Comments (8)

1. 

   rjacobse says October 22, 2012 at 12:48 pm

   It wasn’t sexual harassment sexual harassment. (You know, like Polanski didn’t commit rape rape.)

   It’s all so simple when you’re a lib. As long as you you’re liberal, you can claim that, whatever it is, it isn’t actually what it is, why, you’re fine.
2. 

   McGehee says October 22, 2012 at 12:58 pm

   Rjacobse, do you remember the (I think ABC) TV series “Dinosaurs”? One episode from not too long after the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill BS featured a congressional hearing about a double entendre by the dinosaur dad’s friend “Sexual” Harris.

   They wanted to know “what Sexual Harris meant.”
3. 

   geoffb says October 22, 2012 at 12:59 pm

   From the link at your link.

   On page 16 of the deposition (page 5 of the pdf) Sugar Creek’s attorney verifies that she is employed at Sugar Creek:

   Q: What was your job at Sugar Creek? A: I handled marketing, and then I also showed apartments and took care of move-ins and move-outs, and pictures of the apartments.

   During the deposition with the lawyer for Sugar Creek, the plaintiff was asked about her past as a model in a way that suggests her alleged trauma of her experience should receive less legal consideration. Excerpts from the deposition: Page 6:

   I walked into the office and – on Thursdays—to start off with, every Thursday, I would walk in to empty bottles; liquor bottles, beer bottles, empty bottles of vodka, whiskey, rum, alcohol. And it just smelled awful. Somebody had to clean all that up. And, frequently, there would be broken plants, broken furniture, broken dishes, other things that I’d have to clean up; and the maintenance people would help do that sometimes, but sometimes I’d have to do all of it myself. And it was the entire main office that had to be cleaned up before we opened the front doors. So that, I expected.

   Pages 11-12

   Q: Okay. What happened next? A: I put them over my jeans, just thinking they would just stop and, you know: There, that makes them happy. They’re on. Can we move on from the situation now? And then I took them off and I went to the bathroom. They followed me into the bathroom with the shorts, with the underwear, and wanted me to wear them because they wanted to have their fashion show. So Teri started to unbutton my pants and pull them down. At that point, I realized she was so impaired that my pants were coming off. They were—if I didn’t take them off, she was taking them off. Q: Let me ask you a question, ma’am: Why didn’t you just leave? A: Kim was behind me. Teri was in front of me, and Teri had her hands on my pants, unbuttoning them. Q: Were they physically restraining you? A: I would say that’s restrained. Yes.

   Sounds like they they had passed sexual harassment gone into sexual assault and were coming close to rape-rape.

   There is also this on the Senator from Misery and hubby.
   

   According to the Missouri Secretary of State website, Claire McCaskill’s husband, Joseph Shepard, is a partner in at least six companies that are not listed on McCaskill’s most recent financial disclosure form
4. 

   Squid says October 22, 2012 at 1:43 pm

   He’s a silent partner, and it’s hard to be a silent partner if your wife goes blabbing about everything in her disclosures.
5. 

   LBascom says October 22, 2012 at 2:58 pm

   If your name is Herman Cain
   You can feel McCaskill’s pain…
6. 

   happyfeet says October 22, 2012 at 5:42 pm

   Missouri has exceptionally trashy candidates for senate this year to pick from to where you hardly ever even hear George Allen’s name
7. 

   newrouter says October 22, 2012 at 5:54 pm

   in the vicinty of legitimate rape
8. 

   rjacobse says October 22, 2012 at 9:06 pm

   McGeehee, I remember the show (and I introduced my kids to it via Netflix), but I don’t recall that specific episode.