September 29, 2014

MSNBC Harris-Perry cruises down that river in Egypt [Darleen Click]

Geez, guys, when did the last “workplace violence” include beheading?

That was no accident and has everything to do with Islamism. Can anyone point to any murder by beheading that does not have a connection with Islam?

Posted by Darleen @ 11:23am
25 comments | Trackback

September 29, 2014

Obama on 60 Minutes tosses James Clapper under the bus on ISIS [Darleen Click]

Barry, Himself, is always blameless …

On 60 Minutes, the president faulted his spies for failing to predict the rise of ISIS. There’s one problem with that statement: The intelligence analysts did warn about the group.

Nearly eight months ago, some of President Obama’s senior intelligence officials were already warning that ISIS was on the move. In the beginning of 2014, ISIS fighters had defeated Iraqi forces in Fallujah, leading much of the U.S. intelligence community to assess they would try to take more of Iraq.

But in an interview that aired Sunday evening, the president told 60 Minutes that the rise of the group now proclaiming itself a caliphate in territory between Syria and Iraq caught the U.S. intelligence community off guard. Obama specifically blamed James Clapper, the current director of national intelligence: “Our head of the intelligence community, Jim Clapper, has acknowledged that, I think, they underestimated what had been taking place in Syria,” he said.

Reached by The Daily Beast after Obama’s interview aired, one former senior Pentagon official who worked closely on the threat posed by Sunni jihadists in Syria and Iraq was flabbergasted. “Either the president doesn’t read the intelligence he’s getting or he’s bullshitting,” the former official said.


Posted by Darleen @ 9:53am
29 comments | Trackback

September 28, 2014

“The United Nations has become a global platform for anti-semitism and the destruction of of the Jewish State” [Darleen Click]

Posted by Darleen @ 12:45pm
9 comments | Trackback

September 28, 2014

Kevin Williamson to Lena Dunham: “We really, truly, sincerely do not wish to be involved in your sex life.” [Darleen Click]

Every paragraph is a spot-on take down of the perpetually puerile Dunham and her “5 reasons to Vote”:

Our national commitment to permanent, asinine, incontinent juvenility, which results in, among other things, a million or so abortions a year, is not entirely unrelated to the cultural debasement that is the only possible explanation for the career of Lena Dunham. A people mature enough to manage the relationship between procreative input and procreative output without recourse to the surgical dismemberment of living human organisms probably would not find much of interest in the work of Miss Dunham. But we are a nation of adult children so horrified by the prospect of actual children that we put one in five of them to death for such excellent reasons as the desire to fit nicely into a prom dress.

It’s not for nothing that, on the precipice of 30, Miss Dunham is famous for a television series called Girls rather than one called Women. She might have gone one better and called it Thumbsuckers. (The more appropriate title Diapers would terrify her demographic.)

Miss Dunham, reflecting celebrity culture at large, makes a fetish of voting, and it is easy to see why: Voting is the most shallow gesture of citizenship there is, the issuance of a demand — a statement that “this is how the world should be,” as Miss Dunham puts it — imposing nothing in the way of reciprocal responsibility. Power without responsibility — Stanley Baldwin would not have been surprised that Miss Dunham and likeminded celebrities think of voting in terms of their sex lives. Miss Dunham, in an earlier endorsement of Barack Obama, compared voting in the presidential election to losing one’s virginity — you want it to be someone special. Understood that way, voting is nothing other than a reiteration of the original infantile demand: “I Want!” [...]

[F]or Miss Dunham et al., this isn’t a question of citizenship — it’s a therapeutic matter. Voting, she promises, will offer “a sense of accomplishment,” knowledge that one has done the right thing, even “joy.” But checking a box is the most trivial accomplishment imaginable; having done so is no guarantee that one has done the right thing, inasmuch as voters routinely make bad decisions for evil reasons; and one suspects that Miss Dunham means something different and less by “joy” than did, say, Beethoven or Walt Whitman. “I wore fishnets and a little black dress to vote,” she writes, “then walked around with a spring in my slinky step. It lasted for days. I can summon it when I’m blue. It’s more effective than exercise or ecstasy or cheesecake.” And that of course is the highest purpose of our ancient constitutional order: to provide adult children with pleasures exceeding those of cheesecake or empathogenic phenethylamines. [...]

Those of us who have been working against various mandates imposed by the Affordable Care Act are as a matter of fact attempting to extricate ourselves from involvement in Lena Dunham’s sex life, the details of which we would gratefully leave to her own idiosyncratic management. It is the so-called Affordable Care Act that has involved us in subsidizing birth control, abortifacients, surgical abortions, and who knows what else, for the strong, powerful, self-actualized American woman who cannot figure out how to walk into Walgreens, lay down the price of a latte, and walk out with her own birth-control pills, no federal intervention necessary. The very conservative editors of this magazine are in fact trying to make it easier for them to do so with over-the-counter birth control. I suspect that Miss Dunham does not know very many conservatives, so allow me to pass along the message: We really, truly, sincerely do not wish to be involved in your sex life.

I would like to suggest, as gently as I can, that if you are voting as an act of self-gratification, if you do not understand the role that voting in fact plays in a constitutional republic, and if you need Lena Dunham to tell you why and how you should be voting — you should not vote. If you get your politics from actors and your news from television comedians — you should not vote. There’s no shame in it, your vote is statistically unlikely to affect the outcome of an election, and there are many much more meaningful ways to serve your country and your fellow man: Volunteer at a homeless shelter; join the Marine Corps; become a nun; start a business.

And maybe think about acting like men and women rather than boys and Girls.

Read the whole thing.

It is noteworthy that Ms. Dunham’s “blog post” allows no comments and her twitter feed is as shallow and genitalia-obsessed as her show.

It’s all she has. She’s a one-trick pony, or something.

Bless her heart.

Posted by Darleen @ 11:20am
11 comments | Trackback

September 28, 2014

“Christians flee Muslim-dominated areas for fear of being stoned to death” [Darleen Click] UPDATED

More news about ISIS’ take over of parts of Iraq and Syria? No.


Christians with Middle Eastern backgrounds in Denmark experience harassment, verbal attacks and in some cases direct violence from Muslims. TV2 News has been in contact with a number of Christians here in Denmark who tell of violent experiences.

Jojo was born in Denmark of Lebanese parents. She lived in Gellerupparken (a major Muslim area) until she was eight.

One day she sat in her car in Nørrebro (a Muslim-dominated area in Copenhagen). Seven young people with Arab background surrounded the car. One of them put his foot up on the hood and stared at her.

“Do you think I’m looking at you, you fucking ugly whore. Try to see what clothes you wear, bitch,” he said to Jojo, who dresses as Danish women do: shorts and a t-shirt in the summer.

Then he noticed the cross around her neck.

“Well, you have a cross on — then you are also a Christian fucking whore. Do you know what we do to people like you? Do you know what we do to people like you? You get stoned,” he screamed. …

The Danish police say that they do not get many reports about such matters, but they fear that such crimes are largely under-reported, because people do not dare to report the cases.

Britain’s Trojan Horse 2

Department for Education officials are said to have become increasingly concerned over a ‘Trojan Horse 2′ scandal which they believe could involve dozens of schools in East London, including in the Borough of Tower Hamlets, known for its Islamist-linked Mayor Lutfur Rahman.
The Times reports:

Emergency inspections of 21 schools in the city by the schools regulator Ofsted resulted in five schools being placed in special measures.

“Tower Hamlets is expected to be the next Birmingham, but even worse, because the problems surrounding Muslim fundamentalists imposing their views on education seem to be more embedded,” said a senior Whitehall source.

Both secular state schools and private Islamic schools are under suspicion, and there are concerns that non-Muslim teachers are staying silent for fear of losing their jobs.

“The DfE will rely on whistleblowers to come forward about non-Muslim teachers being sidelined by Muslim fundamentalists in the borough,” the source said. “But potential whistleblowers fear they may be bullied, further sidelined or fired if they raise concerns.”

Allegations about the imposition of extreme views in Tower Hamlets classrooms come as Ofsted prepares to publish the findings of emergency inspections of 40 schools in England in the past fortnight.

In an interview with The Sunday Times, Sir Michael Wilshaw, the chief inspector of schools, warned: “The problems in Birmingham are far from resolved.”

Highly Muslim populated areas such as Birmingham, Bradford, and East London have been the targets of radicalisation for some time now, though the depths to which the Islamists have plumbed in order to radicalise children is only just becoming apparent.

Posted by Darleen @ 10:35am
6 comments | Trackback

September 28, 2014

“They feel their fundamental freedoms have been violated and are forced into secrecy or to deny their love.” [Darleen Click]

No no … not same-sex love.

This is the other love that dare not speak its name..

Sexual relations between siblings or between parents and their children are forbidden under section 173 of the German criminal code and offenders can face years in prison.

But on Wednesday, the German Ethics Council recommended the section be repealed, arguing that the risk of disability in children is not enough to warrant the law and de-criminalising incest would not remove the huge social taboo around it.

The chairman of the council, Christiane Woopen, was among the 14 members voting in favour of repealing section 173, while nine people voted for the ban to continue and two abstained.

A statement released on Wednesday said: “Incest between siblings appears to be very rare in Western societies according to the available data but those affected describe how difficult their situation is in light of the threat of punishment.

“They feel their fundamental freedoms have been violated and are forced into secrecy or to deny their love. [...]

In a statement outlining its recommendations, the Ethics Council said the law against incest “put couples in a tragic situation”.

“The majority of the German Ethics Council is of the opinion that it is not appropriate for a criminal law to preserve a social taboo,” it added.

“In the case of consensual incest among adult siblings, neither the fear of negative consequences for the family , nor the possibility of the birth of children from such incestuous relationships can justify a criminal prohibition.

The fundamental right of adult siblings to sexual self-determination has more weight in such cases than the abstract protection of the family.”

Wow, don’t those arguments sound … you know … familiar.

Posted by Darleen @ 12:38am
9 comments | Trackback

September 27, 2014

Saturday Music Video: Batman Evolution [Darleen Click]

The Piano Guys …

Posted by Darleen @ 1:11pm
19 comments | Trackback

September 27, 2014

“Workplace violence” … [Darleen Click]

Told you so

Authorities are treating Thursday’s beheading at an Oklahoma food distribution center as an incident of workplace violence but that is prompting raised eyebrows among some terrorism experts.

The FBI is investigating the incident in which fired employee Alton Nolen, 30, allegedly attacked Colleen Hufford, 54, stabbing her several times before severing her head. Nolen also stabbed another women at the plant. The company’s COO, a reserve sheriff’s deputy, thwarted the second attack, shooting Nolen, who is in stable condition.

Co-workers reportedly said Nolen tried to convert them to Islam after his own recent conversion.

And Fox 25 in Oklahoma City reports that the FBI is looking into Nolen’s Facebook page. The page has anti-American rants under the name “Jah’Keem Israel.”

The station said the Facebook page has several photos of Usama bin Laden and a screen shot from the 9/11 terror attacks. It also shows a man with a quote: “I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smile ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them.”

Colin Clarke, a Rand Corp. terrorism expert, told Fox & Friends Saturday that the beheading was an act of terrorism and should be characterized as such.

“Calling it workplace violence is counterproductive,” he said.

I guess that depends on whether or not admitting that, Yes, Virginia, Jihadists are committing terrorist acts in America, is in the best interests of the Obama regime.

Certainly, “moderate” Muslims will rally to help out the local community and show their disgust with jihadist terrorism, right?

Saad Mohammad, a spokesman for the Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City, told that leaders of the society’s mosque are taking security precautions to protect Muslims who gather there from any potential retaliatory violence.

Mohammad said any anti-Muslim sentiments local residents might have could be heightened due to the beheadings and violence overseas by Islamic State militants.

Yes, yes, it is always about the Colonizers, and the kafir should just shut-up and deal with it.

Religion of Pieces.

Posted by Darleen @ 12:36pm
25 comments | Trackback

September 26, 2014

Woman beheaded — in OKLAHOMA … [Darleen Click] UPDATED 3x

“Workplace violence” to be declared in 3 … 2 … 1

Police say a woman who was killed by a co-worker at a food distribution center in suburban Oklahoma City was beheaded.

Moore Police Sgt. Jeremy Lewis said Friday that the woman, who has not been identified, was beheaded by a man who attacked her and another woman Thursday at Vaughan Foods in Moore.

An off-duty officer who was working at the business shot the suspect. The surviving victim and the suspect were still hospitalized Friday.

The motive for the attack was unclear, but Lewis said the suspect and the victims were apparently not involved with each other outside of their work at the business.

Unclear? Really?


video h/t Gateway Pundit via Donald Douglas


Police press conference – Oklahoma City, OK – News, Weather, Video and Sports |

According to Sgt. Jeremy Lewis with the Moore Police Department, coworkers told police that the suspect, 30-year-old Alton Alexander Nolen, had recently converted to Islam to become a Muslim. Coworkers said he had been trying to convert them to Islam, as well. [...]

When officers arrived at the scene, police said they found two victims, 54-year-old Colleen Hufford and 43-year-old Tracy Johnson. Hufford was beheaded, and Johnson was suffering from multiple knife wounds.

According to police, Nolen, the suspect, had already been shot by off-duty reserve deputy Mark Vaughan when officers arrived. Vaughan is the Chief Operating Officer of Vaughan Foods.

Both Johnson and Nolen were transported to the hospital. They are said to be in stable condition.

During a news conference Friday morning, Sgt. Lewis said Nolen was a production line employee at the business and was recently terminated. After being terminated, Nolen reportedly went to the parking lot and drove his vehicle to the front of the business, where he hit another car. He then walked into the front office and began attacking Hufford and Johnson.

Nolen reportedly beheaded Hufford, and was still assaulting Johnson when deputy Mark Vaughan fired shots at him. Sgt. Lewis hailed Deputy Vaughan as a hero for saving Johnson’s life and ending the threat.

Posted by Darleen @ 9:58am
59 comments | Trackback

September 26, 2014

U of Michigan — “discounted feelings” & “withholding sex” are just other forms of “sexual violence” [Darleen Click]

If there are any clearer examples of how Leftists want to be in charge of every individual’s life to be had, the wave of authority over the dating habits of adult students who attend colleges and universities sets a pretty high bar …

The redefinition of the word violence continues among revelations that discounting a sexual partner’s feelings and withholding sex constitutes sexual violence at the University of Michigan. The relevant info can be found at the university’s “Stop Abuse” webpage:

Examples of sexual violence include: discounting the partner’s feelings regarding sex; criticizing the partner sexually; touching the partner sexually in inappropriate and uncomfortable ways; withholding sex and affection; always demanding sex; forcing partner to strip as a form of humiliation (maybe in front of children), to witness sexual acts, to participate in uncomfortable sex or sex after an episode of violence, to have sex with other people; and using objects and/or weapons to hurt during sex or threats to back up demands for sex.

Criticizing someone sexually and withholding sex are unkind things to do, but they aren’t violent acts in and of themselves. Indeed, a university spokesperson could only defend the definitions as appropriate within “a larger context,” according to Derek Draplin of The College Fix:

The definitions of behaviors of violence … describe most accurately what occurs in an abusive relationship,” [U-M spokesperson Rick Fitzgerald] said in an email. “Those behaviors not in the context of violence are not abusive. A reader of this site would recognize that it’s described as one behavior in the context of a pattern of behaviors to maintain power and control over an intimate partner.”

But, as Draplin writes, universities make these slips all the time—treating disfavored behavior and physically painful behavior as one and the same. He cites an interview with the sexual violence support coordinator at Brock University in Canada in which the administrator claims “anything that makes someone feel unsafe” counts as violence.

This, of course, is just another facet of the Left’s destruction of any individual agency in intent. Authors or speakers, it matters little what they actually say or what their intent was when writing/speaking, all power of interpretation is located with the recipient — as long as that recipient is a member-in-good-standing of the Leftist orthodoxy.

It has never really been about sex or race or gender or any other “ism” that the Left will demand blood for … it is, and has always been, about power. Authoritarian, totalitarian power.

That explains the irony of witnessing such draconian sexual behavior codes on college students being supported by the same Leftists who take about full page newspapers ads demanding Republicans expel “social conservatives” from their midst.

Left fascism, indeed.

Posted by Darleen @ 9:21am
10 comments | Trackback

← Older posts