Comments (11)

1. 

   hobgoblin says February 12, 2005 at 2:12 am

   not exactly “impossibly curvaceous”

   No?
2. 

   Jeff Goldstein says February 12, 2005 at 2:21 am

   I think maybe Martha means “impossibly curvaceous for a vampiress.”
3. 

   CraigC says February 12, 2005 at 2:43 am

   Were they serum-glazed nipples?
4. 

   tommy says February 12, 2005 at 3:40 am

   Ahh, truly one of the greatest examples of American Lesbian Vampire Porn.

   ~Sweet land of Liberty,
   
   Of thee I sing~
5. 

   Ana says February 12, 2005 at 4:16 am

   Thanks for that, hobgoblin. Now all I need to have seared on my brain is an image of Jeff’s feet and I can die happy.
6. 

   Ana says February 12, 2005 at 4:17 am

   Okay, that might have been my own fault. Vampire porn should have given it away.
7. 

   bob says February 12, 2005 at 5:58 am

   Hnmm…is that drool on the page?
8. 

   JWebb says February 12, 2005 at 6:27 am

   It’s a fangless job, but someone has to do it.
9. 

   CraigC says February 12, 2005 at 8:10 am

   All right, Webb, we’re gonna have to have some kind of pun tribunal for you.  We’ve suffered enough.
10. 

    CraigC says February 12, 2005 at 8:11 am

    Are you sure it’s not thongless?
11. 

    CraigC says February 12, 2005 at 8:11 am

    Oh, wait, was that Sondra?