapples with a nuclear crisis in Japan, a sovereign debt crisis in Europe and war in the Middle East there is growing concern that further price hikes could put the brakes on a sluggish economic “recovery.”

In an effort to mollify these concerns, on March 8 the Obama administration released data showing that domestic oil production – at least in the Gulf of Mexico – had risen to its highest level in seven years.

“From 2008 to 2010, oil production from the Outer Continental Shelf increased more than a third – from 446 million barrels in 2008 to an more than 600 million barrels of estimated production in 2010,” White House climate change czar Heather Zichal said.

These figures – obtained from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) – were trumpeted by Mr. Obama at a press conference four days later.

“Any notion that my administration has shut down oil production might make for a good political sound bite, but it doesn’t match up with reality,” Mr. Obama said. “We are encouraging offshore exploration and production.”

What the Obama administration neglects to point out, however, is that this expanded production is the result of policies implemented during the administration of former president George W. Bush. And while Mr. Obama announced a modest expansion of offshore drilling a year ago – he reversed course and imposed a six-month moratorium on new leases in the wake of the BP oil spill last summer. Also, earlier this month U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar told reporters that the “Obama moratorium” would be extended to cover the duration of the president’s first term in office.

So much for supporting expanded “exploration and production.”

More importantly, Mr. Obama neglected to mention that the EIA figures he used to highlight increases in domestic production in 2009 and 2010 show projected decreases in production in 2011 and 2012 – thanks to his policies. He also failed to point out that domestic oil production remains 20 percent below its mid-1990 levels.

In addition to his hostility toward offshore drilling, Mr. Obama opposes oil exploration within the 19-million acre Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as well as exploration beneath the Arctic Circle – where 90 billion barrels of recoverable oil are waiting, according to a 2008 U.S. Geological Survey report.

Not only that, leaked documents from the U.S. Department of Interior show that the Obama administration is considering closing off huge swaths of the Western United States to energy exploration – without Congressional approval or the consent of local authorities.

According to a 2009 study by the non-partisan Congressional Research Service (CRS), there are currently 167 billion barrels of recoverable oil in the United States – or enough to replace current OPEC imports for more than 75 years. Why are our leaders not using – and seeking to expand – this supply?

Also, why are we not more efficiently managing our existing oil supply? Mr. Obama has wasted billions of dollars sending green jobs overseas in pursuit of costly, inefficient energy alternatives, but what has he done to make better use of our existing energy sources?

According to Jerry Taylor – a senior fellow at the Cato Institute– simply increasing the aggregate extraction rate in existing oil fields from 35 to 40 percent would “be the equivalent of adding two Saudi Arabias to the global market.”

Americans are indeed “tired of talk” when it comes to rising gas prices. They are ready for Mr. Obama to allow supply to increase and lower those prices – before they become an even bigger drain on our economy.

[my emphasis]

Using the bureaucracies as an extra-legislative arm of the Executive, Obama is installing an ever-expanding regulatory authority that can bypass Congress and remove the important check on his authority demanded by the Constitution, and clearly intended by the framers, who prescribed co-equal branches.

Pressure groups largely funded through the EPA (like, eg., the increasingly politicized American Lung Association) are working with their governmental benefactors to beat back attempts by the GOP to rein in and defund the expanding regulatory state — the very bureaucratic bedrock of the ongoing progressive coup attempt.

It is essential, therefore, that we insist that the GOP not cave to pressures (“WHY DO REPUBLICANS HATE CLEAN AIR? WHY DO THEY WANT THE CHILDREN TO DIE?”) and work either to return these regulatory agencies to the functionaries they are supposed to be, or else defund and dismantle them entirely.

Obama, through unelected leftist bureaucrats and various czars, is laying the groundwork for a soviet-style industrial policy that would cripple the economy and change the very nature of this country.

We must stop him.

But while doing so, please: make sure you note that he’s doing all this because he thinks it’s best for the US, and this aggressive takeover of a capitalist system by a socialist president is really just Obama’s way of showing us his fundamental goodness and patriotism.

Otherwise, you have no idea what kind of shitstorm you might unleash.

****
update: Sean H sends along this link to Senate News from about a week ago detailing Mitch McConnell’s Senate efforts to curtail the EPA’s expanding powers.

Finally. A reason to cheer for McConnell!

15 Replies to “"Obama On Oil: More Misleading Rhetoric" [updated]”

  1. Old Texas Turkey says:

    First.

    Seriously thinking about bootleg drilling for oil.

  2. dicentra says:

    PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE CONNECTION BETWEEN OBAMA, SOROS, AND PETROBRAS BECAUSE IT DOESN’T EXIST OTHERWISE HOW COULD WE CALL GLENN BECK A FEARMONGER!

    the Obama administration is considering closing off huge swaths of the Western United States to energy exploration – without Congressional approval or the consent of local authorities.

    I think huge swaths of the Western United States are about to become ungovernable.

  3. LBascom says:

    Who cares if Obama despises the very foundation of the USA. He is sincere in thinking fundamentally changing the country into something else is a good thing, therefor he is a good person. In his mind, he’s taking care of me, the average citizen. Whether I want his help or not.

    You see, it’s not the object of your desire, nor the means you use to secure it that matters. It’s the sincerity of your principles that count, not he principals themselves that define the person.

    Stalin could tell you that, if he weren’t burning in hell that is…

  4. Old Texas Turkey says:

    Inexperienced, egomaniacal and lazy. Three qualities that have no place in the Oval office. I hope America can weather the damage this man inflicts.

    Perhaps its time to bring back the notion that only those who earn a living and pay taxes (net) should be allowed to vote.

  5. Squid says:

    If we characterized petroleum as “Gaia’s unborn,” could we get some Proggie support for sucking it out of the ground?

  6. Patrick S says:

    Squid posted on 3/24 @ 1:28 pm
    If we characterized petroleum as “Gaia’s unborn,” could we get some Proggie support for sucking it out of the ground?

    Strong work, Squid.

    Also, you have no idea of how much Diet Dr Pepper Cherry stings when squirted out the nose.

  7. Squid says:

    My thanks and apologies.

  8. LTC John says:

    By God, I agree – that was an excellent effort, Squid. BTW – I like the avatar, is that Tom Wham drawn?

    So, O! was lying about the petroleum, eh? SHOCKA!!!!

  9. Blake says:

    Squid has been on a roll lately.

    Putting huge swaths of energy producing lands off limits is nothing new for Democrats.

    See also: Bill Clinton and the creation of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument which placed a huge deposit of clean burning coal off limits.

  10. Stephanie says:

    The GSE National Monument shutdown was payback to the Chinese for those dollars in the coffers of Clinton/Gore 1998.

  11. zino3 says:

    When are they going to stop fucking around and impeach that traitorous moron? Or are they going to wait until he finishes wiping his ass with the constitution and flushing it down the toilet?

    Obama is NOT a decent and good man. He is a fucking snake.

  12. Jeff G. says:

    Obama = fundamentally good, decent, well-meaning, patriotic.
    Goldstein = “whiny, overly verbose, hypocritical, thin-skinned, dishonest, nasty, money-grubbing sorry excuse for a man.”

    Pragmatism.

  13. Jeff G. says:

    — “you forgot ugly, lazy, and disrespectful –”
    “Shut up, bitch! Go make me a turkey pot pie.”

  14. Squid says:

    I like the avatar, is that Tom Wham drawn?

    It’s the Surly Squid, a creation of El Rey Del Art. I’m trying to convince the Lovely Bride to knit me a hat like this one. Though perhaps not in pink.

  15. Unlikely Hospitalist says:

    I won’t disagree in principle to your comments and links, but would like to bring up the comments made by the president pushing for increased production of natural gas drilling in shale. I live in upstate New York and have noted over the past 6-12 a growing cacophony of leftists calling for the outright banning of the practice. As I have noted, their rhetoric doesn’t match the science and Obama’s statement in favor puts him in direct opposition to his most loyal base and in line with the ignorant sluts who are in favor of production. See here http://punditpress.blogspot.com/2011/03/president-obama-calls-for-expanded.html

Comments are closed.