June 7, 2009
Estrada and Sotomayor [Dan Collins]

From Brian Garst at American Thinker:

The most shocking case, however, is that of Miguel Estrada. Estrada was nominated by President Bush for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, a position he was, by most accounts, more than qualified for. Estrada graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where he was also editor of the Harvard Law Review, a post that would later be highly touted on Obama’s thin Presidential resume. In addition to time spent in private practice, Estrada went on to clerk for Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, and then joined the Department of Justice during the Clinton Administration as an Assistant to the Solicitor General.

In 2001, President Bush made the Estrada appointment to the Court of Appeals. The democratic response was apocalyptic, and Estrada was eventually forced to withdraw after 2 years of stonewalling and filibusters. Thanks to a slew of leaked memos between democratic Senators and liberal interest groups, we now know the despicable motives behind this opposition: Estrada was a Hispanic who might one day be appointed to the Supreme Court, and by a Republican, no less. One memo highlights that Estrada was “especially dangerous” in part because he “is Latino.” In the twisted world of identity politics, advancement of minority groups is only acceptable when it’s made through the appropriate political party, namely the democrats. Conservative minorities are not afforded the same benefits of identity politics as liberal minorities, because they are a threat to the condescending notion that minorities may only think and vote democratic.

Naturally, Estrada’s opposition had to come up with better reasons than blatant racism to publicly oppose a candidate even they admit in the memo was “clearly an intelligent lawyer.” In their “talking points” section, they justified opposition on the grounds that he “has serious temperament problems,” and is a “right-wing zealot.” This last line of attack is somewhat baffling given the repeated claims that he “has virtually no paper trail.” And far from being the asset touted with Sonia Sotomayor, Estrada’s “compelling life story” was dismissed as evidence of nothing more than “affirmative action.” It’s hard to imagine the uproar if a similar statement were to be made about Sotomayor today.

Good links, read the whole thing.

12 Comments  :::   Post a comment »

  1. Comment by serr8d on 6/7 @ 5:52 am #

    Another good compare / contrast article in the NYT this morning; Sotomayor vs. Clarence Thomas.

    Surprisingly good, actually.

  2. Comment by serr8d on 6/7 @ 8:55 am #

    Ahhh, but RACISM!

    In a recently filed lawsuit, Explosive Productions promoters Steve Weiner and Ira Klein also claim the magazine executives refused to advertise in Hispanic-targeted media because they feared it would attract the wrong crowd and kill the event.

    “We will have a bunch of gangbangers and get shut down,” wrote 944 executive Steve Kushnir in an e-mail days before the Feb. 3, 2008, Super Bowl in Glendale, according to the lawsuit filed March 27 in Maricopa County Superior Court.

    “There is no (expletive) way we are going to advertise to Mexicans,” Kushnir said at a meeting in 944 Media’s Scottsdale office, according to the suit.

  3. Comment by B Moe on 6/7 @ 9:02 am #

    I wonder what Sotomayor’s feelings are about illegal immigration? I have a few Puerto Rican friends, across the political spectrum, and one thing they all agree on is there absolute loathing of Mexicans. It might be an interesting line of questioning during the confirmation hearings, although she probably is prepared for it.

  4. Comment by sdferr on 6/7 @ 9:10 am #

    Which is why I laughed when I heard someone had depicted Sotomayor as a piñata, B Moe.

  5. Comment by sdferr on 6/7 @ 9:15 am #

    After all, this a woman who said she didn’t know what a taco was until she went to college and had a Mexican girl for a roommate.

  6. Comment by guinsPen on 6/7 @ 9:35 am #

    The Supremes are a sham until they get someone of exercise ball stock.

    ht/hf

  7. Comment by guinsPen on 6/7 @ 9:39 am #

    Wait, they’ve already got what’s-his-name.

  8. Comment by Vinny Vidivici on 6/7 @ 11:56 am #

    Marcuse smiles. ‘Repressive tolerance’ in action.

  9. Comment by mcgruder on 6/7 @ 7:33 pm #

    pretty gross to read about this stuff, the litmus tests and racial politics.
    the GOP does it on idelogical grounds, 100% certain, so the right is little better, but when you see it done on the account of race….yeccch.

  10. Comment by Bob Reed on 6/7 @ 7:36 pm #

    They better be careful about how they oppose Estrada…

    Oh, wait…

  11. Comment by Jeffersonian on 6/7 @ 7:47 pm #

    Is “Can’t reroof a house worth shit” an acceptable objection?

  12. Comment by Merovign on 6/7 @ 11:47 pm #

    Wait, you mean Dems make expressly racist statements and the MSM gives them a pass?

    The deuce you say.

    You can’t get through, go around.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

TrackBack URI: http://proteinwisdom.com/wp-trackback.php?p=15025

Leave a comment

If you want to leave a feedback to this post or to some other user´s comment, simply fill out the form below.

(required)

(required)