Comments (14)

1. 

   rjacobse says August 20, 2012 at 7:00 am

   “Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.”
2. 

   Car in says August 20, 2012 at 7:24 am

   It’s going to make the revolution interesting. I mean, when we have to turn guns upon those sucking on the teet…
3. 

   John Bradley says August 20, 2012 at 8:40 am

   We’re going to declare “war on teet-suckers” next? Cool, new costumes for those boobs at Code Pink.
4. 

   John Bradley says August 20, 2012 at 8:42 am

   BTW, here’s this morning’s exciting development in Marxism.

   I approve of Mr. Bus Driver’s honesty, at least.
5. 

   rjacobse says August 20, 2012 at 9:28 am

   Car,
   My question is: How many of the teet-suckers really like being a teet-sucker, and how many of them would really rather have a job?
6. 

   leigh says August 20, 2012 at 9:32 am

   Gad. Condi joins Augusta.
7. 

   Silver Whistle says August 20, 2012 at 9:32 am

   BTW, here’s this morning’s exciting development in Marxism.

   I approve of Mr. Bus Driver’s honesty, at least.

   “Its objective,” he added, “is to make revolution in the United States, overthrow the capitalist system and build communism.”

   Like that is going to come as a shock to anyone outside of broadcast media.
8. 

   Jeff G. says August 20, 2012 at 9:33 am

   I think I posted a bit on this before, John B, but I’ma hit it again, thanks.
9. 

   leigh says August 20, 2012 at 9:33 am

   I just can’t take a guy with a name like Golash seriously. Too much like goulash or Snidley Whiplash.
10. 

    Jeff G. says August 20, 2012 at 10:24 am

    Augusta’s choice.
11. 

    BigBangHunter says August 20, 2012 at 11:15 am

    - Side note: Condi is starting to build her sports creds for her hoped for ascention to commisioner of the NFL.
12. 

    leigh says August 20, 2012 at 11:17 am

    <i.Augusta’s choice.

    Sure. I wonder how long they’ll take to install the Ladie’s tees? 5-10 years or so?

    BBH, Condi would make an excellent NFL commissioner.
13. 

    leigh says August 20, 2012 at 11:17 am

    stupid html.
14. 

    charlesaustin says August 20, 2012 at 11:51 am

    One note, that graph does not take into account the ever changing definition of poverty. Yes, more people are worse off, but they are also changing the definition to make it look even worse to justify their confiscatory actions.