Now that Souter is retiring? Naturally, a woman. Preferably, a minority. Obviously, not a Catholic. Hmmmmmm.
Allah Pundit archly suggests on Twitter that Michelle Obama might fit the bill. Then, she would have that salary that she craves. But isn’t this thinking rather limited? Why are there no trannies on the Supreme Court? Haven’t American Siamese twins been historically under-represented? Who’s your ideal candidate?
Comment by DarthRove on 5/1 @ 8:21 am #
Why can’t He appoint Himself? Surely such as The One can do two jobs at once.
Comment by BJT-FREE! on 5/1 @ 8:21 am #
Perez Hilton. For the transcendent judgement.
Comment by Joe on 5/1 @ 8:25 am #
I am sure K-Lo is crooning “Ponnrrrrrrrruuuuuuu!”
Comment by N. O'Brain on 5/1 @ 8:28 am #
Joe “The Bill of Rights IS a suicide pact” Biden.
Comment by Pablo on 5/1 @ 8:31 am #
RuPaul, bitches. You better work.
Comment by Joe on 5/1 @ 8:31 am #
Ward Churchill is tan, rested, ready.
Bill Ayers is available too.
Comment by Joe on 5/1 @ 8:32 am #
Alex “Bitch Tits” Rodriquez is available if Obama can buy out his current contract with the Yankees.
Comment by Patrick, Mayor of Scotumwah Iowa on 5/1 @ 8:33 am #
I hereby pledge my support, and that of my 13 residents, to the Supreme Court candidacy of Oprah Winfrey.
Pingback by Jules Crittenden » A Reverse Souter, I Entreat Thee on 5/1 @ 8:40 am #
[...] Protein Wisdom, channeling Allahpundit on Twitter, wickedly suggests Michelle Obama. Hear, hear! [...]
Comment by Matt on 5/1 @ 8:47 am #
John Edwards isn’t doing a whole lot these days.
Comment by Mike on 5/1 @ 8:50 am #
Just heard some über-PC subgenius on NPR say that “probably the next four or five” USSC nominees should be women. No reason given; no mention of the outlandish, extremist, and probably illegal idea that maybe we ought to give competence, juridical record, and understanding of the Constitution a wee mite of consideration. But then, the Barrackorrhoids wouldn’t consider that last a good thing anyway.
Comment by ThomasD on 5/1 @ 8:50 am #
Since you don’t actually need to be an attorney to serve on the supreme Court disbarment is no significant impediment.
There’s a bookend to the Specter saga.
Comment by Gormless Worm on 5/1 @ 8:57 am #
The White House will create a special “Judicial Committee” that will allow President Obama to weigh in on all Supreme Court rulings…in omnipotent style. All confirming opinions will be written, under the new Six-pack Doctrine, by the sitting Judge with the best abs. However, judges are barred from participating if they have over 20% body fat…at which point, the new White House “Judicial Committee” will be obligated to write the opinion…
You can look it up.
The Worm
Comment by bigbooner on 5/1 @ 9:03 am #
Janeane Garofalo. She just KNOWS shit.
Comment by Kevin B on 5/1 @ 9:07 am #
In the spirit of International jurispridence, which is all the rage with our current leaders, (also to cheer up happyfeet), I was going to suggest George Soros, but since he is more of a behind the scenes string pulling kind of guy, I thought maybe Kofi Annan could spare the time.
Comment by Jim in KC on 5/1 @ 9:08 am #
Camille Paglia. I guarantee that would prove entertaining.
Comment by Spiny Norman on 5/1 @ 9:09 am #
Helen Thomas.
Then she and her idiot socialist soul-sister Ginsburg can both fall asleep during testimony.
Comment by serr8d on 5/1 @ 9:12 am #
I would’ve bet Hillary. I might still.
Comment by Carin on 5/1 @ 9:13 am #
Perez Hilton is a cunt.
I nominate Monica Conyers.
Comment by Carin on 5/1 @ 9:16 am #
O/t; it’s on local news but the White House threatened one of the Chrysler bond holders (who didn’t go along with the dealo yesterday) – said they would face the hostility of the entire White House Press Corp. I heard the lawyer make the accusation. The Executive branch apparently has the power to sic the press corp?
Indpendent media, anyone? Anyone?
Comment by mossberg500 on 5/1 @ 9:19 am #
Vladimir Putin.
Comment by Mr. Pink on 5/1 @ 9:22 am #
20
Holy f@#@ got a link?
Comment by serr8d on 5/1 @ 9:23 am #
Andre Smith.
Comment by Jay C. on 5/1 @ 9:24 am #
Based on the specs in the first line, I nominate Janice Rogers Brown.
Woman? Check. Of color? Oh yeah. Defender of the Constitution? Yep. Obama lackey? Nope. Bipartisan support? Hahahaha.
Comment by Rob Crawford on 5/1 @ 9:26 am #
John Edwards.
No, not the politician. The “psychic”.
His jurisprudence will be as valid and Constitutionally-based as any other liberal justice.
Comment by Clint on 5/1 @ 9:30 am #
#25 – Beautiful!
“I can see that your grandmother is swayed your arguments, you didn’t really have a good relationship with her, did you? Would you like to make amends? She’s listening.”
Comment by Clint on 5/1 @ 9:32 am #
…swayed by…
Comment by McGehee on 5/1 @ 9:33 am #
Splash.
Comment by geoffb on 5/1 @ 9:43 am #
The new improved pitchforks, the ones the “ONE” is saving them from.
Comment by U-238 on 5/1 @ 9:44 am #
This is where Cindy Sheehan finally gets her appointment.
Comment by The Limerick Avenger on 5/1 @ 9:44 am #
I don’t think John Edwards will get it
If ‘bama got Liz’ book and read it
John’s soft on crime,
And a real slime
And has Rielle’s kid to his credit
Comment by Dana on 5/1 @ 9:46 am #
Serr8d suggested:
Way too out-of-control for Mr Obama. He likes her where she is now: a position in which he can give her orders, and fire her when he feels like it. :)
Comment by geoffb on 5/1 @ 9:47 am #
Bill Clinton would bring an entirely new sense of decorum to the Supreme Court. Make it part of the 24/7 world of the news media, a ratings booster. Win, win.
Comment by The Monster on 5/1 @ 9:55 am #
Biden is a Constitutional Law professor (who doesn’t know the difference between Articles I and II based on his performance in the Veep Debate) so he’s automagically qualified, right? Obama could promote him to the Supreme Court, then would get to name a new Veep out of the deal. While awaiting confirmation of the replacement, Stretch Pelosi would be the proverbial heartbeat away.
I think I’m going to be sick now.
Comment by N. O'Brain on 5/1 @ 9:55 am #
And those robes can cover up so much, geoff.
Comment by kelly on 5/1 @ 9:58 am #
Barney Frank wishes he was black. Again.
Comment by geoffb on 5/1 @ 10:03 am #
And think of all the room under that bench, more than a desk’s kneehole.
Comment by Roland THTG on 5/1 @ 10:10 am #
His Zombie Grandmother!
Comment by Rob Crawford on 5/1 @ 10:13 am #
Every year, interviewing twenty-something wanna-be lawyers…
Comment by Carin on 5/1 @ 10:20 am #
I’m at work, but I’ll look Pink.
Comment by hindmost on 5/1 @ 10:23 am #
Aw, c’mon… nobody took the easy one?
Wouldn’t the first fill that last requirement?
You’d have the first Klingon on the court too.
Comment by Carin on 5/1 @ 10:26 am #
I found the audio:
Frank Beckman’s show on WJR.
I hope I got that right, because I don’t know how to cut and paste on this stupid computer. I copied the whole thing.
Comment by Rob Crawford on 5/1 @ 10:27 am #
Yeah, but it’d be an old-style, apparently extinct Klingon. Unless that hair’s hiding a hella bumpy forehead.
Comment by Mr. Pink on 5/1 @ 10:27 am #
Cool thanks. I am at work too and will have to wait till I get home to que up the audio.
Comment by Rob Crawford on 5/1 @ 10:29 am #
Got it, Carin.
Comment by SBP on 5/1 @ 10:29 am #
My money is on Sean Penn.
Surprise pizza deliveries, dude!
Comment by Rob Crawford on 5/1 @ 10:33 am #
“One of my clients was directly threatened by the White House, in essence compelled to withdraw its opposition to the deal under threat that the full force of the White House press corps would destroy its reputation if it continued to fight.”
(Client apparently threatened: Perella-Weinberg?)
Comment by mojo on 5/1 @ 10:35 am #
Raul Castro. After the sex-change and melanin injections.
Comment by Clint on 5/1 @ 10:36 am #
The One is hip enough – why not bring a new approach to all this stale politics and appoint Jay-Z?
Comment by Joe on 5/1 @ 10:38 am #
I would support Camile Paglia. We need a lesbian non lawyer Justice. If lawyer was important we could go with Hillary.
Comment by steveaz on 5/1 @ 10:38 am #
What kind of judges will Obama appoint? Easy: ones who will sanction the Congress’ up-and-coming “Hate Crimes” legislation.
Sunset has been looming over Affirmative Action for the last decade, and insofar as the Prog mvmt is reliant on governmental reinforcements of archaic racial divides for its power, the sun was setting on them, too.
Quiet choices about whom we choose to associate with are made by free Americans every day. And, if, say, a fringe of shaved Irish-Americans demonstrated a propensity to let off bombs (or, destroy property) for “the Irish,” then you’d see self-identifying Irish people as a group suffer, as business owners (who tend to own property and don’t want to see it destroyed) will naturally back away from hiring Irish. This mechanism, the discriminatory, “weeding-out” interview process that we all perform in our daily lives, engages citizens’ faculties of discernment, and serves as a crucial anti-coagulate in our pluralistic, ‘melting pot” society.
Which makes it detrimental to insurgent movements that rely on amalgamated masses to force political concessions from the citizenry: citizens’ free discernment ensures that a terrorist in Detroit or Philly can not seek cover in this or that group “identity” openly without exposing members of “his” group to the quiet, organic exclusionary response of discerning, everyday Americans. And this essential bulwark, freedom of association, coupled with the right to “bear arms” are codified guarantees that are essential to a freeman’s repelling of tyrannical government and a foreign invasion.
That’s where the Soop’s come in. “Hate Crimes” resurrection in Obama’s Congress indicate that the Progressives intend to use “hate” accusations to effectively neutralize the citizens’ freedom of discernment and association. And if HC’s become national law it will reverse the stakes in the court: If my read of DC’s current renters is correct, expect an immediate ramping up of EEOC claims in highly visible courtrooms (complete with wall-to-wall coverage in friendly media), and an engorging of the government’s lucrative “anti-discrimination” legal apparatuses.
Obama needs a pliant court if he’s gonna ratchet this shake-down on to its next stage, and, in the end, more and more of America’s productive economy will grow underground.
America is gonna go all semifossorial on the One.
Comment by Rob Crawford on 5/1 @ 10:38 am #
Ya know, maybe we should limit our ideas to people with experience on the bench. To that end, I suggest Harry Anderson.
Comment by SBP on 5/1 @ 10:38 am #
I’m imagining Bill interviewing prospective clerks.
“Now, honey, the next skill we’re going to check is how well you can bang my gavel, followed by the ‘oral arguments’ section of the test.”
Comment by geoffb on 5/1 @ 10:39 am #
If you’re going to go the nepotism route, to keep it in the family, remember there is no age restriction or even citizenship restriction in the Constitution to the appointment of SCJ. Obama has a huge number of relatives to choose from.
Comment by Pablo on 5/1 @ 10:45 am #
Aunt Zeituni!
Comment by steveaz on 5/1 @ 10:47 am #
Oops! I’m semi-literate today!
It’s not even noon yet and I’m already conjugation-challenged.
Comment by Mr. Pink on 5/1 @ 10:48 am #
He just needs someone who can find our border and immigration laws discriminatory. World Citizens Unite!!!111!!!
Comment by mojo on 5/1 @ 10:52 am #
(re: 48)
And a hump. Can we get him a hump? Have we ever had a hunchback Justice?
HISTORY-MAKING!
Comment by The Limerick Avenger on 5/1 @ 10:52 am #
Surely Barry won’t appoint Shelly
Such a move would be smelly
‘Course, he is Teh One
So it could be done
And the Court would go straight to Helly
Comment by pdbuttons on 5/1 @ 11:02 am #
caligulas horse
of course/of course
i want revenge
Comment by Sdferr on 5/1 @ 11:03 am #
How comes it, in light of Dan’s headline, that Mary Wilson hasn’t been offered up? She was, after all, the only Supreme there from start to finish.
Comment by jf4 on 5/1 @ 11:04 am #
Michelle was making 350K a year at the Univ of Chicago…a better deal than the Supremes.
Comment by BJT-FREE! on 5/1 @ 11:06 am #
Dana is on LIMERICK FIRE, BAYBEE!
Comment by dicentra on 5/1 @ 11:17 am #
Me, I’m just thrilled to see “whom” used correctly. My life is small like that.
Comment by Noah Nehm on 5/1 @ 11:20 am #
#42: Carin
I posted this on LGF in response to your link:
Here’s a partial transcript of Tom Lauria’s remarks on the Frank Beckmann radio show. Lauria is bankruptcy attorney at White & Case, and is representing a group of investers who are refusing to go along with Obama’s bankruptcy plan for Chrysler.
Tom Lauria [1:34]:
Let me just that it is no fun standing on this side of the fence opposing the president of the United States. In fact, let me just say, you know, people have asked me who I represent. And that’s a moving target. I can tell you for sure that I represent one less investor today that I represented yesterday. One of my clients was directly threatened by the White House and in essence compelled to withdraw its opposition to the deal under threat that the full force of the White House press corps would destroy its reputation if it continued to fight. That’s how hard it is to stand on this side of the fence.
Beckmann [2:20]
Was that Perella Weinberg?
Tom Lauria [2:24]:
That was Perella Weinberg. …
Comment by The Limerick Avenger on 5/1 @ 11:21 am #
The Lim’rick Avenger is stumped
‘Cause though we’re rid of this chump
Anyone Barry likes
Will make us say, “Yikes!”
The Court will become such a dump.
Comment by dr kill on 5/1 @ 11:21 am #
Did Sammy Davis Jr. perhaps have an illegitimate lesbian daughter?
Pingback by Souter’s Gone. Let the Democratic Carnage Begin! : The Sundries Shack on 5/1 @ 11:25 am #
[...] going to be very ugly. Every activist group that hitched their wagon to President Obama is going to push their pet jurist on the White House and there won’t be much room for compromise or civility. There will be blood on the floor and [...]
Comment by LTC John on 5/1 @ 11:26 am #
#60 – I rather enjoyed that one. Thanks.
So, what is Janet Reno doing these days?
Comment by Mr. Pink on 5/1 @ 11:28 am #
65
Maybe I am slow or something but how is that not a HUGE deal? The freakin President is threatening the reputations of private citizens who do not kowtow to his demands. Threatening to “sick” the press corp, a supposedly impartial and unbiased body, on them. WTF over? What if Bush did this to anti-war groups that kept protesting? This is sick.
Comment by cynn on 5/1 @ 11:33 am #
I think this attorney is just talking smack.
Comment by Rob Crawford on 5/1 @ 11:36 am #
Really? Shocking.
Comment by Mr. Pink on 5/1 @ 11:36 am #
71
Yeah I am sure he is just making the whole thing up. It is not like the President demonized AIG or Wall Street execs or anything……..
Comment by Jon on 5/1 @ 11:37 am #
Someone dead, Corpse-Americans (Necro-Americans would sound racist) are grossly underrepresented. Just think how quick the hearings would be!
Comment by geoffb on 5/1 @ 11:42 am #
Carin may wish to weigh in since Wilson is a Motown Supreme.
Comment by louchette on 5/1 @ 11:44 am #
never happen, but i think i’d like the tv judge glenda hatchett. she’s a woman, and black, and she’s pretty tough and conservative on most issues. also, she’s not ugly.
and i’d be mostly happy with ted nugent too. he’d fiercely protect the 2nd amendment, and he could play some wicked solos and pass out yummy deer jerky during any lulls. might liven the place up a little.
not gonna happen. but a girl can dream…
Comment by Benedick on 5/1 @ 11:49 am #
Is Mills Lane still alive?
Comment by TorchesToRome on 5/1 @ 11:49 am #
I’m thinking Will-I-AM from the black eyed peas since he wrote that amazing obama chant. Or maybe Chuck D from public enemy, because no way is he picking flavor-flav. Although court sessions would always start on time with all of those clocks around his neck.
Comment by Noah Nehm on 5/1 @ 12:02 pm #
#42 Carin
Just thought you should know: Your link is now on Instapundit…
Comment by McGehee on 5/1 @ 12:22 pm #
Yep. Not being a Necrotic-American makes him a less attractive pick, I’m afraid.
Comment by pdbuttons on 5/1 @ 12:30 pm #
a judge of the globe
puts on a shiny black robe
and pees more freely
Comment by N. O'Brain on 5/1 @ 12:35 pm #
“Comment by Jon on 5/1 @ 11:37 am #
Someone dead, Corpse-Americans (Necro-Americans would sound racist) are grossly underrepresented. Just think how quick the hearings would be!”
The Democrats would tie up that voting bloc.
Oh.
Wait…….
Comment by BJT-FREE! on 5/1 @ 12:43 pm #
Paula Abdul? hick,/i>
Comment by JHoward on 5/1 @ 12:43 pm #
Living with thor, shopping for a new Jeep Wrangler, red.
Comment by BJT-FREE! on 5/1 @ 12:51 pm #
souter to fly off
summer’s breeze awaits his turn
to be right again
Comment by LTC John on 5/1 @ 1:00 pm #
#74 – I am afraid the only correct term is “Life Challenged Americans”.
Comment by Dana on 5/1 @ 1:08 pm #
Jon suggested:
Necro-Americans are already represented on the Senate Judiciary Committee; Ted Kennedy sits there.
Oh, wait, that was just so wrong. I denounce myself.
Comment by The Limerick Avenger on 5/1 @ 1:12 pm #
If Necro-Americans can vote
Why cain’t they be on the Cou’t?
We’ll always know
How their vote will go
And their ‘pinions is already wrote.
Comment by ccoffer on 5/1 @ 1:18 pm #
It needs to be a midget of any color except the bad one. Everyone knows which one the unacceptable color is.
Comment by MarkD on 5/1 @ 1:24 pm #
Why does it have to be an American? Since some members of the court think we ought to care more for international opinion, I nominate: Kim Jong Il.
How can you beat a guy who shoots an 18 at golf? Even Biden couldn’t out-do Kim.
Comment by David Avera on 5/1 @ 1:53 pm #
I hear Angela Davis isn’t busy right now.
Comment by Obstreperous Infidel on 5/1 @ 1:55 pm #
I have to agree with MarkD. You people are all so jingoistic and xenophobic. Fuck that. We don’t need an American on that court. We need an earthling!
Comment by Boeing on 5/1 @ 2:00 pm #
Obama is going to disband the Judicial Branch and merge the functions into the Executive Branch because Obama doesn’t want Robert Mugabe laughing at him and calling him a lightweight.
Comment by mojo on 5/1 @ 2:10 pm #
PLEASE!
“Decomposing Americans”
Potty mouth…
Comment by bill on 5/1 @ 2:11 pm #
Too bad William Kunsler is dead. How about Ramsay Clark?
How about Sheik Omar Abdul Rahman, the blind sheik in Supermax. (he fits the image of the statue with the blindfold) Besides we can get Sharia law without the raggies nuking a few cities. Make the Gitmo gangstas officers of the court.
Comment by mojo on 5/1 @ 2:11 pm #
Or “Americans of Decomposition”, if you prefer.
Comment by pdbuttons on 5/1 @ 2:13 pm #
how how to serve man
injun casino does judge
more firewater!
Comment by kelly on 5/1 @ 2:19 pm #
Somewhere Robert Reich quietly weeps.
Comment by kelly on 5/1 @ 2:21 pm #
On the plus side, Timmy Geithner is also ruled out. I mean, c’mon, “Toes” Emanual looks buff by comparison.
Comment by SBP on 5/1 @ 2:22 pm #
Bernardine Dohrn has a law degree, I believe.
Comment by kelly on 5/1 @ 2:28 pm #
So does Star Jones.
Comment by Boeing on 5/1 @ 2:30 pm #
Multi-ethnic transsexual midget. Problem solved.
Comment by SBP on 5/1 @ 2:33 pm #
I think Rahm Emanuel has already been mentioned, Boeing. :-)
Comment by Timstigator on 5/1 @ 2:34 pm #
Bill Clinton.
Comment by N. O'Brain on 5/1 @ 2:45 pm #
“Somewhere Robert Reich quietly weeps.”
Be on your toes, folks! Like Robert Reich at a urinal.
Comment by kelly on 5/1 @ 2:51 pm #
Toes? How about a step ladder? Honestly, is it just me or isn’t Reich the same guy who was one of the recurring villians on Wild, Wild West years ago?
Comment by baldilocks on 5/1 @ 2:51 pm #
Anita Hill. Just because he hates Clarence Thomas.
Comment by mojo on 5/1 @ 2:54 pm #
One of the Gore Girls.
Comment by mojo on 5/1 @ 3:09 pm #
I am still living with your ghost
Lonely and dreaming of the west coast
I don’t want to be your downtime
I don’t want to be your stupid game
With my big black boots and an old suitcase
I do believe Ill find myself a new place
I don’t want to be the bad guy
I don’t want to do your sleepwalk dance anymore
I just want to see some palm trees
Go and try and shake away this disease
We can live beside the ocean
Leave the fire behind
Swim out past the breakers
Watch the world die
I am still dreaming of your face
Hungry and hollow for all the things you took away
I don’t want to be your good time
I don’t want to be your fall-back crutch anymore
Ill walk right out into a brand new day
Insane and rising in my own weird way
I don’t want to be the bad guy
I don’t want to do your sleepwalk dance anymore
I just want to feel some sunshine
I just want to find some place to be alone
We can live beside the ocean
Leave the fire behind
Swim out past the breakers
Watch the world die
– Everclear, “Santa Monica”
Comment by Vermont Neighbor on 5/1 @ 3:12 pm #
My money’s on Valerie Jarrett. She’s not part of any controversy: Blago was the bad guy on that one.
Plus, Jarrett was Michelle Robinson’s boss at the Mayor’s office.
Comment by Rob Crawford on 5/1 @ 3:45 pm #
Dr. Miguelito Loveless
Played by Michael Dunn, who has some interesting bits in his biography:
Comment by Vladimir on 5/1 @ 4:03 pm #
Surely it’ll be someone possessed of the knowledge which constitutes “Cosmic Justice” and the ability to render it.
Comment by Sdferr on 5/1 @ 4:09 pm #
Ding Ding Ding! Vlad has got it down, baby!
Comment by Carin on 5/1 @ 4:15 pm #
So … lemme get this straight … I get an insta-launch on a comment where I didn’t even have my blog linked to my name? Figures.
Comment by Carin on 5/1 @ 4:20 pm #
Oh, I see. he didn’t link PW. Just the audio.
Comment by N. O'Brain on 5/1 @ 4:22 pm #
” a hotel detective…”
Keyhole peering was a snap.
Comment by McGehee on 5/1 @ 4:28 pm #
The hotel detective, he was out of sight.
Comment by Adriane on 5/1 @ 4:34 pm #
Barack Obama, Sr.
- Harvard trained, decomposing, favored 100% tax rates and higher, non-Protestant, non-white, non-Anglo-Saxon, Dreamed About by the appointing President …
Comment by kelly on 5/1 @ 4:49 pm #
Thanks, Rob.
Comment by peter jackson on 5/1 @ 5:36 pm #
I think multi-culti decorum demands that Obama replace one queer with another. I nominate Leslie.
Comment by pdbuttons on 5/1 @ 6:24 pm #
#117
we come in your town…
then we go home
to be investigated
i will now richard armitage shut-up
zip…
[mumble]
Comment by meya on 5/1 @ 6:28 pm #
“What kind of judges will Obama appoint? Easy: ones who will sanction the Congress’ up-and-coming “Hate Crimes†legislation.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_v._Mitchell
That was a unanimous Rehnquist opinion from 1993.
“Anita Hill. Just because he hates Clarence Thomas.”
Not just that, but also to test Specter’s new loyalties.
Comment by pdbuttons on 5/1 @ 6:28 pm #
joe biden
“i would not/could not/
get on that train
unless michelle/with her steel drivin’ hammer’
“corrected” me
Comment by geoffb on 5/1 @ 6:54 pm #
You cannot “test” for nor can something be “new” which has never existed. Spector is loyal to Spector. Singular, loyal to himself, only. This does however make him a good fit for and right at home as a Democratic Party Leader except for the Party thing. They will come to love him as much as I do.
Comment by B Moe on 5/1 @ 6:55 pm #
So what is your point?
Comment by Celtic Dragon on 5/1 @ 7:56 pm #
120: Oh my gods! I forgot about Leslie! I used to live in Austin in the 90’s, and had to walk through downtown to catch my bus for work, and I passed Leslie almost every day. Good times. Good, strange times…
Comment by meya on 5/2 @ 8:21 am #
“So what is your point?”
That there’s no need to be concerned with “hate crimes” and the court. Its already weighed in unanimously.
Comment by Sdferr on 5/2 @ 10:21 am #
So you all can just, y’know, stop thinking and shut up now. Permanently. Oh, and that little mess with CJ Taney and all, just nevermind that.
Comment by SBP on 5/2 @ 1:51 pm #
But if you think Obama is nominating people ‘who will sanction the Congress’ up-and-coming “Hate Crimes†legislation’ then you’re barking up the wrong tree.
You are a liar, liebot.
Every word out of your lying liehole is a lie.
Sorry.
Comment by SBP on 5/2 @ 3:37 pm #
The Supreme Court rule against Dred Scott 7-2, liebot.
I guess you’re okay with that one, too?
How about the 7-1 decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, liebot?
Comment by Goliath on 5/2 @ 3:40 pm #
How about the unanimous decision on In re Debs, liebot?
Okay with that one?
Comment by SBP on 5/2 @ 6:55 pm #
You haven’t figured out that I’m being descriptive here, not normative.
You haven’t figured out that I’m not going to let you lie, spin, prevaricate, drag the conversation off-topic, introduce red herrings, or any of the other shop-worn tactics of which you are so fond.
I’m not going to let you pretend that this is any type of honest discussion or debate. It isn’t.
I’m not going to let you pretend that you are arguing in good faith. You aren’t.
You are a liar, liebot. Everything you say is a lie, either direct or by omission.
Comment by SBP on 5/2 @ 8:22 pm #
So do you think that obama is concerned with nominating people
I think you are a serial liar, and I’m not going to help you pretend that this is any type of honest discussion or debate. It isn’t. I’m not going to help you pretend that you’re anything other than a mendacious, spinning crapweasel. You aren’t.
Comment by SBP on 5/3 @ 9:35 am #
Lame comeback, crapweasel, even for you.
What, you don’t know how to respond when others refuse to let you control the narrative? No chapter in Alinsky for that situation, liebot?