Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Dems 2008: The usual exit poll warning as PSA [Karl]

Today’s warning comes from CQ blogger Taegan Goddard, who reminds us not pay much attention to the exit polls for a number of reasons and recommends Charles Franklin’s final analysis of the primary polling instead.

And while I prefer looking at state polls when possible, my usual spiel about not taking polls too literally gets more support from Pollster.com’s Mark Blumenthal in a post on the current divergence in national polls.  Blumenthal links to further explanations from ABC News Poobah of Polling Gary Langer, whose analysis is good, but would be better if acknowledged that the New York Times/CBS poll has a skewed sample, as it so often does.

(h/t HotAir headlines.)

12 Replies to “Dems 2008: The usual exit poll warning as PSA [Karl]”

  1. Mikey NTH says:

    Exit polls only tell you what those who want to be polled say; in those places where the pollsters are. On election day only one poll counts – sort of. :)

  2. happyfeet says:

    Exit polls give valuable demographic information that’s worthless except for confirming the narrative you’ve established. If it says something different then it’s just a stupid exit poll and you should be very very cautious. I learned this from listening to how teh NPR analyzes them.

  3. John Ryan says:

    After the debacle that was the 2006 Federal election the Republicans have a certain distaste for exit polls. Winners like them losers do not

  4. Karl says:

    Like the Dems in 2000 and 2004.

  5. Mikey NTH says:

    The whole premise of an exit poll is its flaw. If the person exiting doesn’t wish to talk, they can’t be polled. It is as self-selecting as an internet poll. It measures the who extroverted and passionate the polled person is, but it doesn’t give any information on all of the voters in that polling center. If ten percent, or even thirty percent of the voters are polled what good is that? How do you know they aren’t lying? What do the non-polled think?

    It is a straw poll with no controls on it. It is worthless except to give television analysts something to blab about as they wait for the real counts to come in. Think ‘Pron Praul’ and internet polling for an idea how useful this actually is.

  6. LiveFromFortLivingRoom says:

    After the debacle that was the 2004 Presidential election Democrats have a certain wild eyed conspiracy theory about exit polls. Winners like them losers do not.

  7. Mikey NTH says:

    Isn’t that reversed, Fort Living Room? I thought the losers were the ones crying that the exit polls went one way and the actual count the other, so the actual count was to be disregarded for the polls. BECAUSE OF THE DIEBOLD!!!!!111one hundred and eleven!!!!

  8. Mikey NTH says:

    Not eleventy, ’cause I’m no hobbit-fancier. Now an elf-maiden….

  9. LiveFromFortLivingRoom says:

    Whatever I am 9 beers deep and probably one of the worst commentors on here. Love the website though.

  10. PCachu says:

    Just as well, Mikey. Sam would kill you if you tried anything.

  11. thor says:

    O!

  12. The Lost Dog says:

    Exit polls, scmexit polls.

    I watched Obama speak tonight nand I have only one thing to say.

    “Be afraid. VERY afraid!”

    I have never heard an emptier speech than his. I am beginning to understand what I have never been able to – how the fuck did the Nazis come to power in a nation with elections?

    This guy is scary, and I think that our academics have finally put their neo-Marxism over the %50 benchmark.

    “Hope” and “change” with no mention of how to pull it off except to fuck “the rich”

    (Shiver)

Comments are closed.