April 1, 2008
Kill Devil Hill [Dan Collins]

Well, Barack’s been getting hammered with Wright Brother, so it’s only fitting that Hillary should suffer for a story about her that the MSM have been froward in reporting.

Bon appetit!

Hillary’s Tuzla story explained: She mistook herself for Christopher Hitchens.

24 Comments  :::   Post a comment »

  1. Comment by cranky-d on 4/1 @ 5:00 pm #

    I am shocked! Shocked! By this report on her behavior.

    Then again, it was along time ago, right? She was just a youngin’. Nothing to see here; move along, move along.

  2. Comment by Rob Crawford on 4/1 @ 5:07 pm #

    Oh, come on!

    The real shock would have been her behaving ethically. This is Hillary we’re talking about, after all.

  3. Comment by cranky-d on 4/1 @ 5:10 pm #

    Sarcasm. It’s what’s for dinner.

  4. Comment by Enoch_Root on 4/1 @ 5:49 pm #

    she really is a complete pile of shit

  5. Comment by Chairman Me on 4/1 @ 6:06 pm #

    Dude, you mispelled Tulsa again.

  6. Comment by Big D on 4/1 @ 6:09 pm #

    Read through the site and didn’t want to throw my laptop out the window. Just realized why: Nishi hasn’t posted today.

  7. Comment by Patrick Carroll on 4/1 @ 6:30 pm #

    Am I the only one to realize that no matter who wins this election, America loses?

    Which brings me to a rewrite of a Soviet-era joke: Clinton, Obama, and McCain are on a plane that crashes. Who’s saved? America.

  8. Comment by Big D on 4/1 @ 7:07 pm #

    Which brings me to a rewrite of a Soviet-era joke: Clinton, Obama, and McCain are on a plane that crashes. Who’s saved? America.

    Don’think I would lump McCain in with those two. I’m not a real big McCain fan, but he is infinitely better than either Clinton or Obama.

  9. Comment by CraigC on 4/1 @ 7:51 pm #

    WTF? Have I been wearing my super-duper atomic Cloak of Invisibility lately and didn’t know it, or something?

  10. Comment by Obstreperous Infidel on 4/1 @ 8:37 pm #

    Patrick, no you aren’t. There are grades of the teh suxor, though. McCain is the least problematic, imo. But, I definitely see the point of those conservatives who wish to see McCain lose to either of the Dems. He would just continue the Bush march toward more statism, but under the republican banner. Allegedly, foreign policy would be his strenghth against tweedle dee and tweedle dumb, but then he gives a speech like he did the other day, so who the hell knows. Vote, but caveat emptor in this election.

    As for the post,…who knew? Hillary, say it isn’t so!

  11. Comment by Obstreperous Infidel on 4/1 @ 8:38 pm #

    “He would just continue the Bush march toward more statism, but under the republican banner.”

    meant to say that he would keep it under the republican banner.

  12. Comment by thor on 4/1 @ 9:28 pm #

    Goddamn Hillary! Her eggs are roosting! She invented AIDS! That old, stretched out, white Betty hates the black community! I Goddamn, Goddamn, Goddamn her!

  13. Comment by cynn on 4/1 @ 9:37 pm #

    You will not let up on the left. But you ignore the obvious petty distractions on the right. So obvious.

  14. Comment by The Way Lost Dog on 4/1 @ 9:53 pm #

    It has been known for 35 years that Hillary wanted to deny Nixon counsel. That would be Hillary “Fuck The Constitution” Rodham Clinton.

    Thank you MSM, for your honesty and forthrightness in spreading the truth about this gravy-like stain on America…

  15. Comment by ThomasD on 4/1 @ 9:54 pm #

    The only scandal here is the fact that the media had to be wholly in the tank for Obamessiah before they were willing to spread this far and wide.

    Without Wright, Obama’s not-typical-white albatross sucking away victory, this tidbit would still be an aged non-story.

  16. Comment by thor on 4/1 @ 10:10 pm #

    Damn those advantages of being messianic.

  17. Pingback by Dems 2008: Clinton impeded Watergate investigation, withheld information from Congress [Karl] on 4/1 @ 10:22 pm #

    [...] to Protein Wisdom homepage « Kill Devil Hill [Dan Collins]  |  Home  |  Don’t Quit the Day Job (CraigC) » [...]

  18. Comment by Big D on 4/1 @ 11:22 pm #

    Comment by cynn on 4/1 @ 9:37 pm #

    You will not let up on the left. But you ignore the obvious petty distractions on the right. So obvious.

    OK, Cynn. What is so obvious? What are these “Petty distractions” you speak of? Say what you will, but back it up please.

  19. Comment by Mikey NTH on 4/2 @ 6:09 am #

    #6

    Mwahahahahahaha!

    BTW – if they are ‘petty distractions’ then by definition we are behaving correctly by ignoring them.

  20. Comment by ahem on 4/2 @ 7:00 am #

    There’s no reason to let up on the Left: it’s unequivocally wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

  21. Comment by Rob Crawford on 4/2 @ 7:55 am #

    BTW – if they are ‘petty distractions’ then by definition we are behaving correctly by ignoring them.

    She’s attempting to say that things like Barack’s 20-year association with a flaming racist and Hillary’s lifetime habit of corruption and lying are “petty distractions”.

  22. Comment by Mikey NTH on 4/2 @ 8:09 am #

    She’s attempting to say that things like Barack’s 20-year association with a flaming racist and Hillary’s lifetime habit of corruption and lying are “petty distractions”.

    Ohhhh. I get it. She’s wrong, of course. Things that speak directly of the character of the candidate, and are sufficiently longstanding (decades worth is good), are simply important in making an assessment of that character. A one-time thing would be a petty distraction, but decades of the same behavior is the crux of the matter.

  23. Comment by Swen Swenson on 4/3 @ 12:14 am #

    Don’think I would lump McCain in with those two. I’m not a real big McCain fan, but he is infinitely better than either Clinton or Obama.

    Unfortunately, infinity is an awfully large place and they’re all three clustered down in one tiny end of it. One may be infinitely better than nothing and still infinitely worse than average.

  24. Comment by Swen Swenson on 4/3 @ 12:24 am #

    BTW – if they are ‘petty distractions’ then by definition we are behaving correctly by ignoring them.

    Eggzactly! So go forth and respond to cynn no more.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

TrackBack URI: http://proteinwisdom.com/wp-trackback.php?p=11646

Leave a comment

If you want to leave a feedback to this post or to some other user´s comment, simply fill out the form below.

(required)

(required)