Sometimes you need to (retroactively) scramble a few eggs to make the perfect matriarchal omelet.
****
related: When suprisingly apt metaphors attack!
|
Return to Protein Wisdom homepage
« a CITIZEN JOURNALIST reports from battleground USA, 16 | Home | Muslim Brotherhood Apologist Channels Sullivan, Greenwald [Karl] »
August 9, 2007
Post-partum aggression
Sometimes you need to (retroactively) scramble a few eggs to make the perfect matriarchal omelet. **** 52 Comments ::: Post a comment »RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI: http://proteinwisdom.com/wp-trackback.php?p=9579 Leave a commentIf you want to leave a feedback to this post or to some other user´s comment, simply fill out the form below. |
||
Comment by RiverC on 8/9 @ 1:08 pm #
Bed-maker, meet bed. Have a nice set-down.
Comment by Joseph on 8/9 @ 1:15 pm #
Witness sickness and evil at work.
Comment by BJTexs on 8/9 @ 1:17 pm #
I’d comment on that post but reading caused all of by brain tissue to melt into a greyish/green puddle at my feet. Staining my shoes.
By the love of something these people need to get serious, psychological help and stop blaming their psychosexual issues on all of the maleness.
And, yes, those statements were a form of child abuse. What kind of mother wishes she had dumped her son’s egg down a Planned Parenthood drain because he’s not marching lockstep with a political philosophy?
Get. Serious. Help. Please.
Comment by psychologizer on 8/9 @ 2:04 pm #
The libel threat theme in the comments is cute. Patriarchically speaking.
“I’m tellin’ my Daddy on you!”
Blankie. Get one.
Comment by RiverC on 8/9 @ 2:07 pm #
It has almost reached the tenor of those who in the past might have done one of the following (just to compare.)
1. Wished they had committed infanticide on their daughters because they weren’t male.
2. Wished they had aborted their child because they turned out gay.
3. Wished they had not had their child because they married a person of another race.
The only conceivable difference between those three positions in the sense of the mindset is…?
No, the only difference is that the wisher is a feminist, and the recipient of the abuse a male (white, preferably.)
Comment by SarahW on 8/9 @ 2:12 pm #
The eggs may be btoken, but where’s the omelette?
Comment by BrendaK on 8/9 @ 2:32 pm #
Dear lord – after being raised by that hyena, if he doesn’t despise women it’s a freakin’ miracle.
Comment by Techie on 8/9 @ 2:54 pm #
I learned something today. I learned that womyn is plural. Who knew?
TW: first piping
(not even going to touch that one)
Comment by Rob B. on 8/9 @ 3:42 pm #
RiverC, there are a few other differences.
In the case of your first example, the difference between the perfered and actual state is biological and cultural.
In the case of your second example, the difference between the perfered and actual state is possibly biological, or behavioral (depending where you fall on recent studies), but an expression of sexuality that is outside of the accepted societal norm. And by norm, I am refering to the fact it is statistically less practiced and stigmatized at a much larger percentage.
In the case of your third example, the difference between the perfered and actual state is predominately culturally and ethnically biased. In that, sociological studies have shown that interracil marriage recieves different levels of resistence in relation to the time, race of participant and race of reacting cultures.
That might seem like a minor set of distinctions but the example of the feminist and her son is based on the difference between the perfered and actual state as defined by political ideological conformity.
While politics may, and probably do, play a part in definie the cultural aspects to the example you gave, this instance is different in that politics ARE the culture in whole.
That being the case, I think a different reaction to the example that you gave and this instance would stand out regardless of the participants. Now, if you can a person wishing death on thier offspring due to their political persuasuion, that would probably be more apt a comparison.
Of course, you can disregard all of this if you were just trying to score points on the way to the moral highground. But if the comparison was meant to be serious, we’d probalby be better off looking for a long time political official expressing similar thoughts for their kids as a source of comparison.
Comment by kelly on 8/9 @ 4:19 pm #
Why doesn’t this womyn just exercise her constitutional “right to choose” and simply seek an abortion in the…45th trimester?
Comment by Pablo on 8/9 @ 4:22 pm #
That is just beyond repugnant. Can we question their hatefulness yet?
tw: necessary alienated
Comment by SGT Ted on 8/9 @ 4:40 pm #
Oh Heavens! Teenage boys who enjoy Looking at Porn! What next? Will she make another breathless post about how shocking it is that the Sky is Blue?
I take it there’s no dad in the house to explain these things to this clueless woman. He either killed himself years ago to escape her or doesn’t even know she kept the child. Nor did she have any brothers growing up.
If there was ever a need for CPS, this is an ironclad case. This woman is a deranged sexist.
Comment by buzz on 8/9 @ 4:41 pm #
That was simply amazing. I had no idea looking at porn, and masturbating were foreplay, if you will, to rape. Huh. I never raped anyone, that doesn’t make me gay does it?
Comment by happyfeet on 8/9 @ 4:49 pm #
As long as you don’t get paid for it, no. Or is it the other way around?
Comment by Diana on 8/9 @ 4:56 pm #
There really are some women who should be spayed at birth.
Comment by buzz on 8/9 @ 4:58 pm #
I have the feeling gay porn would be ok with this womon? Womyn? Whats the correct way again? Well, man dominating man gay porn anyway. Actually, probably chick on chick also. Whoops. Bet I wasn’t supposed to use that word.
Comment by JD on 8/9 @ 5:23 pm #
Rob B – you can quibble around the edges all you want. At the end of the day, what that womyn said was vile and reprehensible.
Comment by Tman on 8/9 @ 5:34 pm #
with every orgasm he will further solidify his own hatred of and superiority over, women.
…..or you know, just simply give him an eventual case of carpal tunnel syndrome.
My question is, if he’s a righty, and he uses his left, does this like reverse the curse or something? Or does that make it even worse?
Either way, I feel sorry for the little fella. It’s bad enough to have Mom catch you dating rosie palm and the five sisters, but when Mom thinks you’re a rapist for looking at porn, well, that’s gonna cost a lot in therapy eventually.
Comment by Pellegri on 8/9 @ 6:27 pm #
I’m tickled by the fly-in who chastises Riehl for helping “ruin” this woman’s–womon’s–life in concert with the deranged internet sociopath that hacked her private board, oh woes.
At a certain point, the b-word deserves to have her life ruined–what she hasn’t already ruined of it herself. Once that’s all over, she might actually become a competent parent, buuut I’m not holding my breath on that.
This moment of vitriol brought to you by the TWs: eccentric opinion
Comment by JD on 8/9 @ 6:35 pm #
And Pellegri just stood there with her arms crossed beneath her ample bosom, tapping her foot, and shaking her head. ;-)
Comment by MLD on 8/9 @ 6:43 pm #
I remember reading somewhere how a conservative columnist deduced that the women’s liberation movement promoted sexual freedom which has also lead to the mainstreaming of porn.
No wonder this mother is so messed up, she created her little monster/future rapist both figuratively and literally.
Comment by JD on 8/9 @ 6:53 pm #
Tman – Ambidextrous is the only way to go.
How does this woman function on a day-to-day basis? Does she scream rapist at every man she sees ?
Comment by JD on 8/9 @ 6:58 pm #
The truly sad part of this, is were this poor young child to grow up and become a rapist, it is likely due to the fact that she has taught him that all sex is rape, and has removed that bright flashing line between sex and rape.
We require licenses to operate a motor vehicle, yet any idiot can go have a child and fuck it up.
Comment by N. O'Brain on 8/9 @ 7:23 pm #
Teh Son:
Can I do it until I mildly dislike women?”
Comment by N. O'Brain on 8/9 @ 7:24 pm #
Oh, and was the mother raped?
Comment by Rob B on 8/9 @ 7:25 pm #
JD, I totally agree it was vile. I’m not defending her in the least. I was just pointing out that this is different that the examples that River had listed because it has to do with this lady wishing retroactive evil on her own kid due to political ideology.
Comment by Ouroboros on 8/9 @ 7:29 pm #
I admit it.. I’m a rapist. I’ve been raping womyn for 33 years (with their permission)over 14 states and 6 countries… and the cops havent caught me yet. but they could.. They may be closing in even as we speak. So I need all of your help to build myself up a legal defense fund. Just drop me an e-mail and I’ll let you know where to send your checks (made out to cash).. And if you choose not to give, well, the womyn will have won.. Just ask yourself who’ll be left to help when they come for you.
Comment by RiverC on 8/9 @ 7:43 pm #
Dunno, wishing your child was never born – with such explicit language, sounds as bad as any so-called bigotry. I claim no moral highground, for whatever its worth. This is to me about how those who tout social justice so often do not from any pursuit of justice, but from a distorted view of reality. If wanting to grandfather in an abortion isn’t distorted, then I’m not sure what is. What’s especially twisted is that he’s growing up with probably about the best chances for success in life of anyone in any previous time… and she would have thrown it away.
tw: Parents sig…
Comment by JD on 8/9 @ 7:46 pm #
Rob – Sorry if I misinterpreted. Maybe the comparisons were not as precise as one might hope for, but they were clearly illustrative. Frankly, this one requires no comparisons. It is quite vile all by its lonesome.
Comment by Q30 on 8/9 @ 8:05 pm #
Maybe a call to the Columbus child-abuse hotline would be in order?
We all know that feminists are the first to suggest taking children away from abusive mom- er, DADS, I mean.
Comment by ladonne on 8/9 @ 8:05 pm #
That is just beyond repugnant. Can we question their hatefulness yet?
d00d you are so past that.
TW: teh sucks
Comment by JD on 8/9 @ 8:12 pm #
ladonne – Do you share the same type of obsession that Charles Wilson does?
Comment by SGT Ted on 8/9 @ 8:42 pm #
TW:coote residue
Ok thats just WRONG!
Comment by Jeff G. on 8/9 @ 8:49 pm #
Oh, Jesus. It’s the ESL internationalist, last seen here offering a spirited defense of Scott Beauchamp.
Comment by JD on 8/9 @ 8:52 pm #
Jeff G – Is that michelines / dorita / doritos / etc … If so, we can expect a good bout of teh krazy anytime now.
Comment by happyfeet on 8/9 @ 8:57 pm #
I would comment but I’m afraid she’ll swallow.
Comment by Diana on 8/9 @ 8:58 pm #
I have an old upholstery needle and some dental floss that will fix that right up.
Comment by B Moe on 8/9 @ 9:11 pm #
I just hope the poor little son of a bitch is too busy looking at porn to see that blog post.
And yes, I meant that literally.
TW: Melville layers The Great White Beaver?
Comment by JD on 8/9 @ 9:13 pm #
Diana – I just threw up a little in the back of my mouth.
Comment by Diana on 8/9 @ 9:20 pm #
I can hem anything.
Comment by Josh Scholar on 8/9 @ 9:47 pm #
Reading a radical feminist screwed me up as a teenager. No, I don’t want to talk about it, but it would have helped if I had realized that she was a fucking lesbian who had no use for the male sexuality that she obviously wanted to see destroyed.
Comment by Jeffersonian on 8/9 @ 10:26 pm #
Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill!
Bitches is crazy.
Comment by dog8myhmwk on 8/9 @ 11:02 pm #
I read on another blog where this was discussed that this woman claims to have been raped when she was young. That may explain – though it certainly does not excuse – her horrendous comments.
I know the “rape sensitivity” training at my son’s university pretty much took the position that all the boys were rapists at heart. When he and some others protested that attitude, they were ignored. To keep girls safe we have to indict all boys? Ridiculous!
Comment by lonetown on 8/10 @ 3:39 am #
Any beaver in its metaphorical territorial waters will attack and whether its a leathery tail or a Coach handbag you will feel its wrath.
Comment by Dan Collins on 8/10 @ 5:36 am #
Would you hem my car for me please, Diana?
Comment by DarthRove on 8/10 @ 7:22 am #
It continues to astound me that feminazis measure their level of “empowerment” in direct proportion to their level of “victimhood”.
TW: natu responsible. No, they’re na.
Comment by jeremy on 8/10 @ 7:32 am #
Is that michilines chick’s blog reallly dedicated to Rightwingsparkle? Of all the people on the Tubes to go after, she is really going to hitch her wagon to RWS, one of the most inoffensive people ever to grace to Web?
That is some grade A crazy right there.
Comment by McGehee on 8/10 @ 7:50 am #
Jeremy, I think she wants to be the next Dr. Cowbell.
Comment by Pablo on 8/10 @ 8:02 am #
Seems she’s got two. One insane and one inane.
Comment by BJTexs on 8/10 @ 8:10 am #
Apparently inane and incoherent are not good for traffic. She has virtually no comments, about the same as the A-Bot. she’ll be back weeping for her Iranian students very soon.
tw: beliefs which define teh inane
Comment by Big Bang Hunter on 8/10 @ 9:32 am #
- Apparently this is a case of “role reversal”, wherein as she noted her son’s masterbation habits, she was the one that went insane. Also check her palms for hair. There ought to be hair.
- Either that, or she’s one of “those” wymon who really let herself go to hell after his birth, and knows at this point she couldn’t get laid at a pervert convention with hundred dollar bils pasted all over her body.
TW: fsrther Pstrick ….snf s little to the fsr-Left…..
Comment by Big Bang Hunter on 8/10 @ 9:35 am #
- “and a little”….. Ok…. so I am going blind…..whats it to yah….