Wall Street Journal Opinion piece:
Obama May Not Have Fully Contained Damage From Ex-Pastor
That’s like saying the Chernobyl reactor leaked a little radiation.
|
Return to Protein Wisdom homepage
« Gore’s global warming ad draws some cool responses [Karl] | Home | Andrew Sullivan, just as excitable offline [Karl] »
April 7, 2008
Ya Think? [Dan Collins]
Wall Street Journal Obama May Not Have Fully Contained Damage From Ex-Pastor That’s like saying the Chernobyl reactor leaked a little radiation. 15 Comments ::: Post a comment »RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI: http://proteinwisdom.com/wp-trackback.php?p=11733 Leave a commentIf you want to leave a feedback to this post or to some other user´s comment, simply fill out the form below. |
||
Comment by JD on 4/7 @ 6:42 am #
It has to be mind-boggling to the MSM that all of their ignoring, slanting, and water-carrying for Baracky has not made this issue go away.
Comment by High Priest of the Church of Stooge on 4/7 @ 6:51 am #
My dad is a staunch Democrat, retired school teacher. The comments of Rev. Wright sent him ballistic and there is no way he would vote for Sen. Obama.
When you are losing people like my dad, you are losing the election.
Comment by Mikey NTH on 4/7 @ 6:55 am #
Darn sock-puppet! #2 was me.
Comment by barryL on 4/7 @ 7:18 am #
You mean the same Opinion page which still believes Vince Foster was murdered by Hillary Clinton is convinced that a Democrat did something wrong? How out of character for them….just amazing.
Comment by Karl on 4/7 @ 7:18 am #
Heh.
Comment by Karl on 4/7 @ 7:19 am #
Indeed.
Comment by Karl on 4/7 @ 7:21 am #
barryL,
The WSJ piece is a news story, not an Opinion page column. Links are your friend.
Comment by Jeffersonian on 4/7 @ 7:21 am #
I wonder why the MSM isn’t showing clips of the ranting, fulminating second-stringers at TUCC.
Comment by Dan Collins on 4/7 @ 7:25 am #
I was the one who characterized it as an opinion piece, Karl.
Comment by Rob Crawford on 4/7 @ 7:27 am #
Eh? When did the WSJ ever state that?
Or is this another case of the left believing its own propaganda?
Comment by Boobs on Friday - not Enoch_Root on 4/7 @ 7:45 am #
Dan – didnt you get the memo? the Rev. Wright thingy is behind us. All played out. I mean, the messiah spoke to is, calmed the waters, assuaged our ignorant Whitey fears and all. It’s like Global Cooling/Warming, it’s been discussed and settled. No more discussion needed. Nor wanted. You are not playing very unitinesslously. EEEEEEEVVVVVVVVVVVIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLL
Comment by Cowboy on 4/7 @ 7:55 am #
from the WSJ piece:
The Obama campaign says the concerns are overblown and the party will rally around Sen. Obama if he wins the nomination, in part because Sen. Clinton will campaign for him
I just don’t see her falling into line after BHO gets the nomination. Given her recent statements and ads, I wonder if she’d rather McCain win than Obama. Throughout this whole campaign she’s consistently appeared more concerned about her candidacy than about the party.
Comment by mojo on 4/7 @ 3:22 pm #
“Sacred conversation”?…
Can we get just a little more pretentious, please?
Comment by Swen Swenson on 4/7 @ 3:26 pm #
I”ll stand by my prediction*:
And that’s if BO doesn’t find himself sitting on a park bench with Vince Foster.
Comment by Swen Swenson on 4/7 @ 3:32 pm #
Well, they couldn’t very well have a profane conversation. They’re men of the cloth doncha know?