Someone please tell Joan Walsh to put some ice on that?
Don’t lock your car and perpetuate the theft culture, we need to tell people to stop stealing cars [Darleen Click]
Why not? That’s what the Social Justice Vagina Warriors would have us do about rape
A tudent event at Arizona State University suggested that intoxicated men just grab tacos with friends in order to prevent rape.
The event, sponsored by the student group I Always Get Consent, made the claim that teaching women self-defense techniques perpetuates “rape culture” and advised men to tell their drunken buddies at the bar that a woman is ugly to prevent him from going home with her and raping her.
“How many of you guys have been at a party or been with friends, and might be under the influence and someone suggests food?” said Kat Hofland, who headlined the event. “If you are drunk and someone says, let’s go get tacos, everyone is up and moving to get the food, right?”
Alternatively, Hofland, an ASU student, said that people could try to persuade intoxicated male friends that the girl he is talking to is “ugly” and “not worth sleeping with.” [...]
Hofland blamed the popular song, “ Blurred Lines” and rape jokes for perpetuating rape culture in everyday events and details. She also claimed that teaching women self-defense techniques such as fashioning a weapon out of keys by sticking them between knuckles, possessing pepper spray, fighting back against an attacker, and consistently being aware of one’s surroundings contributed to rape culture.
“We should be telling people not to rape people,” she said. “All these things we tell women to do…they don’t bring down the number of rapes that happen. They don’t.”
You know, I always thought Abortion Barbi looked familiar —
h/t Wayne Dupree
“Rommel, you magnificent bastard! I read your book!”
~George S. Patton Jr.
Stacy has taken Patton’s quote to heart and has been doing the seemingly impossible task of slogging through all manner of texts of the Womyn’s Studies set. He has been posting some eye-opening (and nausea-inducing) analysis of Feminism from their own words and works.
Collection (so far) is here.
I’m looking forward to seeing it in book form.
Speaking truth to Female Supremacists
Ezekiel Emanuel “I do think at a certain point you’ve
made enough money lived long enough.” [Darleen Click]
If it’s not Obama wanting to set the parameters of your earnings –
It’s Dr. Death Panels wanting to set the parameters of your life
By the time I reach 75, I will have lived a complete life. I will have loved and been loved. My children will be grown and in the midst of their own rich lives. I will have seen my grandchildren born and beginning their lives. I will have pursued my life’s projects and made whatever contributions, important or not, I am going to make. And hopefully, I will not have too many mental and physical limitations. Dying at 75 will not be a tragedy. Indeed, I plan to have my memorial service before I die. And I don’t want any crying or wailing, but a warm gathering filled with fun reminiscences, stories of my awkwardness, and celebrations of a good life. After I die, my survivors can have their own memorial service if they want—that is not my business.
Am I being flip? I don’t think so …
Nor am I talking about waking up one morning 18 years from now and ending my life through euthanasia or suicide. Since the 1990s, I have actively opposed legalizing euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. People who want to die in one of these ways tend to suffer not from unremitting pain but from depression, hopelessness, and fear of losing their dignity and control. The people they leave behind inevitably feel they have somehow failed. The answer to these symptoms is not ending a life but getting help. I have long argued that we should focus on giving all terminally ill people a good, compassionate death—not euthanasia or assisted suicide for a tiny minority.
Now, if that seems contradictory, it is not. It is part and parcel of Emanuel’s support of State-run medical care using a rationing system based on “Complete Lives System” (see page 6 at PDF)
[note: I recall writing an analysis of Emanuel's Lancet article sometime in 2010, but those posts were never recovered]
Emanuel’s current “Death begins at 76″ soliloquy is more of the same that only the subset of the population who are healthy, productive and between ages of 15-55, deserve actual medical care, the rest will have to muddle through with some palliative care.
His bigotry against the elderly is pretty stark. First off, is his idea that old farts just are of little use to society
Even if we aren’t demented, our mental functioning deteriorates as we grow older. Age-associated declines in mental-processing speed, working and long-term memory, and problem-solving are well established. Conversely, distractibility increases. We cannot focus and stay with a project as well as we could when we were young. As we move slower with age, we also think slower.
It is not just mental slowing. We literally lose our creativity. [...]
[T]he fact is that by 75, creativity, originality, and productivity are pretty much gone for the vast, vast majority of us. Einstein famously said, “A person who has not made his great contribution to science before the age of 30 will never do so.” He was extreme in his assessment. And wrong. Dean Keith Simonton, at the University of California at Davis, a luminary among researchers on age and creativity, synthesized numerous studies to demonstrate a typical age-creativity curve: creativity rises rapidly as a career commences, peaks about 20 years into the career, at about age 40 or 45, and then enters a slow, age-related decline. There are some, but not huge, variations among disciplines. Currently, the average age at which Nobel Prize–winning physicists make their discovery—not get the prize—is 48. Theoretical chemists and physicists make their major contribution slightly earlier than empirical researchers do. Similarly, poets tend to peak earlier than novelists do. Simonton’s own study of classical composers shows that the typical composer writes his first major work at age 26, peaks at about age 40 with both his best work and maximum output, and then declines, writing his last significant musical composition at 52.
Are you now to argue that even if at 76 you’ve suddenly lost your ability to meaningfully contribute to The Hive, you are still a valued member of your own family?
Perish the thought:
Living parents also occupy the role of head of the family. They make it hard for grown children to become the patriarch or matriarch. When parents routinely live to 95, children must caretake into their own retirement. That doesn’t leave them much time on their own—and it is all old age. When parents live to 75, children have had the joys of a rich relationship with their parents, but also have enough time for their own lives, out of their parents’ shadows.
It is your duty to die at 75 — Do it for your children.
I’d advise Emanuel’s parents to hire a food taster if they holiday at Ezekiel’s home.
Last night I commented on the Scottish vote to stay in the United Kingdom by stressing the welfare state aspect with the following:
[The Scots] find themselves on the horns of a dilemma. With the English they can’t vote in a complete worker’s paradise. Without the English they’d actually have to find the funds for it.
A vote no shouldn’t necessarily be read as a conservative vote. A great percentage of those no votes are also voting for the greatest possible welfare state that they consider to be possible.
I’m sure everyone has read similar thoughts elsewhere as well. Geoff recommends a good post by Richard Fernandez and some of resulting comments.
Our ol’ pal Silver Whistle offered his thoughts:
bh, it is the exact inverse.
I offer this as an illustration, not dispositive proof:
Bringing my eldest and his room mate back from college in Perth last week, there was not one single ‘Yes’ poster from my west coast village to Perth. This is a very conservative with a small ‘c’ country, especially in the sticks where there isn’t a plurality of the population dependent on welfare. The main support for ‘Yes’ was in Glasgow and Dundee. It is no secret that the ‘Yes’ campaign was an attempt to thrust socialism on Scotland which couldn’t be delivered from Westminster. Nationwide, every election around 400,000 vote Conservative in Scotland. These votes may be lost in a constituency first past the post election, but in a national referendum, vital.
Then Silver Whistle was nice enough to extend his remarks:
The other morning, while we were listening to referendum coverage on BBC Radio5Live at breakfast my youngest said “As far as I can tell, all the ‘Yes’ arguments are based on childish appeals to emotion.”
A bit harsh, perhaps, but here in Scotland, my sense of the depth of the country’s attachment to the Union has never wavered. My youngest is in high school, and for the first time, 16 year olds were allowed to vote in the referendum. Alex Salmond was probably allowing himself a wee smirk over his porridge when he unleashed the votes of high school children. Recent polls have suggested that Salmond miscalculated badly, with 57% of under 18s voting to stay with the Union.
This vote did not follow strict party lines, with a large number of officially anti-independence Labour voters voting ‘Yes’. Scotland provides a crucial number of Labour MPs to Westminster, so the UK Labour party was desperate not to lose these seats. Numbers of Scottish National Party voters voted ‘No’, as many of them are disgruntled Labour voters first and not nationalist at all. And, as I mentioned in my comment here, Scotland is a very conservative with a small ‘c’ country, with deep ties to the Union that may be from the military, shared experience of the last war, and other cultural ties with the wider UK. Incomers make up about 16% of the population so it would be interesting to see the breakdown on their vote, but it is clear that native Scots themselves are overwhelmingly responsible for saying ‘No’.
Nice bit of context all around there and perhaps a helpful caution against throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
What say all of you? Or, open thread, take your pick.
I regard heterosexual marriage as a much more important feminist issue and bigger oppressor of women than the burka.
— Catherine Deveny (@CatherineDeveny) September 16, 2014
Don’t you just hate it when this happens?
MEMPHIS, Tenn. (WREG) —A Memphis man who went to police after he saw a severed head in a man’s backyard says it’s an image he can’t forget. [...]
Michael Wilson, Jr., is now facing charges of second-degree murder and abuse of a corpse.
Lacedric Ruffin said he went to Wilson’s home on Dunn to pick up some scrap metal Wilson said he could have.
While he was loading items on to his truck, he noticed Wilson pull a large black bag out of a garbage can and try to place it in a metal bucket.
Ruffin said the bag started ripping, and a head fell out of it.
“I’m like, man, what the hell you got going on, bro? He said something like he didn’t mean to kill him. I said, kill who brother? I don’t want to know who that is, I don’t want to know. You don’t got to tell me,” Ruffin said.
He said Wilson told him there were also two hands inside the garbage bag.
He thinks Wilson was planning on putting the severed head on the back of his truck along with everything else.