LeftEmos and human nature … [Darleen Click]
Newsbusters occassionally highlights the drivel from Kosskiddies, diving into the fever swamps born of “Screw ‘em” Markos’ low character so we don’t have to.
Here is an example of how the Left treats people and ideas that are blasphemous to Leftwinger dogma — The Values Voters Summit — as “sexist and white supremacist.”
No surprise, but what gave me a giggle is the spittle-flecked invective spewed by Hunter towards a pamphlet called “Modesty Matters” that was merely on display at the Summit. Hunter goes off the rails, not from actually reading it, but based on ‘excerpts’ offered by another LeftEmo site, Think Progress. Basically, the Left has dialed to eleven to equate someone offering opinion on Christian modesty to Islamist governments enforcing Sharia. Hunter:
For a group so concerned about sharia coming to America, telling the womenfolk how to dress in order to make things easier on the menfolk does indeed kinda sound like sharia coming to America.
The stupid, it burns!
However, this is the bit from Hunter that really demonstrates the cognitive dissonance that marks the whole of the Left and its wholly owned subsidiaries such as Feminism.
Just your garden-variety movement to point out that you slutty sluts in your revealing slutty church clothes are riling up the godfearing but lustful menfolk, so stop it already. So what’s in the (multiple) brochures?
– From the “Modesty: It’s nothing to be ashamed of” pamphlet: “Since men are particularly visual, immodesty in church can trigger lustful thoughts.”
Ah. The old “if I’m having impure thoughts, it’s must be because you women are sluts” argument. The favorite argument of anti-women religious movements everywhere, including in such lovely places as Afghanistan, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Women owe it to men to dress in accordance to men’s needs, and if they don’t, women deserve the blame for it. So cover up!
“My men’s bible study group talks frequently about controlling our lust, thoughts, and eyes. Yes the problem and responsibility are ours, but is it really reasonable for the women of the church to make it THIS difficult for us?”
No insult intended (sic), but it sounds like your men’s bible study group consists of a bunch of perverts. Really?
As I’ve said before, the whole history of civilization are stories of human beings overcoming their nature. And such amelioration of the baser aspects of that nature come only after acknowledging they actually exist.
So what is it that Hunter is attempting to say here? That men do not react visually to scantily-clad women? Maybe he could then explain the significant portion of our economy based on such a reaction. Or is he saying that a man actually acknowledging his nature and wishing to not be a pig about it is the problem? Or is he saying that women are so superior in their status that men are only allowed to react to them based on a woman’s whim and any unintended, natural reaction is “perversion”?
e.g. Proud “slut walks” but don’t ever, ever call a woman a slut.
The Left is anti-civilization, and no where is it more evident than in their perverse policing of male/female natures and relationships.