Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Mo. Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement

No mincing words here:

Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.

“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.

“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.

“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.

“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts – not a free society.”

Notes Allah at Hot Air:

Needless to say, no one actually has to be prosecuted for this to work. Prosecution will be impossible anyway in most cases thanks to the First Amendment. The point isn’t to jail critics but merely to price the cost of prospective litigation into their decision on whether to publicly criticize The One. Add this to the threatening letters his lawyers sent to station managers over the NRA ads, the flash-mob smearing of David Freddoso, and the appeal to the Justice Department to prosecute the American Issues Project for its perfectly factual yet devastating Ayers ad. Oh, the fun we’ll have with a deep blue Congress and an Obama-run DOJ and FCC. He promised you a “new type of politics,” didn’t he?

And a new type of politics it will be, too! — not that old divisive kind of politics where one is constantly being sniped at by the so-called “loyal opposition,” but rather a new and harmonious politics of consensus and agreement, brought about by the stern and loving hand of those in government willing to do the hard work of putting an end to all this hate by legislating, intimidating, or hectoring into silence the unpatriotic ingrates who refuse to get with the orgy of love that is Obama’s America.

Because remember: Venezuela-type Utopias just don’t happen; first, you have to find someone who loves his country so much that he’s willing to take on the role of Chavez.

For the greater good. And, y’know — so his wife can finally be proud and all.

****
update: Obama’s campaign to unify America by keeping all messages the same continues apace:

A UMW spokeswoman says that the Obama campaign required the sign-and-banner ban [during an Obama rally]. That campaign tells us that the ban is for “security” reasons. But a spokesman for the U.S. Secret Service, responsible for protecting presidential candidates, says that the service has no objection to signs at rallies, provided that no “part of the sign could be used as a weapon”–e.g., a heavy metal pole or a sharpened stick. Finally, the McCain campaign tells us, “We encourage people to make signs at our events.”

Maybe O! was afraid somebody would wave an American flag or something equally, you know, NASCAR-esque.

And like, how gauche is that?

(thanks to Darleen)

165 Replies to “Mo. Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement”

  1. Jeffersonian says:

    We’re gay…that’s the problem.

  2. Jeff G. says:

    Viva la Truth Squads!

  3. dre says:

    Black shirts? ah no, um, Brown shirts? er don’t go there, Mauve shirts? YES

  4. dre says:

    Madrassa of Chicago has a new franchising opportunity for you. Start up capital provide by ACORN Financial.

  5. Jeffersonian says:

    I’m going with lavender…yes, lavender. Then applying over at the Gateway Ministry of Truth.

  6. Darleen says:

    I remember saying something a while back that Obama was channeling the full-blown paranoid Nixon at his ratfucking best.

    I wonder how long The One’s enemies list is at present.

  7. Jeffersonian says:

    I mean, how many legs did the Mob actually have to break for the lesson to get through to the rest?

  8. Jeff G. says:

    Hot Air will be forced to publish Kos Diarists. BECAUSE OF THE FAIRNESS!

  9. David R. Block says:

    Darleen,

    Maybe that is why Mark Levin calls him Barack Milhouse Obama?

    Naw, couldn’t be….

  10. Jeff G. says:

    protein wisdom will be forced to include “rebuttals” by datadave.

    BECAUSE OF THE FAIRNESS!

  11. Jeff G. says:

    The Corner will be forced to run commentary by Rich Brookhiser.

    BECAUSE OF — oh. Nevermind.

  12. XBradTC says:

    Or, Blunt could have mentioned that he had a big old stack of pardons just waiting to be signed.

  13. dre says:

    “Nobody puts ketchup on a hot dog” Inspector Callahan

  14. steveaz says:

    I just bought a roasted chicken and a bottle of wine at a Safeways in Flagstaff…

    Lines were long at the checkout stand so I perused the tabloids while I waited to be rung-up. To the left and to the right were story after story about Sarah Palin’s “other man,” McCain’s battle against the trauma of alien abduction, and how Laura Bush was leaving George, again.

    Nowhere, I mean nowhere, did I see a single piece on Obama. Nowhere. It’s as if there is a blackout on dissin’ O!, or something; as if saying “boo” to Obama is now a taboo…just like wearing your nipple-rings to your grandma’s pool-side birthday party is verboten…

    A chill wind is blowing down the aisle of checkstand number 8.

  15. Jeffersonian says:

    MUSTARDIST!!

  16. Darleen says:

    What the Fairness Doctrine does to talk radio is that if, say, one has 3 hours highly successful Rush Limbaugh which makes oodles of ad revenue for the station because people actually listen to him…regardless of how many “dissenting” phone callers he takes, a station will have to run 3 hours of Randi Rhodes, which will be a loser in more ways than one.

    Station throws up hands, cancels its “talk format”, fires almost all humans and gets a robo machine and converts to an AM Top 40 station.

    It’s like how the Dems are looking to ban secret ballots for employees voting on whether to unionize or not.

    The risk of dissenting against the powers that be is too costly.

  17. meya says:

    He should buy himself like 10 million bucks worth of brutality.

    http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2008/09/04

  18. Darleen says:

    steveaz

    Let’s see how many comedians will dare dis The One after he becomes President.

    Pay no attention to the thugs in the wings on Open Mic night at the Comedy Club.

  19. meya says:

    “Prosecution will be impossible anyway in most cases thanks to the First Amendment. ”

    Prosecutors caring about the first amendment? Ok. If you say so. No worries then.

  20. Sdferr says:

    I dig the headline “GOP convention lawsuits” as opposed to “Police misconduct lawsuits” or, if warranted, “Police brutality lawsuits”.

  21. Spiny Norman says:

    Station throws up hands, cancels its “talk format”, fires almost all humans and gets a robo machine and converts to an AM Top 40 station.En Español.

    /the only other AM format that makes any $$$

  22. Spiny Norman says:

    Damn, damn HTML…

  23. dre says:

    Damning HTML. I seen alot that sort of stuff happening here. I request that you look into your own souls and explore your inner BusHitler of your HTMLism.

  24. mishu says:

    We are the fascists we’ve been waiting for.

  25. Blitz says:

    Darleen? re your #16

    Cost is not an issue to them. They are what they are, they do what they do. An end is what they want and the means be damned. They WANT this “experiment” destroyed.

    I put it that way because from talking to many leftists of all ages (my daughters friends, my peers and my customers) The Proggs simply believe that as a Country, The US is a work in proGGress…and yes, I spelled that correctly. They honestly believe the MSM hype and lies,no matter how much I and others try to steer them to places like this.

  26. dre says:

    Yea but you know DESIGNER FACISTS

  27. takeshi kovacs says:

    We have seen such tactics withthe ‘coletilla’
    that Fidel used in Cuba, before silencing the Diario de la Marina; the counterpart to the Wall Street Journal; intervened against Bohemia; the Time Magazine equivalent which ahd supported his rise to power, A generation later, the Sandinistas cut back the newsprint to La Prensa; which took a dim view of their malfeasance, and their genocide
    against the Miskito indians. Chavez’s tactics against the Cisneros after the 2002 coup attempt; driving RCN out of business, and into exile. The irony of a former coup plotter, whose efforts in ’91, so inhinged the economy complaining about a coup against him, seems a bit much. There’s of course, Putin’s campaign against the MOST/Gusinsky
    network, who challenged their influence. The difference here, is that all those instances
    occurred after they took power.

  28. Darleen says:

    The One has banned at signs at a public rally on a public university campus

    NOT ALL COUNTRIES guarantee their citizens the right to virtually unbridled freedom of speech. The United States does. Would someone please tell the campaign of Sen. Barack Obama? And the dozing guardians of liberty at the University of Mary Washington?

    Mr. Obama, the Democratic nominee for president, is scheduled to speak at a rally at the university today. The public is invited to this forum, on property it, the public, owns. However, signs and banners will not be allowed, according to the organizers and compliant campus officials. Suddenly, UMW is a First Amendment-Free, or at least a First Amendment-Crippled, Zone, subject to the self-serving preferences of politicos. Why does an Obama rally–or a McCain rally or a Nader rally–justify taking a little off the top of Americans’ most fundamental rights?

    A UMW spokeswoman says that the Obama campaign required the sign-and-banner ban. That campaign tells us that the ban is for “security” reasons. But a spokesman for the U.S. Secret Service, responsible for protecting presidential candidates, says that the service has no objection to signs at rallies, provided that no “part of the sign could be used as a weapon”–e.g., a heavy metal pole or a sharpened stick. Finally, the McCain campaign tells us, “We encourage people to make signs at our events.”

  29. Darleen says:

    oh lord … “banned all signs”

    I blame the gin.

  30. Blitz says:

    May I be optimistic for a moment though? I have a daughter (pregnant) who will teach her child about the freedoms bought by others before us and the necessary commitment by all of us to ensure that they continue, (Whew, I’m out of big words, Lowly High school grad here) So all is not lost. Jeffs boy,Carin’s kids,Darleens adult kids…it’s a start.

  31. N. O'Brain says:

    “…have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.”

    Scratch a lefty, find a fascist.

  32. N. O'Brain says:

    “Comment by Jeffersonian on 9/27 @ 8:11 pm #

    I mean, how many legs did the Mob actually have to break for the lesson to get through to the rest?”

    Do you know how to tell when you’re in a restaurant run by the Mafia?

    They have “Broken Leg Of Lamb” on the menu.

  33. Big Bang Hunter (pumping you up) says:

    “Do you know how to tell when you’re in a restaurant run by the Mafia?”

    – I heard you could tell because there were always some cement trucks in the back parking lot.

  34. That’s some powerful shit you’re smoking, Jefferson G.

  35. Darleen says:

    Well, another refugee from Biden’s alternate America has shown up.

    Goody.

  36. dre says:

    Bank Death Pool cont.:

    The largest bank to ever be taken over by the government was next. And this is the scary part. Washington Mutual was taken over by the government on Thursday. They were not able to handle the surge for cash requests and became insolvent. The government however has made a big – HUGE – mistake.

    In taking over Wash Mu, the government told Wash Mu bondholders that they would not be paid. This precedent when recognized by the investors around the world will cause massive pandemonium if the government doesn’t do something quick. You see the bondholders are people and institutions who buy bonds for stable and guaranteed returns with a payoff based on the bond type. Banks and many corporations raise capital or get money by issuing bonds. If bondholders realize that their bonds with banks will not be paid off if the bank goes under, then the bond will become very risky especially during these times, if not worthless. This will cause banks the inability to raise capital to pay off the depositors they have on the books. Depositors will become scared and more ‘runs on the bank’ will occur in all financial service industries.

    The President has made a proposal for the government to step in. They must do so quickly. There is no time to waste. Fear is a great motive and causes people to do crazy things. Already treasurers of companies are divesting their assets from risky investments and moving it to more safe places. This is causing illiquidity in the market and will continue if not addressed. Congress cannot continue to filibuster and lollygag. The world economy is at stake. The root problems of a government policy encouraging bad loans, corporate and government greed (some Fannie Mae executives made off with millions), and a Congress that wishes to put pork on this bill to save our economy must be addressed and now.

    http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/09/wash-mu-bondholders-were-not-paid.html

  37. JuliaM says:

    “A UMW spokeswoman says that the Obama campaign required the sign-and-banner ban [during an Obama rally]. That campaign tells us that the ban is for “security” reasons.”

    Not because it’s embarassing to see that some of his followers are idiots then?

    http://punditkitchen.com/2008/09/22/political-pictures-barack-obama-supporting-doing-wrong/

  38. Topsecretk9 says:

    A UMW spokeswoman says that the Obama campaign required the sign-and-banner ban [during an Obama rally]. That campaign tells us that the ban is for “security” reasons. But a spokesman for the U.S. Secret Service, responsible for protecting presidential candidates, says that the service has no objection to signs at rallies, provided that no “part of the sign could be used as a weapon”–e.g., a heavy metal pole or a sharpened stick. Finally, the McCain campaign tells us, “We encourage people to make signs at our events.”

    and the ACLU rejoiced!

  39. Topsecretk9 says:

    So what happens if Obama is elected and because he’s such a fucking pussy, no protests? No million man marches that oppose Obama’s war in Afghanistan? Nothing? Just Obama’s little gitmos speckled about to house his critics?

  40. MikeD says:

    This is a bit off topic, I suppose, and for that I apologize but the increasingly fascistic behavior or the “opposition” raises this issue for me. Ignore if you wish; the question is really for MAJ John.

    The stifling of free expression in the name of political “fairness” and the margins of fascistic behavior being explored by both Obama’s formal and shadow campaign are, I find, disconcerting if not outright frightening. One wonders to what extreme these might ultimately rise. One hopes nothing of real consequence will ever manifest itself and all such anxieties will amount to nothing. Yes, one hopes.

    On the other hand the left, abetted by the MSM, seems seldom to be constrained by reason or classical liberalism, as Jeff has gone to some pains to describe, and seems bent on a strategy to subvert history and pursue a condition the founders and conservatives in general find increasingly uncomfortable and might more accurately characterize as a national horror. And that ultimately raises the possibility of a condition beyond rational resolution; one where only violent response or action can resolve evolving direction or preserve the traditions and values of 200 plus years. Of course, we can deny that such an eventuality would ever come to pass but occasionally one is drawn to ponder such eventualities.

    And the question that then comes to mind is one for MAJ John, who on a number of occasions in this forum, has been adamant about the oath he has sworn as a member of our military and the obligation he and so many of his colleagues feel to preserve the republic and oppose any violent opposition to its seated government. And believe me, I truly admire both his sentiments and moral position. But that moral position, I would suggest, presupposes historical values and conditions embodied in a document seemingly held in small regard by too many on the left. At what point, indeed is there a point, where conditions and national direction obviate the oath and moral positions of men such as MAJ John and the military? Are there conditions that give such patriots pause and concern? Or does an oath to preserve and protect take precedent over form and function to the point where the military and men like MAJ John must blindly serve what other reasonable persons may judge to be illegitimate and a prostitution of original intent—even if that prostitution is ostensibly backed, in so far as it is possible to determine accurately, by a majority? Sorry if this strays too much from discussion but I find myself quite curious about this. The question keeps raising its ugly head.

  41. Bob Reed says:

    Arrest the Governor…He’s…He’s…He’s, speaking badly about O!

    Can you believe that this is brought to you by the same bunch that trots out the first amendment on a regular basis, encourages their supporters to “Get in their face”, and believes that shouting down critics, jamming their phone lines with worthless calls, and crashing servers by spamming are lefitimate and honorable campaign tactics??? WTF???

    *sigh* I guess it’s more of that new kind of politics I keep hearing so much about these days…

    O!

  42. dre says:

    Designer St. Louis jump suits

  43. eCurmudgeon says:

    Station throws up hands, cancels its “talk format”, fires almost all humans and gets a robo machine and converts to an AM Top 40 station.

    Only with the proposed changes to music licensing rates that radio stations may start having to pay, it may make more sense to get out of the radio business altogether.

    Not unlike, say, Clear Channel deciding that focusing on outdoor advertising is a safer business path…

  44. dre says:

    Will O!, who likes Communist China so much, start blocking the intertubes? Axelrod & Roses!

  45. O! is just aggressively responding to attacks. HE WILL NOT BE SWIFTBOATED!

  46. cjd says:

    I wonder who will be the Dzerzhinsky/Yagoda/Yeszhov/Beria figure in the new administration. Any guesses?

  47. Neo says:

    We need somebody in Missouri to file a formal complaint to the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice claiming intimidation by St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, Senator Claire McCaskill and Barack Obama.

    I’m real serious about this.

  48. MC says:

    But…but…it’s the Show Me State!

  49. MAJ (P) John says:

    “At what point, indeed is there a point, where conditions and national direction obviate the oath and moral positions of men such as MAJ John and the military? Are there conditions that give such patriots pause and concern? Or does an oath to preserve and protect take precedent over form and function to the point where the military and men like MAJ John must blindly serve what other reasonable persons may judge to be illegitimate and a prostitution of original intent—even if that prostitution is ostensibly backed, in so far as it is possible to determine accurately, by a majority?”

    I don’t quite have the time to respond in the depth I would like to – but I can think of a couple of examples of when at lest I wouldn’t go along… shoot protestors that aren’t threatening life, safety or property. Or closing down a church, media outlet or such on a simple declaration that I must do so for the greater good, yada yada yada. Nobody in the US Armed Forces would go along with any Chavez style nonsense, so I don’t see that as a possibility.

    I worry less about Sen Obama’s shabby attempts to silence critics as much as I dread the joyous participation in self-limiting, in what is said or done. An Army of Durantys, if you will.

    Jeff has already pointed out what a danger this is to a free society. And as I have mentioned, it seems like the “new” media has started to mature just in the nick of time. People like Jeff and the rest of PJM are becoming less a nice thing to have around, but more like an essential one.

    I am going to go hit the Tip Jar right now, and I would ask the rest of you to consider doing so when you can.

  50. cjd says:

    Just to add to my previous comment. This is pretty shameful that this is going on in the the state of my birth and where I grew up. But, it also explains a lot why my Dad packed us up and moved just over the border to Overland Park, KS. Of course, now we’re in the hands of Gov. Katherine “Republicans are racists” Sebelius. Out of the bedpan, into the…well, you get it.

  51. Republican on Acid says:

    I am not so sure how much longer people are going to be civil about this shit. I seriously can’t ever remember being as angry as I am right now. This complete and total criminality is driving me nutty. More Republicans need to go on national news shows and tell the public about this sort of thing. It needs to get out to everyone before its too late.

  52. thor says:

    When was the last time you had your nose flattened by a Democrat?

  53. Republican on Acid says:

    I am not worried about my nose, I am worried about yours.

  54. Darleen says:

    Democrats aren’t honest enough to fight face to face

  55. geoffb (JARAIP) says:

    I’m not concerned about the men and women in our armed forces. The ones at the pointy end of the spear who are laying their lives on the line to bring freedom to people in far off lands.

    The ones that are of concern will be the freshly minted graduates of the many “Camp Obamas”. The young activist “volunteers” in Obama’s civilian equivalent of the military. Spread over the land, doing their “patriotic” (in the Pelosian sense) duty for their messiah.

  56. Rusty says:

    Yer honor. I done know what da problem is. Eeverybody knows da ‘lightworker’ needs some help aroun electiontime. Ya knows. Like Santa Clause aand his elves……………….you got a problem wit dis?

  57. Obama for Omerica says:

    New Obama Campaign Poster Released for Missouri

    Campaign is testing it out there and will be going national with it in all 57 states if they can get away with it.

    Here is the Link:
    http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n317/zuule/BarryObummer/WelcomeToMissouri.jpg

  58. alppuccino says:

    When was the last time you had your nose flattened by a Democrat?

    I believe this is a rhetorical question. I think thor is pointing out that Democrats are not violent people, so when at loggerheads, never fear a democrat.

  59. Semanticleo says:

    “The root problems of a government policy encouraging bad loans, corporate and government greed”

    Of course you know that there is NO guarantee that a WorldWide Depression will not occur even if the bailout (which seems to be done) is passed.

    The problem is; consumer confidence. That’s what all the hubub is about.
    They want us to think this is an anomaly which occurred because a few bankers got greedy.(It’s such a rare event!!)

    The problem is; we’ve had 28 years of happy economic horseshit from the
    RWR Devotees, endlessly pontificating that the best climate for all is one in which piss is perceived as rainfall, and that a ‘golden shower’ truly enriches all.

    Regulation by government is bad for business, because it hampers the creative efforts of the truly gifted (SOCIOPATHS!!!) amongst us.

    That Republican swill is the true opiate of the masses which fostered some, or all of the mindless personal credit spending of the last 10 years, wherein the delusional belief that housing values would continue to grow exponentially, would allow us to continue to raid that equity to buy toys and shit.

    Why else would the Commander-in-Chief suggest, that for the sake of the country, we should all just ‘go shopping’ as a remedy to our angst following 9/11?

    We have to keep shopping in order for the whole house of cards to be perpetuated, but the Butcher’s Bill was inevitable.

    Forsake ‘VooDoo Economics’ forever as you would any Republican lie.

    Do it for the good of the country.

  60. N. O'Brain says:

    “Comment by thor on 9/28 @ 1:16 am #

    When was the last time you had your nose flattened by a Democrat?”

    Ah, thor is familiar with flattened noses.

    Now go wipe your chin.

  61. N. O'Brain says:

    Comment by Semanticleo on 9/28 @ 6:54 am #

    Do you speak English?

  62. ThomasD says:

    Exactly. Because unions, and their mafiosi good squads are card carrying republicans to the core.

  63. N. O'Brain says:

    Marxism is the opiate of the intellectual.

  64. Semanticleo says:

    NO’B…..

    Quack, quack…..

  65. MAJ (P) John says:

    Now everyone – TTP list should have already included s’cleo. Plenty o’ evidence from here and Just One Minute as to why…

  66. Semanticleo says:

    “Just One Minute as to why…+

    And just as many reasons to go allow my assertions to remain unanswered.

    “By their silence, they concur………”

  67. happyfeet says:

    Shopping is how you get things what make your life better. Like area rugs and squiggly bulbs and bath towels and free weights and birthday presents for your mom.

  68. N. O'Brain says:

    Comment by Semanticleo on 9/28 @ 7:07 am #

    Ah, you speak Duck.

    Gat a translator you can use?

  69. N. O'Brain says:

    Got….

    S/B got.

    I was laughing so hard at seman’s mindless reply I committed a typo.

    Maybe seman should change it’s name to semanticDonald.

  70. N. O'Brain says:

    Maybe sematicMerganser.

    Quack quack.

  71. Ric Locke says:

    Not so fast, guys. Semanticleo is simply expressing what is effectively the vector sum of left-center opinion on the matter.

    The fact that she contradicts herself directly without being conscious of it, well, that’s just the way it works. (That is, she observes, quite correctly, that a major problem is consumer confidence. She then excoriates Bush for making a joke intended to bolster consumer confidence — “go shopping”, i.e., if you worry too much you’ll make things worse, so act normally as best you can, which is true.)

    What always amazes me about the POV Semanticleo espouses is that she sees a difference that isn’t apparent to me. That is, banks and finance companies are big organizations full of people bent on self-aggrandizement; a “regulatory agency” is a big organization full of people bent on self-aggrandizement; therefore turning control of the first over to the second is a big improvement for everybody??!!??

    Regards,
    Ric

  72. Semanticleo says:

    “therefore turning control of the first over to the second is a big improvement for everybody??!!??”

    Well then, you won’t object to the Billions in tax dollars saved when we
    loose all the sociopaths in Federal Prison. Because we kain’t has no
    REGULATION since our prison system is an imperfect regulation of criminal types.

    Or would you rather: ‘Let’s get all the criminals off the street to make it safe for the White collar business criminals.’

  73. Darleen says:

    Ric Locke

    To examine the basic core of anti-capitalists is to find people who wish to suspend the law of gravity. They engage in magical thinking and when they step off the roof and splat against the sidewalk, they don’t blame themselves, they blame gravity and the building.

  74. happyfeet says:

    Liberals are so drama queen dramatic. This is why Baracky will fail and flounder. People have had enough drama for now I think. Normal is a lot the state of equilibrium, not Baracky’s frantic socialisms.

  75. Pablo says:

    The stoopid is thick this morning.

  76. N. O'Brain says:

    Comment by Semanticleo on 9/28 @ 8:34 am #

    Quack quack!

  77. maye says:

    Why ban signs in a content neutral manner? Just have some college kapos kick out the people based on the content of their political convictions.

    http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?pid=1423

    Much fairer.

  78. Darleen says:

    Comment by Semanticleo on 9/28 @ 8:34 am #

    Whoa, we’re gonna need some bigger hipwaders.

  79. Darleen says:

    #79

    Hmmmmm….

    The police officers explained the rally was a private event and the organizers could pick and choose who would attend.

    yep, exactly the same thing.

    you’re part of Obama’s brownshirts Troooooth Squad, right?

  80. Darleen says:

    ok, tag-fu off this morning. I’m under caffeinated.

  81. Cave Bear says:

    I don’t have a problem with answering Semanticlit’s bullshit. The simple fact is the reason all this is happening is because the Commeicrats forced banks to issue sub-prime loans to the “disadvantaged”, who in fact could not afford them, especially when the grace period ended, and the mortgage interest rate went up, as it inevitably was going to. So, to quote Malcolm X, “the chickens have come home to roost”, thanks to your D’rat pals.

    And yes, both the e-vil Bushitler/Cheney/Halliburton/Rove/Rethuglican cabal, and McCain tried to stop this, or at least ameliorate it years ago, but people like Barney “Do me, Daddy, do me” Frank, Chris “Countrywide” Dodd and others of the crypto-Marxist opposition blocked them. So here we are…

    Spout your DKos/DU memes all you want, ‘clit. Just don’t expect everyone to have consumed the Kool-Aid like you have.

  82. Rob Crawford says:

    NB: Seman-boy is ignoring the thread immediately previous to this one, despite that thread being on-topic for what Semen-boy wants to discuss.

    Me thinks Semen-boy wants to disrupt discussion of the left’s thuggish tactics more than he wants to actually discuss any real issue.

  83. Semanticleo says:

    “discuss any real issue.”

    I don’t think Jeff meant this thread to be serious, unless mirrors are prohibited…..

  84. N. O'Brain says:

    Comment by Semanticleo on 9/28 @ 9:13 am #

    Quack quack!

  85. N. O'Brain says:

    Comment by Semanticleo on 9/28 @ 9:13 am #

    Do you speak English seman?

    You never answer my question.

  86. slackjawedyokel says:

    To return just briefly to MikeD’s and MAJ(P)John’s comments:
    Nearly forty years ago I swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Not the sitting administration. The Constitution.
    How that document is interpreted and applied, and at what point elected authority ceases to be lawful, and therefore obeyed, is a moral dilemma that I thank God I have never faced. It frightens me to think this is a question that we may, in the not too distant future, have to confront.

  87. happyfeet says:

    Baracky scares a lot of people. At the debate the other night he said he might could back off some of his agenda cause of the economy. But he was lying. Frantic Democrats in total control of government would be an orgy of socialisms I think. Card checks and carbon credits and government healthcare and mandatory volunteerisms and defense cuts and no oil drillings and taxes taxes taxes and obeisances to the United Nations and an America down on one knee.

  88. Sdferr says:

    Mark Steyn and Stanley Kurtz on Obama’s intimidation tactics at the Corner.

  89. steveaz says:

    The one outlet left to Obama-critics is to damn him with fake praise. That way, O’s sense of self will go unruffled and the critic can still score a hit without going to jail.

    Some examples: Barak is soooooo smart, he rivals God in his omniscience. Or, Barak is an expert at politics. Or, I wish I was as good-looking as Barak is. Or, Barak could be King, he’s so regal.

    To the religious hoi-polloi in an anti-numinous, vanity-averse ex-monarchy, these are all obvious put-downs. But, to “the One,” they’ll be construed as fawning compliments.

    “Praise” him loudly enough, and you may even get a cabinet position. But, call him a “Liar,” or worse, and your kid won’t get admitted to Colombia University (Pakistani patronage politics are coming to a town near you).

  90. thor says:

    #

    Comment by Darleen on 9/27 @ 8:07 pm #

    I remember saying something a while back that Obama was channeling the full-blown paranoid Nixon at his ratfucking best.

    I wonder how long The One’s enemies list is at present.

    I wonder if they’ll issue you sunscreen at Gitmo.

  91. Dr. Weevil says:

    Is the title of this post a pun? “Mo. Gov. Blunt Statement” could be read as meaning a blunt statement by the Missouri governor, or a statement by Missouri Governor Blunt.

  92. Dash Rendar says:

    The fantasy comes full circle! Bush wouldn’t oblige the libs by turning Gitmo into a Gulag, libs go into tantrum mode b/c they look like fools, now libs fantasize about sending those critical of the O! to Gitmo. Coming soon to a small town, um, theater near you!

  93. happyfeet says:

    shoot. I am at work and YouTube is blocked, dre. Sometimes it gets through anyway but not now. It’s just cause of bandwidth, not fascisms I don’t think, but it’s still sort of an odd approach to the problem.

  94. SteveG says:

    http://www.holocaust-trc.org/sinti.htm

    I look forward to my green triangle

  95. N. O'Brain says:

    “Comment by thor on 9/28 @ 9:46 am #

    I wonder if they’ll issue you sunscreen at Gitmo.”

    Oh, thor, you silly goose, you KNOW that it’s always reactionart y leftist fascists who maintain death camps.

    The Nazi concentration camps, the Soviet Gulag, the whatever it is the Chinese commies call thier’s, hell all of Cambodia under Pol Pot.

    Are you saying Obama fits the profile?

  96. happyfeet says:

    Baracky will do what he’s told I think.

  97. Jack Klompus says:

    Always listen to the wise words of Semanticleo, the one who once claimed, “This ain’t algebra where a negative plus a negative is a positive.”

  98. Dash Rendar says:

    “negative plus a negative is a positive”

    Fake but accurate, or something.

  99. Semanticleo says:

    So I guess the group stipulates (who, by their silence, obviate) that REGULATION is a necessary evil, that any argument to the contrary is
    rendered irrelevant.

    On to the next point………

    If we are to Nationalize private industry, and with NO promise of profit
    from the venture, the bean-counter in me wishes to balance the ledger.

    Since we are going to NATIONALIZE the Fiancial Sector, which is of dubious value, why not NATIONALIZE profitable enterprises to provide a hedge against those self-same potential losses.

    How ’bout the PETROLEUM INDUSTRY…….

    the PHARMACEUTICALS………..

    THE MEDICAL INDUSTRY AS A WHOLE……………

    THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY…………..

    THE LIQUOR INDUSTRY………………………

    That’ll do for a start……………………..

  100. happyfeet says:

    Life is not a Lego playset you big socialist dork.

  101. SDN says:

    meya #19: I agree. Whenever I hear someone saying that the First Amendment will stop any prosecutor, I have to laugh.

    Montgomery, AL, 1982-83: DA Jimmy Evans, fresh from his victorious lawsuit against the satellite TV company that broadcast the Playboy channel because those broadcasts could be received in AL, sent a letter around to all the bookstores in Montgomery, including the B. Dalton’s I was working in at the time, demanding they remove all the Playboy and Penthouse magazines from the shelves and sell it from behind the counter. If they didn’t, he would have the manager and assistant manager arrested for “facilitating access of obscene materials by minors” since any teenager could pick one up and read it in the store.

    He concluded: “I know that when this case is appealed to the Supreme Court, I’ll lose. However, the manager and assistant manager will be denied bail and will sit in jail until I do. Is it worth it?”

    B. Dalton immediately told the manager to remove the magazines, and since company policy prohibited the sale of items that couldn’t be on the shelves, they stopped selling them in Montgomery for several years.

    It isn’t enough to win the appeal unless the prosecutor can be jailed for abusing his authority. And they should be.

  102. Semanticleo says:

    “Life is not a Lego playset you big socialist dork.”

    Gee, you’re not nice………………

  103. happyfeet says:

    I share my toys already I don’t need nobody to share them for me. That’s not sharing that’s stealing.

  104. Semanticleo says:

    “That’ll do for a start……………………..”

    Did I mention we won’t have to raise their taxes, and they won’t have to worry about Capital Gains……………………..

  105. Rob Crawford says:

    Again, Semen-boy has argued in favor of slavery. His boner for stealing the work of others under the euphemism “nationalization” should be no surprise.

  106. Darleen says:

    Would someone like to explain to Cleo that belief in sound traffic management doesn’t mean banning private ownership of cars?

  107. Victor. says:

    cleo,

    I understand that you are convinced that this financial crisis was a result of deregulation, I have a question for you.

    What regulation, or lack of regulation, can you specifically cite that would have prevented the Triple A credit rating of these sub-prime bundles?

    thanks.

  108. Semanticleo says:

    “I understand that you are convinced that this financial crisis was a result of deregulation”

    You fail to understand the BIG picture of which the Financial debacle is merely a symptom. If you want to know the root causes of the meltdown, read
    the following words and remember…………………………….

    “Government isn’t the solution to the problem, it IS the problem.”

    RWR

  109. B Moe says:

    Is someone else posting as cleo? She usually doesn’t stick around this long and the style has changed noticeably. This shit is really getting tiresome.

  110. Dash Rendar says:

    Heh. “Government isn’t the solution to the problem, it IS the problem,” so we should have more gov. regulation. Um, sure.

    “the BIG picture of which the Financial debacle is merely a symptom,” of a government that mandates x% of mortgages be sub-prime, cf. FM/FM, and the wall street firms that but derivatives of said mortgages.

    Try again.

  111. Semanticleo says:

    I have not changed, maybe it’s you…..

  112. Dash Rendar says:

    You still haven’t answered Vic’s question Semantic. O please, enlighten us to the BIG PICTURE!!11!.

  113. Victor. says:

    Oh sorry, I thought you actually believed your own bullshit when you were saying this:

    The problem is; we’ve had 28 years of happy economic horseshit from the
    RWR Devotees, endlessly pontificating that the best climate for all is one in which piss is perceived as rainfall, and that a ‘golden shower’ truly enriches all.

    Regulation by government is bad for business, because it hampers the creative efforts of the truly gifted (SOCIOPATHS!!!) amongst us.

    That Republican swill is the true opiate of the masses which fostered some, or all of the mindless personal credit spending of the last 10 years, wherein the delusional belief that housing values would continue to grow exponentially, would allow us to continue to raid that equity to buy toys and shit.

    Why else would the Commander-in-Chief suggest, that for the sake of the country, we should all just ‘go shopping’ as a remedy to our angst following 9/11?

    We have to keep shopping in order for the whole house of cards to be perpetuated, but the Butcher’s Bill was inevitable.

    Forsake ‘VooDoo Economics’ forever as you would any Republican lie.

    I understand that you have basically changed your argument, I just was wondering if you had any way to site where “VooDoo Economics” forced credit rating agencies to tell the world that sub-prime bundles were AAA investments?

  114. Semanticleo says:

    “I understand that you have basically changed your argument”

    You sure lay claim to a lot of ‘understanding’ that isn’t supported by your own admission; and that I didn’t answer the way you wished.

    Get the big picture?

  115. N. O'Brain says:

    Comment by Semanticleo on 9/28 @ 11:00 am #

    Quack quack!

  116. Dash Rendar says:

    Arguments consist of stipulations based on facts.

    The original question stands:
    “What regulation, or lack of regulation, can you specifically cite that would have prevented the Triple A credit rating of these sub-prime bundles?”

    We’re waiting.

  117. Rusty says:

    #115

    Ah. I believe I see your problem right there.

  118. B Moe says:

    Sorry cleo, I thought thor was being cute again. I don’t know which of you should be more embarassed.

  119. Semanticleo says:

    Sorry cleo, I thought thor was being cute again.

    An unintended compliment…..like consequences, seems beneath your radar.

  120. Darleen says:

    cleo uses the word “consequences”

    heh

  121. Rob Crawford says:

    WTF is it with people who refuse to make a clear statement? And who act as if failure to understand their obfuscations is the readers’ fault?

    If you want to take a position, state it. If you’re incapable of stating it in a manner that is understandable, then you need to go away, think it over, and come back when you understand your own position enough to make it understandable.

    Writing down your internal dialog takes no intelligence or effort. Stating your beliefs in a manner that’s understandable takes effort — and if you don’t take that effort, it can only mean you don’t give a rat’s ass about communicating your beliefs.

  122. Dash Rendar says:

    A sense of irony is poor with this one.

    Still waiting Semanticleo.

  123. MikeD says:

    Thanks, slackjawedyokel, for your clarifying statement at #89. I should have recognized that it is, in fact, the Constitution that is intended to be defended, not any particular sitting administration. Given our apparent national “direction” I think the moral question and dilemma you identify really is a frightening issue that all of us, not just the military, may have to confront far too soon. Thanks for clarifying the issue far better than I did, and in far fewer words.

  124. N. O'Brain says:

    Good luck with with getting and answer from duck-boy, Dash.

    He absolutely refuses to answer the question I’ve been posing to him for months now.

    But, what the hell, just for shits and giggles, I’ll try again:

    seman, do you speak English?

  125. Dash Rendar says:

    Meh, I expected as much. I think he has enough self-awareness to realize his argument will be eviscerated as quick as ethanol evaporating off a dry counter top.

  126. Education Guy says:

    Leo is easier to understand if you get that he pictures himself as Jesus giving knowledge through parables. Only in his case, there is far more smearing of feces on walls.

  127. Semanticleo says:

    You first; Try the ‘nationalization’ of profitable corps.

    Is it doable? (not like Palin is ‘doable’)

  128. Semanticleo says:

    “Leo is easier to understand if…”

    Well I’ve tired simple, declarative sentences, but still no takers…..

  129. Rob Crawford says:

    Semen can’t answer questions. It’s too stupid.

  130. N. O'Brain says:

    “Comment by Dash Rendar on 9/28 @ 11:27 am #

    Meh, I expected as much. I think he has enough self-awareness…”

    Don’t be too sure.

  131. Big Bang Hunter (pumping you up) says:

    – The mail is running 98% against the bailout plan, so the Dems are in a panic, watching their nannystate boat sink slowly in the West.

    – The Reps aren’t going to budge until the Dems strip out all the feather bedding for their activist friends. ACORN and community organizing, CAC, ext, are all toast.

  132. Dash Rendar says:

    “You first; Try the ‘nationalization’ of profitable corps.

    Is it doable?”

    It doesn’t speak English.

  133. Big Bang Hunter (pumping you up) says:

    – thor-boy, semi-dufus, your Chia pets are going to due.

  134. Rob Crawford says:

    Well I’ve tired simple, declarative sentences, but still no takers…..

    No, you haven’t. You’ve made statements but not bothered to connect them back to any argument.

    I mean, after all, Herodotus was a well-traveled man.

  135. Big Bang Hunter (pumping you up) says:

    – No funding for the Socialist fucks – A good day for America.

  136. Semanticleo says:

    “I mean, after all, Herodotus was a well-traveled man.”

    Holy Moly….first it’s Jesus then it’s Herodotus….

    what must you think of me?

  137. guinsPen says:

    I don’t think of you at all.

  138. Rob Crawford says:

    what must you think of me?

    Tim Curry doesn’t get the credit he deserves.

  139. Victor. says:

    I guess the up-shot is that Cleo isn’t even pretending to defend his argument anymore.

  140. ushie says:

    Semanticleo types: Well I’ve tired simple, declarative sentences

    No, you haven’t tired them at all. You’ve never exercised a simple sentence in simple declarative words in your entire life.

  141. lee says:

    the up-shot is that Cleo isn’t even pretending to defend his argument anymore.

    Anymore?!

    When did it ever?

  142. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Who is this “Semanticleo” you’re talking about? I see no “Semanticleo” here.

    Heh.

  143. Rob Crawford says:

    You MUST share your new toy, SBP. I tried to write one the other day, but don’t know enough about Greasemonkey to get it to work.

  144. Jack Klompus says:

    Hey Cleo, how about another math lesson like you gave over at Just One Minute?

  145. B Moe says:

    148 Link please?

  146. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    You MUST share your new toy, SBP.

    On the Pub now, Rob.

  147. Jim in Kansas City, MO says:

    On Their Own Time – NOT Illegal

    Blunt said he has “exposed plans.” He does not site any incident of actual treats to anyone.

    Frank Donatelli, deputy chairman of the Republican National Committee:

    http://tinyurl.com/4anoxc

    In a telephone interview with the News-Leader, Donatelli admitted the Democratic prosecutors “haven’t specifically said” they would use their prosecutorial powers on Obama’s behalf.”

    I watched the video. There was no statement from the interviewed individuals to indicate they planned to doing anything in their official capacity of enforcing laws.

    Matt Blunt is a sleaze that is leaving office because Missourians would never reelect him. He is looking for a job in the McCain administration.

    Sen. Claire McCaskill is too smart to do anything that stupid. She was Missouri’s State Auditor and a prosecuting attorney.

  148. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Very good, Jim.

    Now go tell Axelrod that you deserve a bonus for making good use of bold face in your copy-paste troll.

  149. Rob Crawford says:

    I watched the video. There was no statement from the interviewed individuals to indicate they planned to doing anything in their official capacity of enforcing laws.

    So it’s OK, then? I mean, it’s OK if law-enforcement officials make legal threats when they’re off the clock, because then you can assume they won’t carry them out when they’re on the clock?

    Does anyone else remember the shrieks and horror when an administration spokesman said people need to be careful what they say? It was a “chill wind” sweeping away the 1st Amendment, remember?

    Oh, but that was on the job, not in his personal capacity, right? Yet the lack of any threat wasn’t enough to keep it from being spun as a threat. But in this case, an explicit threat is spun as nothing, because, hey, they didn’t say they’d do anything in their professional capacities.

  150. […] here. Posted by Darleen Click @ 9:02 pm | Trackback Share […]

  151. Darleen says:

    Hey Jim

    I worked in a DA office for over 10 years… the kind of thing those prosecutors did on tape would have them suspended from their jobs in a New York minute and have the state bar start an investigation.

  152. TmjUtah says:

    If TmjUtah, unemployed surveyor, sits down in his trademark hugeous suspendered blue jeans and sweatstained ball hat and makes an internet video saying he’s going to bring suit against people that lie about his candidate, people wonder how a guy with a butt that big found a lens big enough to make the video. They may or may not bother to rate or leave a comment.

    If TmjUtah, state’s attorney for the State of Missouri, and a sworn officer of the court, sits down with local and national news networks and on video says that he is going to prosecute people who lie or make false claims about a particular political figure, well that’s fascism with no warning label needed.

    One gets laughed at, and justifiably so. The other? Are you sure you want that hassle? He’s the STATE.

    He’d be unemployed were there standards of professional conduct in the State of Missouri. His, and his lady friend’s, continued celebrity status indicate that their aren’t.

    Or is Missouri one of those states that keep polls open late if Democrats are behind? Ah… never mind.

  153. […] MISSOURI GOVERNOR Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement …. […]

  154. Rob Crawford says:

    people wonder how a guy with a butt that big found a lens big enough to make the video.

    Speaking from personal experience — fish-eye lens.

  155. TmjUtah says:

    Got me there, Rob. Found one that worked on ebay.

    Tripod weighs thirty five pounds, though.

  156. Jim in Kansas City, MO says:

    The reporter plans to hold a news conference to correct the story

    Reporter: Obama ‘truth squad’ story got twisted

    http://tinyurl.com/47pge7

    Frank Donatelli, deputy chairman of the Republican National Committee:

    “In a telephone interview with the News-Leader, Donatelli admitted the Democratic prosecutors “haven’t specifically said” they would use their prosecutorial powers on Obama’s behalf.””

    http://tinyurl.com/4anoxc

  157. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    Darleen: “Jim” is a copy-paste troll.

    He won’t read or respond to anything you say.

  158. thor says:

    Hyperventilating r-winger trolls are again grasping for their asthma inhalers.

    Can’t breath! Obama in the lead! Ack! Pppft!

  159. Jim in Killa City says:

    #Comment by Jim in Kansas City, MO on 9/28 @ 2:36 pm #

    On Their Own Time – NOT Illegal

    Blunt said he has “exposed plans.” He does not site any incident of actual treats to anyone.

    Frank Donatelli, deputy chairman of the Republican National Committee:

    http://tinyurl.com/4anoxc

    In a telephone interview with the News-Leader, Donatelli admitted the Democratic prosecutors “haven’t specifically said” they would use their prosecutorial powers on Obama’s behalf.”

    I watched the video. There was no statement from the interviewed individuals to indicate they planned to doing anything in their official capacity of enforcing laws.

    Matt Blunt is a sleaze that is leaving office because Missourians would never reelect him. He is looking for a job in the McCain administration.

    Sen. Claire McCaskill is too smart to do anything that stupid. She was Missouri’s State Auditor and a prosecuting attorney.

    I just want to point out that this is not the original “Jim in KC.”

  160. Jim in KC says:

    I’m not sure who that schlub was, but it’s a bit hard to imagine why county prosecutors feel the need to inject themselves into the national race. Maybe it’s just a resurgence of machine politics.

Comments are closed.