“The NRA’s RINO Endorsements”
We’ve discussed this here before: the NRA looks for candidates who maintain senior status, which means that the organization is heavily pro-incumbent, provided the candidates they endorse have a stable record on protecting gun ownership.
Which raises the question, why is the NRA supporting those whose records on gun rights are not terribly impressive, when many of the groups members are strong constitutional advocates, and as such, are far more likely to be TEA Party supporters than not.?
And what should we constitutionalists do about it?